Here you go, third time you've been given a direct answer and been forced to pretend you weren't.
Enjoy.
You didn't address anything I said, so it gets said back to you again: Cynically using a tactic to solve a non-existent "problem" because you know it'll have a small but favorable impact for your side on the disadvantaged -- knowingly and specifically at the expense of minority groups -- is patently racist. Your ignorance of how and why Republicans crafted voter suppression laws doesn't constitute a reasoned position. Neither does your inability or unwillingness to read.
Intellectual dishonesty on your part doesn't constitute a reasoned position.
:rofl: If only you'd established your claim -- that "Democrats spent a century pushing massively expensive and destructive laws to fight problems that didn't exist."
Instead, you shat out a nonsensical rant against environmentalism -- no surprise there, you're a shit human being in every other circumstance, so why not another? Except you didn't establish either the "massive cost," mixed in with willful ignorance about the cost of
not taking care of the planet, didn't establish how they're "destructive," various uses of fallacious reductive logic, and a slew of old-fashioned conspiracy theorizing nonsense. Spectacular, Rocktard.