Look, 2001- Mar 2003, we'd be all up in that bitch. Everyone shut the fuck up real quick after 11 Sept because they knew someone was about to get fucked up.
Printable View
Look, if I were President, all that Middle East shit is done. We're focusing on Mexico, we're focusing on Central and South America. The Gulf of Mexico. The most dangerous nation in the world is Mexico. That is some bullshit. They should be one of the more prosperous and safest ones. That is how you solve immigration.
Mexico broke out into basically a civil war within the last couple of hours. It's fucked. El chapos kids taken into custody which has led to the cartels swarming. I've seen footage of at least two Mexican military helicopters shot down.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Seth_Guil...95364509667328
Don't click this link.
https://mobile.twitter.com/CuervoMon...18074891423744
Venezuela is now part of the UN human rights council. This is why the UN is a fucking joke.
Would the brutal crackdowns look like this Turkish attack on the Kurds?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uUNL6rW-Ck
You're really taking the state line at face value?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...-idUSKBN1WN28J
Quote:
ISTANBUL (Reuters) - As Turkish troops finalize plans to attack northeast Syria, Ankara’s scheme to move millions of refugees into conquered territory there is alarming some Western allies as much as the military operation itself.
Addressing world leaders at the United Nations two weeks ago, President Tayyip Erdogan held up a map of the region setting out ambitious proposals to build dozens of new villages and towns to settle Syrian refugees.
...
But most of the 3.6 million Syrians in Turkey are from Sunni Arab areas in western Syria, not the mainly Kurdish northeast. Moving huge numbers of refugees into an area hundreds of miles from their homes would involve a drastic demographic shift.
...
Ankara has dismissed the concerns about the impact of a return of refugees from Turkey, saying any change to the population would only be redressing moves by the Kurdish forces which currently control the region.
Are you sure they wouldn't look like this?
https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.4957...,f8f8f8.u8.jpg
It's an interesting turn of events to see that we now agree that it is best to keep these refugees as close to their place of origin as possible. It really is the best and most economical way of doing it.
P.S. This was a part of Steve Bannon's geopolitical policy and was labeled as a racist policy.
Remember this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIiBY_u0vaw
So if there's a terrorist group living amongst civilians, it's ok to systematically murder, torture, and displace those civilians to get at the terrorists?
Think real hard about your answer here.
Yes, we're all aware of why the Electoral College exists.
And it's doing its job.
Even Hillary was all about it until she lost, then she suddenly wasn't.
But keep entertaining us with your tears about bullshit that doesn't matter.
Tard.
https://i.imgur.com/yYlJQFX.jpg
I'm waiting for a football team to start crying because they didn't score enough points to win but had the most yards run. "But..but we ran the ball more! We should have won!"
Or a baseball team that loses via score but had the most bases stolen. "But...but stealing bases is harder! We should have won!"
Or a basketball team that can't score enough but sucks China's dick more. "Bmph...bumph we shulda wan!"
Or a hockey team that didn't score as much as the other team but started more fights. "But...but we started more fights! We should have won!"
Actually that last one is a pretty apt analogy for modern day Democrats.
Democrats when they thought Trump was literally going to round up 10+ million illegal aliens and deport them all: That's an impossible undertaking! We don't have those kind of resources! Plus it's dangerous and inhumane!
Democrats when it comes scary looking guns: We are gonna send police officers to every home which owns an AR15 and confiscate them!
If I didn't know any better I would say Democrats care more for law breaking illegal aliens than they do for law abiding Americans. Why does anyone still vote Democrat? What do Democrats do for you anymore other than virtue signal about how woke they are because they state what their pronouns are?
You keep forgetting that they don't actually think about how to execute the things they come up with or anything involving logic and reason. All that matters is if saying it makes them feel good.
Exhibit A:
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-d3znnflxo...careForAll.jpg
It's pretty fascinating. Hillary calls Tulsi Gabbard a Russian asset and the left and the media immediately fall in line and start talking about all sorts of "proof" that Gabbard is indeed a Russian asset.
An Antifa piece of shit punched a 52 year old Trump supporter on the back of the head then proceeded to choke him while he was on the ground. The guy ended up having a heart attack during this attack.
His prison sentence? 18 months.
2 Proud Boys were literally attacked by Antifa members (the police testified to this), the Proud Boys defended themselves and were sentenced to 5 years in prison.
Welcome to the left's idea of justice these days. You get a harsher prison sentence for defending yourself against Antifa than Antifa gets for ambushing a man twice their age and causing him to have a heart attack.
The Trump guy should have had a conceal carry permit and smoked the soy boy. Save the system time and money and clean up the world!
Dems in congress "grilling" Zuckerberg on:
How many LGBT+ people worked on a project, cause it's good practice to ask that and track it.
Why poor people won't be able to use Libra... because they are poor and Libra is... currency.
How many black people have been hurt by Facebook.
Dems have issued more subpoenas this year than successfully passed bills.
A transgender woman in the UK wanted to get into the modeling and porn business. A guy claimed he could help "her" by fucking her senseless while recording it. PORN!
Once the guy found out "she" has a dick he said: aight, I'm out! You have a cock!
The woman believes this is a hate crime and has reported it to the police.
The police said "You fucking crazy? Stop wasting our time!"
Naww! Just kidding. The police said they are going to investigate this as a hate crime.
Yes, apparently in the UK it might be a "hate crime" to refuse to have sex with someone. Well, I'm assuming it's only a hate crime for a man to refuse to have sex with someone. Equality!
https://metro.co.uk/2019/10/19/porn-...enis-10946108/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/101624...estigate-porn/
https://summit.news/2019/04/13/uk-po...-racist-music/
About 10 seconds search and 25 seconds of cut and paste. Learn to internet search.
Nancy Pelosi on the death of Bin Laden:
Nancy Pelosi on the death of what's his name:Quote:
I salute President Obama, his national security team, Director Panetta, our men and women in the intelligence community and military.
I'm surprised she even remembered to thank our military after sucking so much of Obama's dick.Quote:
Americans salute the heroism, dedication and skill of our military and our intelligence professionals.
Makes sense, since let's not forget that Obama was acting like he stormed the compound by himself and took out Bin Laden and everyone else with his bare hands.
https://media.tenor.com/images/25368...6fe6/tenor.gif
So this happened:
Minnesota: Drag Queen Flashes Crotch to Kids at Library Story Hour
Aren't there ways to prove how woke you are without making your kid watch a grown man in women's clothing do a stripe tease for them, or flash their dick to them, or let them crawl all over them, and then claim it's all innocent fun because they might get around to reading a story eventually? Let's not forget there have been at least two registered sex offenders caught being at this Drag Queen story time events.
"I let some pedophile get some fapping fodder by allowing my child to crawl all over him while the pedo smiles for the camera! Look how much I love the trans community!"
I just tend to read news sources that aren't just bashing Trump 24/7, or busy sweeping any and all violence committed by Democrats under the rug, or are too busy talking about imaginary white supremacy being around every corner to cover children literally being dragged to a small room by their parents and force them to sit in front of a sexual predator who flashes their dick at them.
You know, news sources that aren't: ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, NYT, or any other left leaning trash rag that pretends to be a legitimate news source.
Imagine the 24/7 news cycle if a priest flashed his dick at a bunch of kids. The furor wouldn't die down until the church in question was closed down.
A drag queen does it and all Democrats can do is yawn.
Whoever does the voiceover for project veritas needs to be fired.
A family of Mormons (who were American citizens) were slaughtered in Mexico yesterday by a cartel, the cartel ambushed them and killed several women and children then kidnapped whoever they didn't kill.
Pretty horrible shit right? Surely every American news outlet can just print up a story stating how horrible the situation is and how Mexico needs to do something about the cartels.
Well...you would think that...but here is how the NYT decided to report on the story:
Darn white colonialists practicing polygamy!!!!!Quote:
Murder in Mexico: Mormon Families Have a Long History There
Fundamentalist religious communities have a long history in northern Mexico, dating back to settlers who practiced polygamy.
People are killed all over the world everyday. Hell, Chicago has like 30 a week. Why would we give two shits about murders in another country? We can't even manage it here. It's a horrible story, yes. Horrible shit happens every day right here in America, lets get our shit straight before we rush to another country to fight a war that won't ever end (the drug "war").
Looks like Anal Lee got nuked wonder how long before he/she is back under yet another name.
I would hope if they report on stories of innocent people being murdered by gang violence in Chicago they would focus the report on the problem of gang violence in the city and not make the story about the victim's religion and what sort of shit they practice when the victim's religion has absolutely nothing to do with the murder.
What spin did I provide again? I don't recall claiming or even implying that the NYT didn't report on the fact that they were slaughtered, I merely mentioned the very real fact that the headline in question mentioned nothing about the brutal slaughter and kidnapping and focused on the religion of the victims, alluded to some sort of colonialism bullshit, and stated that their religion practiced polygamy. Shit the headline I provided even says "Murder in Mexico" so I'm not sure how you arrived to the conclusion that I was claiming the article didn't mention the fact that they were murdered.
Why do you hate facts so much? Oh, right, you're basically alt-left now because you're another person Trump broke.
Also, what did the article in question have to do with Trump in the first place? You were the one who brought it up. I know you wish that were you in the Nationals pic but give it a rest,
You omitted the fact that the main article did exactly discuss the AMBUSH. The one you posted was a side article, with a smaller headline with backstory.
Oh, wait, I see the problem. You must be talking about a different article from NYT because that headline you claimed is part of the story I am referring to isn't there. They did update the story I am referring to so it comes off as less douchey and they focus more on the brutal slaying and less on the religion of the victims, but even in the updated story I don't see the line you are referring to.
It's okay to be white, Some Rogue, but it's not okay to constantly be wrong about everything. Stop that.
I mentioned Trump because it's clear that Trump has broken you so much that you have turned into an empty shell of a human being. It's pretty obvious with the way you suck the dick of every bad person I mention. Or maybe you've always just been a horrible person. My bad if that's the case then.
Look, the story I am referring to WAS the main story. It had its own page on their website, it's own headline, was tweeted out by NYT and everything. I even quoted part of the headline that said "MURDER", how did I omit the fact that they discussed the murder? Almost the entire article was devoted to the victim's religion as opposed to the brutal slaying. There must be more people out there that don't hate Trump so much that they forgive bad actions on the part of the media because they completely redid the article I am referring to in order to focus more on the killings and less on the religion. Why would they do that if it was just a "side article with a smaller headline with backstory"? Almost as if you're wrong like you usually are and can't just admit it.
Yeah, they were side by side. Sorry your blinders were on.
Attachment 9455
I WONDER WHICH ONE IS THE MAIN STORY.
Of course I don't like Trump, I use more than 2% of my brain, but do you ever notice it is only you I respond to because you are a moron who picks and chooses facts, posts quotes and articles with no link to the actual article and just generally come off as an idiot with a hardon for Trump and I AM MAKING FUN OF YOU.
Gee really? You're making fun of me? Me no get that, me understand now.
You're not as clever or as deep as you think you are.
And yeah I like Trump, I'm not gonna deny that. Why would I? It's just funny that even in stories that have nothing to do with Trump you'll still come here with "BUT TRUMP!" And you wonder why I think Trump is the reason for you defending bad people, it's all you talk about when it comes to politics on the PC.
Do you REALLY like Trump, or do you just like all the other options a little less? I'm in the Trump is better than the competing sewage camp. But I'm not running up and down the aisles at work telling everyone I'm a Trump supporter. I am, for reasons above.
Let's face it though, he's a douche and while it's granted he does things I like, he does them in TERRIBLE ways and trips over himself doing them.
I mean...far leftists typically take the bait pretty much every time no matter how obvious it is, and can always be counted on for an entertaining as fuck reaction, so why not constantly troll them?
We had a news reporter fact checking an obviously Photoshopped picture of Trump giving a dog a medal last week, and some other tard this week screaming for a MLB player to be banned from baseball for wearing a MAGA hat and saying "I love you all!"
They're just begging to be trolled. They just don't have the self awareness to realize it.
Like this :lol:
https://www.facebook.com/1489260708/...86?d=n&sfns=mo
r/insanepeoplefacebook is a goldmine.
He wasn't even close to my pick in the 2016 Republican primary and I sure as shit supported him over Hillary. I didn't even vote in 2016 but you can bet your sweet ass I'll be voting in 2020.
Trump has done a fantastic job as president. Is he always nice? No, but so what? If my boss isn't always nice but is doing things to make my life at work better, including giving me generous pay raises, then I wouldn't care about him being a douche bag sometimes either.
Four simple reasons I love Trump:
1) He has exposed the Democrats for exactly who they are. It was always kind of a joke that Democrats were the biggest racists and sexists in the US, but since Trump got elected they went ahead and tore the mask off and proved it. They'll call black people the worst names imaginable to their faces if they are a Trump supporter, they will openly call for the destruction of whites, and no one in their party even bats an eye. Fuck Democrats and Never Trumpers such as Some Rogue who thinks this shit is okay.
2) He exposed the media for exactly who they are. I always knew the media had a bias towards the left but holy fucking shit I didn't realize just how much of a bias they had until sometime around November 8th of 2016. They are just so blatant about it now and pretend they are objective journalists, meanwhile the laughable Democrats go around saying the media isn't biased, that ties in to reason 1. The media has become so desperate to remain in power that they have successfully bullied Twitter to not allow political ads from anyone other than the media so they can control the narrative, and they are trying to do the same with Facebook and other large online companies. CNN literally sent a news team to some old woman's house in Florida to harass her and accuse her of being a Russian puppet because supposed Russian trolls were part of her Facebook group. Fuck the media and fuck Democrats and Never Trumpers who think this shit is okay. CNN is also seriously running stories about Trump's spelling errors on Twitter and what that means. No, seriously, that was on cable TV.
3) He exposed many Republicans for exactly who they are, either just a bunch of Democrat Lites or a bunch of spineless cowards. Look at Jeff Sessions, Democrats made up some bullshit reason for why he should recuse himself from the Russia investigation and he caved almost instantly. Spineless shithead. Then we have the Democrat Lites such as Mitt Romney, Bush Jr, Paul Ryan, etc. They are just so desperate to be liked by Democrats that hate their guts that they drop all pretenses of having conservative values. Then almost the rest of the Republicans are too afraid of using the Democrats' own tactics against them.
4) And most importantly he has done a damn good job at being an actual conservative president. I thought he was just going to be another Democrat Lite, waffling on the tough issues and siding with Democrats on the more difficult issues like Republican presidents of past have done. But nope. He took a hard stance against abortion, he took a very hard stance against illegal immigration and didn't just roll over when Paul Ryan and the Democrats stymied his efforts at every turn to secure border wall funding. He has lowered taxes, he has been very pro business, he has cut regulations, all of which have helped boost our economy and the stock market. He he helped black people just like he promised he would do: lowest black unemployment ever, black families having more money in their pockets, and passed that prison reform bill which helped a lot of black people as well. He was tough on ISIS exactly like he promised he would be. He has been very pro police exactly as he promised he would be. He is very patriotic and seems to love his country, which is a refreshing thing after 8 years of Obama and watching the degenerates in the Democrat party constantly shit on this country.
Honestly what does he do that's so bad? He's mean to people like Colon Kaepernick because the asshole protests our flag and national anthem? He's mean to people like Kathy Griffin who poses with his severed head? He dares to fight back against an ever increasingly unhinged Democrat party? People act as if Trump picks on little kids or something, he mostly just fights back against people who are calling him racist and a sexist and a bigot. If Trump were a Democrat there would already be talks of amending our constitution to allow him to run for a third and fourth term, but he's a Republican so he's an evil bigot.
Perfect example of what I mean: the media is now threatening Trump and Rand Paul to not disclose the name of the whistleblower because they claim it is against the law and they will go to jail. Not only are they wrong, but since when is the media in favor of NOT reporting on something? But they know damn well who the whistleblower is and they know damn well it will make the whole impeachment fiasco look like complete bullshit if report on who it is and report on his Democrat ties, so they are now threatening a sitting US senator and the sitting US president in an attempt to silence them.
Isn’t the whistleblower a former Biden staffer?! Lmao.
Here's another perfect example of this: The Democrat controlled House just approved a measure to use tax payer dollars to enhance the border security of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, and Tunisia, but they won't use tax payer dollars to enhance our own border security. Nothing but US hating shit stains at this point.
If Trump is the president we need to continue exposing Democrats and the news media for the American hating, backwards ass pieces of shit that they are then I say Trump 2020, 2024, 2028, and beyond!
“Do your job and print his name!” Paul said as the president clapped and looked on approvingly.
On Tuesday, the Kentucky Republican went a step further, threatening to reveal the name himself.
But many of Paul’s colleagues oppose the idea of exposing the identity of the person who helped launch the impeachment drive by detailing Trump’s call with the Ukrainian president.
Senior Senate Republicans are worried about the precedent it would set, fearing government sources would be less likely to reveal wrongdoing in future presidencies.
They also have a simpler concern: not breaking the law.
“We should follow the law. And I believe the law protects whistleblowers,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.).
“The whistleblower statute is there for a reason. And I think we need to respect the law where whistleblowers are concerned. Eventually that person may decide to come forward voluntarily,” said Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.), who added that senators like Paul are frustrated with the lack of transparency from the House.
Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) said officials “ought to respect the whistleblower laws,” as did Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.). Several senators cited the work of Chuck Grassley, the most senior Senate Republican, who has made whistleblower protections a signature issue.
On Tuesday the Iowa Republican reiterated his stance. “All I can say is I expect whistleblowers to be protected according to what the law gives them,” Grassley said.
“I write whistleblower laws. I got to go by what the law says, and things of that nature so I made my position pretty clear,” he added. “And journalists will have to do what journalists do.”
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) also expressed his support for the whistleblower.
“Whistleblowers should be entitled to confidentially and privacy, because they play a vital function in our democracy,” Romney said.
AND THOSE FUCKING REPUBLICANS TOO! @#(p*$^&*()@!#&^$%%()*#@!$^
This is what I mean with you defending bad actors. My entire point was about the media who used to pride themselves on reporting on things. 10 years ago they would have been all over someone naming the whistleblower so they could report on it, or even reporting on it themselves if they knew who it was, they are now literally threatening a US senator and the US president in an attempt to silence them.
Why are you so broken? Why can't you just say "Yeah the media is pretty fucked up these days." Instead you're just like a typical leftist these days and I am your Trump; if I'm against Thing A you have to be for Thing A, and if I'm for Thing B you have to be against Thing B.
Did you know the media is also currently busy NOT reporting on the Epstein coverup ABC engaged in? I suppose they are still good guys because Trump said "grab'em by the pussy" one time right?
I guess it's good your friendly Russian Media went ahead and printed it.
American news organizations resisted the pressure, but—in a 2019 re-play of “Russia, if you’re listening”—Kremlin-controlled state media promptly jumped on it.
Shortly after Sen. Paul tweeted out an article that speculated in considerable detail about the identity of the whistleblower—with a photograph, a name, and details about the purported political history of a CIA professional—Russian state media followed suit.
Holy shit you really are broken. "But Russia!"
You still can't just admit that the media literally threatening Trump and Rand Paul into silence is some fucked up shit. If people like you existed back in the day you all would be bashing Bob Woodward for receiving information from Deep Throat. Oh wait, no you wouldn't, because that implicated a Republican president, you're only in the business of defending Democrats apparently.
How do the balls of the collective DNC taste? Pretty salty I must imagine, but that seems to be your thing.
What's the law then? Can you cite the specific part of the law which states anyone and everyone who merely says the name of the whistleblower is going to be thrown in jail? Or are you like a good Democrat puppet and you just repeat what you are told without questioning it?
A couple of """"journalists"""" have literally told Rand Paul to his face he will go to jail if he names the whistleblower. Do you just not pay attention at all or what?
No real dog in this fight. Would be chewed up and spit out prob.
But, dropping by with a few relevant facts:
1) Can I keep my identity confidential?
Yes. Most Inspectors General have hotlines that allow employees to make confidential disclosures. Inspectors General are prohibited from disclosing an employee’s identity unless the IG determines that disclosure is unavoidable or is compelled by a court order. If you file a disclosure with OSC, your identity will not be shared outside of OSC without your consent. However, OSC may disclose your identity only if OSC determines that it is necessary because of an imminent danger to public health or safety or an imminent violation of any criminal law.
Source: https://www.cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Insp...ow-Your-Rights
2) Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants
Source: https://www.cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Insp...ection-Act-WPA
3) And a little light reading if the discussion really wants to turn to the legal matters behind these summary points: 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)
Source: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...q=true&num=125
The path forward is very clear. To remove the protection of anonymity from the 'whistleblower', simply remove the appropriate IGs, insert loyal IGs, overturn the protected status of identity, and win. The code will protect against any retaliation, which is a criminal offense.
That's the point. It's policy, not law, that prohibits the release of names. The policy is set to provide enforcement basis (can't retaliate if you don't know who) and encouragement (not afraid of retaliation if they don't know I did it). Even then, law doesn't compel, only policy does.
I found it interesting the commentary around it being unavoidable. I thought that'd be the area of most robust discussion. But - all that's why the path shown wins. A new IG sets the new policy and off you go. No law against it. No one will ever use that IG again, and there'll be some fights over legality. But by then, the name's already out there.
Didn't Trump Jr just oust one of the whistle blowers?
He's probably going to jail.
Don't be lame, bro. Telling someone they are going to jail if they say something is a threat to get the person not to say something. But I get it, I hate the leftist media so you have to love the leftist media. I also hate rape, gonna be interesting reading all of your bullet points about why rape is good.
Here's how Some Rogue thinks the world works:
Woman A to Woman B: If you don't stop talking shit I'm going to get my husband to beat the shit out of you!
Woman B: I'm going to call the cops for threatening me!
Cops: No, Woman B, she didn't threaten you because she said she was going to get her husband to beat the shit out of you.
Some Rogue is so dumb he got hit by a parked car.
ABC just fired the person who leaked to Project Veritas about how they chose to kill the Epstein story 3 years ago in order to protect Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.
Democrats: OMG! If you mention the Trump whistleblower then you're going to jail!!!!
Also Democrats in regards to a whistleblower being fired within the news media:
Sad, but they are here. Wonder if they revoked Epstein's annual pass.
https://www.wesh.com/article/disney-...cases/29729215
Just a quick fact, and inconclusive because I haven't seen enough detail yet to know how accurate it is.
The Whistleblower Protection Act protects those who bring matters of wrongdoing to a government or law enforcement agency. Remember that IG? A leaked news story sent to American right-wing activist organization that is neither government nor law enforcement is not grounds for whistleblower status and corresponding protections afforded under law.
It does call into question the reliability of an employee. Whether that is sufficient for firing the individual, and what manner of collusion may have happened is a matter for civil court as a wrongful termination, not criminal court as an act of retaliation.
And this part is not a fact, but in my view it is a very good spin and will gain traction.
It's not really a step up to help investigate a pedo that has zero wealth and power. It's an entire different step up when you finally release a 3 year old media interview that labeled Epstein as "The most prolific pedophile in US history" and "The palace" (Queen of England) told us not to run the story.
P.S. It also has me concerned about the Kurds in Syria, Kentucky.
https://media.giphy.com/media/Vg0JstydL8HCg/giphy.gifQuote:
Fresno brewery prints "Epstein didn't kill himself" on the bottom of cans
Looks like you were right. The person they fired says they weren't the one who leaked to Project Veritas while the one who did slams ABC for being cowards.
What a fucking mess. But just remember: Orange Man Bad!
Oh yeah it's worse than that. The person fired doesn't even work for ABC news anymore but now works for CBS. So ABC and CBS news literally colluded together in order to "find" the leaker and have them fired even though they now work at a completely different company, and it wasn't even the leaker!
CVS banned all guns from their stores, 2 months later an armed robber shot a woman who was 8 months pregnant in one of their stores. We can forgive him for the pregnant part, he might have just been helping her perform an abortion on a clump of cells after all, but I hope they throw the fucking book at him for not being able to read the "GUN FREE ZONE" signs!
I think what bothers me most about this is, when one really thinks on the subject, you have to ask yourself "How long has this kind of cherry picked news been going on for?". It becomes far more heinous than Epstein and pedo's and that's an extremely difficult summit to surpass.
I don't have anything against it, I'm just not a big fan of handguns personally. Not in the "OMFG AR-15" way, I just never really enjoyed shooting them and never wanted one in the house when the kids were young. I would consider conceal carry though, maybe. :shrug:
It would be nice to have when I go on my road trips.
Probably a very long time. Remember Project Veritas' first big story about how Planned Parenthood was selling baby parts? The """""news""""" had probably received all sorts of tips about that, but what do they do instead? They wait until Project Veritas releases the story and then gaslights everyone into believing Project Veritas edited the clips in a way so as to be deceptive because of course they did! The media has been in the pocket of Democrats for years now, probably decades, of course they are going to cover for an abortion factory that donates a lot of money to the Democrats, the bonus being squashing a much smaller investigative journalist outlet. Can't let that competition become big and respected!
Ummm, it can get out, depending on where the entry is. It is less likely than some. The .22 caliber is the most common killer of civilians according to the FBI. The .223 is a lot different than the regular .22 LR that people think of as .22 it is not just a "fast 22."
.22 is great for a lot of things outside of self defense even though more civilians die from it than anything else.
All that said, get a reliable modern firearm for self defense. Get modern training for self defense use of that firearm. Use modern, high quality ammo in that self defense firearm. Practice with that firearm regularly. Lastly, make sure you have it when you need it because the best firearm in the world won't do shit if it's not in someone's hand fighting back against an attacker.
Antifa professor bashes people over the head with a bike lock, almost kills one man, sentenced to probation.
Antifa goons get into a fight with Proud Boys, Antifa goons are questioned and released, no charges.
Antifa thugs attack police officers at a rally and beat police horses with sticks, no arrests made.
Antifa gang members attack a female reporter and steal her camera equipment, police refuse to intervene or make any arrests.
A Trump supporter slashes a Trump baby balloon, charged with a felony.
Democrats and their enforces really are turning this country to complete shit.
If there is any doubt left in your mind that Democrats are becoming more disgusting by the day because of their hatred of Trump then let this story remove the last remaining shred of doubt.
In 2016 Trump held a fundraiser to raise money for Veteran charities. Said fundraiser raised 2.8 million dollars.
Trump was sued in the state of NY because of reasons.
Trump got tired of defending himself against this bogus lawsuit so he decided to settle.
The judge in the case even recognizes that each and every single dime raised went to Veteran charities but since Trump and his family distributed the money this counted as a "campaign contribution" and thus Trump was ordered to pay 2 million dollars to the Veteran charities he had already given 2.8 million dollars to via the fundraiser he held for them.
Yes, you read that right. Democrats were so upset that Trump looked good by raising money for Veterans that they literally sued him in court and kept hounding him using state resources until he finally decided to settle the case. The judge then recognized that even though all of the money went to the charities Trump said they would go to that wasn't good enough and said Trump had to pay an additional 2 million dollars out of pocket just to make sure Trump looks bad a year out from the 2020 campaign. Oh yeah did I forget to mention that unlike most charities and fundraisers that take administration fees off the top to pay people's salaries that Trump and his family didn't take a dime out of the money raised and even used some of their own funds to help distribute that money? Not good enough!!!!!!
Don Cherry, apparently a popular hockey sports caster in Canada, was fired for what is being described as a "racist" and "discriminatory" and "toxic" "rant".
The so called "toxic rant" in question:
Such racism! Such intolerance! Must fire!Quote:
I live in Mississauga. Very few people wear the poppy. Downtown Toronto, forget it. Nobody wears the poppy. Now you go to the small cities. You people that come here, whatever it is, you love our way of life. You love our milk and honey. At least you can pay a couple bucks for a poppy or something like that. These guys paid for your way of life that you enjoy in Canada. These guys paid the biggest price for that.
So much bullshit happening lately that I can hardly keep up!
San Fransisco's newest DA, who is the son of convicted domestic terrorists, vows to no longer prosecute people for public camping, offering or soliciting sex, public urination, blocking a sidewalk,and more, claiming these issues "criminalize" being homeless, because apparently if you're homeless you have to piss and shit in the street and offer up your body for sex in exchange for money or something.
In other news the EU courts have decided that any products sold in the EU from "occupied" parts of Israel have to be labeled as such. Because you know all of the countries in the world who have captured land from natives or other countries is okay, but when those pesky Jews do it then it's bad and we have to shame them for it! It's not anti semitic at all, you bigot!
I mean, if you want to pay or be paid for sex and both parties consent, and everything is on the level, let them?Quote:
offering or soliciting sex
Um, did the EU forget that they are the reason that the Jews are currently in Israel?
I wonder how many trillions in reparations the EU would have to pay back to all the countries (which would be pretty much every country outside of Europe) they have occupied over the centuries?
If we're going to legalize prostitution it should be a heavily regulated industry so the government can make sure everyone is being tested and that the women aren't being trafficked in for sex. Otherwise pimps can abuse this and force women to be streetwalkers since apparently it's now okay in San Fransisco to offer to suck someone's dick on the street for 20 bucks.
Let's be perfectly honest, when we say the EU, we're really talking about Germany. France is being France and once again GB is trying to get out of a deal they should have known better than to get involved in.
I honestly can't believe that EU shit was ever allowed to happen.
A school board in Illinois passed a rule stating any student can use any locker room as long as they identify with that gender.
Basically this boy wanted to get dressed and undressed with the girls, and the boy was upset that he couldn't live every teenage boy's dream as seen in the documentary film "Porky's", so he actually took his case to the school board who agreed he should be able to watch girls get naked simply because he dyed his hair pink and says he's a girl.
I bet all the parents of the girls are ecstatic for this new rule.
"Protesters" were shouting at Jewish students in Canada screaming "Go back to the ovens!"
Now if you're wondering why this hasn't made world headlines it's because they weren't white supremacists but rather Muslims "protesting" under the guise of they really just hate Israel's policies, they don't hate Jews. Because telling Jews to "go back to the ovens" totally says "I disagree with Israel's policies on this particular issue."
But if you're a piece of shit like Back and Seran you stick your fingers in your ears and scream "LALALALALALALAALA" while you go vote for a white as paste Democrat who tells you the real problem facing the world today is white supremacy.
https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Activ...versity-608617
I saw the video on Twitter but it's not on that page apparently.
Fucking Democrats are losing their minds at an exponential rate.
Queerty, an online magazine that deals with, well that should be obvious, wrote this amazing article:
What you stand to lose by not having sex with people with HIV
In which they try to guilt trip you for not wanting to date and have sex with someone who is HIV positive.
No I shit you not. Remember just last year we had the whole #MeToo thing and how everyone should have the right to have sex with whoever they want? Well fuck that noise! Have sex with the men with HIV, you bigots!
#MyBodyMyChoice
#MyButtholeMyChoice
https://youtu.be/cVIwepliNeo
Telling Jewish students they should go back to the ovens over a disagreement with their politics is fucked up.
Tgo's conflated strawmen are nothing more than his inability to see anything without a binary political lens. His wildly outrageous and false accusations are more harmful to the community at large and himself than they are to me personally. I'm concerned for his well-being because over the years he has really slipped down the slippery slope of right wing radicalization promoted by the so called right wing media.
Now are you going to vote for a white Democrat who tells you white supremacy is the real problem in the world today?
Are you going to demand more of the news you consume (CNN, MSNBC, etc) to report on hateful speech such as this even if it comes from Muslims? Or are you going to go about business as usual while they too tell you the real problem facing the world today is white supremacy and Donald Trump?
Or is the extent of your "caring" just to denounce this on the PC so you can virtue signal and think you "won" this one against me?
Let's be real, Back, it's the last one.
Who I vote for and why is infinity more complex than your political binary brain can seemingly comprehend and I don't mean that as an insult either. If republicans would denounce that shit, show some actual inclusivity, open up the tent, instead of suppressing voters, gerrymandering, and protecting their rich buddies on Wall Street they may actually get an actual majority.
But lets talk about the recent resurgence of white supremacy issue.
Do we not agree that white supremacy is a negative thing and that anyone saying they will fight it is a positive thing?
Isn't it clear that if people do not fight it at every turn, in every instance, it will keep popping up again and again as history has shown?
And lets be real, Backrash voting for anyone not a dem isn't happening. Don't try and pretend you are open minded or anything. We all know you are a partisan bitch who'll virtue signal and snowflake all day long.
I didn't see your edit until now.
First of all, you have no idea what news I consume. I know this because I've repeatedly told you yet you still make incorrect claims and are still coming to conclusions based on thse false assumptions. Right out of the gate, before I even get a chance to state an opinion, you've already written it out for me based on these imaginary things in your head that do not reflect reality. I suspect you're much more comfortable with me not ruining that diseased little stew of hatred in your head but I have no idea why it is that you need some mental construct to take your frustrations out on.
I do not feel the need to demand more news from any particular news source. Thats your issue. Thats your criticism of MSNBC or CNN or whoever. Its not my issue nor my criticism. And not because I don't want to know whats happening. There are tons of places to get information. So much so that it would be impossible for any one outlet to cover everything and for one person to consume it all. If I don't see something its not because I don't care about it. Its because I legitimately cannot see everything everywhere all the time.
White supremacy and its resurgence is an issue. I believe that because of the people who perpetrate it. Not because someone told me to be upset about it. If the idiots who keep pushing this bullshit would shut the fuck up and go away it would not be an issue. But guess what? They keep bringing it up. Not me. Not the media. No one is to blame but the assholes still pushing that bullshit.
Donald Trump is not doing anything to help the issue and is in fact in my opinion stoking that mentality with his anti-mulsim, anti-immigrant, anti-shit hold country, and anti-common decency.
Who the fuck am I virtue signalling to? You think my opinions on racism are me trying to be more popular here on the PC? THE FUCK YOU SMOKIN SON. If you knew as much about me as you think you do you'd know thats the biggest crock of shit anyone tried to sell around here. I'm not here for popularity.
I've been real this whole time. I think you need to get real.
Back, you are so full of shit that the whites of your eyes have turned brown.
While it may be true that we don't know all the media you consume, we very well DO know the media that you regurgitate. If you use no other sources then your claim is only slightly more credible than the hearsay in all the televised testimony during the impeachment hearings. Until you demonstrate otherwise the perception is the reality that all you consume and regurgitate is MSM who have been proven repeatedly to have a deeply Leftist bias and who have repeatedly and maliciously fabricated complete pieces of fiction about the country, this administration and this President.
Of course you don't want any new sources because based on your posting, they might make you uncomfortable and force you to see how myopic and disingenuous your espoused views are.
White Supremacy is only on the rise due to our previous President inciting racial divide, his passive aggressive racism and his unwillingness to govern the country through the transition of power in his last months. It is not the most serious threat we face, it's not even in the top 10 and likely not in the top 100.
You are virtue signaling to anyone that might listen and always have since you come across as disingenuous, willfully ignorant and often play the victim, much like you are trying too now. I believe that you have adopted the modus operandi of virtue signaling so much that it is simply now an unconscious habit. I don't know if you can manage to be genuine and believable at the same time. Maybe face to face communication might provide clues to substantiate your claims however in text, you have come across as a plastic, shallow, vapid, Leftist shill.
"An issue" sure, the most pressing concern for the world at the moment? Not even close. The most pressing concern as far as just violence goes? Again not even close.
Radical Islamic terrorism remains by far the biggest threat to Western civilization, but like I said before you'll shove your fingers in your ears and listen to the likes of Elizabeth Warren tell you white supremacy is the biggest threat. People such as yourself like to pretend 9/11 was a hundred years ago or something and everyone involved is dead and buried, but it wasn't, an entire generation hasn't even passed yet. 9/11 alone was responsible for more deaths than white supremacy in the past 50 years. This says nothing about the two largest Islamic terrorist attacks in Iraq responsible for almost 3000 deaths, not to mention the hundreds of Islamic terrorist attacks that take place every year that amounts of tens of thousands murdered every year.
But tell me more about how white supremacy and its "resurgence" is an issue because some white racist said some mean things.
What the fuck are Democrats doing to our society?Quote:
Children as young as six are to be given compulsory self-touching lessons that will teach them about touching or ‘stimulating’ their own genitals.
That does not invalidate the need to rebut it, even the smallest instance of it, all day every day.
I don't recall her ever saying one word about Islamic terrorism. I do hear white supremacists say that though. Its part of their cannon.
Domestic terrorists in America have killed more people here than Islamic terrorists since, and including, 9/11.
It was almost 20 years ago. They were from Saudi Arabia. The world is a much different place now. I recognize the threat of people who want to attack America. Including the domestic terrorists, who in my opinion, are dirtier, more evil, and fucked up than foreign terrorists because they walk among us not saying anything while hiding behind the guise of being American or patriotic.
Turning a blind eye or ear to white racists saying mean things gets you a holocaust.