There is nothing logical or emotional about this dispute. Allereli has made a claim, that Fleurs is irrational. You have made a counterclaim, that Fleurs is rational. This is a matter of fact - there is no deduction that will reveal the truth of this, no reasoning, only brute fact. You have told yourself that anyone who disagrees with your claim of fact only does so out of emotion. This is (logically speaking) not necessarily the case, even if you are factually correct.
I get that you very strongly believe you are right, but logic has nothing to do with the strength of your conviction.