I'm sorry- scientific fact?
The notion that life begins at conception is not a "scientific fact"- there's
no consensus on that. There's not even a formal scientific "opinion" on the matter because it's a philosophical question, not a scientific one.
What you are claiming as a fact is actually a belief. And a new one at that.
In the late 60s/early 70s Evangelical community came together at various points to talk about the issue and, for the most part, the belief was that life begins at birth. NOT conception.
And that was based on scripture:
[/B]
The idea that life begins at conception is a political narrative that was started largely after the Roe v Wade decision to organize the religious right. So it's only been a "widespread" belief (and it's not even *that* widespread) for the past few decades.
It was
never a scientific stance. And it's still not. It's an arbitrary belief people started to get conservative people out to vote for their political opponents.
And if you think I'm wrong, then please show us non-partisan, objective scientific literature that clearly demonstrates a consensus belief that life begins at conception. We'll wait.