Originally Posted by
Flap
You are trying to justify it, or at a very minimum say that it's not as bad as people made it out to be. I've never seen Roots. And frankly I find it disturbing that you, a Libertarian, would be a slavery apologist. We're talking about the one thing that should be THE cardinal sin to a Libertarian, but somehow it's not evil because other nations were doing it at the same time? Or maybe you're saying that by doing something any decent human being would do(stopping slavery if they had the power) our nation has absolved itself of its sins?
Yes, other nations did slavery. The USA is not unique in being a nation with many evil deeds in its past, present and future. Biden's military did a drone strike on a water carrying truck last year that killed a bunch of children and zero enemies. PURE FUCKING EVIL!
Honestly, there's no excuse for justifying slavery or saying that it's somehow not as bad as people say it was. It was evil. Pure and simple evil. If you can't acknowledge that I think we should stop talking. It's okay to admit when you're wrong, I've done it this week on this very forum!
Some would argue that Bezos owes the workers that made him all that capital a fair share of said capital. I know the standard response is that the workers agreed to their pay rate etc etc, but at the end of the day people are being exploited in my opinion. They're peeing in bottles, dude, and health care is tied to employment. When you lose one along with the other, you tend to take what you can get.
And no, this is the thinking of someone who has empathy. I've been poor. I grew up in a household with low enough income that I got welfare checks. I'm wealthy now, though my own efforts and, to a not-insignificant degree, privileges. I think it's way too hard to do what I did. If I had been guaranteed shelter, food and medical care when I was broke, I think I'd be in a much better position than I am today. I want the same for others.
You can't help poor people...by making them not poor? Please explain the logic there.
That's an awful thing to say about unhoused people. It sounds like you realize that a large portion of them are unhoused due to being mentally ill. Don't you think we should have a strong social safety net to help these people and everyone else?
How do you propose we do this without so-called redistribution of wealth?
I'll answer your question with my own question: What are governments for, if not to provide benefits to its citizens?
I know you're anti-statist, but government isn't going anywhere. Taxes aren't going anywhere. I think you know both of these things are true. So why don't we use the money that we're already paying...for things that benefit our nation rather than bombing other countries and killing brown folks over counterfeit 20's?