Rand Paul's War on Women continues

[Delcry]

Republican candidate Rand Paul has decided to go after women reporters for some reason.

http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=90046&siteSection=dailycaller&videoId=28861865

He would never do that to Matt Lauer. One time is inexcusable, but twice is obviously a character flaw. He's unelectable as President of the United States. You would never see President Barack Obama do something this foul and repulsive. Good thing for poor Ms. Guthrie that this was an interview over the camera and not in person; there's no telling what Rand "The Thug" Paul would do.

Here is the interview the good people at MSNBC were talking about. If I were Ms. Guthrie, I would consider a restraining order on that loose cannon.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rand-paul-goes-off-on-savannah-guthrie-for-saying-hes-changed-his-positions/

[Gelston]

Women shouldn't be reporters anyways.

[kutter]

As opposed to the selfie taking Manchurian candidate currently in the White House? You really prefer someone that never shows emotions and is slowly driving this country into insurmountable debt and losing standing in the world? Yeah, that has worked out really well.

If I were his press manager I would tell him to stay of the main stream media, he gains nothing for it and everyone on there is gunning for him.

Besides reporters are gender neutral, if you cannot handle a little guff from a tough interview, then you are in the wrong business.

[Johnny Five]

Women shouldn't be reporters anyways.

They can't even make decent sandwiches anymore. All has been lost.

[waywardgs]

If I were his press manager I would tell him to stay of the main stream media, he gains nothing for it and everyone on there is gunning for him.

"As the press manager for your presidential candidacy, I advise you to never talk with the media."

hahahahahaha


Besides reporters are gender neutral, if you cannot handle a little guff from a tough interview, then you are in the wrong business.

Yep.

[kutter]

"As the press manager for your presidential candidacy, I advise you to never talk with the media."

hahahahahaha


I realize that sounds a little silly, but if you know all they want is a gotcha moment and the people watching it are never going to vote for you anyhow, why would you do it?

As far as I am aware, the current President has only done one interview on Fox News and he managed to get elected twice. He knows that is not his target audience. In fact Rand Paul needs to take notes from his candidacy and do a lot of fluff on the internet and what not to get the attention of the younger generation that gets all of its info in 30-60 second snippets on the internet.

[Latrinsorm]

I realize that sounds a little silly, but if you know all they want is a gotcha moment and the people watching it are never going to vote for you anyhow, why would you do it?

As far as I am aware, the current President has only done one interview on Fox News and he managed to get elected twice. He knows that is not his target audience. In fact Rand Paul needs to take notes from his candidacy and do a lot of fluff on the internet and what not to get the attention of the younger generation that gets all of its info in 30-60 second snippets on the internet.Fox News is a cable channel, though, where you'll get maybe a million viewers in the morning. This is the Today Show, with around five million.

[kutter]

That does not really go against my point, if you know those people are not going to vote for you, why would you try to pander to them?

But I admit, I did not realize there was such a disparity, are there really that many people that do not have cable? It reflects it in the other cable channels as well not just Fox. I guess I cannot imagine not having at least some sort of cable in my house.

[Candor]

So I watched the video, and while Rand Paul could have handled the situation somewhat better, I think you libbies are rather thin skinned over the matter. She *was* editorializing with her questions, and he called her on it. If you're actually going to get upset, well feel free to go cry a river.

She was interviewing a presidential candidate. This is the big leagues. If your feelings are going to get hurt, you need to be watching something else. In any case, if it had been a conservative female reporter interviewing a male liberal candidate with similar results, don't think for a second that I believe that any of you libbies would be the least bit upset over it.

[waywardgs]

She was interviewing a presidential candidate. This is the big leagues. If your feelings are going to get hurt, you need to be running for something else.

ftfy

[Warriorbird]

So I watched the video, and while Rand Paul could have handled the situation somewhat better, I think you libbies are rather thin skinned over the matter. She *was* editorializing with her questions, and he called her on it. If you're actually going to get upset, well feel free to go cry a river.

She was interviewing a presidential candidate. This is the big leagues. If your feelings are going to get hurt, you need to be watching something else. In any case, if it had been a conservative female reporter interviewing a male liberal candidate with similar results, don't think for a second that I believe that any of you libbies would be the least bit upset over it.

None of us give a damn. This was posted by a fake account.

[Gelston]

None of us give a damn. This was posted by a fake account.

You're a fake account.

[waywardgs]

We're all fake accounts.

[Warriorbird]

You're a fake account.

Well, yes. I didn't vote for Al Gore. I voted for Ralph Nader. But principles!

[Candor]

We're all fake accounts.

if (newcommentsentence == "We're all fake accounts.")
{
notifyprogrammer (RedAlert);
stopnewaccountcreation();
stopbotcomments();
}