ClydeR
03-03-2012, 10:29 AM
Just like before (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showpost.php?p=900571&postcount=1), the liberals are at it again, attacking Rush Limbaugh. Even Santorum seems to be jumping on the liberal bandwagon, calling Rush absurd.
To his credit, Romney declined to say anything (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/romney-on-rush-not-the-language-i-would-have-used/) bad about Rush. When asked about it, Romney merely said he would have chosen his words differently. He refused to say that Rush was wrong to call women prostitutes for wanting so many birth control pills. He just thought Rush should have used nicer words to say it.
But as governor of Massachusetts, Romney signed a law requiring all employers, even religious institutions, to provide birth control pills, including emergency contraception morning after pills, to their employees.
Do you think it is possible that Romney is pandering?
To his credit, Romney declined to say anything (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/romney-on-rush-not-the-language-i-would-have-used/) bad about Rush. When asked about it, Romney merely said he would have chosen his words differently. He refused to say that Rush was wrong to call women prostitutes for wanting so many birth control pills. He just thought Rush should have used nicer words to say it.
But as governor of Massachusetts, Romney signed a law requiring all employers, even religious institutions, to provide birth control pills, including emergency contraception morning after pills, to their employees.
Do you think it is possible that Romney is pandering?