PDA

View Full Version : Commentary: Obama breaks his own rule (Campbell Brown/CNN)



Furrowfoot
01-24-2009, 05:04 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/23/campbell.brown.lobbyists/index.html?iref=mpstoryview#cnnSTCText

(CNN) -- Just a couple of nights ago, we heaped praise on the new president for announcing what he called a new era of openness, where in his administration, transparency would rule the day.

And the lobbyists that he was so critical of during the campaign? Well, he told us they will now face even tougher new restrictions.

President Obama: "The executive order on ethics I will sign shortly represents a clean break from business as usual. As of today, lobbyists will be subject to stricter limits than under any other administration in history. If you are a lobbyist entering my administration, you will not be able to work on matters you lobbied on, or in the agencies you lobbied during the previous two years. When you leave government, you will not be able to lobby my administration for as long as I am president."

That's what he said two days ago. But as we first told you Thursday, and sadly we are learning more about this Friday, President Obama already wants an exception to his own rule.

You see, what happened is, there is this former lobbyist for a big defense contractor called Raytheon. His name is William Lynn.

President Obama wants him to be deputy defense secretary. So, the Obama administration wants a waiver to its own rule.

That basically means they are saying, we will mostly put tough new restrictions on lobbyists, except when we won't.

Really? Is this how it is going to be?

Please, please don't make us all any more cynical than we already are, Mr. President.

If you have no intention of abiding by your new rules, then don't make new rules. That would be "actual" transparency.

Gan
01-24-2009, 08:30 AM
Its the Republicans fault.

Fallen
01-24-2009, 08:40 AM
Yeah, NPR was trying to smooth that over. I hate bias in my news, any way it leans.

Gan
01-24-2009, 09:00 AM
I missed the NPR story. :(

Working late forced me to miss all the news on the drive home.

Warriorbird
01-24-2009, 09:20 AM
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Campbell Brown

Hmm... missing from the original quotation.

Sean of the Thread
01-24-2009, 10:50 AM
I blame it on seal clubbers.

Gan
01-24-2009, 11:25 AM
Hmm... missing from the original quotation.

Yes, its a another R-Team conspiracy... (capt. obvious).

He provided the link, those who do not take things at face value recognized it was an op-ed piece immediately when they followed the link.

Those who do take things at face value here on the PC... well, do their opinions really require defending to the degree of pointing that out?

Stanley Burrell
01-24-2009, 11:29 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/23/campbell.brown.lobbyists/index.html?iref=mpstoryview#cnnSTCText

(CNN) -- Just a couple of nights ago, we heaped praise on the new president for announcing what he called a new era of openness, where in his administration, transparency would rule the day.

And the lobbyists that he was so critical of during the campaign? Well, he told us they will now face even tougher new restrictions.

President Obama: "The executive order on ethics I will sign shortly represents a clean break from business as usual. As of today, lobbyists will be subject to stricter limits than under any other administration in history. If you are a lobbyist entering my administration, you will not be able to work on matters you lobbied on, or in the agencies you lobbied during the previous two years. When you leave government, you will not be able to lobby my administration for as long as I am president."

That's what he said two days ago. But as we first told you Thursday, and sadly we are learning more about this Friday, President Obama already wants an exception to his own rule.

You see, what happened is, there is this former lobbyist for a big defense contractor called Raytheon. His name is William Lynn.

President Obama wants him to be deputy defense secretary. So, the Obama administration wants a waiver to its own rule.

That basically means they are saying, we will mostly put tough new restrictions on lobbyists, except when we won't.

Really? Is this how it is going to be?

Please, please don't make us all any more cynical than we already are, Mr. President.

If you have no intention of abiding by your new rules, then don't make new rules. That would be "actual" transparency.

If he has to block a million lobbyists to get the dipshits who stopped stem cell research from becoming a realistic building block in our culture, I say go for it.

The greatest thing about Bush II was he made unilateral vetoes and double-backing rhetoric for everything being lobbied, under the sun, a more acceptable standard for a United States president. I hope Barack Obama fully follows that new-age lawfulness laid out so pleasantly by his antecedent.

That being said, I'd prefer it (lobby blocking) were concerning issues that went more into funding rearrangement vs. seating arrangement of just one person. I guess I would be happy if he went Jimmy-motherfucking-Hoffa on anyone who would form a petition group that doubted him replacing conservative S.C. Justices (as far as an emphasis-on-a-single-person-basis goes.)

I hope his (hopefully) 8 years in office are spent on hypocritical rhetoric that blocks every single warmongering/let's-pay-less-taxes-because-we-have-a-seven-digit-income shithead's lobby for just about anything.

Viva Capitalism.