PDA

View Full Version : Blagojevich Impeached



Clove
01-09-2009, 12:29 PM
Illinois House impeaches Gov. Rod Blagojevich

By CHRISTOPHER WILLS, AP – In this Dec. 19, 2008 SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – The Illinois House voted overwhelmingly Friday to impeach Gov. Rod Blagojevich, an unprecedented action that sets up a Senate trial on whether he should be thrown out for abuse of power, including allegations that he tried to sell President-elect Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat.

Impeachment required just 60 votes. The final result was 114-1.

Legislators accused the second-term Democratic governor of letting down the people of Illinois by letting ego and ambition drive his decisions.

"It's our duty to clean up the mess and and stop the freak show that's become Illinois government," said Rep. Jack D. Franks, a Democrat.

Blagojevich was out jogging in his Chicago neighborhood when the vote came down. His office declined to comment, but said he would issue a statement Friday afternoon.

During the House's 90-minute debate on impeachment, no one spoke up to defend the governor. But Rep. Milton Patterson, a Chicago Democrat, made the sole vote against impeaching Blagojevich.

Patterson said he read the impeachment committee's report and wasn't comfortable voting against the governor. "I have no firsthand knowledge of any of the evidence," he said.

"I went by my own gut feeling, it's as simple as that," he said. "I read the report. If the government is going to indict him, let them go ahead and do that. That's their job and I'm doing my job."

Rep. Elga Jefferies, another Chicago Democrat, voted "present."

Blagojevich was arrested Dec. 9 on federal charges that include allegations he schemed to profit from his power to name Obama's replacement in the Senate. The criminal complaint included an FBI agent's sworn affidavit describing wiretaps that caught Blagojevich allegedly talking about what he could get for the seat, how to pressure people into making campaign contributions and more.

That arrest triggered impeachment hearings by a special House committee.

The committee on Thursday unanimously recommended impeachment based on the criminal charges but other allegations as well — that Blagojevich expanded a health care program without proper authority, that he circumvented hiring laws to give jobs to political allies, that he spent millions of dollars on foreign flu vaccine that he knew wasn't needed and couldn't be brought into the country.

"The citizens of this state must have confidence that their governor will faithfully serve the people and put their interests before his own," the committee's report said. "It is with profound regret that the committee finds that our current governor has not done so."

Blagojevich has denied the criminal charges. He criticized the House impeachment process as biased and said a Senate trial would produce a different result.

But he didn't testify before the House impeachment committee and hasn't offered an explanation for the federal charges.

"His silence in this great matter is deafening," said House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, a Chicago Democrat.

Parkbandit
01-13-2009, 08:05 AM
I think it's hilarious though that he was still able to seat a Senator... but let's be perfectly honest.. had he selected a white man for that position, there is no way in hell he would have been seated. Burris is being seated because no one wants to be called a racist (and the Democrats other option would be to have a special election.. something they couldn't afford to do financially or politically)

DeV
01-13-2009, 09:34 AM
Illinois Republicans would have loved a special election.

Illinois Democrats would rather be considered racist (by those unfamilar with Illinois politics) than alllow a special election to take place that would see a Republican (Mark Kirk) be easily seated.

Depending on their political history and personal/political associations, I feel they'd treat a potential white male or female candidate the same, and I believe we'd see that candidate eventually seated.

Keller
01-13-2009, 09:40 AM
I think it's hilarious though that he was still able to seat a Senator... but let's be perfectly honest.. had he selected a white man for that position, there is no way in hell he would have been seated. Burris is being seated because no one wants to be called a racist (and the Democrats other option would be to have a special election.. something they couldn't afford to do financially or politically)

I'm just glad the FBI had the wherewithall and foresight to arrest him before he had a say in naming the new senator.

Serious question: Is it exhausting being a fool?

Parkbandit
01-13-2009, 10:10 AM
Illinois Republicans would have loved a special election.

Illinois Democrats would rather be considered racist (by those unfamilar with Illinois politics) than alllow a special election to take place that would see a Republican (Mark Kirk) be easily seated.

Depending on their political history and personal/political associations, I feel they'd treat a potential white male or female candidate the same, and I believe we'd see that candidate eventually seated.

Are you saying that if Blog had nominated a white guy with the same credentials as Burris, that he would be seated now? I guess we can play what ifs all day, but I'll respectfully disagree.

Tea & Strumpets
01-13-2009, 10:31 AM
I don't really think it's about white people or black people, because nobody likes either of those groups.

DeV
01-13-2009, 12:04 PM
Are you saying that if Blog had nominated a white guy with the same credentials as Burris, that he would be seated now? I guess we can play what ifs all day, but I'll respectfully disagree.Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

I also understand where your disbelief originates, but I still feel the same. It is quite strange to see a white man play the race card this masterfully, but he's also doing his own bidding and no one else's.

Ironically, there are two black power players (Obama and White), although I don't know their true mastery or lack thereof, who both opposed Burris' appointment from the beginning as did other black politicians. Race cards were dealt, but I disagree with your thinking that a white man on par with Burris could not be seated in Illinois.

Even more ironic is the fact that only Blago had the power to call for a special election, and one in which we probably would have seen a Republican seated. Illinois Democrats took the lesser of the two evils and I think it's safe to say that Blago and Burris, by default, won this round.

Honorable mention: The loudest voice among the vocal minority who insisted the replacement must be black was our very own Bobby Rush, a reformed Black Panther, who apparently hasn't developed a forward thinking mindset that is more conducive to building bridges than burning them and furthering a divide.

TheRunt
01-14-2009, 01:48 AM
[B]Illinois House impeaches Gov. Rod Blagojevich



"It's our duty to clean up the mess and and stop the freak show that's become Illinois government," said Rep. Jack D. Franks, a Democrat.

How the hell are they going to do that? Nuke the entire chicagoland area? Or perhaps put 95% of the politicians there in a gas chamber?



[SIZE="3"][B]Rep. Elga Jefferies, another Chicago Democrat, voted "present."



A great start to be out next president, Not only is she a black female(can you say change?)but shes also votes present!!!!one one one