PDA

View Full Version : Waxman pounces on AIG



Gan
10-08-2008, 07:53 AM
WASHINGTON (AP) - Less than a week after the federal government had to bail out American International Group Inc. (AIG (http://research.scottrade.com/public/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?id=1&symbol=AIG)), the company sent executives on a $440,000 retreat to a posh California resort, lawmakers investigating the company's meltdown said Tuesday.

The tab included $23,380 worth of spa treatments for AIG employees at the coastal St. Regis resort south of Los Angeles even as the company tapped into an $85 billion loan from the government it needed to stave off bankruptcy.

The retreat didn't include anyone from the financial products division that nearly drove AIG under, but lawmakers were still enraged over thousands of dollars spent on catered banquets, golf outings and visits to the resort's spa and salon for executives of AIG's main U.S. life insurance subsidiary.

"Average Americans are suffering economically. They're losing their jobs, their homes and their health insurance," House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., scolded the company during a lengthy opening statement. "Yet less than one week after the taxpayers rescued AIG, company executives could be found wining and dining at one of the most exclusive resorts in the nation."

The hearing disclosed that AIG executives hid the full range of its risky financial products from auditors as losses mounted, according to documents released Tuesday by a congressional panel examining the chain of events that forced the government to bail out the conglomerate.

The panel sharply criticized AIG's former top executives, who cast blame on each other for the company's financial woes.

"You have cost my constituents and the taxpayers of this country $85 billion and run into the ground one of the most respected insurance companies in the history of our country," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. "You were just gambling billions, possibly trillions of dollars."

AIG, crippled by huge losses linked to mortgage defaults, was forced last month to accept the $85 billion government loan that gives the U.S. the right to an 80 percent stake in the company.

Waxman unveiled documents showing AIG executives hid the full extent of the firm's risky financial products from auditors, both outside and inside the firm, as losses mounted.

For instance, federal regulators at the Office of Thrift Supervision warned in March that "corporate oversight of AIG Financial Products ... lack critical elements of independence." At the same time, Pricewaterhouse Cooper confidentially warned the company that the "root cause" of its mounting problems was denying internal overseers in charge of limiting AIG's exposure access to what was going on in its highly leveraged financial products branch.

Waxman also released testimony from former AIG auditor Joseph St. Denis, who resigned after being blocked from giving his input on how the firm estimated its liabilities.

Three former AIG executives were summoned to appear before the hearing. One of them, Maurice "Hank" Greenberg - who ran AIG for 38 years until 2005 - canceled his appearance citing illness but submitted prepared testimony. In it, he blamed the company's financial woes on his successors, former CEOs Martin Sullivan and Robert Willumstad.
"When I left AIG, the company operated in 130 countries and employed approximately 92,000 people," Greenberg said. "Today, the company we built up over almost four decades has been virtually destroyed."

Sullivan and Willumstad, in turn, cast much of the blame on accounting rules that forced AIG to take tens of billions of dollars in losses stemming from exposure to toxic mortgage-related securities.

Lawmakers also upbraided Sullivan, who ran the firm from 2005 until June of this year, for urging AIG's board of directors to waive pay guidelines to win a $5 million bonus for 2007 - even as the company lost $5 billion in the 4th quarter of that year. Sullivan countered that he was mainly concerned with helping other senior executives.

Sullivan also came under fire for reassuring shareholders about the health of the company last December, just days after its auditor, Pricewaterhouse Cooper, warned of him that AIG was displaying "material weakness" in its huge exposure to potential losses from insuring mortgage-related securities.

AIG's problems did not come from its traditional insurance subsidiaries, which remain healthy, but instead from its financial services operations, primarily its insurance of mortgage-backed securities and other risky debt against default. Government officials feared a panic might occur if AIG couldn't make good on its promise to cover losses on the securities; investors feared the consequences would pose a threat to the U.S. financial system, which led to the government bailout.

AIG suffered huge losses when its credit rating was cut, thanks largely to complex financial transactions known as "credit default swaps." AIG was a major seller of the swaps, which are a form of insurance, though they are not regulated that way.

The swap contracts promise payment to investors in mortgage bonds in the event of a default. AIG has been forced to raise billions of dollars in collateral to back up those guarantees.

Sullivan said many of the firm's problems stemmed from "mark to market" accounting rules mandating that its positions guaranteeing troubled mortgage securities be carried as tens of billions of dollars in losses on its balance sheet.

This in turn, said former AIG chief executive Willumstad, who ran the company for just three months after Sullivan left, forced the firm to raise billions of dollars in capital. The federal rescue came after AIG suffered disastrous liquidity problems after its credit rating was lowered, forcing the company to come up with even more capital.

"AIG was caught in a vicious cycle," Willumstad said in the testimony.
Greenberg said that AIG "wrote as many credit default swaps ... in the nine months following my departure as it had written in the entire previous seven years combined. Moreover, "unlike what had been true during my tenure, the majority of the credit default swaps that AIGFP wrote in the nine months after I retired were reportedly exposed to subprime mortgages."

But Sullivan said the complex swaps had underlying value, even as the market for them froze, sending their book value plummeting and forcing AIG to scramble for collateral.

"When the credit markets seized up, like many other financial institutions, we were forced to mark our swap positions at fire-sale prices as if we owned the underlying bonds, even though we believed that our swap positions had value if held to maturity," Sullivan said.

The hearing is the second in two days into financial excesses and regulatory mistakes that have spooked stock and credit markets and heightened fears about a global recession.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081008/D93M0K6G3.html

__________________________________________________ ______-

Rockout with your Bailout.
http://i.cdn.turner.com/trutv/thesmokinggun.com/graphics/art4/1007083aig1.gif

http://i.cdn.turner.com/trutv/thesmokinggun.com/graphics/art4/1007083aig2.gif

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/1007083aig1.html

Parkbandit
10-08-2008, 07:59 AM
Seriously, what kind of monumental retarded executives are there at AIG?

"Hey, we've had a rough couple of months driving this company into the ground.. I say it's time to finally treat ourselves to some stress relief to the tune of $440,000"

Was there no one among them that stood up and said "Um, hey guys.. do you really think this is time appropriate?"

Ignot
10-08-2008, 08:34 AM
All I can say is wow. Those are some fucked up executives there and that's a slap in the face considering the government is bailing them out. It reminds me of those Career Builder commercials where all the exec's are monkeys.

2437

Allereli
10-08-2008, 08:41 AM
I'm not surprised. Why were they not fired in the first place as a term of the bailout?

When you give assholes money, it's not going to make them not be assholes.

Keller
10-08-2008, 08:54 AM
Shit; my firm isn't in financial troubles (moreso than the current market is for everyone) and we canceled our partner meeting in Arizona to save money.

Someone needs to kick these monkeys in the testicles.

ElanthianSiren
10-08-2008, 10:56 AM
Someone needs to kick these monkeys in the testicles.

FTW. Cranial evolution seems to have skipped a few generations there.

Clove
10-08-2008, 12:55 PM
Seriously, what kind of monumental retarded executives are there at AIG?

"Hey, we've had a rough couple of months driving this company into the ground.. I say it's time to finally treat ourselves to some stress relief to the tune of $440,000"

Was there no one among them that stood up and said "Um, hey guys.. do you really think this is time appropriate?""Aw c'mon, nobody will notice..."

Clove
10-08-2008, 01:00 PM
Shit; my firm isn't in financial troubles (moreso than the current market is for everyone) and we canceled our partner meeting in Arizona to save money.

Someone needs to kick these monkeys in the testicles.QFT my company has been hit by the current economy; even still we're currently up over last year BUT we're missing our revenue budget so... we're slashing expenses as much as possible.

Slashing travel expenses, freeze on new hiring, freeze on new capital purchases, cutting back on corporate functions and spending less on them (our holiday party which is usually at hotel and allows one guest will probably be at the office and employees only, for example), and halting planned expansions.

These ignorant, arrogant fucks run out and spend 1/2 million right after the taxpayers buy out their company.

And people think I'm joking when I say I'd only allow capital punishment for white collar offenses.

Gan
10-08-2008, 01:05 PM
Our company has reduced staff through layoff and attrition. We're cutting unnecessary ancillary services (fluff) and things like employee outings/parties have all but disappeared. Last year we had employees only for Christmas. This year I think we'll have a pot-luck lunch party for Christmas, employees only.

The focus on egregious spending is clearly the key as everyone is looking to cut overhead and turn their branch operations into lean mean machines.

These guys at AIG need to be terminated like yesterday. I'm surprised that there was not an employee revolt back at the office from those who have to work under idiots like that. I would have been pissed as hell if I was beholding to people like that for my paycheck.

DeV
10-08-2008, 01:29 PM
Average Americans need to be able to write these clowns "expenses" off on our tax returns since we're the ones bailing their arrogant asses out. Unbelievable.

Numbers
10-08-2008, 03:45 PM
The execs should be forced to pay it all back, with massive interest, to the taxpayers. Out of their own bank accounts. And then be indicted for fraud and theft. And then be sent to prison. And not a white-collar resort prison. The anally raped kind of prison.

Methais
10-08-2008, 03:55 PM
http://cache.kotaku.com/assets/resources/2006/09/honk_like_a_pig.png

Allereli
10-08-2008, 06:24 PM
It gets worse:


AIG hits up Fed for more money
Three weeks after an $85 billion bailout, AIG is turning to the New York Fed for additional funding.
By Tami Luhby, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: October 8, 2008: 6:08 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The New York Federal Reserve is lending up to $37.8 billion to American International Group to give the troubled insurer access to much-needed cash.

In exchange, AIG is giving the New York Fed investment-grade, fixed-income securities that it had previously lent out to other institutions for a fee. Those institutions are now returning these securities and want their money back.

The new program, announced Wednesday, is on top of the $85 billion the federal government agreed to lend to AIG last month to prevent the global company from collapsing. AIG said last Friday it had drawn down $61 billion.

The lending program is a way for AIG to get funding for its businesses, said a New York Fed spokesman. The system is similar to lending facilities the Fed provides to banks, which can also exchange collateral for cash.

The latest announcement does not jeopardize the government's ability to recoup its loan to AIG, experts said.

"AIG will repay the loan," said Stewart Johnson, portfolio manager at Philo Smith, an investment bank specializing in insurance. "It's just a matter of how much of themselves they will have to sell."

On Sept. 16, the Federal Reserve Board agreed to lend AIG $85 billion backed by the assets of AIG and its subsidiaries. The loan is expected to be repaid from the proceeds of the asset sales. Interest on the line of credit is steep, and the government took a 79.9% stake in the company.

First Published: October 8, 2008: 5:52 PM ET

http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/08/news/companies/aig/index.htm?cnn=yes

crb
10-08-2008, 06:29 PM
Member when Democratic Party Buddy Countrywide did this same shit back in like February?

Allereli
10-08-2008, 06:33 PM
Member when Democratic Party Buddy Countrywide did this same shit back in like February?

Yes, both parties are way too corrupt to run this country

Some Rogue
10-08-2008, 06:54 PM
ANARCHY!

Clove
10-08-2008, 09:44 PM
http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2008/09/29/jump-you-fuckers/