Barackometer

[Parkbandit]

Take this 100% completely unbiased and bipartisan test to see if your values measure up to Obama's.

http://barackobamatest.com

:)

[diethx]

You AGREED with the Barack Obama position on 32 of the 51 test questions. This means you agree with the Obama position 63% of the time.

I disagreed mostly on the environment/drilling shit, gun control, and on late-term abortion.

[sst]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 47 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 92% of the time.

[diethx]

No shit it's skewed, who fucking cares. Post your results or STFU.

[Soulpieced]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 37 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 73% of the time.

[Drakefang]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 45 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 88% of the time.

[Warriorbird]

It's like every bullshit Republican scare tactic point EVER!

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 26 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 51% of the time.

We've also totally spotted Mabus's RL identity!

http://barackobamatest.com/media/images/oleary.jpg

http://barackobamatest.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.aboutTheAuthor

[Gan]

The liberals QQ'ing in this thread is hillarious.

[Parkbandit]

The liberals QQ'ing in this thread is hillarious.

Maybe I should have used italics for the sarcasm impaired?

[Gan]

Maybe I should have used italics for the sarcasm impaired?

It would not have helped. There still would have been QQ'ing.

[Warriorbird]

Pff. QQ? Not. More amusement. It amuses me that some folks would take that sort of thing as 'truth.'

[Mabus]

We've also totally spotted Mabus's RL identity!

I'll take your interest in me as flattery, but I feel it is best to tell you before your feelings get hurt; I am a male, and a breeder.

[Warriorbird]

Sorry. I just think your fuckery is entertaining.

(though your commentary does sound like some non straight friends... THAT is suspect)

[Keller]

It would not have helped. There still would have been QQ'ing.

As if those who support the big-government-fundamentalist-Christian-war-mongering Republicans wouldn't call a similar "survey" directed towards McCain biased?

[Gan]

As if those who support the big-government-fundamentalist-Christian-war-mongering Republicans wouldn't call a similar "survey" directed towards McCain biased?

Other than laughing (posting), I doubt I would participate in the thread at all.

[Keller]

Other than laughing (posting), I doubt I would participate in the thread at all.

Exactly. You definately wouldn't call them out for "QQ"ing when they called the "survey" biased.

[Hulkein]

What the f is QQ'ing? Crying?

[Gan]

Exactly. You definately wouldn't call them out for "QQ"ing when they called the "survey" biased.

Incorrect. I could call someone out for QQ'ing if they sounded like they took such a spurious thread seriously to the point of 'calling it out as biased'.

Now if they were laughing at the thread, then you are correct. I would not and could not effectively call them out. I would merely join in the merriment.

[Gan]

What the f is QQ'ing? Crying?

Yes

[CrystalTears]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 46 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 90% of the time.

[Some Rogue]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 48 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 94% of the time.

[Audriana]

Some say Barack Obama’s plans to implement sweeping environmental regulations will raise the cost of gas, groceries, heating and air conditioning. Do you favor or oppose Obama’s environmental plans?

Some say?

Well some here say Obama's the antichrist, do I agree that he is? What sort of 'unbias' questions are these?

Most of the rest I've seen are okay, no mention of Obama's views so you don't know if you agree or disagree. This one is BS.


Do you favor or oppose an increase in the tax that stock holders pay on returns from 15% to nearly 40%?

nearly 40%? really? you can't just give us the correct #s as to not try to sway our minds?


Barack Obama recently said, 'The first thing I'd do as president would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act,' This legislation would wipe out all state and federal abortion restrictions including the partial-birth abortion ban. Do you agree or disagree with Barack Obama's statement?

Again, with a test like this, to be remotely scientific, you have to not know if you're going to be voting with or against him.


Recently, Barack Obama was asked when he thought life begins, in reference to the issue of abortion. Obama responded by saying that decision was above his paygrade. Knowing that the next president may be able to appoint two or three U.S. Supreme Court Justices, who may be called to make rulings on the issue of Abortion; do you support or oppose a president who does not know when life begins?

Christ in allmighty heaven. This test is such a load of bullshit it's not even funny.

Who said this was unbias again? oh right...

[Some Rogue]

And who's missing the sarcasm again? Oh yeah...

[Gan]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 42 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 82% of the time.

[Audriana]

And who's missing the sarcasm again? Oh yeah...

There have been MANY times I've read something from PB and thought to myself, "he's got to be joking, nobody could be this shortsighted and blatantly incorrect... He's like an Alzheimer's patent" and it turn out that he wasn't joking at all.

some people need the [/sarcasm] tag, PB's one of them.

[Keller]

What the f is QQ'ing? Crying?

It's supposed to be two eyeballs with tears.

[Parkbandit]

There have been MANY times I've read something from PB and thought to myself, "he's got to be joking, nobody could be this shortsighted and blatantly incorrect... He's like an Alzheimer's patent" and it turn out that he wasn't joking at all.

some people need the [/sarcasm] tag, PB's one of them.

It was obvious to anyone with half a brain. Sorry, I should have sent you a PM warning you. My bad.

[Keller]

It was obvious to anyone with half a brain. Sorry, I should have sent you a PM warning you. My bad.

Ya. "100% completely unbiased" was a sarcasm clue.

Call it out as biased -- but don't pretend that PB was being serious. Even I, the spurned lover, can't bring myself to criticize PB on those grounds.

[BigWorm]

Some say Barack Obama’s plans to implement sweeping environmental regulations will raise the cost of gas, groceries, heating and air conditioning. Do you favor or oppose Obama’s environmental plans?

---

Yes, I want everything to cost more for no good reason

[CrystalTears]

I wasn't very happy with the questions either. Some vagueness, other very "do you still beat your mother" type of questions I could have done without. Not every issue is so black and white (no pun intended).

[Sean of the Thread]

Obama is like 1 mile from me at my single A baseball stadium... feels odd.

I didn't attend. McCain had his at the convention center.... hmmmmmmmm

[BigWorm]

McCain and Palin spoke at the (very) minor baseball stadium that is within walking distance of my house right after the convention. Both candidates with speak where ever they are given a chance.

[AnticorRifling]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 44 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 86% of the time.

[Gan]

Racist

[Daniel]

Incorrect. I could call someone out for QQ'ing if they sounded like they took such a spurious thread seriously to the point of 'calling it out as biased'.

Now if they were laughing at the thread, then you are correct. I would not and could not effectively call them out. I would merely join in the merriment.

Are you *trying* to be a retard for kicks or did you have some sort of accident recently?

[Gan]

Are you *trying* to be a retard for kicks or did you have some sort of accident recently?

Are you trying to stalk all my posts?

How does it feel to be on a real man's nuts?

[crazymage]

You AGREED with the Barack Obama position on 34 of the 51 test questions. This means you agree with the Obama position 67% of the time.

[Faent]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 48 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 94% of the time.

Wow. Terrifying. Think much, do you?

[Gan]

Wow. Terrifying. Think much, do you?

So someone who doesn't agree with Barack isn't capable of independent thought?

[Parkbandit]

I think it's terrifying that someone could agree with Obama as much as many of you do.. in a very conservative slanted questionnaire.

[Faent]

So someone who doesn't agree with Barack isn't capable of independent thought?

If almost every time Barack asserts that p, you assert not-p, chances are you're about as capable of independent thought as a brick outhouse. It's vastly more likely that, for example, you've hooked your brain up to your pastor's ass, or Rush's ass, or O'Reilly's ass, or ...

[Parkbandit]

If almost every time Barack asserts that p, you assert not-p, chances are you're about as capable of independent thought as a brick outhouse. It's vastly more likely that, for example, you've hooked your brain up to your pastor's ass, or Rush's ass, or O'Reilly's ass, or ...

You mean instead of shoving your tongue up Obama's ass like you obviously are?

Check.

[Gan]

If almost every time Barack asserts that p, you assert not-p, chances are you're about as capable of independent thought as a brick outhouse. It's vastly more likely that, for example, you've hooked your brain up to your pastor's ass, or Rush's ass, or O'Reilly's ass, or ...

Surely you cant be serious. If you are, then I LOL in your general direction, multiple times, heartily.

[Faent]

Surely you cant be serious. If you are, then I LOL in your general direction, multiple times, heartily. -Gan

Could you be less dumb please? How reasonable do you think it is for you to believe that Barack is 100% unreliable? Get a clue: It's vastly unreasonable.

[Gan]

Could you be less dumb please? How reasonable do you think it is for you to believe that Barack is 100% unreliable? Get a clue: It's vastly unreasonable.

I dont believe anyone here has rated 100% yet.

PS. The world really looks better if you remove the blinders.

[Faent]

Wait, I have an idea. Fuck the Bible. That's old hat written by long dead prophets, right? Let's hook a machine up to Barack's brain that silences him and broadcasts not-p every time he gets ready to assert that p. We'd suddenly have a perfect truthteller - for all intents and purposes, a regular prophet! If you think this, you need brain surgery and castration.

[Gan]

Wait, I have an idea. Fuck the Bible. That's old hat written by long dead prophets, right? Let's hook a machine up to Barack's brain that silences him and broadcasts not-p every time he gets ready to assert that p. We'd suddenly have a perfect truthteller - for all intents and purposes, a regular prophet! If you think this, you need brain surgery and castration.

Someone took away all of your toys as a child didnt they?

[CrystalTears]

Or PB could have been mocking Faent for his retarded terrifying comment for the same reason.

[Keller]

WB, re-read his post and edit your own. He's not saying "This R real" at all.

[AnticorRifling]

a very conservative slanted questionnaire.
That questionnaire was slanted?!!

[Warriorbird]

Post pulled... let me leave it at this... if this was posted non seriously (and Mabus has actually tried to argue for most of this shit)... what was stopping people from responding with all Obama's supposed beliefs?

[Gan]

:wtf: is up with all the non-reading comprehension today?

[Keller]

:wtf: is up with all the non-reading comprehension today?

Today?

[Gan]

Today?

LOL

point

:help:

[Faent]

Or PB could have been mocking Faent for his retarded terrifying comment for the same reason. -CT

Irrational believers are terrifying. The more you tow a broad party line, the more likely it is you're as rational as someone who has had a melon baller taken to their grey matter. Oh, but you're a member of the rational party, aren't you? ROFL.

[Parkbandit]

Christ.. the stupidity on this forum astounds me some days. I was pretty sure everyone except maybe Mush Head would be able to ascertain that I was being sarcastic when I posted:


Take this 100% completely unbiased and bipartisan test to see if your values measure up to Obama's.


I even put the smiley face at the end, JUST to make sure the slow people would get it.

Obviously, my faith in the intelligence of some posters here was misplaced and undeserved.

[Faent]

Maybe I should point out - for the completely braindead - that if you disagree with everything McCain has to say, the probability that you're irrational is also high. (I'd say that the probability that you're a freak of nature is high, but sadly, it's rational persons who are the freaks of nature.)

[Gan]

Maybe I should point out - for the completely braindead - that if you disagree with everything McCain has to say, the probability that you're irrational is also high. (I'd say that the probability that you're a freak of nature is high, but sadly, it's rational persons who are the freaks of nature.)

For the sake of humanity and all things of humor, please stop posting in this thread.

[CrystalTears]

Maybe I should point out - for the completely braindead - that if you disagree with everything McCain has to say, the probability that you're irrational is also high. (I'd say that the probability that you're a freak of nature is high, but sadly, it's rational persons who are the freaks of nature.)
It's the fact that you're taking any of these quiz results seriously is what's the problem.

BTW, for all of your intelligence, learn to quote.

[Parkbandit]

Maybe I should point out - for the completely braindead - that if you disagree with everything McCain has to say, the probability that you're irrational is also high. (I'd say that the probability that you're a freak of nature is high, but sadly, it's rational persons who are the freaks of nature.)


HOLY FUCKING CHRIST YOU ARE A DUMB MOTHER FUCKER, FORCING ME TO FUCKING SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT!

THE
FUCKING
"SURVEY"
IS
FUCKING
SLANTED
COMPLETELY
AND
UTTERLY
TO
THE
FUCKING
RIGHT
YOU
DUMB
MOTHERFUCKER
.


IT'S
MADE
SPECIFICALLY
TO
GET
A
HIGH
"YOU
DISAGREE
WITH
OBAMA"
SCORE
.

[Parkbandit]

BTW, for all of your intelligence, learn to quote.

Please show me any glimmer of intelligence in any post of Faent's.

[Faent]

Um, thanks PB. I'm aware of that.

[CrystalTears]

Please show me any glimmer of intelligence in any post of Faent's.
Et tu, Brute?! Heh.

I edited my post to add the italics. Thanks for pointing it out. :)

[Keller]

Um, thanks PB. I'm aware of that.

Then why do you continue to use this survey as the basis of some misguided and off-topic philosophical proof?

[Parkbandit]

Um, thanks PB. I'm aware of that.


Really? This is the first post where it was evident.

[Faent]

Really? This is the first post where it was evident. -PB

You, along with several other posters here, obviously can't read. One worries where you get your information, since you can't process text. Are you blind? Does your computer read to you?


Then why do you continue to use this survey as the basis of some misguided and off-topic philosophical proof? -Keller

More reading non-comprehension. I have nowhere "used this survey" as the "basis" for any "philosophical proof". My initial post said that scoring 48/51 was terrifying. It is. (I just retook the survey aiming for a perfect conservative score. I only managed to hit 48/51 myself, and the answers I had to give were terrifying.)

But then, for those of you who cannot read, Gan wrote:


So someone who doesn't agree with Barack isn't capable of independent thought? -Gan

Everything I have said after that quote, you god-forsaken morons, has constituted a reply to this statement of Gan's. And the reply has been perfectly accurate. Furthermore:


It's the fact that you're taking any of these quiz results seriously is what's the problem. -CT

Everything I have said since Gan's post HAS NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO with how slanted ANY DAMN QUIZ is. Even if the quiz were PERFECTLY FAIR, EACH ONE OF MY POINTS WOULD STILL BE PERFECTLY CORRECT.

God. The unbelievable stupidity of people is amazing.

[Parkbandit]

God. The unbelievable stupidity of people is amazing.

I think I've already stated this.. but it was basically directed at you and Mush Head.

[Gan]

You, along with several other posters here, obviously can't read. One worries where you get your information, since you can't process text. Are you blind? Does your computer read to you?



More reading non-comprehension. I have nowhere "used this survey" as the "basis" for any "philosophical proof". My initial post said that scoring 48/51 was terrifying. It is. (I just retook the survey aiming for a perfect conservative score. I only managed to hit 48/51 myself, and the answers I had to give were terrifying.)

But then, for those of you who cannot read, Gan wrote:



Everything I have said after that quote, you god-forsaken morons, has constituted a reply to this statement of Gan's. And the reply has been perfectly accurate. Furthermore:



Everything I have said since Gan's post HAS NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO with how slanted ANY DAMN QUIZ is. Even if the quiz were PERFECTLY FAIR, EACH ONE OF MY POINTS WOULD STILL BE PERFECTLY CORRECT.

God. The unbelievable stupidity of people is amazing.

Hey buddy, don't blame your idiocy on me.

:nono:

[CrystalTears]

:banghead:

[Snapp]

This survey says that I disagree with Barack Obama. :(

I think it might be a little biased.

[Keller]

I have nowhere "used this survey" as the "basis" for any "philosophical proof".

Except where you did, of course.

It's pretty damn hard to get me to agree with, let alone defend, PB. That should be a clear indication of the nonsense you've engaged in throughout this thread.

[Gan]

This survey says that I disagree with Barack Obama. :(

I think it might be a little biased.

hahaha

How badly do you disagree?

[Snapp]

hahaha

How badly do you disagree?

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 28 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 55% of the time.

[Gan]

:lol:

I wonder if we could use you as our slant baseline?

[Faent]

Hey buddy, don't blame your idiocy on me. -Gan

I didn't blame anything on you, much less idiocy. Back to third grade with you.


:banghead: -CT

Trying to knock sense into your head now?


Except where you did, of course. -Keller

You lose. Back to third grade, please. Do not pass go. I replied to Gan. The survey is irrelevant. I win. Die now. Kthxbye.

[Drunken Durfin]

That was fun.

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 32 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 63% of the time.

[Parkbandit]

This survey says that I disagree with Barack Obama. :(

I think it might be a little biased.

That's fucking nuts. It's like it's FUCKING SUPPOSED TO!

PS - I bet it says you are straight too.. since being gay is a sin.

[Jenisi]

Biased as fuck, whatever I had a free half hour.

You AGREED with the Barack Obama position on 27 of the 51 test questions. This means you agree with the Obama position 53% of the time.

I hope this will help you make an informed decision on Election Day.

[CrystalTears]

Trying to knock sense into your head now?
Maybe you should try it. Or maybe you knocked it too hard. Sometimes it's difficult to tell with you.

[Faent]

Sometimes it's difficult to tell with you. -CT

I understand women are attracted to mysterious guys. Don't get any ideas.

[Parkbandit]

I understand women are attracted to mysterious guys. Don't get any ideas.

Mysterious guys like "I wonder what he does for a living" or "I wonder what his home looks like"

Not "I wonder if this is the dumbest guy I've ever tried to communicate with" mysterious.

[CrystalTears]

I understand women are attracted to mysterious guys. Don't get any ideas.
You'd have to be a man to qualify. No worries.

[Clove]

Take this 100% completely unbiased and bipartisan test to see if your values measure up to Obama's.

http://barackobamatest.com

:)


And who's missing the sarcasm again? Oh yeah...


Ya. "100% completely unbiased" was a sarcasm clue.

Call it out as biased -- but don't pretend that PB was being serious. Even I, the spurned lover, can't bring myself to criticize PB on those grounds.OMFG PB THAT WAS SOOOO BIASED!!1!!11! YOU LIED TO ME!!!!1!!1!

[Parkbandit]

Some say?

Well some here say Obama's the antichrist, do I agree that he is? What sort of 'unbias' questions are these?

Most of the rest I've seen are okay, no mention of Obama's views so you don't know if you agree or disagree. This one is BS.



nearly 40%? really? you can't just give us the correct #s as to not try to sway our minds?



Again, with a test like this, to be remotely scientific, you have to not know if you're going to be voting with or against him.



Christ in allmighty heaven. This test is such a load of bullshit it's not even funny.

Who said this was unbias again? oh right...

You missed this post from Mush Head, Clove. It took the cake.

[Clove]

Oh and I disagreed with Obama like 80% of the time or some crap.

[Clove]

You missed this post from Mush Head, Clove. It took the cake.I wouldn't say I "missed it" PB. It was the inspiration for mine but there are some things even I can't bring myself to repeat.

[Parkbandit]

Gotcha..

[Back]

The domain registrant of Barackometer.com has changed in the past 12 hours. It WAS an advocacy group in VA but now it seems to be registered to D. I. I. out of New Jersey. driving.inc.intl@gmail.com

When I get back to my laptop I will post the VA advocacy group it was registered to less than 12 hours ago.

[Sean of the Thread]

You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 41 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 80% of the time.

[Gan]

You'd have to be a man to qualify. No worries.

/end thread.


:lol: