PDA

View Full Version : Drill Drill Drill Is Working



Gan
08-05-2008, 03:35 PM
August 05, 2008

Drill, Drill, Drill Is Working

By Lawrence Kudlow

As Sen. John McCain and the GOP leadership nationalize the drill, drill, drill message, the Republican party might conceivably be riding a summer political rally. The question of offshore drilling, along with expanded domestic energy production, has suddenly become the biggest political and economic wedge issue of this election. Is there a Republican tsunami in the making?

According to the major polls, Sen. McCain has overcome a big deficit to pull even with Obama. Meanwhile, according to a Rasmussen survey, Democratic party identification has slumped.

While Republicans on the House floor shouted "vote, vote, vote" and "lower gas prices," the Democratic majority turned off the lights, cameras, and microphones. Determined Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell offered unanimous-consent requests to vote on lifting the ban on deep-water exploration, and the Democrats objected. When McConnell asked Democrats if they'd overturn the ban at $4.50 a gallon, they replied "no." When he raised the price to $5, $7, and $10, they cried "no," "no," and "no."

On the Stephanopoulos Sunday news show, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi underscored her refusal to allow a drilling vote. Asked about the Republican rebellion in the House, she said, "What you saw in the Congress this week was the war dance of the handmaidens of the oil companies." She went on to say, "We are spending all of this time on a parliamentary tactic, when nothing less is at stake than the planet, the air we breathe, our children breathe."

Oh really? Voters have a much different view. Polls suggest that two-thirds to three-quarters of the nation wants to drill. To wit, while a just-released Obama campaign ad attacks McCain as a tool of big oil, McCain has taken his first-ever lead in a Rasmussen tracking poll.

There is a voter revolt going on, and it reminds me of the anti-tax rebellion that lifted Ronald Reagan into office twenty-eight years ago. Is the conventional wisdom about to be swept away? As Republicans press home the drill, drill, drill message, might they pick up seats in Congress this year? And might the national clamor for a more realistic and balanced energy policy -- one that includes more oil, natural gas, clean coal, nuclear, and the alternatives of wind, solar, and cellulosic -- carry John McCain to a convincing victory over Obama?

Without even realizing it, the GOP drilling offensive has become a new contract with America. And it appears to be working. The public is putting aside global warming and choosing instead new-energy production, a stronger economy, and more job creation. Voters want growth, not austerity. They want Ronald Reagan, not Thomas Malthus. And by resisting this grassroots call, the Democratic party is digging itself into one of the biggest political dry holes in history.

New economic statistics highlight the damage done by the unprecedented oil-price shock. Only a year ago real gross domestic product was growing at 4 to 5 percent. Then came the dramatic rise of energy prices and down came the economy.

GDP contracted slightly late last year and rose a miniscule 0.9 percent in this year's first quarter. And although real growth picked up to nearly 2 percent in the second quarter, that number is suspect since the government does not count surging import prices from food and energy.

Wall Street blames everything on the housing slump and the sub-prime credit crisis. Of course, these are significant. But the drop in housing starts, sales, and prices has been going on for nearly two years, without crunching down the economy.

It's the oil shock that has brought us perilously close to recession. In fact, despite a slight rise in GDP, nonfarm corporate payrolls have declined for seven consecutive months while private payrolls have fallen for eight straight months. A year ago the unemployment rate was 4.5 percent. Today it's 5.7 percent. Topping it off, the inflation rate has climbed from 2 to 4 percent over the past year.


Right now the recession call is still an open question. But the economic damage caused by skyrocketing energy prices is a no-brainer.

When President George W. Bush eliminated the executive moratorium on offshore drilling a month ago, effectively launching the drill, drill, drill offensive, oil was close to $150 a barrel. Since then, the barrel price has dropped to nearly $120 as futures-market traders anticipate a major shift in federal drilling policy.

Over at the Intrade pay-to-play prediction market, the probability of an offshore drilling bill passing in 2008 is now handicapped at 50 percent, up from 25 percent only a few days ago. Clearly, investors know market prices will move well before we see actual new energy supplies from offshore drilling. The likelihood of greater energy supply will incentivize those much-vilified traders to slash barrel prices much more, bringing relief at the pump and earning the gratitude of a whole nation.

At the same time, those wrongheaded Democratic leaders, from Obama to Reid to Pelosi, will see their political fortunes plummet deep into bear-market territory.

Lawrence Kudlow is a former Reagan economic advisor, a syndicated columnist, and the host of CNBC's Kudlow & Company.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/drill_drill_drill_is_working.html

ClydeR
08-05-2008, 04:12 PM
Talking about changing the law may be more powerful than changing the law. The proof is in the pudding.


House Republicans on Tuesday said their protest of Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) decision not to allow a vote on expanded offshore oil drilling has helped lower gas prices.

More... (http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/gop-claims-house-protest-led-to-lower-prices-2008-08-05.html)

Renian
08-05-2008, 04:22 PM
The proof is in the pudding.

The pudding...OF THEIR DOOM!!!!1

Seran
08-05-2008, 09:35 PM
At this point the Republicrats are going to claim anything in order to not lose more seats in the House to hungry looking Democrats. The fact that alot of Americans see right through the illusion of opening up new unproven areas for drilling when wells in active basins are sitting idle says alot.

crb
08-06-2008, 12:22 AM
don't drink the koolaid.

I'm sure if those big bad profit hungry oil companies could get oil on all the "existing leases" Obamaphiles bandy about they would, right? Oil is not found everywhere ya know. Other things not found everywhere: gold, diamonds, uranium, copper, iron, titanium, silver, emeralds, rubies, etc. Geology is wonderful!

Parkbandit
08-06-2008, 01:01 AM
At this point the Republicrats are going to claim anything in order to not lose more seats in the House to hungry looking Democrats. The fact that alot of Americans see right through the illusion of opening up new unproven areas for drilling when wells in active basins are sitting idle says alot.


At least the Republicrats can actually claim something.. which is far more than the DonothingDumbercrats can at this point.

Back
08-06-2008, 01:06 AM
Hey, I farted last week. If you want to thank who is responsible for gas and oil prices being down you can thank me. You are welcome. From the bottom of my bowels.

Clove
08-06-2008, 07:20 AM
At this point the Republicrats are going to claim anything in order to not lose more seats in the House to hungry looking Democrats. The fact that alot of Americans see right through the illusion of opening up new unproven areas for drilling when wells in active basins are sitting idle says alot.One third to one quarter says a lot?

On the Stephanopoulos Sunday news show, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi underscored her refusal to allow a drilling vote. Asked about the Republican rebellion in the House, she said, "What you saw in the Congress this week was the war dance of the handmaidens of the oil companies." She went on to say, "We are spending all of this time on a parliamentary tactic, when nothing less is at stake than the planet, the air we breathe, our children breathe."

Oh really? Voters have a much different view. Polls suggest that two-thirds to three-quarters of the nation wants to drill. To wit, while a just-released Obama campaign ad attacks McCain as a tool of big oil, McCain has taken his first-ever lead in a Rasmussen tracking poll.

Gan
08-06-2008, 08:48 AM
Hey, I farted last week. If you want to thank who is responsible for gas and oil prices being down you can thank me. You are welcome. From the bottom of my bowels.

Al Gore will be sure to thank you for your methane contribution to our sensitive global warming... scratch that, global crisis.


+50 points if you farted in bed and pulled the covers over your head.

Gan
08-06-2008, 09:01 AM
At this point the Republicrats are going to claim anything in order to not lose more seats in the House to hungry looking Democrats. The fact that alot of Americans see right through the illusion of opening up new unproven areas for drilling when wells in active basins are sitting idle says alot.

Right, so thats why Pelosi and Obama are starting to support the measure. Because alot of Americans actually support drilling according to the article. I know I know, its not sourced - and the author was a Reaganomics advisor. Blah blah blah. However, if what he's eluding to is on the mark (seems Obama and Pelosi recognize the importance see below) - then the populist movement of opening up the drilling is accurate (due from inflationary pressure, bad economy, and already high (but falling) fuel prices) then its something that the Democrats SHOULD pay attention to - otherwise they stand to lose a lot more than what little credibility they have on the hill.



California Democrat Nancy Pelosi may be trying to save the planet — but the rank and file in her party increasingly are just trying to save their political hides when it comes to gas prices as Republicans apply more and more rhetorical muscle.

But what looks like intraparty tension on the surface is part of an intentional strategy in which Pelosi takes the heat on energy policy, while behind the scenes she’s encouraging vulnerable Democrats to express their independence if it helps them politically, according to Democratic aides on and off Capitol Hill.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12304.html




Sen. Joe Lieberman said Sunday that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama's decision to embrace limited offshore drilling was halfhearted and loaded with caveats and he predicted the senator from Illinois would find a reason to change his position again if he had to vote on the issue.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi agreed with Mr. Obama's stance that some offshore drilling could beon the table as part of a broader energy bill.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/04/lieberman-skeptical-of-obama-drilling-stance/

ClydeR
08-06-2008, 09:52 AM
Right, so thats why Pelosi and Obama are starting to support the measure. Because alot of Americans actually support drilling according to the article. I know I know, its not sourced - and the author was a Reaganomics advisor. Blah blah blah. However, if what he's eluding to is on the mark (seems Obama and Pelosi recognize the importance see below) - then the populist movement of opening up the drilling is accurate (due from inflationary pressure, bad economy, and already high (but falling) fuel prices) then its something that the Democrats SHOULD pay attention to - otherwise they stand to lose a lot more than what little credibility they have on the hill.

The question is whether it will be as important to voters in November as it is today.


Meet the Press roundtable, August 3, 2008
MR. TODD: One warning on energy. How many times, how many summers of a president--of a, of a an election year do we say, "oh, energy" because the gas price thing pops up, "energy." You know, what happens when--gas prices are going to continue to drop. We've seen--we know the price of oil has finally fallen a little bit. Gas prices are going to go down, too. And we see--to 3.40, 3.50 a gallon. And we've seen, the American public always seems to absorb it. They absorbed--we thought $3 was going to be...

MS. MITCHELL: I think this is different, though.

MR. TODD: I know we keep saying it's different.

MS. MITCHELL: I, I really do think that this is an exponential...

MR. TODD: But I'm just saying, don't be surprised if it falls...

MS. MITCHELL: There have been behavior changes. People are really using less, driving less. This has affected people's lives, people's employment who are not able to drive where they need to drive. I think this is exponential.

More... (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25992968/page/6/)

Gan
08-06-2008, 10:39 AM
The question is whether it will be as important to voters in November as it is today.

Therein lies the key, but its also dependant on several variables.

1. Democrats adopting a support for drilling position in the short term with the hopes of reversing it once they secure majority leadership and the white house in November.

2. Fuel prices remaining over $3.00 a gallon (arbitrary since some people will not feel any ease until closer to $2 a gallon).

3. The Democrats short term support of drilling will not piss off their voting constituentcy to the point of apathy and/or non-voting in November.

4. The economy remining on the forefront of voting issues come November (Clove's prediction).

I've observed over the past few election cycles (since 1988 when I was old enough to vote) that older voters tend to last for the long run and vote whereas younger voters lose interest once the passion of the moment has faded and tend not to vote (see Rock the Vote efforts, etc.). I think you know who a majority of the 'older' voters will support this November. ;)

crb
08-06-2008, 01:09 PM
gas has been stabilizing largely from what is coming out of washington. McCain started campaigning on it, it stabilized. Bush lifted the executive ban. It started dropping. Republicans in congress hammered it, it dropped more. Obama flipped, it dropped more.

If you have ever talked with a real estate investor before you'll have likely heard the phrase "Real estate is a great investment, because they're not making any more of it."

Oil for a long time has been a good investment for that reason as well. They weren't planning to ever bring on new supply, which made it a sure thing, which kept increasing the future spot price. Now with politicians making noise about bringing on new supply, the future spot price is no longer a sure thing to go up, so it has gone down, which has a retro affect on current prices.

So ya, it is working.