PDA

View Full Version : There is a first time for everything



Keller
06-26-2008, 10:19 PM
Looks like PB was right afterall:

CNN) -- Sen. Barack Obama donated $2,300 Thursday to the campaign of his former opponent, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

In addition, Obama's national finance chairman, Penny Pritzker, donated $2,300, said Terry McAuliffe, who served as Clinton's chief campaign fundraiser. The $2,300 is the maximum individual contribution allowed.
"He wrote a check himself, as well as his finance chairman, so I got two checks in my pocket for Hillary," McAuliffe said.


Asked how much the checks were for, he responded, "They maxed out."
The move comes nearly three weeks after Clinton suspended her campaign and endorsed Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
This week, Obama asked top contributors to help Clinton retire her campaign debt of $22 million, about $12 million of which she loaned to her own campaign.


The two Democrats met Thursday night in Washington with her top fundraisers.


On Friday, they are to appear together a rally in Unity, New Hampshire, a town on the state's western border where they tied in the January primary.
Clinton (http://topics.cnn.com/topics/hillary_clinton) and Obama endured a protracted and, at times, fierce primary season. After months of divisive contests that took them through every state, the two are focused on uniting their party in order to defeat the Republicans in November.


Concern about the division in the party arose because the two candidates appealed to such different segments of the electorate. Clinton did well with working-class voters and the elderly. Obama (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/candidates/barack.obama.html) rallied the support of affluent, well-educated voters, African-Americans and the younger generation. http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/tabs/video.gifWatch what Clinton and Obama hope to accomplish » (http://cnn.site.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Obama+donates+to+Clinton+campaign+-+CNN.com&expire=-1&urlID=29404806&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2008%2FPOLITICS%2F0 6%2F26%2Fclinton.obama%2Findex.html&partnerID=211911#cnnSTCVideo)

(http://cnn.site.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Obama+donates+to+Clinton+campaign+-+CNN.com&expire=-1&urlID=29404806&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2008%2FPOLITICS%2F0 6%2F26%2Fclinton.obama%2Findex.html&partnerID=211911#cnnSTCVideo)
In exit polls conducted throughout the primary season, many Clinton backers said they either would not vote or would vote for Sen. John McCain (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/candidates/john.mccain.html), the presumptive Republican candidate, should Obama become their party's nominee.


Clinton has said it would be a "grave" mistake for her supporters to cast their votes for McCain.


"Anyone who voted for me has very little in common with the Republican party. If you care about the issues I care about, and the future that I outlined during my campaign, then you really have to stay with us in the Democratic Party (http://topics.cnn.com/topics/U_S_Democratic_Party_Politics) and vote for Sen. Obama to be our next president," she said in Washington on Tuesday.


Since Clinton endorsed Obama this month, she has been urging her supporters to follow suit.


"The way to continue our fight now to accomplish the goals for which we stand is to take our energy, our passion, our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama the next president of the United States," she said as she suspended her campaign.


Obama and Clinton have appeared on good terms in recent weeks. Obama has repeatedly praised Clinton while on the trail, and this week he asked some of his top donors to help Clinton retire some of her campaign debt.
Obama has shied away from any talk of a possible joint ticket, although he's said Clinton "would be on anyone's short-list."


The senator from Illinois has made it clear, however, that he wants Clinton to help as much as she can.


"I want her campaigning as much as she can. She was a terrific campaigner. She I think inspired millions of people, and so she can be an extraordinarily effective surrogate for me, and the values and ideals that we share as Democrats," Obama said Wednesday in Chicago.


"I think we will have a terrific time together in New Hampshire. And I think that she will be very effective all the way through the election," he said.
But voters aren't quick to forget what was, at times, a contentious race for the Democratic nomination.


Clinton labeled Obama and "elitist" for saying some small-town Pennsylvanians were "bitter" people who "cling to guns and religion" in the days leading up to that state's primary.


Obama accused Clinton on Sunday of acting like "Annie Oakley ... packin' a six-shooter" in her attempts to connect with gun owners.


"They were allies before the campaign. They will be allies again. They are very -- two astute politicians, very smart individuals, and I am sure that Sen. Obama will have Sen. Clinton as a trusted adviser. Someone who can help guide him along the path as he goes forward," she said.


Ahead of their appearance Friday, Clinton and Obama planned to meet privately with donors Thursday night.

ClydeR
06-26-2008, 10:47 PM
[QUOTE=Keller;753120Obama (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/candidates/barack.obama.html) rallied the support of affluent, well-educated voters, African-Americans and the younger generation.[/QUOTE]

What an odd group. I understand why African Americans and the younger generation would be attracted to Obama. But it's hard to see what about him attracts affluent well educated voters.

crb
06-27-2008, 07:57 AM
They're all college democrats.

The liberal arts areas of almost all of our colleges are taught by very very liberal professors, and even real science majors are forced to take some liberal arts type classes to "round them out" so all get exposed to it.

Unfortunately, many college students are naive, impressionable, and driven by fads, so they become Democrats.

Of course, one of the core features of liberalism, intellectual arrogance, is also attractive for these people. They're all James Taggarts.

The good news is, once they get out in the real world and start working for a living and stop mooching off mom and dad many adopt more conservative principles, especially on economic issues. For instance, even among Democrats, especially the educated democrats, very very very few do not believe in supply side economics, free markets, or the benefits of competition fueled capitalism. So they're voting for democrats stems from the mere fact that they place less weight on economic issues than on social issues and they are like moths to a flame for almost any social cause (anything to make them feel good about themselves), so they vote for the liberal.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/165185

Warriorbird
06-27-2008, 08:03 AM
Because the Republican party is "totally conservative!"

Daniel
06-27-2008, 08:56 AM
They're all college democrats.

The liberal arts areas of almost all of our colleges are taught by very very liberal professors, and even real science majors are forced to take some liberal arts type classes to "round them out" so all get exposed to it.

Unfortunately, many college students are naive, impressionable, and driven by fads, so they become Democrats.

Of course, one of the core features of liberalism, intellectual arrogance, is also attractive for these people. They're all James Taggarts.

The good news is, once they get out in the real world and start working for a living and stop mooching off mom and dad many adopt more conservative principles, especially on economic issues. For instance, even among Democrats, especially the educated democrats, very very very few do not believe in supply side economics, free markets, or the benefits of competition fueled capitalism. So they're voting for democrats stems from the mere fact that they place less weight on economic issues than on social issues and they are like moths to a flame for almost any social cause (anything to make them feel good about themselves), so they vote for the liberal.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/165185



Lol you're a fucking retard.

ClydeR
06-27-2008, 11:03 AM
Of course, one of the core features of liberalism, intellectual arrogance, is also attractive for these people. They're all James Taggarts.

The good news is, once they get out in the real world and start working for a living and stop mooching off mom and dad many adopt more conservative principles, especially on economic issues. For instance, even among Democrats, especially the educated democrats, very very very few do not believe in supply side economics, free markets, or the benefits of competition fueled capitalism. So they're voting for democrats stems from the mere fact that they place less weight on economic issues than on social issues and they are like moths to a flame for almost any social cause (anything to make them feel good about themselves), so they vote for the liberal.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/165185

I supplement your southpark link with this one http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/150385

TheEschaton
06-27-2008, 01:35 PM
Funny, my dad's a democrat and he's A) into his 50s, and B) is an i-banker, and has been for over 2 decades. He doesn't even believe in trickle down 'voodoo' economics.

Although I guess I should trust crb who knows my dad's a republican. Crb has shown such rational thinking in the past, including how he handles change to his online gaming.

crb
06-27-2008, 03:11 PM
Funny, my dad's a democrat and he's A) into his 50s, and B) is an i-banker, and has been for over 2 decades. He doesn't even believe in trickle down 'voodoo' economics.

Although I guess I should trust crb who knows my dad's a republican. Crb has shown such rational thinking in the past, including how he handles change to his online gaming.
I try not to speak in absolutes.

You'll never have found any post of mine saying your Dad was a republican, if you can find such a post, please, quote it.

If capitalism is voodoo and doesn't work, well... why the fuck aren't we speaking Russian?

Stanley Burrell
06-27-2008, 03:14 PM
With that kind of money, you could buy the Supreme Court.

/Scarface

TheEschaton
06-27-2008, 03:26 PM
Because the Russians turned socialism into an autocractic dictatorship. Before you say it, no, the former does not necessarily lead to the latter.

Stanley Burrell
06-27-2008, 03:27 PM
Because the Russians turned socialism into an autocractic dictatorship. Before you say it, no, the former does not necessarily lead to the latter.

Goddamn Australian commies.

Keller
06-27-2008, 05:38 PM
I try not to speak in absolutes.

Try harder.

Warriorbird
06-27-2008, 05:40 PM
The problem with communism is that greed was eternal.

This also can be a problem with capitalism. Republicans deify greed.

sst
06-27-2008, 06:27 PM
but greed is what makes capitalism work.

Parkbandit
06-27-2008, 06:28 PM
but greed is what makes capitalism work.

And what makes socialism not work.

sst
06-27-2008, 06:31 PM
lazyness

longshot
06-28-2008, 05:04 AM
Funny, my dad's a democrat and he's A) into his 50s, and B) is an i-banker, and has been for over 2 decades. He doesn't even believe in trickle down 'voodoo' economics.


Income isn't always a great indicator of political affiliation.

In the situation you described, it's perfectly reasonable for a wealthy person to be idealistic. They can even have enough wealth to allow their children to take on no responsibilities in life...

TheEschaton
06-28-2008, 10:32 AM
And yet some of those kids end up taking on responsibilities anyways, and avoid being pretentious douchebags, something you've clearly failed at.

Gan
06-28-2008, 01:14 PM
And yet some of those kids end up taking on responsibilities anyways, and avoid being pretentious douchebags, something you've clearly failed at.

pot meet kettle?

(actually longshot would hardly be an example of what you're attempting to allege, but we already know you have a hypocritical streak running big and yellow down your backside)

longshot
06-28-2008, 04:41 PM
And yet some of those kids end up taking on responsibilities anyways, and avoid being pretentious douchebags, something you've clearly failed at.

I have to take a few cheap shots at the Peace Core kid... sorry.

TheEschaton
06-28-2008, 06:43 PM
It would help if you could spell 'Corps' correctly, first. Secondly, supposedly pretentious kids such as myself don't usually work as an HIV/AIDS organizer in the PC - they usually teach, hug kids, and travel half their time. I spent two weeks travelling through SA to Mozambique to visit one of my closest friends who was in the PC there. I also took 4 days to go to Jo'burg to take the LSAT. 18 days in two years - that's less vacation than anyone here gets - where I didn't have to think about the fact that 1 in 4 of the people I worked with was going to die of an incurable disease. Or have to go to a funeral - I went to about 3-5 of those a week.

Unless you want to count the week I had off due to the fact that I was hospitalized for acute respitory pneumonia and a 104 degree fever. That'd make 25 days.