PDA

View Full Version : Caroline Kennedy: 'A President Like My Father'



Davenshire
01-27-2008, 12:15 AM
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/CGxT5


Caroline Kennedy endorses Barack Obama for President in the New York Times...


A President Like My Father
By CAROLINE KENNEDY



OVER the years, I’ve been deeply moved by the people who’ve told me they wished they could feel inspired and hopeful about America the way people did when my father was president. This sense is even more profound today. That is why I am supporting a presidential candidate in the Democratic primaries, Barack Obama.

My reasons are patriotic, political and personal, and the three are intertwined. All my life, people have told me that my father changed their lives, that they got involved in public service or politics because he asked them to. And the generation he inspired has passed that spirit on to its children. I meet young people who were born long after John F. Kennedy was president, yet who ask me how to live out his ideals.

Sometimes it takes a while to recognize that someone has a special ability to get us to believe in ourselves, to tie that belief to our highest ideals and imagine that together we can do great things. In those rare moments, when such a person comes along, we need to put aside our plans and reach for what we know is possible.

We have that kind of opportunity with Senator Obama. It isn’t that the other candidates are not experienced or knowledgeable. But this year, that may not be enough. We need a change in the leadership of this country — just as we did in 1960.

Most of us would prefer to base our voting decision on policy differences. However, the candidates’ goals are similar. They have all laid out detailed plans on everything from strengthening our middle class to investing in early childhood education. So qualities of leadership, character and judgment play a larger role than usual.

Senator Obama has demonstrated these qualities throughout his more than two decades of public service, not just in the United States Senate but in Illinois, where he helped turn around struggling communities, taught constitutional law and was an elected state official for eight years. And Senator Obama is showing the same qualities today. He has built a movement that is changing the face of politics in this country, and he has demonstrated a special gift for inspiring young people — known for a willingness to volunteer, but an aversion to politics — to become engaged in the political process.

I have spent the past five years working in the New York City public schools and have three teenage children of my own. There is a generation coming of age that is hopeful, hard-working, innovative and imaginative. But too many of them are also hopeless, defeated and disengaged. As parents, we have a responsibility to help our children to believe in themselves and in their power to shape their future. Senator Obama is inspiring my children, my parents’ grandchildren, with that sense of possibility.

Senator Obama is running a dignified and honest campaign. He has spoken eloquently about the role of faith in his life, and opened a window into his character in two compelling books. And when it comes to judgment, Barack Obama made the right call on the most important issue of our time by opposing the war in Iraq from the beginning.

I want a president who understands that his responsibility is to articulate a vision and encourage others to achieve it; who holds himself, and those around him, to the highest ethical standards; who appeals to the hopes of those who still believe in the American Dream, and those around the world who still believe in the American ideal; and who can lift our spirits, and make us believe again that our country needs every one of us to get involved.

I have never had a president who inspired me the way people tell me that my father inspired them. But for the first time, I believe I have found the man who could be that president — not just for me, but for a new generation of Americans.

LMingrone
01-27-2008, 01:08 AM
I've always thought he spoke like JFK, but still think that's just his schtick. He's just another actor. At least he's young and probably has less debts to pay to his elders.

I just wish there was a candidate that made you say "That's my President." Sadly, I'm only 25 and have never experienced that.

Drew
01-27-2008, 01:12 AM
I just wish there was a candidate that made you say "That's my President." Sadly, I'm only 25 and have never experienced that.


You were alive during Reagan.

LMingrone
01-27-2008, 01:53 AM
You were alive during Reagan.

Sarcasm? I'm drunk and I can't tell.

TheEschaton
01-27-2008, 02:10 AM
Reagan was one of the worst presidents ever, tyvm.

Latrinsorm
01-27-2008, 09:22 AM
The point isn't policy, as both Reagan and Kennedy have huge blemishes there. The point is inspiration, and it is inarguable whether Reagan or Kennedy receive the highest marks there. I don't hesitate to put Obama in the same category (though of course he'd have to be President to have the same kind of impact).

Gan
01-27-2008, 10:08 AM
Reagan was one of the worst presidents ever, tyvm.

Yes, we're well aware of your extreme leftist socialist opinion. TYVM

Latrinsorm
01-27-2008, 10:19 AM
In the vein of Obama as a uniter, the exit poll demographics:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#SCDEM

Obama as inspirer:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/26/obama.transcript/index.html

I mean, come on.

Gan
01-27-2008, 10:33 AM
It makes me sad that even despite best intentions, it appears that voting based purely on race or gender will be very prominent in this election rather than on where each candidate stands on the issues. Of course, a few candidates choose to stand pretty close to the same spot on a majority of their issues as it is - so I guess race and or gender is the only thing left to vote on.

:(

Latrinsorm
01-27-2008, 11:21 AM
That's why I was so pleased Obama won the female vote resoundingly in SC. I think people are wising up to Clinton's strategy of divisiveness and not wanting any part of it.

It is troubling (but let's be honest, not in the least surprising) that the older white people get in SC, the less they support Obama, but I don't expect that sentiment will extend across the nation (or at least not so dramatically).

Clove
01-27-2008, 11:22 AM
It makes me sad that even despite best intentions, it appears that voting based purely on race or gender will be very prominent in this election rather than on where each candidate stands on the issues. Of course, a few candidates choose to stand pretty close to the same spot on a majority of their issues as it is - so I guess race and or gender is the only thing left to vote on.

:(

I think I'll vote race. Maybe we can select a breed of super-politicians.

Keller
01-27-2008, 02:33 PM
It makes me sad that even despite best intentions, it appears that voting based purely on race or gender will be very prominent in this election rather than on where each candidate stands on the issues. Of course, a few candidates choose to stand pretty close to the same spot on a majority of their issues as it is - so I guess race and or gender is the only thing left to vote on.

:(

I was over at Lyonis' on Thursday and we were chatting about the primaries. He had a pretty good point that I would like to share here.

You may think it's revolutionary to elect a woman or a black, but electing a third party candidate would be even more revolutionary than electing either Hillary or Obama.

So if anyone is planning on going into the election voting with the intention of turning traditional American politics on its head, maybe you should consider the rich white man instead of the woman or black man.

Stanley Burrell
01-27-2008, 02:59 PM
I was over at Lyonis' on Thursday and we were chatting about the primaries. He had a pretty good point that I would like to share here.

You may think it's revolutionary to elect a woman or a black, but electing a third party candidate would be even more revolutionary than electing either Hillary or Obama.

So if anyone is planning on going into the election voting with the intention of turning traditional American politics on its head, maybe you should consider the rich white man instead of the woman or black man.

Small steps.

Latrinsorm
01-27-2008, 03:48 PM
I was over at Lyonis' on Thursday and we were chatting about the primaries. He had a pretty good point that I would like to share here.

You may think it's revolutionary to elect a woman or a black, but electing a third party candidate would be even more revolutionary than electing either Hillary or Obama.

So if anyone is planning on going into the election voting with the intention of turning traditional American politics on its head, maybe you should consider the rich white man instead of the woman or black man.Strom Thurmond (a third-party candidate) received more electoral votes than every woman and black man in history put together. It's patently ridiculous to claim that electing a white guy with a letter not R or D after his name is anywhere close.

Keller
01-27-2008, 03:51 PM
Strom Thurmond (a third-party candidate) received more electoral votes than every woman and black man in history put together. It's patently ridiculous to claim that electing a white guy with a letter not R or D after his name is anywhere close.

What American politics needs is less patent ideological conformity. A third party would allow people to break out of the "I'm a republican so I believe blah blah blah" or "I'm a democrat, so I believe blah blah blah" rut. We need more people who think for themselves.

Latrinsorm
01-27-2008, 03:56 PM
People are allowed to do that already.

Hulkein
01-27-2008, 04:14 PM
How about 'a third party would help people break out of the...'

No need for the semantics when you know what his point is.

Keller
01-27-2008, 04:23 PM
People are allowed to do that already.

But they don't. People treat elections like sporting events.

Did anyone see Jon Stewart analogy of the media to Don King on, I think, Wednesday's A Daily Show?

Latrinsorm
01-27-2008, 05:56 PM
It has nothing to do with semantics. People change parties if they really want to, look at the no longer Solid South. Third parties have nothing to do with anything. The only thing a plurality of candidates does is allow for unrepresentative dark horses.

Latrinsorm
01-27-2008, 05:59 PM
And to add to that, why don't people change? Because of the perception that all politicians are more or less the same. How do we change that perception?

How about a fresh-faced (relatively speaking) political newcomer who is demonstrably different from his peers?

TheEschaton
01-27-2008, 06:50 PM
I was watching this interview with voters, where they all blatantly said "I voted for the person I like the most."

It makes policy wonks like myself sad in the pants. :(

-TheE-