Obama chides Clinton for playing gender card

[875000]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrat Barack Obama, the only black candidate for president, accused rival Hillary Clinton on Friday of hiding behind her gender after she was pummeled in a debate with six male candidates.

"I am assuming and I hope that Sen. Clinton wants to be treated like everybody else," the Illinois senator said in an interview with NBC's "Today Show."

"When we had a debate back in Iowa awhile back, we spent I think the first 15 minutes of the debate hitting me on various foreign policy issues. And I didn't come out and say: 'Look, I'm being hit on because I look different from the rest of the folks on the stage'," he said.

"I assumed it was because there were real policy differences there, and I think that has to be the attitude that all of us take. We're not running for the president of the city council. We're running for the presidency of the United States."

He was speaking a day after New York Sen. Clinton -- the only woman running for president -- urged women voters to rally behind her against "the boys club of presidential politics."

Obama and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, who are both trailing Clinton in polls by a wide margin, attacked the former first lady's honesty, leadership and ability to win the November 2008 election in a Tuesday night debate.

Obama noted on Friday that Clinton is widely viewed as a tough figure in national politics.

"So it doesn't make sense for her, after having run that way for eight months, the first time that people start challenging her point of view, that suddenly she backs off and says: 'Don't pick on me'," he said.

"That is not obviously how we would expect her to operate if she were president."

http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSN0254101120071102

[CrystalTears]

Obama needs to just shut up, FFS. I mean she's no prize and don't really like her, but he's really not helping anything.

[Gan]

ROFL

She's a crafty one.

She must be wearing her winged boots of frustror (+100 DEX political).

[TheEschaton]

He was speaking a day after New York Sen. Clinton -- the only woman running for president -- urged women voters to rally behind her against "the boys club of presidential politics."

I was at this speech. In fact, I was on the stage behind Hillary while she spoke at Wellesley. There's even some pictures of me behind her, though they're not flattering so I won't post them. ;)

And this seems to be a direct manipulation of what she said. The address was literally given to Wellesley students...an all female body. I was only there because the campaign people wanted guys in the stage backdrop to een it out. And she thanked the college for giving her the ability to "be a strong woman in the all boys club of presidential politics." She wasn't hiding behind her femaleness at all.

Silly politicians.

-TheE-

[Gan]

I was at this speech. In fact, I was on the stage behind Hillary while she spoke at Wellesley. There's even some pictures of me behind her, though they're not flattering so I won't post them. ;)

And this seems to be a direct manipulation of what she said. The address was literally given to Wellesley students...an all female body. I was only there because the campaign people wanted guys in the stage backdrop to een it out. And she thanked the college for giving her the ability to "be a strong woman in the all boys club of presidential politics." She wasn't hiding behind her femaleness at all.

Silly politicians.

-TheE-

Sounds like you're doing some manipulation as well. ;)



The New York Times reported that Clinton's campaign officials tried to create sympathy for Hillary the same way they did when Republican Rick Lazio confronted her during their 2000 Senate race.

A Clinton adviser told the Washington Post that, "Ultimately, it was six guys against her, and she came off as one strong woman." A headline on the Drudge Report said: "Scorn: As the Men Gang Up."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/02/EDR2T4OO8.DTL

[Some Rogue]

Hiding behind? Maybe not. Basically saying, vote for me because I'm the only woman running, I'd say so.


And weren't you one of those people who criticized Bush for only allowing certain people into his speeches? And there you are particpating in a speech where they only put you up there so they could even out the crowd and make it look like more men were there?

[Parkbandit]

I actually agree with Obama. Once again, she's trying to play both sides of the fense.

Look at me, I'm tough enough to go up against Bush and the Republicans. You should elect me!

Whoa is me, I'm just a frail little girl against all these men. You should elect me!

[Parkbandit]

Hiding behind? Maybe not. Basically saying, vote for me because I'm the only woman running, I'd say so.


And weren't you one of those people who criticized Bush for only allowing certain people into his speeches? And there you are particpating in a speech where they only put you up there so they could even out the crowd and make it look like more men were there?


Men?

:rofl:

[Alfster]

I was only there because the campaign people wanted guys in the stage backdrop to een it out.
-TheE-

And this is why I hate politicians

[CrystalTears]

I don't see Hillary using the gender card any different than someone else using the race card, or someone like Bush using the religious card. People use the tactics they have to get the votes, not sure what the big deal is with that.

What I didn't appreciate was Obama criticizing one of his own. I realize it's even more politics, but seeing as how IMO he doesn't have a snowball chance in hell to get nominated, he shouldn't be shooting down others who have a shot either, even if it IS Hillary.

[TheEschaton]

I don't think she played any sort of card. She was simply saying that a Wellesley education prepared her for the male-dominated field of politics, by empowering her. The whole theme of the event could be summed up by the idea that anyone could be President.

And I criticized Bush for not letting anyone into the speech in general. I would fully expect him (and any politician) to have the people ON THE STAGE, PROVIDING THE BACK DROP to their speech, to be carefully orchastrated.

-TheE-

[875000]

I don't see Hillary using the gender card any different than someone else using the race card, or someone like Bush using the religious card. People use the tactics they have to get the votes, not sure what the big deal is with that.

Eh. Not certain I agree with this. In all three cases, I think it has a corrosive effect on the political process.

It tends to make people become disaffected, which depresses participation in the political process.

The ones that remain are more likely to make decisions on a more visceral -- as opposed to rational -- basis.

Plus, there is a double standard in play. If someone runs a campaign centered around the concept of "You can't criticize me -- I am a white male!" they would be justifiably criticized.



What I didn't appreciate was Obama criticizing one of his own. I realize it's even more politics, but seeing as how IMO he doesn't have a snowball chance in hell to get nominated, he shouldn't be shooting down others who have a shot either, even if it IS Hillary.

Again, I disagree. Politics is supposed to be a marketplace for ideas, with votes being the ultimate currency. People should be allowed to voice their disagreements. Remove that ability and we step close to the Soviet style politburo, where we are just expected to pull the lever for a candidate chosen by some backroom committee.

The reality is, he -- and others like him -- don't stand a chance unless they do something like this. Political parties want to annoint a standard bearer and discourage competition.

[Tsa`ah]

Obama needs to just shut up, FFS. I mean she's no prize and don't really like her, but he's really not helping anything.

Are you fucking kidding me? Have you been intentionally drinking leaded water these last few months?

Clinton is ahead because no one running against her has bothered to call her on her flip flips from one debate to the next. No one has bothered to call her on the whole "we both have vaginas ... you should vote for me". No one has bothered to call her on her White House experience.

The numbers show it has taken it's toll.

In this debate they were calling her left and right. They pointed out her voting record vs her campaigning rhetoric. They pointed out her "pulling a Bush" when she tried to claim The Clinton Library Archives pose a difficulty in her ability to release documents relevant to her experience as first lady.

She was trounced like any other politician running for office.

This is nothing like being questioned by the media over a pin, or a snapshot of not covering the left side of your chest with your right hand and some bullshit story attached to it.

How about you specifically say what he should shut the fuck up about. You're essentially saying he should just drop out of the race.

Iowa is around the corner. 4 years ago Dean had this Clinton like lead and Kerry was trailing so far being (further than Obama) it really didn't make sense for him to stay in the race. Iowa changed that. This is exactly why Edwards and Obama have taken the kid gloves off. They have months and months of ammo to use and they're unloading it now.

[CrystalTears]

Are you fucking kidding me? Have you been intentionally drinking leaded water these last few months?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v412/Jemah/smilies/cheer.gifIt's a shame you haven't been doing it more.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v412/Jemah/smilies/cheer.gif

I honestly don't really like any candidates running right now, on either side. I'm rather over it with their tactics and bullshit ploys to get elected.

[Krendeli]

What I didn't appreciate was Obama criticizing one of his own. I realize it's even more politics, but seeing as how IMO he doesn't have a snowball chance in hell to get nominated, he shouldn't be shooting down others who have a shot either, even if it IS Hillary.

You must be a republican. Any democrat other than Hillary will win the White House regardless of who the republicans put forward.

[Tsa`ah]

I honestly don't really like any candidates running right now, on either side. I'm rather over it with their tactics and bullshit ploys to get elected.

What tactics are those? Forcing another candidate to explain the double talk? Calling another candidate on their pandering based on gender or race?

In case you haven't noticed ... Obama isn't pandering the black vote. The only people that are taking notice of his race and name are the GOP and the media.

[TheEschaton]

In case you haven't noticed ... Clinton isn't pandering the female vote. The only people that are taking notice of her gender and name are the GOP and the media.

Fixed for you.

-TheE-

[Tsa`ah]

When she makes use of the rhetoric .... she is pandering.

[Gan]

You must be a republican. Any democrat other than Hillary will win the White House regardless of who the republicans put forward.

Speaking of drinking leaded water...

[Sean of the Thread]

This election is shaping up to be a real fucking HOOT.

[Parkbandit]

You must be a republican. Any democrat other than Hillary will win the White House regardless of who the republicans put forward.

You must be retarded. Obama is a political retard.. and Edwards is a greasy lawyer with nice hair. They can't even come close to knocking off Clinton, who has huge numbers of people who say they would never vote for her. They haven't the organization or message to defeat Clinton, let alone anyone else.

Or were you talking about Richardson? Maybe Dodd?

[Parkbandit]

What tactics are those? Forcing another candidate to explain the double talk? Calling another candidate on their pandering based on gender or race?

In case you haven't noticed ... Obama isn't pandering the black vote. The only people that are taking notice of his race and name are the GOP and the media.

Untrue. He has pandered the black vote from day one.. it was the 'real' black members of the party who are not sure he is 'black enough' to gain their support. Obama wasn't 'there' like Jackson and Sharpton..

And I laugh at you even more, trying to infer the media is somehow GOP biased. Talk about a reality check.

[Keller]

Untrue. He has pandered the black vote from day one.. it was the 'real' black members of the party who are not sure he is 'black enough' to gain their support. Obama wasn't 'there' like Jackson and Sharpton..

And I laugh at you even more, trying to infer the media is somehow GOP biased. Talk about a reality check.

First, it's obvious the media has a GOP bias.

Second, the media has made a huge deal of her vagina, which was his point.

[Some Rogue]

Second, the media has made a huge deal of her vagina, which was his point.

When someone holds up a huge sign and points to it all the time, it's hard not to notice.

[Some Rogue]

Wait a minute, when did Hilary get a vagina? I thought we were talking about Chelsea.

[Savageheart]

'The Media' certainly isn't GOP biased by any far stretch unless you're calling Faux News or O'Reily 'The Media' The media is politically biased and will sell slander on both sides of the street as long as it drives revenue.

There has been more Clinton coverage because she is the frontrunner. If it were Mr 9/11 who lead the poles then guess who's coming to dinner?

Yes, the Dem race is going to be highly published because it is going to get the dirtiest. Didn't anybody else wonder how it had stayed so civil so long? You save your ammo until the primaries and unload, that is when the front runner is most disadvantaged and least prepared.

Same thing is happening to Julie Boy on the GOP side, it will probably stay a little quieter because the dems will sell more copy and add space.

Fortunately for his competition the man has a lot of easily impugned characteristics. While he is appealing to most centrists who vote and pay very little attention to party politics, he's practically radioactive.

If he makes it through the primaries I will be thrilled, I personally think that he's the only candidate that Hillary can be elected against. Not that I want her too win but I'll take it against anyone who's answer is 'I don't know' or 'I(u)D is a theory too" when talking about evolution.

Let me be frank I don't care if you believe the magic sky wizard created the world and Jesus rode dinosaurs, homosexuality is a sin against nature and 'Merica' is God's own personal blessed country. Have at it, personally when I'm feeling a little 'wild' I like to put on some Stones and cook naked. Really it's your world what ever gets your goat provided it's not harmful to others, your freedoms stop where your fist ends and my nose begins. I digress... point is you don't get to lead the United States or set educational curriculum standards if you ascribe to any of the above, not yours! As a consolation prize we will give you the states of Wyoming and New Jersey, also we’ll see about expanding the NASCAR circuit to 4 nights a week.

As to Obama being a political retard, I don't really know what you're basing that off of but I'd love to respond if you have an idea where you're going with that one.

Kerry lost the Election, Bush did not win it. Gore on the other hand at least won the popular vote... Not counting dead people in Florida and Diebold voting machines of course.

[oldanforgotten]

Eh, I?m not a Hillary Fan at all. If I was a lawyer, and I billed my company 300 hours on a case my husband may have gotten indicted regarding, I wouldn?t just forget the details in court (whitewater).

I don?t agree with a lot of what Obama is saying, but I admire the enthusiasm and the fact that I honestly believe he cares. I don?t have the same faith in Hillary at all.
Giuliani is a solid leader for NYC, but I think at times he is too much of a pitbull for the international community, and his social views are a lot more acceptable for me than Bush. If I had to pick a leader for domestic affairs only, as much as I tend to not vote Republican, I?d vote for him. Romney is a straight out business guy, I think a better overall candidate, but he doesn?t have the name recognition yet.

I would vote for just about anyone before I vote for Hillary, even if that meant voting Republican. But I?d vote for Hillary before I?d vote for Bush. I?ll take a gender pandering slimeball and lying weasel over a right wing religious idiot any day of the week.

But there is no question Hillary is a vote panderer. When running for Senate in New York, all of a sudden she was a Yankees and Mets fan. Now she?s trying to sway women, the same way Obama doesn?t pander for the black vote. I?m honestly surprised that after the Kerry fiasco with the flip flop label, they aren?t using the same thing for Hillary. She?d sell her mother for a few votes, and I heard she?s going to dye her face black at the African American rallies and get them to vote for the ?real? African American in the race.

Everything and anything you ever need to know about Hillary was contained in her authorization of a press ?leak? from her campaign team that Obama?s middle name was Osama, and that he was taught as a 5 year old in a school that taught Islam. Not a good person at all. But the lawyers love her.
________
Silver Surfer Reviews (http://vaporizer.org/reviews/silver-surfer)

[Keller]

'The Media' certainly isn't GOP biased by any far stretch.

You're wrong.

See, I R debating politics!

[Jesuit]

You're wrong.

See, I R debating politics!


Even Harvard Finds The Media Biased
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:30 PM PT

Journalism: The debate is over. A consensus has been reached. On global warming? No, on how Democrats are favored on television, radio and in the newspapers.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related Topics: Media & Culture


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Just like so many reports before it, a joint survey by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and Harvard's Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy — hardly a bastion of conservative orthodoxy — found that in covering the current presidential race, the media are sympathetic to Democrats and hostile to Republicans.

Democrats are not only favored in the tone of the coverage. They get more coverage period. This is particularly evident on morning news shows, which "produced almost twice as many stories (51% to 27%) focused on Democratic candidates than on Republicans."

The most flagrant bias, however, was found in newspapers. In reviewing front-page coverage in 11 newspapers, the study found the tone positive in nearly six times as many stories about Democrats as it was negative.

Breaking it down by candidates, the survey found that Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were the favorites. "Obama's front page coverage was 70% positive and 9% negative, and Clinton's was similarly 61% positive and 13% negative."

In stories about Republicans, on the other hand, the tone was positive in only a quarter of the stories; in four in 10 it was negative.

The study also discovered that newspaper stories "tended to be focused more on political matters and less on issues and ideas than the media overall. In all, 71% of newspaper stories concentrated on the 'game,' compared with 63% overall."

Television has a similar problem. Only 10% of TV stories were focused on issues, and here, too, Democrats get the better of it.

Reviewing 154 stories on evening network newscasts over the course of 109 weeknights, the survey found that Democrats were presented in a positive light more than twice as often as they were portrayed as negative. Positive tones for Republicans were detected in less than a fifth of stories while a negative tone was twice as common.

The gap between Democrats and Republicans narrows on cable TV, but it's there nonetheless. Stories about Democrats were positive in more than a third of the cases, while Republicans were portrayed favorably in fewer than 29%. Republican led in unfriendly stories 30.4% to 25.5%.

CNN was the most hostile toward Republicans, MSNBC, surprisingly, the most positive. MSNBC was also the most favorable toward Democrats (47.2%), Fox (36.8%) the most critical.

The anti-GOP attitude also lives on National Public Radio's "Morning Edition." There, Democrats were approvingly covered more than a third as often as Republicans. Negative coverage of Democrats was a negligible 5.9%. It seemed to be reserved for Republicans, who were subject to one-fifth of the program's disparaging reports.

Even talk radio, generally considered a bastion of conservatism, has been relatively rough on the GOP. On conservative shows, Obama got more favorable treatment (27.8%) than Rudy Giuliani (25%). Sen. John McCain got a 50% favorability rating while Mitt Romney led the three GOP candidates with 66.7%.

The PEG-Shorenstein effort is only the latest to conclude that the mainstream media tilt left. Others include Stanley Rothman and Robert Lichter's groundbreaking 1986 book "The Media Elite"; "A Measure of Media Bias," a 2005 paper written by professors from UCLA and the University of Missouri; and Bernard Goldberg's two books, "Bias" and "Arrogance." All underscore the media's leftward leanings.

The media, of course, insist they are careful to keep personal opinions out of their coverage. But the facts tell another story — one that can't be edited or spiked.



http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=278808786575124

[radamanthys]

Wait a minute, hold up here. Lemme get this straight...

Hillary is a woman?

[875000]

Wait a minute, hold up here. Lemme get this straight...

Hillary is a woman?

Source, please.

[radamanthys]

She said it herself!

[Keller]

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=278808786575124

Harvard, a bastion of conservative-rhetoric, is obviously just looking out for its own.

I'll need a less biased source.

This r fun!

[Keller]

She said it herself!

I bet she was lying. Hillary will say anything to get a vote.

[Jesuit]

Harvard, a bastion of conservative-rhetoric, is obviously just looking out for its own.

I'll need a less biased source.

This r fun!

And I'll need a source that says Harvard is conservative.

[radamanthys]

http://suitablyflip.blogs.com/suitably_flip/2007/07/bill-clinton-hi.html

But we all know Bill's reputation for honesty. His "I don't thinks" were all actually true as per the lewinsky incident. Hmm..

[Some Rogue]

Why doesn't Hillary wear mini-skirts?















































Because her balls would show.

[Gan]

ROFL at the media having a conservative bias.

:lol:

[Parkbandit]

First, it's obvious the media has a GOP bias.

Second, the media has made a huge deal of her vagina, which was his point.


LOL... when does your wife come home.. because it's clear you are drinking yourself retarded.

[Parkbandit]

And I'll need a source that says Harvard is conservative.


Well, if you use his logic.. if the media is GOP biased.. then obviously all higher learning centers are as well.

[Sean of the Thread]

No comment.

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b236/Japgross/YUMMMM.jpg

[Keller]

And I'll need a source that says Harvard is conservative.

Right, as if the conservative media is going to report on how conservative Harvard is!

:rofl:!!

The media portray's itself as liberal in order to fool weak-minded people, like you, into believing it's a leftist institution. They would never "out" their most productive breeding ground for young conservatives. They've obviously duped everyone but me into believing that not only is Harvard a liberal institution, but they are as well.

How does it feel to be irrevocably naive?

[Gan]

Right, as if the conservative media is going to report on how conservative Harvard is!

:rofl:!!

The media portray's itself as liberal in order to fool weak-minded people, like you, into believing it's a leftist institution. They would never "out" their most productive breeding ground for young conservatives. They've obviously duped everyone but me into believing that not only is Harvard a liberal institution, but they are as well.

How does it feel to be irrevocably naive?

...

http://www.sexhamster.com/weblog/macropics/tinfoil-hat.jpg

[Keller]

...

http://www.sexhamster.com/weblog/macropics/tinfoil-hat.jpg

Sadly, you've been duped, Gan.

I'll pray for you.

[Parkbandit]

Right, as if the conservative media is going to report on how conservative Harvard is!

:rofl:!!

The media portray's itself as liberal in order to fool weak-minded people, like you, into believing it's a leftist institution. They would never "out" their most productive breeding ground for young conservatives. They've obviously duped everyone but me into believing that not only is Harvard a liberal institution, but they are as well.

How does it feel to be irrevocably naive?

Unfortunately, you have no facts to back you up on it.. just you spouting your stupidity.

I expect this from Backlash (chillmonster) or even TheE... not from you.

It's sad what you've become here.

[Gan]

Sadly, you've been duped, Gan.

I'll pray for you.

:lol:

Does that mean I R saved? :help:

[Keller]

Unfortunately, you have no facts to back you up on it.. just you spouting your stupidity.

I expect this from Backlash (chillmonster) or even TheE... not from you.

It's sad what you've become here.

What I've become?

I'm the only person who actually knows the truth. I come here and try to share it with you and this is the thanks I get?

Your mother would be dissapointed.

[Keller]

:lol:

Does that mean I R saved? :help:

Repent and recognize Jesus as your lord and savior. Perhaps then you'll become enlightened, like me.

Until then, I'll keep praying for you, buddy.

[Gan]

Repent and recognize Jesus as your lord and savior. Perhaps then you'll become enlightened, like me.

Until then, I'll keep praying for you, buddy.

Thanks for the chuckle brother Keller.

[Keller]

Look, let's get back to the debate here . . .



I'm right. You're wrong.

[Gan]

I'm right. You're wrong.

source plz.

:whistle:

[Keller]

source plz.

:whistle:

I'm going to pretend you didn't request a source and just remind you how I am right.

Sources are for people who care about facts and accuracy.

All I care about is being right. Which I am. And I guess that makes you wrong.

[Sean of the Thread]

I think my photo summed it up.

[Parkbandit]

Keller's snapped. I knew it would happen sooner or later.

I'm sure this will follow with a /gquit in WoW any moment now...

[Sean of the Thread]

LAW SKOOL = PREZZURE

[Tsa`ah]

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b236/Japgross/YUMMMM.jpg

You forgot to caption it.

It should read "Ooooo you got a fat ass."

[Sean of the Thread]

I think it's called "badonky donk"

[Warriorbird]

Harvard's student body is more conservative than their professors. I'm not sure that's saying too much, however.

[Parkbandit]

Harvard's student body is more conservative than their professors. I'm not sure that's saying too much, however.

It is because you say so? Which year are you specifically referring to.. since the student body changes every year.

[Parkbandit]

source plz.

:whistle:

Please don't take ES's only contribution away from her.

Thanks.

[Warriorbird]

I'm sorry, Parkbandit. With a little talent you can find my source.

:)

[Some Rogue]

I'm sorry, Parkbandit. With a little talent you can find my source.

:)


No one wants to touch your ass.

[Warriorbird]

I'm sorry that he's old and Internet disabled...but you can make up for it by blowing me.

:)

[Keller]

Keller's snapped. I knew it would happen sooner or later.

I'm sure this will follow with a /gquit in WoW any moment now...

Snapped? No, I r debaiting politiks, PC style.

[Parkbandit]

No one wants to touch your ass.

Exactly.

Dear Warriorbird:

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e6/belike53/head_up_your_ass2.jpg

[Gan]

Snapped? No, I r debaiting politiks, PC style.

No, you're debating politics Backlash/TheE style...

Time for you to go sit back down. ;)


Aside from Backlash's comment about how this is not special treatment but instead comports with the coverage given to other candidates announcements, did it ever occur to you that news corporations are run for profit? They report what people read. If it's got a liberal bias it's because there is a market for liberal news. If it's got a conservative bias, it's because there is a market for a conservative bias. Statements such as the above raise your lunacy rating from Backlash levels to Warclaidhm levels.


First, it's obvious the media has a GOP bias.

[Parkbandit]

No, you're debating politics Backlash/TheE style...

Time for you to go sit back down. ;)

Did Keller just call himself Warclaidhm?

Selfpwned ftw

[Clove]

No, you're debating politics Backlash/TheE style...

Time for you to go sit back down. ;)

Give him a break, he's been in France.

[Warriorbird]

I'm sorry Parkbandit. At the least I seem well dressed and professional. People not playing your game bothering you that much?

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2185/1843952852_b07d7888d2_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2013/1592959098_819d95bab2_o.jpg

[Parkbandit]

I'm sorry Parkbandit. At the least I seem well dressed and professional. People not playing your game bothering you that much?


I'm never bothered by a forum on the internet chump.. stop projecting. I find you a joke.. and as such treat you as one.

I'm sorry I make you cry.

:(

[Keller]

No, you're debating politics Backlash/TheE style...

Time for you to go sit back down. ;)

You're a retard if you think that. You're obviously wrong. I just can't even explain how wrong you are.

And because you're wrong, I am right.

God, this is fun!

[Parkbandit]

It's sad what you've become Rasputen. Even though your political beliefs were retarded in my opinion, they were based upon some sort of 'facts' as you see them. Now you are just being a dumbfucking troll with nothing better to do and nothing to add.

Best part though, was your admission that you are indeed a Warclaidhm.

[TheEschaton]

This is like, the ultimate in meta-humor.

[ElanthianSiren]

It's sad what you've become Rasputen. Now you are just being a dumbfucking troll with nothing better to do and nothing to add.

Best part though, was your admission that you are indeed a Warclaidhm.

Very rich coming from you. What did you add with that statement again?

I'm amused and slightly appauled however that you think of me even when I'm not involved in the thread. Way to let someone live in your mind :clap:

Now, go play with the other kindergarteners, who cry when someone uses their game (better than they do).

Hell, we could turn that into a PB worthy sig.
"Annoy a conservative: Play their game better than they do and be confident in the size of your 'sig'"

[Parkbandit]

Very rich coming from you. What did you add with that statement again?

I'm amused and slightly appauled however that you think of me even when I'm not involved in the thread. Way to let someone live in your mind :clap:

Now, go play with the other kindergarteners, who cry when someone uses their game (better than they do).

Hell, we could turn that into a PB worthy sig.
"Annoy a conservative: Play their game better than they do and be confident in the size of your 'sig'"


Once again ES.. you've added nothing to a thread. Are you going for a record?

Well played.. if you are nothing but a big dumb hairy cunt... but we've already established that about you.

I would post a pic of what I think about you.. but that is against TOS. Someone can PM me if they want to see it.

[ElanthianSiren]

Once again ES.. you've added nothing to a thread. Are you going for a record?

Well played.. if you are nothing but a big dumb hairy cunt... but we've already established that about you.

I would post a pic of what I think about you.. but that is against TOS. Someone can PM me if they want to see it.

Wah wah wah. Go threaten someone that cares, little man. Your attempt at reverse psychology has failed AGAIN. Get some new material.

[Parkbandit]

Wah wah wah. Go threaten someone that cares, little man. Your attempt at reverse psychology has failed AGAIN. Get some new material.


Reverse psychology? Are you fucking really this dumb? I stated fact. You've added NOTHING to the thread.

And listen fat lady.. I've never, ever threatened you. That way, if you are found dead from blunt force trama to the face, they won't come looking for me.

[ElanthianSiren]

Reverse psychology? Are you fucking really this dumb? I stated fact. You've added NOTHING to the thread.

And listen fat lady.. I've never, ever threatened you. That way, if you are found dead from blunt force trama to the face, they won't come looking for me.

OH MY GODS NOOOO!!!!!!! ES R SAY MEAN THINGS TO ME ABOUT MY DEBATE APPROACH (or lackthereof) WHEN I WAS ALREADY TROLLINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111one

:cry: me a river of outrage.

I don't need to add anything aside from calling you on the stupidity of invoking my name and hoping I wouldn't be told by someone else here. You are truly laughable.

But go play with your pictures some more, little man. :lol: Hope that's MSpaint by number.

[Keller]

Reverse psychology? Are you fucking really this dumb? I stated fact. You've added NOTHING to the thread.



See, PB can PC debate, too!

First you play a priest to be like Raspy. And now this. I'm flattered!

[Keller]

It's sad what you've become Rasputen. Even though your political beliefs were retarded in my opinion, they were based upon some sort of 'facts' as you see them. Now you are just being a dumbfucking troll with nothing better to do and nothing to add.

Best part though, was your admission that you are indeed a Warclaidhm.

I admitted I was Warclaidhm? Really?

No one who posts on these forums have political beliefs which are based upon facts.

They all have facts based upon their political beliefs.

[Keller]

This is like, the ultimate in meta-humor.

At least someone gets it.

[Parkbandit]

OH MY GODS NOOOO!!!!!!! ES R SAY MEAN THINGS TO ME ABOUT MY DEBATE APPROACH (or lackthereof) WHEN I WAS ALREADY TROLLINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111one

:cry: me a river of outrage.

I don't need to add anything aside from calling you on the stupidity of invoking my name and hoping I wouldn't be told by someone else here. You are truly laughable.

But go play with your pictures some more, little man. :lol: Hope that's MSpaint by number.

Hypocrite. You bitch about my trolling.. yet that is all you've done here and most other threads.

I usually don't make fun of the morbidly obese.. but you are stupid AND fat... which is ashame. At the very least, you should have a good personality.. and you've proven you don't have even one close to good. You are just a lonely, bitter, fat girl.. and for that you have my pity.

They say there is a match for everyone.. but I really can't imagine a guy being that hard up.

[ElanthianSiren]

Hypocrite. You bitch about my trolling.. yet that is all you've done here and most other threads.

I usually don't make fun of the morbidly obese.. but you are stupid AND fat... which is ashame. At the very least, you should have a good personality.. and you've proven you don't have even one close to good. You are just a lonely, bitter, fat girl.. and for that you have my pity.

They say there is a match for everyone.. but I really can't imagine a guy being that hard up.

:rofl: You're several years late on that, but keep trying. I'll keep laughing at you.

Someone call the whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance.

[Parkbandit]

I admitted I was Warclaidhm? Really?

No one who posts on these forums have political beliefs which are based upon facts.

They all have facts based upon their political beliefs.


While I actually agree with you to a point.. there must be SOME factual basis for your opinion or you are considered stupid and irrelevant.

[Parkbandit]

:rofl: You're several years late on that, but keep trying. I'll keep laughing at you.

Someone call the whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance.

You actually found a chubby chaser? Good for you.. I'm serious. I can't imagine someone being that attracted to cottage cheese, massive skin rolls and bodily excretion debris, but hey.. I'm happy for you.

Just please promise not to have any offspring.. we would like the dumb fat bitch gene to die with you.

[ElanthianSiren]

I'll promise that when you promise to stop being stupid. Til then, I'm afraid we're stuck with each other, sweetie.

Go take the bottle from your wife. You're clearly stressed and projecting :lol: .

[Latrinsorm]

So how pathetic is it that PB required an e-nanny state to keep him from degenerating to this level? "You're fat"? Seriously? Though it's been repeatedly demonstrated that intellectual political discourse is untenable here, you can't even achieve politeness? Seriously?

[ElanthianSiren]

It's sort of scary that PB's hunting for morbidly obese women on BBS, enough to invoke someone he thinks is morbidly fat. Anger issues. I promise, nobody here will hold against you the sort of body type you're attracted to though. We're a loving sort of community like that.

[Warriorbird]

Priceless. Thanks Keller.

[Parkbandit]

It's sort of scary that PB's hunting for morbidly obese women on BBS, enough to invoke someone he thinks is morbidly fat. Anger issues. I promise, nobody here will hold against you the sort of body type you're attracted to though. We're a loving sort of community like that.

Sorry tubs.. there's nothing even remotely attractive about you.

[Parkbandit]

So how pathetic is it that PB required an e-nanny state to keep him from degenerating to this level? "You're fat"? Seriously? Though it's been repeatedly demonstrated that intellectual political discourse is untenable here, you can't even achieve politeness? Seriously?

It's funny you should try and get into any discussion about intelligence Latrin, since you've yet to demonstrate any.

[Tsa`ah]

Sorry tubs.. there's nothing even remotely attractive about you.

Attraction aside, is your premise based on the fact that she's diabetic or that you can't recall a single picture she's posted?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but she's a type 1 diabetic that would be best described as skinny.

Aside from that, I fail to see what relevance someone's weight has in a political thread that's been circling in the toilet since page 2.

[ElanthianSiren]

Sorry tubs.. there's nothing even remotely attractive about you.

Okay then; in the future, you can refrain from thinking about me so much that you decide I need to be involved in a thread I never posted in prior to your BS :lol:

Hopefully, you can grasp that, but I don't have much confidence since you can't seem to get over this strange fixation on my body.

[ElanthianSiren]

Attraction aside, is your premise based on the fact that she's diabetic or that you can't recall a single picture she's posted?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but she's a type 1 diabetic that would be best described as skinny.

Aside from that, I fail to see what relevance someone's weight has in a political thread that's been circling in the toilet since page 2.

I doubt he knows the difference Tsa'ah. ZOMG THOUGH!! LET"S WAIT FOR PB TO START GOOGLING!!!!!!!

And yeah, I have IDDM.

edit: cue Sean2 :)

[Parkbandit]

Feel free to take this to PMs ElanthianCunt.. I'll be more than happy to spar with you there. You've wasted enough peoples time with your retardation.

[Parkbandit]

Okay then; in the future, you can refrain from thinking about me so much that you decide I need to be involved in a thread I never posted in prior to your BS :lol:

Hopefully, you can grasp that, but I don't have much confidence since you can't seem to get over this strange fixation on my body.


ok.. just one more maybe. The fixation is like a car accident.. I want to turn away.. I just can't. It's morbid curiosity of that which I would never, ever want to get near... no matter how drunk.

[ElanthianSiren]

I have to confess, I have no desire to PM with you. Your fixation is weird enough as it is.

Also, I'd never go to PMs when you're making such a neat spectacle of yourself publicly here for everyone :popcorn:

[Parkbandit]

I have to confess, I have no desire to PM with you. Your fixation is weird enough as it is.

Also, I'd never go to PMs when you're making such a neat spectacle of yourself publicly here for everyone :popcorn:


And you're not? Come on... I'm just trying to keep up with you.

:popcorn:

[ElanthianSiren]

And you're not? Come on... I'm just trying to keep up with you.

:popcorn:

Imitation is not the fondest form of flattery in this instance. Another tact maybe.

I may be making a spectacle but more for the fact that your pathetic and borderline-creepy behavior is the biggest laugh I've gotten today. So thank you for that. I feel a little guilty however; the same kind of guilt I'd feel if I smacked a retarded person repeatedly.

[Davenshire]

Everytime I think PB cannot hit a new low he surprises me. You are seriously the Jack ass clown of the PCorner.

:club:

[Keller]

Look. This thread was recently about me. I don't appreciate how things have been going recently. If you guys could possibly turn the attention back to me, whether in a positive or negtive light, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks!

Sincerely,

Mr. Right.

[875000]

Look. This thread was recently about me. I don't appreciate how things have been going recently. If you guys could possibly turn the attention back to me, whether in a positive or negtive light, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks!

Sincerely,

Mr. Right.

Fine.

Prove to use you are not Backlash!

[Warriorbird]

Source!

[Clove]

Fine.

Prove to use you are not Backlash!

He can form coherent sentences that's proof enough. I don't know if he should be allowed to visit France anymore though. Clearly croissants effect him negatively.

[Parkbandit]

Everytime I think PB cannot hit a new low he surprises me. You are seriously the Jack ass clown of the PCorner.

:club:


If I'm the clown, you are the...

Wait, who are you? Oh.. that's right.. not much.

And seriously.. 'everytime I think'? When did you show any of that thought process on these forums? Oh.. that's right.. never.

[Keller]

Fine.

Prove to use you are not Backlash!

Niiiiiiiice!

[Keller]

He can form coherent sentences that's proof enough. I don't know if he should be allowed to visit France anymore though. Clearly croissants effect him negatively.

It was the weekly trips to Versailles, a different museum each week, and all the trashy French rags I was reading that caused me to snap.

Don't libel croissants!

[Parkbandit]

It was the weekly trips to Versailles, a different museum each week, and all the trashy French rags I was reading that caused me to snap.

Don't libel croissants!

Hey.. even FRANCE is turning away from socialism. Maybe there's hope for you too!!

[Warriorbird]

The scary thing about that was that most of the "France hate" was drummed up when France was under Chirac...who was conservative. He just didn't follow our guidelines in foreign policy. He wasn't "our" conservative. Blair was more socialist than he was.

[Nieninque]

And Blair was as Socialist as Ben