PDA

View Full Version : Six Foreigners Face Death Sentence in Libyan H.I.V. Case



Xaerve
12-19-2006, 01:25 PM
Six Foreigners Face Death Sentence in Libyan H.I.V. Case


By CRAIG SMITH
Published: December 19, 2006

PARIS, Dec. 19 — A Libyan court again sentenced five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor to be shot by a firing squad for deliberately infecting 400 children with H.I.V., further complicating the country’s efforts to improve relations with the West.

Today’s verdict drew expressions of anger and alarm from Bulgaria and its supporters in the nearly eight-year-old case, which now appears likely to drag on for months more, if not years. Lawyers for the medical workers said they would appeal the sentence to Libya’s Supreme Court.

“We are going to urge the Libyan political leadership to engage in the process,” said Bulgaria’s foreign minister, Ivailo Kalfin, from Washington, where he met with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice hours after the verdict was announced.

Mr. Kalfin said that his country was working through the Libyan foreign ministry to ask the Libyan leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, and the country’s political institutions to intervene, because Libya’s inefficient and biased judicial system had failed to deal with the case credibly.

The case began in February 1998 when the nurses arrived to work at the Al Fateh Children’s Hospital in Benghazi, the country’s second-largest city. By August 1998, children at the hospital had begun testing positive for H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS. Health authorities soon realized they had a huge problem.

An official investigation concluded that the infections had been concentrated in the wards where the Bulgarian nurses had been assigned. Dozens of Bulgarian medical workers were arrested, and a videotaped search of one nurse’s apartment turned up vials of H.I.V.-tainted blood.

According to a Libyan intelligence report submitted to the court, the nurse, Kristiyana Vulcheva, later confessed that the vials were given to her by a British friend who was working for the KBR subsidiary of Halliburton at the time. The nurse was quoted in the report as saying that she and her colleagues used the vials to infect the children.

Col. Qaddafi subsequently charged that the health care workers had acted on the orders of the Central Intelligence Agency and Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.

KBR is primarily an engineering and construction company, but it undertakes many kinds of contract work for the United States Department of Defense and other agencies, and its activities in Iraq and elsewhere have sometimes been controversial.

A Benghazi court eventually convicted five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor of deliberately injecting the children with the virus. But two of the five nurses said they were tortured into confessing, and international AIDS experts — including Luc Montagnier, the French virologist whose team is among those credited with discovering the H.I.V. virus — concluded that the virus predated the nurses’ arrival and was more likely spread through the use of contaminated needles.

The medical workers were sentenced to death in May 2004 in a verdict that was widely condemned in the West. That began a period of difficult negotiations among Libya, Bulgaria, the United States and the European Union to find a solution.

Eventually, the four sides announced in December 2005 that they were setting up an international fund to cover medical care and other costs incurred by the families of the H.I.V.-infected children. Libya’s Supreme Court quashed the death sentences two days later and called for a retrial, this time by a court in the capital, Tripoli.

The families have asked that Bulgaria or other donors provide $10 million for each child, the same amount that Libya agreed to pay each of the families of the 270 people who were killed in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988. Libya has accepted responsibility for the bombing.

Under Libyan law, crime victims’ families have the power to grant clemency in return for compensation. The families of the infected children have said that they would agree to release the medical workers from the criminal charges if their request was satisfied.

But only a few million dollars in cash, services and equipment has been donated to the fund so far. Talks over further donations stalled while the second trial was underway — apparently, the Libyan families say, because Bulgaria hoped the new court would acquit the nurses.

In a seven-minute court hearing in Tripoli today, the presiding judge, Mahmoud Hawissa, read out the verdict and sentence in the latest trial.

Bulgarian officials and the defense lawyers for the nurses argue that the latest trial was as flawed as the first.

“The whole court case was compromised, and covers up the real cause that sparked the AIDS epidemics in Benghazi,” said a joint statement issued today by Bulgaria’s president, Georgy Parvanov, and prime minister, Sergey Stanishev.

Emmanuel Altit, a French lawyer in Paris who worked on the defense team, said: “The question of torture by electricity, proof that the nurses had been beaten, sexually harassed, kept for six months without contact, the question of fabricated evidence — none of this was discussed at all. The court refused to hear our experts.”

“The whole court case was compromised, and covers up the real cause that sparked the AIDS epidemics in Benghazi,” said a joint statement issued today by Bulgaria’s president, Georgy Parvanov, and prime minister, Sergey Stanishev.

Emmanuel Altit, a French lawyer in Paris who worked on the defense team, said: “The question of torture by electricity, proof that the nurses had been beaten, sexually harassed, kept for six months without contact, the question of fabricated evidence — none of this was discussed at all. The court refused to hear our experts.”

Amnesty International issued a statement condemned the trial as “grossly unfair.” “We deplore these sentences and urge the Libyan authorities to declare immediately that they will never be carried out,” said Malcolm Smart, the director of Amnesty’s Middle East and North Africa program.

Mr. Smart’s statement raised a number of complaints about the fairness of the trial, and noted that the evidence produced by Libyan medical experts was called questionable by international medical experts.

Warning that the verdict could frighten Western doctors and nurses away from traveling to Africa to help in future health crises, representatives of some charitable organizations expressed hope that it would be set aside and the doctor and nurses allowed to go home.

The European Union’s justice commissioner, Franco Frattini, called on Libyan authorities to rethink their handling of the case, calling it “an obstacle to cooperation with the E.U.” Bulgaria will become a member of the union on Jan. 1.

Official American reaction to the case has been muted, in part, some diplomats suggested, because the United States is trying to improve its relations with Libya on other fronts. Still, Tony Snow, the White House spokesman, said today that the administration was “disappointed with the verdict.”

Outside the Libyan court, families of the children, about 50 of whom have since died, rallied today to call for the sentence to be carried out immediately, news agencies reported.

But for the Libyans who believe the nurses are guilty, the verdict was a foregone conclusion, even if their execution is not.

Ramadan al-Faitore, whose 4-year-old stepsister was among the first to die, predicted earlier this month that the medical workers would be sentenced to death.

“But no one will kill the nurses,” Mr. Faitore said in Paris, echoing a statement made by Col. Qaddafi’s son, Seif, two years ago. “After the trial, negotiations will start again.”

Mr. Kalfin, the Bulgarian foreign minister, said today that his country was committed to the making sure that the fund would “provide lifelong medical treatment for the children, and create conditions that would prevent this from ever happening again.”

But he bristled at the suggestion that Bulgaria would pay “blood money” for the release of the nurses, calling such talk “cynical.”

“We feel a great deal of sympathy for the children and the families,” Mr. Kalfin said. “But making a linkage between this tragedy and the work of the Bulgarian nurses has absolutely no foundation.”

Standing in a muddy field across the street from the Libyan Embassy in Sofia, Zorka Anachkova, Ms. Vulcheva’s mother, said she wasn’t surprised by the verdict.

“What kind of negotiations can you have for innocent people?” she asked. “All the evidence proves their innocence. Their innocence is axiomatic. What else is there to talk about?”

I'm generally against capital punishment, but wow...

Back
12-19-2006, 01:35 PM
If they really did infect 400 children with HIV, they deserve worse.

Goretawn
12-19-2006, 01:38 PM
Without all the facts for both sides, it is hard to say here. If they did do it, infect their assess and make them suffer. I have no sympathy for those who intentionally hurt children.

Xaerve
12-19-2006, 01:41 PM
What is really interesting to me is that you can buy your way out of punishment in their justice system if you can get the victim, or in the above case the victim's family, to agree to accept the payment.

Stanley Burrell
12-19-2006, 02:00 PM
That has definitely been a 99%-guaranteed sought death sentence in the States for quite a while now (relatively) if our justice system lays the gavel down by deeming that one individual was maliciously + deliberately infected (Albeit, I admittedly am not completely certain to how avant-garde the Libyan CSI system is in the 21st century.)

.

I must say that Libya has come a long way from the days of being just another run-of-the-mill Plutonium bookie:

http://www.trilogy3.com/images/bttf1_pix/bttf056.jpg

Gan
12-19-2006, 03:11 PM
A Benghazi court eventually convicted five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor of deliberately injecting the children with the virus. But two of the five nurses said they were tortured into confessing, and international AIDS experts — including Luc Montagnier, the French virologist whose team is among those credited with discovering the H.I.V. virus — concluded that the virus predated the nurses’ arrival and was more likely spread through the use of contaminated needles.

Probably the most significant part of the article with regards to guilt by the medical staff.

The whole thing smacks of inadequate medical care, not some hairbrained western CIA/Haliburton conspiracy theory that would join multiple nurses and doctors into collusion resulting in the death of numerous children.

I'm waiving the bullshit flag on this one.

Mighty Nikkisaurus
12-19-2006, 04:19 PM
Probably the most significant part of the article with regards to guilt by the medical staff.

The whole thing smacks of inadequate medical care, not some hairbrained western CIA/Haliburton conspiracy theory that would join multiple nurses and doctors into collusion resulting in the death of numerous children.

I'm waiving the bullshit flag on this one.

QFT.

Skirmisher
12-19-2006, 05:00 PM
Even I who think Haliburton has done some horribly shady things would need something along the lines of video tape of the CEO of them asking the nurses to actually infect children with HIV and that is not even going into the odds for finding a group of nurses willing to do such a thing.

It's as outlandish as one of the bad episodes of Alias in it's last season.

xtc
12-20-2006, 01:54 PM
Can we really trust a French lawyer, Amnesty International, and an EU Justice Minister? Come on PB and Sean2 you'll you back me on this?

On a serious note this is a very convoluted case. Anyone who would intentionally infect a child with HIV needs to be hung from the rafters. A confession indicting Haliburton and infected blood found in one of the nurse's apartment is damning evidence. Enough to convict anyone in a Western court. However I imagine most Americans are as suspicious of foreign justice as most foreigners are suspicious of American justice.

At the very least they were guilty of gross neglect that caused children to become infected with HIV, as a French virologist concluded the infection was spread through contaminated needles.

Mighty Nikkisaurus
12-20-2006, 07:15 PM
Can we really trust a French lawyer, Amnesty International, and an EU Justice Minister? Come on PB and Sean2 you'll you back me on this?

On a serious note this is a very convoluted case. Anyone who would intentionally infect a child with HIV needs to be hung from the rafters. A confession indicting Haliburton and infected blood found in one of the nurse's apartment is damning evidence. Enough to convict anyone in a Western court. However I imagine most Americans are as suspicious of foreign justice as most foreigners are suspicious of American justice.

At the very least they were guilty of gross neglect that caused children to become infected with HIV, as a French virologist concluded the infection was spread through contaminated needles.

If they were tortured.. and that wouldn't surprise me, then no, it wouldn't hold water in a Western case.

If the French virologist IS right, then those nurses aren't guilty as all as the infections occurred even BEFORE their arrival. This sucks, yes, but it's hardly intentional and how the hell does it make the situation any better to kill people over it? One-hundred people are infected.. so now instead of just 100 people dying, let's kill 100 medical workers and make the total 200! Wee!

Seriously, I dislike Haliburton and Bush and all sorts of stuff in this but I 100 percent agree with Gan.. this seems like an utterly crack-pot sort of scam. Why the fuck would Haliburton even want to infect some Libyan children with AIDS? It's not like they'd make any money off of it. There's no cause and effect besides children and medical workers being fucked over. Nothing in this seems damning to me, it seems very circumstantial and very twisted/bias. That may be politics but that's not law.

Bartlett
12-20-2006, 10:50 PM
If they were tortured.. and that wouldn't surprise me, then no, it wouldn't hold water in a Western case.


While torture, I am sure, is a fairly common thing over there, in this case it seems more like a smoke and mirrors act. Only 2 of 5 of these nurses were smart enough to come up with it. If the other 3 accept responsibility and point out the other 2, which they probably did, then firing squad it is.

Tsa`ah
12-21-2006, 01:09 AM
I would almost be unsympathetic if conspiracies of the CIA, KBR, and the Mossad weren't tossed in there.

The claim of torture, the above conspiracy assertion, and the fucked up system that allows the convicted to buy freedom ... seems to me that a government doesn't want to admit that the medical service they provide for their citizens is more than lacking.

If the cases of infection predate the arrival of the nurses ... they should nut up, provide for the infected children and families and overhaul their system.

Olanan
12-21-2006, 02:37 AM
Blast em.

Mighty Nikkisaurus
12-22-2006, 01:09 AM
While torture, I am sure, is a fairly common thing over there, in this case it seems more like a smoke and mirrors act. Only 2 of 5 of these nurses were smart enough to come up with it. If the other 3 accept responsibility and point out the other 2, which they probably did, then firing squad it is.

I fail to see how Bulgarian Nurses living in a relatively hostile area would admit to something like infecting kids with AIDs when it DOES appear to be smoke and mirror anyway, without there having been torture involved. I'm sorry but it's not like an interrogator was like "Oh hai, y these kids have AIDS?" and they were just like "O Haliburton and Bush made uz do it!".

This whole thing just is like, a big cracked-out case that doesn't make any sense except that Libya doesn't have its shit together.

Numbers
12-22-2006, 08:18 PM
http://www.post-trib.com/lifestyles/181771,Condemned.article

The kids had HIV three years before the nurses even arrived.