PDA

View Full Version : Habeas Corpus



ClydeR
03-19-2025, 08:12 AM
If police arrest you, claim that you are not a citizen, claim that you are a vicious criminal, and tell you that you are being sent to a prison in El Salvador, then, in that unfortunate circumstance, should you get the right to argue to a judge that the allegations are untrue prior to being flown to El Salvador? That is the issue a federal judge was asked to decide. Even if we're not judges, I think we all know the right answer.

The Founding Fathers had strong opinions on the subject, putting the right of Habeas Corpus in the original Constitution prior to the subsequent expansion of rights in the Bill of Rights. To implement the Constitution, Congress enacted the Alien Enemies Act in 1798, as a one of a series of laws knows and the Alien and Sedition Acts. Here is the text of the law..


Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies.

More... (https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title50/chapter3&edition=prelim)

As you can see, the law can be used by the President in either of the following two situations..

There is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government.
There is an invasion by any foreign nation or government.

There is obviously no declared war. The question, then is whether or not there is an invasion by a foreign nation. When I hear the President speak, he refers to the deported people as vicious criminals, not soldiers. He does not claim that they acted under the direction of a foreign government. If Trump's prior speeches are true, they are people who were released from jails in Venezuela. Since there is no invasion by a foreign government, why not let a court decide if they are non-citizens and criminals, as the law requires? It is very dangerous to allow the President to send people to foreign prisons without a court first checking if they are actually non-citizens and criminals.

Suppressed Poet
03-19-2025, 09:38 AM
If police arrest you, claim that you are not a citizen, claim that you are a vicious criminal, and tell you that you are being sent to a prison in El Salvador, then, in that unfortunate circumstance, should you get the right to argue to a judge that the allegations are untrue prior to being flown to El Salvador? That is the issue a federal judge was asked to decide. Even if we're not judges, I think we all know the right answer.

The Founding Fathers had strong opinions on the subject, putting the right of Habeas Corpus in the original Constitution prior to the subsequent expansion of rights in the Bill of Rights. To implement the Constitution, Congress enacted the Alien Enemies Act in 1798, as a one of a series of laws knows and the Alien and Sedition Acts. Here is the text of the law..



As you can see, the law can be used by the President in either of the following two situations..

There is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government.
There is an invasion by any foreign nation or government.

There is obviously no declared war. The question, then is whether or not there is an invasion by a foreign nation. When I hear the President speak, he refers to the deported people as vicious criminals, not soldiers. He does not claim that they acted under the direction of a foreign government. If Trump's prior speeches are true, they are people who were released from jails in Venezuela. Since there is no invasion by a foreign government, why not let a court decide if they are non-citizens and criminals, as the law requires? It is very dangerous to allow the President to send people to foreign prisons without a court first checking if they are actually non-citizens and criminals.

So you are on the side of protecting dangerous foreign national criminal gangs like Tren de Aragua. We’re talking about illegal aliens that are also rapists and murderers. Why am I not surprised?

Methais
03-19-2025, 09:42 AM
So you are on the side of protecting dangerous foreign national criminal gangs like Tren de Aragua. We’re talking about illegal aliens that are also rapists and murderers. Why am I not surprised?

ClydeR is upset because he has rape fantasies about them and now they're gone.

Back
03-19-2025, 10:26 AM
So you are on the side of protecting dangerous foreign national criminal gangs like Tren de Aragua. We’re talking about illegal aliens that are also rapists and murderers. Why am I not surprised?

It's pretty scary that you are totally willing to just take someone's word for it that those guys are who they say they are and that they are doing what they say they are doing. Without going through the process of determining the facts those in charge can just make s*** up and throw people out of the country. That doesn't bother you at all?

Tgo01
03-19-2025, 10:33 AM
It's pretty scary that you are totally willing to just take someone's word for it that those guys are who they say they are and that they are doing what they say they are doing. Without going through the process of determining the facts those in charge can just make s*** up and throw people out of the country. That doesn't bother you at all?

Suddenly Democrats don't trust the government.

"Stay at home! Keep your kids out of school! Bully anyone who doesn't wear a mask! THE GOVERNMENT SAID IT'S FOR OUR OWN GOOD!!!"

"Those murderers and rapists are innocent! Sure at the very least they are in our country illegally, but that doesn't matter! Never trust the government!!!!11!"

Tell you what, Back. I'm all for keeping some of these murderers and rapists in the country as long as they are sent directly to your house and your family member's houses and they are forced to live there for a minimum of 2 years and you will be charged for any crimes they commit. Sound fair? Or does your virtue signaling only go as far as it not directly affecting you?

Methais
03-19-2025, 10:46 AM
It's pretty scary that you are totally willing to just take someone's word for it that those guys are who they say they are and that they are doing what they say they are doing. Without going through the process of determining the facts those in charge can just make s*** up and throw people out of the country. That doesn't bother you at all?

Stop being such a vagina.



Tell you what, Back. I'm all for keeping some of these murderers and rapists in the country as long as they are sent directly to your house and your family member's houses and they are forced to live there for a minimum of 2 years and you will be charged for any crimes they commit. Sound fair? Or does your virtue signaling only go as far as it not directly affecting you?

His virtue signaling only goes as far as his keyboard.

Suppa Hobbit Mage
03-19-2025, 11:49 AM
It's pretty scary that you are totally willing to just take someone's word for it that those guys are who they say they are and that they are doing what they say they are doing. Without going through the process of determining the facts those in charge can just make s*** up and throw people out of the country. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. Can I have your name and address?

Suppressed Poet
03-19-2025, 12:03 PM
It's pretty scary that you are totally willing to just take someone's word for it that those guys are who they say they are and that they are doing what they say they are doing. Without going through the process of determining the facts those in charge can just make s*** up and throw people out of the country. That doesn't bother you at all?

No it does not bother me.

What bothers me is the previous administration allowed these thugs to illegally enter our country with impunity and in many cases not hold them accountable for violent crimes committed against our citizens.

Suppa Hobbit Mage
03-19-2025, 12:53 PM
No it does not bother me.

What bothers me is the previous administration allowed these thugs to illegally enter our country with impunity and in many cases not hold them accountable for violent crimes committed against our citizens.

Illegals, are, by definition, illegal. And should be treated as such, comrade.

rolfard
03-19-2025, 01:00 PM
In the original post I wondered is the person trying to say"innocent until proven guilty" and the burden on the state is proof beyond reasonable doubt the identity of the accused? And in that case, you may be detained until your identify can be confirmed? And you shouldn't be deported ever and remain detained forever if you can't be proven beyond reasonable doubt that you are not here legally and you cannot be compelled provide an id showing you are a resident?
I'm confused

Methais
03-19-2025, 01:27 PM
In the original post I wondered is the person trying to say"innocent until proven guilty" and the burden on the state is proof beyond reasonable doubt the identity of the accused? And in that case, you may be detained until your identify can be confirmed? And you shouldn't be deported ever and remain detained forever if you can't be proven beyond reasonable doubt that you are not here legally and you cannot be compelled provide an id showing you are a resident?
I'm confused

ClydeR is a huge retard with multiple crippling mental illnesses. It's best to just laugh at what a loser he is while he hides from Covid under his adult sized crib at his mommy's house that he's still never moved out of despite being in his 30s.

Parkbandit
03-19-2025, 02:12 PM
It's pretty scary that you are totally willing to just take someone's word for it that those guys are who they say they are and that they are doing what they say they are doing. Without going through the process of determining the facts those in charge can just make s*** up and throw people out of the country. That doesn't bother you at all?

I laugh at your "scary" emotional response... it goes nicely with the scarf.

Just so we get a clear understanding of the way your brain works...

1) You were willing to take Biden's word that there was no crisis at the southern border. This was proven wrong.
2) You were willing to take Biden's word that people who crossed were seeking asylum and have been vetted. This was proven wrong.
3) You were willing to take Biden's word that it would require Congress to slow down the illegal crossings, even though the previous administration did it. This was proven wrong.
D) You are now willing to take leftists word that OMG THERE MIGHT BE A US CITIZEN DEPORTED WE NEED TO STOP IT!!!!!

You are so upset about the idea of billionaires taking money out of your pockets.. but the 13-20 million people who crossed into our country are probably taking more money out of your pockets than any billionaire by an exponential factor.

Methais
03-19-2025, 02:50 PM
I laugh at your "scary" emotional response... it goes nicely with the scarf.

Just so we get a clear understanding of the way your brain works...

1) You were willing to take Biden's word that there was no crisis at the southern border. This was proven wrong.
2) You were willing to take Biden's word that people who crossed were seeking asylum and have been vetted. This was proven wrong.
3) You were willing to take Biden's word that it would require Congress to slow down the illegal crossings, even though the previous administration did it. This was proven wrong.
D) You are now willing to take leftists word that OMG THERE MIGHT BE A US CITIZEN DEPORTED WE NEED TO STOP IT!!!!!

You are so upset about the idea of billionaires taking money out of your pockets.. but the 13-20 million people who crossed into our country are probably taking more money out of your pockets than any billionaire by an exponential factor.

https://i.imgur.com/MnH3mWv.png

Suppa Hobbit Mage
03-19-2025, 03:42 PM
It's pretty scary that you are totally willing to just take someone's word for it that those guys are who they say they are and that they are doing what they say they are doing. Without going through the process of determining the facts those in charge can just make s*** up and throw people out of the country. That doesn't bother you at all?

ChatGPT - Explain to me all the fallacies in the note above.

The argument contains several logical fallacies. Let’s break them down:


Appeal to Emotion (Argumentum ad Passiones) – The phrase "It's pretty scary" is designed to provoke fear rather than provide a logical reason why the claim is false or problematic.

Straw Man Fallacy – The argument misrepresents the opposing position. It assumes that the other person is "totally willing to just take someone's word for it," when they may simply trust a process or have reasons for their stance.

Slippery Slope – The claim that "those in charge can just make s** up and throw people out of the country"* suggests an extreme consequence without sufficient justification. Just because some individuals might be believed without strict verification does not mean mass deportations will follow.

Loaded Question – The final sentence "That doesn't bother you at all?" implies that if the person is not bothered, they are indifferent to injustice, forcing them into a defensive position rather than allowing a fair discussion.

Hasty Generalization – The argument assumes that if some decisions lack proper verification, all such decisions must be baseless or arbitrary.

False Dilemma (Either-Or Fallacy) – The argument suggests that one must either be completely skeptical or blindly accepting, ignoring the possibility of a reasonable middle ground.

Overall, this argument relies more on emotional appeal and rhetorical pressure rather than logical reasoning.

Suppa Hobbit Mage
03-19-2025, 03:43 PM
6 are low numbers man. You need to pump up your fallacies.

Suppressed Poet
03-19-2025, 04:10 PM
ChatGPT - Explain to me all the fallacies in the note above.

The argument contains several logical fallacies. Let’s break them down:


Appeal to Emotion (Argumentum ad Passiones) – The phrase "It's pretty scary" is designed to provoke fear rather than provide a logical reason why the claim is false or problematic.

Straw Man Fallacy – The argument misrepresents the opposing position. It assumes that the other person is "totally willing to just take someone's word for it," when they may simply trust a process or have reasons for their stance.

Slippery Slope – The claim that "those in charge can just make s** up and throw people out of the country"* suggests an extreme consequence without sufficient justification. Just because some individuals might be believed without strict verification does not mean mass deportations will follow.

Loaded Question – The final sentence "That doesn't bother you at all?" implies that if the person is not bothered, they are indifferent to injustice, forcing them into a defensive position rather than allowing a fair discussion.

Hasty Generalization – The argument assumes that if some decisions lack proper verification, all such decisions must be baseless or arbitrary.

False Dilemma (Either-Or Fallacy) – The argument suggests that one must either be completely skeptical or blindly accepting, ignoring the possibility of a reasonable middle ground.

Overall, this argument relies more on emotional appeal and rhetorical pressure rather than logical reasoning.

I asked ChatGPT how should I respond to Back’s estrogen fueled soy-boy rant and it sent me this:


https://youtu.be/JrwiEjh2AMU?si=iVIg5JBzUA-Jv4x6

Methais
03-19-2025, 04:27 PM
ChatGPT - Explain to me all the fallacies in the note above.

The argument contains several logical fallacies. Let’s break them down:


Appeal to Emotion (Argumentum ad Passiones) – The phrase "It's pretty scary" is designed to provoke fear rather than provide a logical reason why the claim is false or problematic.

Straw Man Fallacy – The argument misrepresents the opposing position. It assumes that the other person is "totally willing to just take someone's word for it," when they may simply trust a process or have reasons for their stance.

Slippery Slope – The claim that "those in charge can just make s** up and throw people out of the country"* suggests an extreme consequence without sufficient justification. Just because some individuals might be believed without strict verification does not mean mass deportations will follow.

Loaded Question – The final sentence "That doesn't bother you at all?" implies that if the person is not bothered, they are indifferent to injustice, forcing them into a defensive position rather than allowing a fair discussion.

Hasty Generalization – The argument assumes that if some decisions lack proper verification, all such decisions must be baseless or arbitrary.

False Dilemma (Either-Or Fallacy) – The argument suggests that one must either be completely skeptical or blindly accepting, ignoring the possibility of a reasonable middle ground.

Overall, this argument relies more on emotional appeal and rhetorical pressure rather than logical reasoning.

Emotional blackmail is the only card these retards have in their deck to play.

Except they're so retarded that nobody takes them seriously, which makes them even more upset, and it's great.

ClydeR
03-19-2025, 09:11 PM
ChatGPT - Explain to me all the fallacies in the note above.

I bet it would say my post was exactly right. It would probably ask permission to use in the future when people inquire about Habeas Corpus. Or you could ask Grok, and it would use it without asking permission.

ClydeR
03-19-2025, 10:06 PM
The Trump administration has admitted in federal court documents that “many” Venezuelans it accused of being dangerous gang members and deported through presidential wartime powers have no criminal records in the United States, but argued it was only because they had only been in the U.S. briefly.

More... (https://www.yahoo.com/news/administration-many-venezuelans-sent-el-235238333.html)


Cerna said the lack of information the government has on the deported Venezuelans “demonstrates that they are terrorists with regard to whom we lack a complete file.”

LOL!

~Rocktar~
03-19-2025, 11:15 PM
LOL!

Incorrect, being in the US illegally is a crime and enough to warrant deportation. Period.

Parkbandit
03-20-2025, 07:49 AM
I bet it would say my post was exactly right. It would probably ask permission to use in the future when people inquire about Habeas Corpus. Or you could ask Grok, and it would use it without asking permission.

I'm shocked you were wrong again.

Really.

ClydeR, your post contains several logical errors, factual inaccuracies, and misinterpretations of both the Constitution and the Alien Enemies Act. Let’s go through them systematically.
1. Straw Man ArgumentYour opening hypothetical scenario—where police arrest someone, falsely claim they are a non-citizen and a vicious criminal, and announce they will be sent to a prison in El Salvador—is not what the legal or political debate is actually about. You’re presenting an extreme, unrealistic case to make it seem like the fundamental issue is whether people should have legal recourse against wrongful deportation, which is a given in U.S. law. However, the actual debate concerns specific policies and legal processes regarding deportation, not arbitrary detentions and extraditions without due process.
2. Misrepresentation of Habeas CorpusYou correctly point out that the right of Habeas Corpus is enshrined in the Constitution, but your argument misrepresents its application. Habeas Corpus protections are already a fundamental part of U.S. law, and courts routinely hear cases where individuals contest their detention or deportation. There is no evidence that the government is denying access to courts in deportation cases. The implication that the current administration is circumventing Habeas Corpus without judicial oversight is misleading.
3. Historical Inaccuracy: Mischaracterizing the Alien Enemies ActThe Alien Enemies Act of 1798 does not give the President unilateral authority to deport people outside of wartime without due process.


First, as you acknowledge, it applies only during declared wars or invasions by a foreign government. Since neither condition is met, invoking this law is irrelevant to the issue at hand.
Second, even during wartime, the law specifically applies to citizens of enemy nations residing in the U.S., not just any non-citizen.
Third, the Alien Enemies Act does not allow the President to bypass judicial oversight entirely. Legal challenges to deportations still exist under current immigration laws.

4. False Equivalence Between Criminal Deportations and an "Invasion"You argue that since there is no declared war, the only relevant question is whether an "invasion by a foreign nation or government" is occurring. However:


Deporting criminals who entered illegally is not the same as responding to a military invasion. The word "invasion" in constitutional and legal contexts refers to armed conflict or forceful occupation by a foreign government, not illegal immigration or criminal activities.
Even if certain individuals were released from Venezuelan prisons, as Trump claimed, that does not constitute an invasion by the Venezuelan government under any legal definition.

5. Appeal to Authority Fallacy (Misuse of the Founding Fathers)You invoke the Founding Fathers as if their general support for Habeas Corpus automatically supports your argument. However:


The Founders also wrote immigration and deportation laws that provided for the removal of non-citizens under legal processes.
Deportation procedures have existed throughout U.S. history, and courts have long held that non-citizens have limited but defined due process rights in removal proceedings.
The fact that Habeas Corpus exists does not mean that all non-citizens have the same rights as citizens when it comes to immigration enforcement.

6. Slippery Slope FallacyYou suggest that allowing the President to deport people without court involvement could lead to arbitrary detentions and deportations of citizens. However:


The law already requires courts to review removal orders in contested cases.
No evidence suggests that the government is bypassing courts or deporting people en masse without legal review.
Presenting a worst-case scenario where the President suddenly starts shipping innocent people to foreign prisons is alarmist and not reflective of current legal realities.

7. Contradiction in Your ConclusionAt the end, you say that because there is no foreign invasion, "why not let a court decide if they are non-citizens and criminals, as the law requires?" But that’s already how the system works.


Immigration courts and appeals processes exist for exactly this purpose.
The right to challenge deportation is already established under current laws.
Your argument suggests that the government is preventing judicial review when, in reality, legal challenges to deportations happen every day.

ConclusionYour post uses rhetorical exaggerations, historical misinterpretations, and flawed legal reasoning to create a false sense of crisis. Deportation is a legal process that already includes court oversight, and the Alien Enemies Act is irrelevant to this discussion. Misrepresenting immigration enforcement as an unconstitutional power grab only confuses the real issues at play.

Tgo01
03-20-2025, 08:28 AM
LOL!

Man I love the dishonesty of you terrorist-loving far leftists.

No criminal records...IN THE UNITED STATES. Do they have a lengthy criminal record in another country? If so, shouldn't they be considered dangerous and removed immediately anyways? Or are you people so fucking dumb you think stepping foot in the US suddenly makes you a model citizen?

Suppressed Poet
03-20-2025, 09:44 AM
I bet it would say my post was exactly right. It would probably ask permission to use in the future when people inquire about Habeas Corpus. Or you could ask Grok, and it would use it without asking permission.

I asked Grok what it thought about your post and it sent me this:


https://youtu.be/5hfYJsQAhl0?si=Ahvnz_OItMlIMQAK

ClydeR
03-20-2025, 10:53 AM
Incorrect, being in the US illegally is a crime and enough to warrant deportation. Period.

How do you know they were here illegally, and not actual U.S. citizens born in this country? You don't, because there was no judicial check before they were deported. Why was there no judicial check? Because Trump claimed we were being invaded by a foreign government, in which case he could use war powers to bypass judicial safeguards.

~Rocktar~
03-20-2025, 10:57 AM
How do you know they were here illegally, and not actual U.S. citizens born in this country? You don't, because there was no judicial check before they were deported. Why was there no judicial check? Because Trump claimed we were being invaded by a foreign government, in which case he could use war powers to bypass judicial safeguards.

How do you know they are citizens? You don't, because you are retarded. Why are you retarded, because the Divine saw that we needed entertainment on this board long ago and made it so.

Methais
03-20-2025, 11:20 AM
How do you know they were here illegally, and not actual U.S. citizens born in this country? You don't, because there was no judicial check before they were deported. Why was there no judicial check? Because Trump claimed we were being invaded by a foreign government, in which case he could use war powers to bypass judicial safeguards.

Go eat your own ass, retard.

Suppressed Poet
03-20-2025, 11:32 AM
How do you know they were here illegally, and not actual U.S. citizens born in this country? You don't, because there was no judicial check before they were deported. Why was there no judicial check? Because Trump claimed we were being invaded by a foreign government, in which case he could use war powers to bypass judicial safeguards.

https://64.media.tumblr.com/8d394ba8571040682a830a20232014c5/tumblr_mpkbxjbcTj1rf9wf0o2_1280.png

Neveragain
03-20-2025, 11:41 AM
Literally anyone can be detained without charges being filed for a couple days, depending on the state. It's 72 hours in my state.

It's been that way forever, STFU retard.

ClydeR
03-21-2025, 09:37 AM
An attorney representing a migrant sent to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act says her client was deported due to a soccer logo tattoo, according to court declarations submitted Wednesday night.

More... (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/man-deported-el-salvador-alien-enemies-act-soccer-logo-tattoo-attorney/story?id=119983892)

Trump wouldn't be trying so hard to hide what happened if he didn't realize he made major mistakes. He should fess up, admit his error, and not allow people to remain in high security prisons who both entered the U.S. legally and were not members of a terrorist gang. I bet at the end of the day we'll find out that at least one U.S. citizen was illegally flown to a foreign prison. And if it could happen to a U.S. citizen with a soccer ball tattoo, it could happen you! Unless, that is, we go back to honoring the ancient legal requirement of having an independent judge double check before someone is sent to a lengthy prison sentence.


The Trump administration has been reluctant to release the names and other details of the groups flown to El Salvador over the weekend, despite questions from a judge hearing challenges to the removal flights that were brought by groups including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The White House argues that all those removed posed enough of a national security threat to be deported under the Alien Enemies Act.

More... (https://www.newsweek.com/deportation-flights-venezuelan-real-madrid-tattoo-tren-de-aragua-2047960)

No way a terrorist would wear white and orange shoes like those he's wearing in the photo at the above link. That's proof he's not a terrorist, and it's just as weighty as the proof offered by Trump that he is a terrorist. He coaches soccer for children, for goodness sake! He entered the country legally and was scheduled for an immigration hearing this week, which he did not attend because he had been taken by the government and sent to a prison in El Salvador.

Suppressed Poet
03-21-2025, 10:52 AM
And if it could happen to a U.S. citizen with a soccer ball tattoo, it could happen you!

No.

I keep in a safe all my important documents like birth certificate, passport, SSN card, etc. I don’t have any tattoos. I’m white as fuck. Are you seriously suggesting that ICE is going to deport me? Get the fuck outta here…

Edit: Also, not referring to this specific situation, but I imagine some mistakes will be made. When those mistakes happen it’s good to rectify the situation and move on. That should not impede progress. Do you think El Salvador lowered their crime rate by 98% in 9 years without making any mistakes? You gotta crack a few eggs to make an omelette…

Tgo01
03-21-2025, 10:55 AM
An attorney representing a migrant sent to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act says her client was deported due to a soccer logo tattoo, according to court declarations submitted Wednesday night.

Well as long as an attorney representing someone says that's the real reason they were removed then it must be true!

What is even the solution you people are looking for here anyways? The dude was not an American citizen and is currently in jail in another country. Do you really think he should be sprung from jail and sent back to the US or what? Sounds like this is an issue for the government of El Salvador to address.

ClydeR
03-21-2025, 11:57 AM
Well as long as an attorney representing someone says that's the real reason they were removed then it must be true!

You're arguing about the burden of proof. Is it the responsibility of the accused to prove that he is innocent, or is it the responsibility of the government to prove that he is guilty.


What is even the solution you people are looking for here anyways? The dude was not an American citizen and is currently in jail in another country. Do you really think he should be sprung from jail and sent back to the US or what? Sounds like this is an issue for the government of El Salvador to address.

The President of El Salvador said on Twitter that he will continue to hold them in prison as long as the U.S. continues to pay. Continued imprisonment, therefore, is up to the U.S. If he did not commit any crimes, the U.S. should not continue to pay another country to hold him in prison. If El Salvador thinks he committed a crime in El Salvador, then it becomes their problem, and they should pay the cost of jailing him.

Methais
03-21-2025, 12:20 PM
No.

I keep in a safe all my important documents like birth certificate, passport, SSN card, etc. I don’t have any tattoos. I’m white as fuck. Are you seriously suggesting that ICE is going to deport me? Get the fuck outta here…

Edit: Also, not referring to this specific situation, but I imagine some mistakes will be made. When those mistakes happen it’s good to rectify the situation and move on. That should not impede progress. Do you think El Salvador lowered their crime rate by 98% in 9 years without making any mistakes? You gotta crack a few eggs to make an omelette…

ClydeR would burn down his entire house trying to boil water.

Suppressed Poet
03-21-2025, 01:00 PM
ClydeR would burn down his entire house trying to boil water.

Yep. He is the reason Hasbro was forced to discontinue the Easy-Bake Oven with the 100-watt heating element, and that the newer safer versions were repackaged to be gender neutral.

Hey ClydeR, thanks for ruining Christmas for millions of little girls. Now we got an entire generation of young women who can’t bake shit. Dickhead.

Methais
03-21-2025, 01:05 PM
Yep. He is the reason Hasbro was forced to discontinue the Easy-Bake Oven with the 100-watt heating element, and that the newer safer versions were repackaged to be gender neutral.

Hey ClydeR, thanks for ruining Christmas for millions of little girls. Now we got an entire generation of young women who can’t bake shit. Dickhead.

Further proof that ClydeR hates women.

Tgo01
03-21-2025, 02:35 PM
You're arguing about the burden of proof. Is it the responsibility of the accused to prove that he is innocent, or is it the responsibility of the government to prove that he is guilty.

This doesn't address a single fucking thing I said. You're acting like this guy is 100% innocent because his lawyer of all people say he's innocent. Like no shit his lawyer is gonna make up some bullshit reason for why he was "really" deported. Remember you're supposed to trust the US government without question, when did this attitude change?


The President of El Salvador said on Twitter that he will continue to hold them in prison as long as the U.S. continues to pay. Continued imprisonment, therefore, is up to the U.S.

lol

That's not how this works. The country of El Salvador has a functioning government that is completely capable of carrying out their own laws and judicial regulations. They could decide tomorrow to release each and every single person from prison. Sure it might piss off Trump and the US government, but don't be a pussy and act like they aren't a sovereign fucking nation.

Parkbandit
03-21-2025, 02:48 PM
ClydeR would burn down his entire house trying to boil water.

I'm relatively sure he's thermophobic and would never ever attempt to do that.

ClydeR
03-21-2025, 08:57 PM
https://i.imgur.com/EH1T1S9.png
https://x.com/kaitlancollins/status/1903215605991211217

Now that we're learning that some of the deportees entered the U.S. legally, had not committed any crimes and were not gang members, Trump is distancing himself from it. Despite the fact that his signature appears to be on the invocation of war powers as officially published, Trump denies that he ever signed it. He says it was all Little Marco. Trump says he just "wanted to go along" with whatever Little Marco wanted. Somebody will have to take the fall for this fiasco. It's starting to look like Little Marco is in real trouble, forging Trump's signature and illegally kidnapping people.

Gelston
03-21-2025, 08:59 PM
https://i.imgur.com/EH1T1S9.png
https://x.com/kaitlancollins/status/1903215605991211217

Now that we're learning that some of the deportees entered the U.S. legally, had not committed any crimes and were not gang members, Trump is distancing himself from it. Despite the fact that his signature appears to be on the invocation of war powers as officially published, Trump denies that he ever signed it. He says it was all Little Marco. Trump says he just "wanted to go along" with whatever Little Marco wanted. Somebody will have to take the fall for this fiasco. It's starting to look like Little Marco is in real trouble, forging Trump's signature and illegally kidnapping people.

Nobody is going to take the fall for shit.

Tgo01
03-21-2025, 09:10 PM
Now that we're learning that some of the deportees entered the U.S. legally, had not committed any crimes and were not gang members

How do we know all of this again? Because their lawyers said so?

Gelston
03-21-2025, 09:11 PM
How do we know all of this again? Because their lawyers said so?

Because ClydeR wishes it so.

ClydeR
03-21-2025, 09:28 PM
Nobody is going to take the fall for shit.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4y52JRDsc0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4y52JRDsc0

ClydeR
04-01-2025, 12:57 PM
Oopsie indeed. This is why the Constitution requires that every person detained must be brought before a judge for an independent determination, except in cases of suspension of Habeas Corpus during wartime.


The Trump administration acknowledged in a court filing Monday that it had grabbed a Maryland father with protected legal status and mistakenly deported him to El Salvador, but said that U.S. courts lack jurisdiction to order his return from the megaprison where he's now locked up.

The case appears to be the first time the Trump administration has admitted to errors when it sent three planeloads of Salvadoran and Venezuelan deportees to El Salvador's grim "Terrorism Confinement Center" on March 15. Attorneys for several Venezuelan deportees have said that the Trump administration falsely labeled their clients as gang members because of their tattoos. Trump officials have disputed those claims.

But in Monday's court filing, attorneys for the government admitted that the Salvadoran man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, had been deported accidentally. "Although ICE was aware of his protection from removal to El Salvador, Abrego Garcia was removed to El Salvador because of an administrative error," the government told the court. Trump lawyers said the court has no ability to bring Abrego Garcia back now that he is in Salvadoran custody.

More... (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/an-administrative-error-sends-a-man-to-a-salvadoran-prison/682254/)


On March 12, Abrego Garcia had picked up his son after work from the boy's grandmother's house when ICE officers stopped the car, saying his protected status had changed. Officers waited for Abrego Garcia's wife to come to the scene and take care of the boy, then drove him away in handcuffs. Within two days, he had been transferred to an ICE staging facility in Texas, along with other detainees the government was preparing to send to El Salvador. Trump had invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, and the government planned to deport two planeloads of Venezuelans along with a separate group of Salvadorans.

Abrego Garcia's family has had no contact with him since he was sent to the megaprison in El Salvador, known as CECOT. His wife spotted her husband in news photographs released by Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on the morning of March 16, after a U.S. district judge had told the Trump administration to halt the flights.

“Oopsie,” Bukele wrote on social media, taunting the judge.

Suppressed Poet
04-01-2025, 01:44 PM
Oopsie indeed. This is why the Constitution requires that every person detained must be brought before a judge for an independent determination, except in cases of suspension of Habeas Corpus during wartime.

The court lacks jurisdiction. The prior convicted MS13 gang member you are trying to paint as a victim was deported under title 8 & presently in the custody of El Salvador. In other words, that judge can’t do shit about it & good riddance to that thug.

ClydeR
04-01-2025, 02:36 PM
The court lacks jurisdiction.

Probably so. He's no longer in the U.S., because Trump unconstitutionally deported him without first bringing him before a judge to double check that the deportation was proper.


"This Court lacks jurisdiction because Abrego Garcia is not in United States custody. Plaintiff's claims fall within the historical “core” of the writ of habeas corpus. Because Plaintiff's claims sound in habeas, they can proceed only in habeas," the DOJ wrote in a March 31 defense motion. "But because Plaintiffs concede that Abrego-Garcia is not in United States custody, this Court cannot hear those claims. It precludes judicial review of any challenge to the decision or action by DHS to execute removal orders which includes challenges to DHS’s ‘legal authority to do so.”

More... (https://www.wmar2news.com/infocus/family-of-alleged-gang-member-deported-to-el-salvador-prison-sues-to-have-him-returned-to-baltimore)





The prior convicted MS13 gang member you are trying to paint as a victim was deported under title 8 & presently in the custody of El Salvador. In other words, that judge can’t do shit about it & good riddance to that thug.

I'm not sure that's true. The Vice President says he was convicted. But his lawyer says that he has never been convicted of any crime. Who is more trustworthy, J.D. Vance or an unknown criminal defense lawyer?


Vice President JD Vance weighed into the case and falsely said on X Tuesday that Garcia was a "convicted MS-13 gang member." Garcia has no criminal convictions in the U.S. or in El Salvador, his legal team said in the lawsuit.

More... (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-was-sent-el-salvador-due-administrative-error-protected-legal-stat-rcna199010)

Suppa Hobbit Mage
04-01-2025, 04:02 PM
Best april fools joke ever.

Parkbandit
04-02-2025, 08:03 AM
Oopsie indeed. This is why the Constitution requires that every person detained must be brought before a judge for an independent determination, except in cases of suspension of Habeas Corpus during wartime.

Look at the way the author of the Atlantic framed the narrative. "Grabbed a Maryland Father" "Picked up his son after work from the boy's grandmother's house"

What an upstanding citizen he was! Trump is super meanie head!!

Truth is: Mr. Garcia was a top member of M-13 gang and had a history with human trafficking. He illegally entered our country in 2011 and got a judge to grant him a temporary protective order in 2019.

Back
04-02-2025, 04:24 PM
Look at the way the author of the Atlantic framed the narrative. "Grabbed a Maryland Father" "Picked up his son after work from the boy's grandmother's house"

What an upstanding citizen he was! Trump is super meanie head!!

Truth is: Mr. Garcia was a top member of M-13 gang and had a history with human trafficking. He illegally entered our country in 2011 and got a judge to grant him a temporary protective order in 2019.

Source?

The Trump administration has admitted that this was a mistake. What about that do you not understand?

Suppa Hobbit Mage
04-02-2025, 04:42 PM
Source?

It's a matter of public record, learn to google.

In 2019, during Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia's bond hearing, an immigration judge determined that he posed a danger to the community, citing alleged MS-13 gang affiliation. This finding was based on local police assertions and a confidential informant's claim that he was a member of MS-13's "Westerns clique" in Long Island, New York, despite him never having lived there. Consequently, bond was denied. The Board of Immigration Appeals upheld this decision, affirming the judge's determination of dangerousness.


Subsequently, Abrego Garcia applied for asylum. While the immigration judge denied his asylum request, he was granted protection from deportation to El Salvador, acknowledging the credible threats he would face if returned. The Department of Homeland Security did not appeal this protection order.


It's important to note that the initial finding of dangerousness related to alleged gang affiliation remained part of his immigration record. Abrego Garcia did not pursue further legal action to overturn this specific finding. His legal team has consistently contested the gang affiliation allegations, asserting that he has never been a member of MS-13 and emphasizing his clean criminal record.

Suppa Hobbit Mage
04-02-2025, 04:45 PM
Source?

The Trump administration has admitted that this was a mistake. What about that do you not understand?

You should white knight this and go down to El Salvador and get him released, then let him live with you so you can prove how much you care about the immigrant community.

Methais
04-02-2025, 05:16 PM
You should white knight this and go down to El Salvador and get him released, then let him live with you so you can prove how much you care about the immigrant community.

I'll pitch in for Back's plane ticket.

Parkbandit
04-03-2025, 08:20 AM
Source?

The Trump administration has admitted that this was a mistake. What about that do you not understand?

Bro, you can't possibly be this dumb for real, can you?

Like you live in a time where all the combined knowledge of man is at your fingertips.. and you just wish to wallow in ignorance.

Suppressed Poet
04-07-2025, 09:57 PM
Oopsie indeed. This is why the Constitution requires that every person detained must be brought before a judge for an independent determination, except in cases of suspension of Habeas Corpus during wartime.

So ClydeR, how much did this burn your asshole today? I think it’s a good compromise and preserves Habeas Corpus giving them a little notice.

Supreme Court lifts orders blocking Trump from deporting Venezuelans under Alien Enemies Act
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5237011-supreme-court-trump-venezuelans-alien-enemies-act/amp/

Oh, and also: :rofl:

Supreme Court puts hold on order that deported Maryland man must be returned to US
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/04/07/supreme-court-hold-order-return-deported-maryland-father/82979310007/

Methais
04-08-2025, 11:42 AM
So ClydeR, how much did this burn your asshole today? I think it’s a good compromise and preserves Habeas Corpus giving them a little notice.

Supreme Court lifts orders blocking Trump from deporting Venezuelans under Alien Enemies Act
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5237011-supreme-court-trump-venezuelans-alien-enemies-act/amp/

Oh, and also: :rofl:

Supreme Court puts hold on order that deported Maryland man must be returned to US
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/04/07/supreme-court-hold-order-return-deported-maryland-father/82979310007/

Amy Coney Barrett was a mistake.

Suppressed Poet
04-08-2025, 12:24 PM
Amy Coney Barrett was a mistake.

Agreed. Her appointment confirmation hearing feels like false advertising at this point.

Suppa Hobbit Mage
04-08-2025, 12:37 PM
I'm not sure I think Amy Coney Barrett was a poor choice honestly. I want constitutionalists on the supreme court, not political advocates or judges with political biases.

Back
04-08-2025, 12:41 PM
Bro, you can't possibly be this dumb for real, can you?

Like you live in a time where all the combined knowledge of man is at your fingertips.. and you just wish to wallow in ignorance.

So you have no source. Gotcha.

The government has dropped their claim of Garcia being a gang member because they could not corroborate their sole confidential informant's information.

I know you don't give a shit about it. Just clearing the record.

Parkbandit
04-08-2025, 12:54 PM
So you have no source. Gotcha.

The government has dropped their claim of Garcia being a gang member because they could not corroborate their sole confidential informant's information.

I know you don't give a shit about it. Just clearing the record.

Just so we're both on the same page.. you don't know how to search the Internet for something... and you can't follow a simple linear thread.

Right under your retarded post was a post by SHM and he posted a synopsis of Mr. Garcia's time in the US.

It's not that difficult to use a search engine to look things up. It's even easier to just read the thread where the answer was provided to you 18 minutes after you posted.

Like how are you this fucking stupid? HOW?

And then to top off your retard sundae... you wait 6 days and say "Oh you don't have a source, I WIN!"

Like honestly, at this point.. no one will ever strip you of the belt you have earned.

Methais
04-08-2025, 01:04 PM
Just so we're both on the same page.. you don't know how to search the Internet for something... and you can't follow a simple linear thread.

Right under your retarded post was a post by SHM and he posted a synopsis of Mr. Garcia's time in the US.

It's not that difficult to use a search engine to look things up. It's even easier to just read the thread where the answer was provided to you 18 minutes after you posted.

Like how are you this fucking stupid? HOW?

And then to top off your retard sundae... you wait 6 days and say "Oh you don't have a source, I WIN!"

Like honestly, at this point.. no one will ever strip you of the belt you have earned.

Turns out Seran was just a paper champion.

Parkbandit
04-08-2025, 04:10 PM
Turns out Seran was just a paper champion.

I honestly can't believe I once called sErAn the goat. Like I have a decent memory.. but even I got caught up in the hype and forgot how fucking utterly retarded Backlash is.

I will not make the same mistake again.

Suppressed Poet
04-08-2025, 07:00 PM
I honestly can't believe I once called sErAn the goat. Like I have a decent memory.. but even I got caught up in the hype and forgot how fucking utterly retarded Backlash is.

I will not make the same mistake again.

I dunno…Seran DID post some wildly dumb epic-level nonsense. You have two of his greatest hits in your signature line. I need to seem them post at the same time & compete for the retard belt before I can definitively cast my vote for the GOAT.

ClydeR
04-08-2025, 09:09 PM
So ClydeR, how much did this burn your asshole today? I think it’s a good compromise and preserves Habeas Corpus giving them a little notice.

The court unanimously ruled that all prisoners must be given the right to petition a court before being sent to a foreign jail. That is exactly what I said. I'm starting to think the Supreme Court Judges are just copying my posts and the collecting a fat pay check.

Suppressed Poet
04-09-2025, 01:52 AM
The court unanimously ruled that all prisoners must be given the right to petition a court before being sent to a foreign jail. That is exactly what I said.

You failed to predict the part that SCOTUS confirmed it is legal for Trump to deport under the Aliens Enemy Act & they also paused having to fly back the MS13 gangbanger into our country. But yeah, they can petition the court and receive the swift hand of American justice. As I said, I think it’s a good compromise. Don’t you?


I'm starting to think the Supreme Court Judges are just copying my posts and the collecting a fat pay check.

Your delusions of grandeur are nothing more than entertainment for the PC. But seriously, your advanced TDS has given you brain rot, you’re a loser, and a pussy. My offer to whoop your ass in chess stands. Since you think you would do better against advanced AI than Bill Gates, I should be a cakewalk…right?

~Rocktar~
04-09-2025, 08:18 AM
Anyone want to bet that they get a faster hearing that most/all Jan 6ers?

Back
04-09-2025, 03:57 PM
Just so we're both on the same page.. you don't know how to search the Internet for something... and you can't follow a simple linear thread.

Right under your retarded post was a post by SHM and he posted a synopsis of Mr. Garcia's time in the US.

It's not that difficult to use a search engine to look things up. It's even easier to just read the thread where the answer was provided to you 18 minutes after you posted.

Like how are you this fucking stupid? HOW?

And then to top off your retard sundae... you wait 6 days and say "Oh you don't have a source, I WIN!"

Like honestly, at this point.. no one will ever strip you of the belt you have earned.

Haha lol You're such a weasel. Whatever.

Parkbandit
04-10-2025, 10:19 AM
Haha lol You're such a weasel. Whatever.

https://media.tenor.com/tb2czHUgsIMAAAAM/jennifer-lawrence-oh-ok.gif

ClydeR
04-17-2025, 08:52 PM
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals today let loose on the Trump Administration in the Garcia case. The appeals court said if the government is so sure that he is a gang member, why are they afraid to prove it in court, as justice requires.


It is difficult in some cases to get to the very heart of the matter. But in this case, it is not hard at all. The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order. Further, it claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing that can be done.

This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.

The government asserts that Abrego Garcia is a terrorist and a member of MS-13. Perhaps, but perhaps not. Regardless, he is still entitled to due process. If the government is confident of its position, it should be assured that position will prevail in proceedings to terminate the withholding of removal order. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.24(f) (requiring that the government prove “by a preponderance of evidence” that the alien is no longer entitled to a withholding of removal). Moreover, the government has conceded that Abrego Garcia was wrongly or “mistakenly” deported. Why then should it not make what was wrong, right?

More... (https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.88.0_5.pdf)

The appeals court also emphasized that, contrary to the Trump Administration's assertions, the U.S. Supreme Court did not merely rule that the government must "facilitate" Garcia's return to the U.S. Instead, the U.S. Supreme Court said the government must "facilitate Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador."

Tgo01
04-17-2025, 09:25 PM
The appeals court said if the government is so sure that he is a gang member, why are they afraid to prove it in court, as justice requires.

Weird. I thought they proved it in court twice. What you really mean is you want to keep taking this to court until the court agrees with you, right?

ClydeR
04-17-2025, 09:40 PM
Trump's police force is getting out of hand.


ICE agents smashed a Guatemalan man's car window and forcibly pulled him from the vehicle during a chaotic immigration arrest in Massachusetts — and the man's lawyer says they had the wrong target.

More... (https://people.com/car-window-shattered-man-pulled-from-car-ice-agents-footage-11716600)


He is currently being held at a detention facility in Dover, N.H., however, Sniffin said she’s been unable to obtain any more information on potential charges or why he remains in custody.


Mendez’s arrest is the latest viral clip to come from President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Earlier this week, footage of federal agents tackling a Venezuelan man in a New Hampshire courthouse — and bulldozing an elderly bystander in the process — was shared by multiple outlets.

ClydeR
04-17-2025, 09:42 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtZkZPtC3ac
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtZkZPtC3ac

These thugs didn't even bother to check on the elderly bystander they slammed to the ground.

Suppressed Poet
04-17-2025, 09:46 PM
Trump's police force is getting out of hand.

Isn’t it wonderful we finally have a president that allows ICE to do their job? My only complaint is they need to deport more illegal aliens in a shorter amount of time.

Tgo01
04-17-2025, 09:52 PM
These thugs didn't even bother to check on the elderly bystander they slammed to the ground.

lol

Don't blame the illegal alien for being an illegal alien. Don't blame the illegal alien for running away TOWARDS the elderly man. No no no. Blame the police for arresting the illegal alien!

"The police didn't immediately let the illegal alien go and check on the elderly man that was knocked to the ground because of said illegal alien!"

Man you fucking Democrats get worse and worse with each passing day.

ClydeR
04-18-2025, 08:41 AM
I can't find anything about what ultimately happened to the elderly bystander, which I assume means he died from his injuries. Or he might still be there, clinging to life and trying over and over to get up, but with no assistance.

Suppressed Poet
04-18-2025, 08:59 AM
I can't find anything about what ultimately happened to the elderly bystander, which I assume means he died from his injuries. Or he might still be there, clinging to life and trying over and over to get up, but with no assistance.

He got up and left never to be seen or heard from again, just like your daddy back in 1989.

Methais
04-18-2025, 09:19 AM
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals today let loose on the Trump Administration in the Garcia case. The appeals court said if the government is so sure that he is a gang member, why are they afraid to prove it in court, as justice requires.



The appeals court also emphasized that, contrary to the Trump Administration's assertions, the U.S. Supreme Court did not merely rule that the government must "facilitate" Garcia's return to the U.S. Instead, the U.S. Supreme Court said the government must "facilitate Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador."

On a scale of 1-10, how important is un-deporting illegal aliens to you?

Methais
04-18-2025, 09:21 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtZkZPtC3ac
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtZkZPtC3ac

These thugs didn't even bother to check on the elderly bystander they slammed to the ground.

Why are you always the *biggest retard in every thread you post in?

*2nd biggest if Back posts in the thread.

ClydeR
04-19-2025, 09:01 AM
It seems US President Donald Trump won't just give up on linking Kilmar Garcia, who was wrongly deported to El Salvador, to the gang MS-13. In his latest post, Trump shared a photo that he claimed to be of Garcia's knuckles with MS-13 tattooed on them. However, experts and hawk-eyed X users pointed out that the image was photoshopped.

More... (https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/trump-shares-doctored-pic-of-deported-man-s-tattoos-to-prove-ms-13-gang-link/ar-AA1Ddbtn)

Trump posted a photo of himself sitting in the oval office holding a photo that he claims is of Garcia's hand. The photos show the letters MS13 tattooed across the fingers. Anybody looking closely at the photo Trump is holding can tell that it has been altered. The fact that Garcia was deported based on photoshopped photos and without a hearing should make every fair-minded person, including every judge, who considers this matter demand the immediate release of Garcia.

Tgo01
04-19-2025, 09:06 AM
The dude was a wife beater and human trafficker. These things have been documented.

Look, I get it, you guys are desperate for a win. But you don't have to shove the dick and balls of a terrorist into your mouth for your win.

Why can't you horrible human beings just say "Sure, this man is probably guilty of some heinous crimes, but he still deserves his due process" or some dumb shit like that? Sure, you're still horrible people, but at least you're pretending to be standing on principal.

Defending this man, refusing to acknowledge the facts that point to him being a gang member, wife beater, and human trafficker, just makes you guys look like beyond horrible. But you guys sold your souls to the devil over a decade ago, so none of this really bothers you anymore.

~Rocktar~
04-19-2025, 10:48 AM
Trump posted a photo of himself sitting in the oval office holding a photo that he claims is of Garcia's hand. The photos show the letters MS13 tattooed across the fingers. Anybody looking closely at the photo Trump is holding can tell that it has been altered. The fact that Garcia was deported based on photoshopped photos and without a hearing should make every fair-minded person, including every judge, who considers this matter demand the immediate release of Garcia.

The Democrat party defending a terrorist, gang member, wife beater and illegal alien. Keep at it, I am sure this will help in the midterms.

ClydeR
04-19-2025, 11:27 AM
The dude was a wife beater and human trafficker. These things have been documented.

Instead of making wild accusations with doctored photos on social media, if the government really has evidence that he committed a crime, then they should present it in court, as required by law. And he should get a chance, as required by law, to defend himself. He was in the U.S. legally at the time he was seized by the government and sent to a life imprisonment in a foreign jail without ever being charged with a any crime in any country.

Tgo01
04-19-2025, 12:07 PM
Instead of making wild accusations with doctored photos on social media, if the government really has evidence that he committed a crime, then they should present it in court, as required by law.

lol

So now the dude's own wife, THE DUDE'S OWN WIFE, in her own writing, stating he beat her, isn't enough for you fuckers? What happened to believe women? That sure went out the window fast.

And the dude was caught in a tiny car stuffed with 8 people in it traveling to Maryland from Arizona. Sure sounds like human trafficking to me.

Parkbandit
04-19-2025, 03:28 PM
Trump posted a photo of himself sitting in the oval office holding a photo that he claims is of Garcia's hand. The photos show the letters MS13 tattooed across the fingers. Anybody looking closely at the photo Trump is holding can tell that it has been altered. The fact that Garcia was deported based on photoshopped photos and without a hearing should make every fair-minded person, including every judge, who considers this matter demand the immediate release of Garcia.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GorNCyaWkAAO2nm?format=jpg&name=small

Back
04-19-2025, 04:21 PM
Trump's sharpie strikes again!

I can't believe you guys worship this clown.

Tgo01
04-19-2025, 04:23 PM
Trump's sharpie strikes again!

I can't believe you guys worship this clown.

What do you think about egg prices dropping by 33%?

Back
04-19-2025, 04:30 PM
What do you think about egg prices dropping by 33%?

Actually posted in the other thread saying it's great. A lot of people will be affected in a positive way. There's a lot more to do though!

~Rocktar~
04-19-2025, 05:52 PM
Trump's sharpie strikes again!

I can't believe you guys worship this clown.

Meanwhile you keep supporting terrorist's and the mass murder and rape of Jewish women and children. Fuck off.

Back
04-19-2025, 06:03 PM
Meanwhile you keep supporting terrorist's and the mass murder and rape of Jewish women and children. Fuck off.

I don't believe I do. What makes you think that?

~Rocktar~
04-19-2025, 09:10 PM
I don't believe I do. What makes you think that?

Your replies in the thread when that event happened.

ClydeR
04-19-2025, 10:08 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GorNCyaWkAAO2nm?format=jpg&name=small

How is that relevant to the question of whether or not he should have been sent to a foreign terrorist prison for a life sentence?

Back
04-19-2025, 11:07 PM
Your replies in the thread when that event happened.

Lol bro you're accusing me of some heinous shit but can't be bothered to quote my words on this forum? I'd call you a clown but even they put some effort into what they do.

Parkbandit
04-20-2025, 11:09 AM
How is that relevant to the question of whether or not he should have been sent to a foreign terrorist prison for a life sentence?

You are STILL unsure how a thread works, aren't you?

I literally quoted the post I was referring to.

How are you this fucking stupid every single day?

ClydeR
04-20-2025, 08:44 PM
From a government filing today in the Garcia case..


Concerning the current physical location and custodial status of Kilmar Abrego García, I am able to provide a partial update. With reference to the recent visit of Sen. Chris Van Hollen to El Salvador, our Embassy reported that Abrego García told Sen. Van Hollen on April 17 that he had been transferred from CECOT to the detention facility “Centro Industrial” in Santa Ana about eight days prior. Abrego García told Sen. Van Hollen that he had been placed in the administrative building of Centro Industrial, in a room of his own with a bed and furniture, and that he was not in a cell.

More... (https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.92.0.pdf)

Wow. The Trump Administration claims that they have been trying to "facilitate" Garcia's return to the U.S., but only Senator Van Hollen has made any headway. Not enough, but more than Trump. Because of Van Hollen, El Salvador was forced by internal politics to move Garcia to a different prison. El Salvador would not have made the move if they really believed Garcia was a terrorist. The move is an implicit admission that there is no basis for the continued imprisonment of a U.S. legal resident who was mistakenly sent to El Salvador. Time for Bondi to send the plane she promised.

Suppa Hobbit Mage
04-21-2025, 09:24 AM
From a government filing today in the Garcia case..



Wow. The Trump Administration claims that they have been trying to "facilitate" Garcia's return to the U.S., but only Senator Van Hollen has made any headway. Not enough, but more than Trump. Because of Van Hollen, El Salvador was forced by internal politics to move Garcia to a different prison. El Salvador would not have made the move if they really believed Garcia was a terrorist. The move is an implicit admission that there is no basis for the continued imprisonment of a U.S. legal resident who was mistakenly sent to El Salvador. Time for Bondi to send the plane she promised.

Per usual, you are wrong. He was moved 11 days before the posturing by Van Hollen.

Tgo01
04-21-2025, 12:45 PM
From a government filing today in the Garcia case..



Wow. The Trump Administration claims that they have been trying to "facilitate" Garcia's return to the U.S., but only Senator Van Hollen has made any headway. Not enough, but more than Trump. Because of Van Hollen, El Salvador was forced by internal politics to move Garcia to a different prison. El Salvador would not have made the move if they really believed Garcia was a terrorist. The move is an implicit admission that there is no basis for the continued imprisonment of a U.S. legal resident who was mistakenly sent to El Salvador. Time for Bondi to send the plane she promised.

lol

How do you read this and determine that Van Hollen had anything to do with the illegal alien gang member being moved? According to what you quoted the gang member himself said he was moved 8 days before he even met the dipshit Senator, well before the dipshit Senator even said he was going to visit the illegal alien gang member.

Sometimes you managed to be more useless than Back, which is quite the feat.

~Rocktar~
04-21-2025, 05:53 PM
https://scontent-atl3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/491997857_3920152144900924_1297670474206933583_n.j pg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=e6IF-GEIRLcQ7kNvwF5FRPr&_nc_oc=Adkeknnfx-ePxhhCEnFqfB7tSDwOUfnxI9b6qVMAiSTJ_vMHbAIZu38rJ__T t-CAjAc&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-2.xx&_nc_gid=VK-rUKVNiQUsFu5TeGA7pA&oh=00_AfHX2kDGJU9qJ_Pbc5z1V3gWpLQjeduD5tbskNXKdpkE aw&oe=680C789F

ClydeR
04-23-2025, 08:02 AM
Something will happen soon in the Garcia case. It appears that the U.S. government is directing El Salvador to release Garcia to another country. El Salvador cannot keep holding him in prison when he has not been charged or convicted of a crime. Public pressure on both the governments of the U.S. and El Salvador is too great.

The judge yesterday ordered the government to produce documents requested by Garcia'a attorneys. Then, in the early morning hours of today, the government filed a request, under seal, requesting that the judge delay that order for one week. Otherwise, the lies that the government told the courts about Garcia will be exposed when the government is forced to reveal information to Garcia's lawyers. That is the only reason the Trump Administration is finally acting.


The Trump administration, which has publicly said that Abrego Garcia is “never coming back” to the U.S., despite Xinis explicitly ordering them to facilitate his return, also claimed that it was doing more than it previously stated in court.

“The State Department has engaged in appropriate diplomatic discussions with El Salvador regarding Abrego Garcia,” the government said in several responses, noting it only started doing so last week after an appeals court issued a stinging condemnation of the Trump administration’s flouting of Xinis’ orders.

More... (https://www.baltimoresun.com/2025/04/22/trump-administration-invokes-state-secrets-as-lawyers-probe-abrego-garcia-efforts/)


https://i.imgur.com/YOAbLZJ.png
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/abrego-garcia-v-noem/

ClydeR
04-23-2025, 08:05 AM
https://scontent-atl3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/491997857_3920152144900924_1297670474206933583_n.j pg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=e6IF-GEIRLcQ7kNvwF5FRPr&_nc_oc=Adkeknnfx-ePxhhCEnFqfB7tSDwOUfnxI9b6qVMAiSTJ_vMHbAIZu38rJ__T t-CAjAc&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-2.xx&_nc_gid=VK-rUKVNiQUsFu5TeGA7pA&oh=00_AfHX2kDGJU9qJ_Pbc5z1V3gWpLQjeduD5tbskNXKdpkE aw&oe=680C789F


The other presidents were more successful than Trump because they followed the law. Trump insists on ignoring the law and trying to look like a tough guy.

~Rocktar~
04-23-2025, 08:22 AM
The other presidents were more successful than Trump because they followed the law. Trump insists on ignoring the law and trying to look like a tough guy.

No they didn't. They are more successful so far because they were globalist shills and part of the uniparty. They all deported the living fuck out of people at the border, like you came in, they asked where you were from, you claimed asylum, they turned your ass around and pushed you back across the border. There was no so called "due process" according to you Leftist pieces of shit.

So here are some questions for all you Leftists:
Why do you support keeping criminals in the US
Why do you support stealing from Americans to support those criminals?
How many Americans have to be raped and murdered before you decide to support your nation and your neighbor over criminals?
How many children have to be abused and trafficked before you decide that enough is enough?
How many of these criminals have you sponsored, personally to live in your home and at your expense?
Why do you think that criminals are more important that your friends, family and neighbors?

Parkbandit
04-23-2025, 01:39 PM
The other presidents were more successful than Trump because they followed the law. Trump insists on ignoring the law and trying to look like a tough guy.

Which law did Obama/Bush/Clinton follow that Trump isn't?

Be specific.

Methais
04-23-2025, 04:03 PM
Something will happen soon in the Garcia case. It appears that the U.S. government is directing El Salvador to release Garcia to another country. El Salvador cannot keep holding him in prison when he has not been charged or convicted of a crime. Public pressure on both the governments of the U.S. and El Salvador is too great.

The judge yesterday ordered the government to produce documents requested by Garcia'a attorneys. Then, in the early morning hours of today, the government filed a request, under seal, requesting that the judge delay that order for one week. Otherwise, the lies that the government told the courts about Garcia will be exposed when the government is forced to reveal information to Garcia's lawyers. That is the only reason the Trump Administration is finally acting.




https://i.imgur.com/YOAbLZJ.png
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/abrego-garcia-v-noem/

I hope they let him out and immediately deport him somewhere else just to watch you retards lose it and shit your pants all over the place while shrieking uncontrollably.

After your TV tells you to do so, of course.

Methais
04-23-2025, 04:53 PM
The other presidents were more successful than Trump because they followed the law. Trump insists on ignoring the law and trying to look like a tough guy.

Would you let any of them stay at your house while their "due process" is playing out?

Parkbandit
04-23-2025, 07:52 PM
Would you let any of them stay at your house while their "due process" is playing out?

His mom doesn't allow cLyDeR's friends to sleep over.

Well, if he had any..

ClydeR
04-26-2025, 10:11 AM
How do you know they were here illegally, and not actual U.S. citizens born in this country? You don't, because there was no judicial check before they were deported,


As you all know, I hate saying, "I told you so." The reason I hate saying it is because I've had to say it so many, many times. To avoid that unpleasantness, I'll just post the below without comment..


WASHINGTON, April 25 (Reuters) - The Trump administration appeared to have deported a 2-year-old U.S. citizen "with no meaningful process," a federal judge said on Friday, as the child's father sought to have her returned to the United States.

U.S. District Judge Terry A. Doughty said the girl, who was referred to as "V.M.L." in court documents, was deported with her mother.

“It is illegal and unconstitutional to deport, detain for deportation, or recommend deportation of a U.S. citizen,” Doughty said.

More... (https://www.reuters.com/world/us/two-year-old-us-citizen-appears-have-been-deported-with-no-meaningful-process-2025-04-26/)

Parkbandit
04-27-2025, 05:30 PM
As you all know, I hate saying, "I told you so." The reason I hate saying it is because I've had to say it so many, many times. To avoid that unpleasantness, I'll just post the below without comment..

cLyDeR 2017: OMG YOU CAN'T SEPARATE A PARENT WITH THEIR CHILDREN!!!!
cLyDeR 2025: OMG YOU NEED TO SEPARATE A PARENT FROM THEIR CHILDREN!!!!!

Spoiler: Having a kid in the US doesn't suddenly make you immune to deportation if you came here illegally.