EC Predictions!

[Solkern]

Wondering what you all think it’s going to be.


I think it’s going to be 298-240 in favor of Harris.

[Parkbandit]

Wondering what you all think it’s going to be.

I think it’s going to be 298-240 in favor of Harris.

Love to see the math on that prediction....

[Shaps]

That's not the question you should ask...

The question should be... out of the whole Nation... why all votes are able to be tabulated and results given... EXCEPT, for 6 Democrat held large cities... that will require multiple days/weeks to tabulate their results...

And somehow all the results in these 6 locations... AFTER "election day" are 95% Democrat, and 5% Republican...

Pretty impressive when you think about it... but not if you have half a brain.

You'd almost have to think it's a statistical improbability... but of course, that would require you imagining that "the system" and those in power, have a certain measure of control.

And if you think they don't, then tell me again... How is the Democratic candidate, someone that never received 1 vote in the "democratically held primaries"? ... Oh, right...

[Methais]

Don't we already have an election thread? I thought this was a ClydeR thread at first just for that reason.

[Parkbandit]

That's not the question you should ask...

The question should be... out of the whole Nation... why all votes are able to be tabulated and results given... EXCEPT, for 6 Democrat held large cities... that will require multiple days/weeks to tabulate their results...

And somehow all the results in these 6 locations... AFTER "election day" are 95% Democrat, and 5% Republican...

Pretty impressive when you think about it... but not if you have half a brain.

You'd almost have to think it's a statistical improbability... but of course, that would require you imagining that "the system" and those in power, have a certain measure of control.

And if you think they don't, then tell me again... How is the Democratic candidate, someone that never received 1 vote in the "democratically held primaries"? ... Oh, right...

What are those 6 cities?

[joeyb]

the election is stolen. your vote doesn't matter.

[joeyb]

That's not the question you should ask...

The question should be... out of the whole Nation... why all votes are able to be tabulated and results given... EXCEPT, for 6 Democrat held large cities... that will require multiple days/weeks to tabulate their results...

And somehow all the results in these 6 locations... AFTER "election day" are 95% Democrat, and 5% Republican...

Pretty impressive when you think about it... but not if you have half a brain.

You'd almost have to think it's a statistical improbability... but of course, that would require you imagining that "the system" and those in power, have a certain measure of control.

And if you think they don't, then tell me again... How is the Democratic candidate, someone that never received 1 vote in the "democratically held primaries"? ... Oh, right...

why would it matter how long it takes to count the votes if they are Democrat held large cities? are you saying that large cities don't almost always vote for democrats?

the question should be, why are you so fucking stupid?

[Tgo01]

why would it matter how long it takes to count the votes if they are Democrat held large cities?

Oh, right. There can't possibly be any shenanigans going on when it comes time to count the votes. You can't question the election or else you're an election denier and a threat to democracy! Unless a Republican wins, then you're a threat to democracy if you DON'T question the vote counting!

But seriously, can you give us a reasonable explanation for why the same blue cities need days, sometimes weeks, to count their ballots when 99% of the US has their votes counted the day of the election? Don't give me no shit about not enough resources, they are large cities, they can afford to hire a few more people who have the difficult to obtain skill to count to a number higher than 10.

[joeyb]

Tgo01 what proof has there ever been that the election was stolen or that any election interference ever happened?

Tgo01, do you disagree that large cities typically vote liberal? Or, are you arguing that they vote liberal because of fraud?

[Suppressed Poet]

Maricopa County (Phoenix area) Arizona… Even if you believe they count votes fairly, there is no argument that however they do it is wildly inefficient compared to every other county in the country.

[Tgo01]

Tgo01 what proof has there ever been that the election was stolen or that any election interference ever happened?

Tgo01, do you disagree that large cities typically vote liberal? Or, are you arguing that they vote liberal because of fraud?

I can't help but notice you didn't answer my question.

Your argument basically amounts to "There can't POSSIBLY be any shenanigans going on because blue cities vote blue! DUH!"

So I guess it would be totally cool if every blue city just so happened to have a 100% voter turnout and it just so happens that each and every single person voted Democrat right?

Man, just imagine if you and Seran stopped posting on the PC, the average IQ of the PC would jump by about 50 points.

[joeyb]

Maricopa County (Phoenix area) Arizona… Even if you believe they count votes fairly, there is no argument that however they do it is wildly inefficient compared to every other county in the country.

my question is, if they count votes fairly, why does it matter if it takes them a bit longer to count votes?

the implication here is that it is taking longer because some sus stuff is going on, right?

[joeyb]

I can't help but notice you didn't answer my question.

Your argument basically amounts to "There can't POSSIBLY be any shenanigans going on because blue cities vote blue! DUH!"

So I guess it would be totally cool if every blue city just so happened to have a 100% voter turnout and it just so happens that each and every single person voted Democrat right?

Man, just imagine if you and Seran stopped posting on the PC, the average IQ of the PC would jump by about 50 points.

i answered your questions with my questions.

you are implying that the reason it takes longer to count votes is because some shady shit is going on in terms of voter fraud. the burden of proof is on you. so answer my questions you stupid braindead fuck or shut the fuck up

[Suppressed Poet]

my question is, if they count votes fairly, why does it matter if it takes them a bit longer to count votes?

the implication here is that it is taking longer because some sus stuff is going on, right?

It’s not enough that our election is fair and free. People need to believe that our voting process is fair. When it takes this Democrat county several days to count their votes and each election cycle they seem to magically come up with just the right number necessary to win the state, that invites a perception of corruption. The mere perception of said corruption is a problem for America.

[Suppressed Poet]

Joey B, put it this way…. say you go out to dinner and you order an appetizer, meal, a few drinks, and desert. When you request your check, the waiter takes forever and brings you a the bill that includes the total amount but no itemized receipt. You notice the bill is higher than you expected.

Even if the total amount charged for your dinner bill is correct, would you find it acceptable that it took the waiter forever to bring it to you & that it does not include an itemized receipt?

[joeyb]

It’s not enough that our election is fair and free. People need to believe that our voting process is fair. When it takes this Democrat county several days to count their votes and each election cycle they seem to magically come up with just the right number necessary to win the state, that invites a perception of corruption. The mere perception of said corruption is a problem for America.

has there been any proven or documented examples of mass voter fraud by democrats that you can give examples of or links to? if not, why would there be any perception of corruption in the system other than Trump's rhetoric?

[Shaps]

i answered your questions with my questions.

you are implying that the reason it takes longer to count votes is because some shady shit is going on in terms of voter fraud. the burden of proof is on you. so answer my questions you stupid braindead fuck or shut the fuck up

Again... you're focused on the wrong thing.

It's not the time it takes to count the votes.
It's not the fact that it's in large cities.

It's the fact that it's ONLY Democrat controlled cities.
It's the fact that it's ONLY after the "election day" is complete.
It's the fact that it's ONLY Democrat votes that somehow are %'s above what is normal, everywhere else.

There is no way, statistically speaking, that such discrepancies occur. If every vote AFTER election day is somehow skewed so favorably in one direction, questions have to be asked... because statistically, it's impossible.

I don't care how long they take to count... it's the fact there is no way... after 99% of the country has voted... that somehow all votes tabulated AFTER the election are 95% in one direction.

You can keep living in your made up world, but yea...

Coincidence and correlation are both very real things...

[joeyb]

what discrepancies are we talking about exactly?

also, I don't get the connection between taking longer and then voter fraud happening? Like, why would they take longer to count votes if they are just going to "do fraud" and make the dems win? if that were happening, wouldn't it make more sense to do the fraud in a timespan that makes it so everything is finished within the same time as everywhere else? unless you're saying it's taking longer because they are doing funky stuff behind the scenes? i don't really get what you're arguing.

anyway, show me proof of this happening.

[Tgo01]

i answered your questions with my questions.

lol

You really just said that unironically didn't you? I think I underestimated my previous comment, I think the average IQ of the PC would jump by about 75 points if you and Seran stopped posting.

[Shaps]

what discrepancies are we talking about exactly?

also, I don't get the connection between taking longer and then voter fraud happening? Like, why would they take longer to count votes if they are just going to "do fraud" and make the dems win? if that were happening, wouldn't it make more sense to do the fraud in a timespan that makes it so everything is finished within the same time as everywhere else? unless you're saying it's taking longer because they are doing funky stuff behind the scenes? i don't really get what you're arguing.

anyway, show me proof of this happening.

You ask me to show you "proof"...

I just gave you statistical proof, the concept of coincidence and correlation, and historical precedence.

How about you "show me proof" it is NOT happening.

[Methais]

i answered your questions with my questions.

you are implying that the reason it takes longer to count votes is because some shady shit is going on in terms of voter fraud. the burden of proof is on you. so answer my questions you stupid braindead fuck or shut the fuck up

The other option is that the poll workers in Maricopa are just that monumentally stupid and have extreme trouble just counting to 10, something I'm sure Seran can relate to.

[joeyb]

you literally didn't show any proof of it happening.

i literally can't show proof of it not happening. that's not how this works. you are making a claim something is going on, the burden of proof is on you. where is the proof? you making a post about it?

[joeyb]

lol

You really just said that unironically didn't you? I think I underestimated my previous comment, I think the average IQ of the PC would jump by about 75 points if you and Seran stopped posting.

answer my questions or shut the fuck up.

you are literally the dumbest person to ever post on this board

[Solkern]

answer my questions or shut the fuck up.

you are literally the dumbest person to ever post on this board

Why do you even try? He honestly believes when Trump says his rallies are always full…

https://i.imgur.com/DCwjsvp.png

[SHAFT]

Oh, right. There can't possibly be any shenanigans going on when it comes time to count the votes. You can't question the election or else you're an election denier and a threat to democracy! Unless a Republican wins, then you're a threat to democracy if you DON'T question the vote counting!

But seriously, can you give us a reasonable explanation for why the same blue cities need days, sometimes weeks, to count their ballots when 99% of the US has their votes counted the day of the election? Don't give me no shit about not enough resources, they are large cities, they can afford to hire a few more people who have the difficult to obtain skill to count to a number higher than 10.

The nazi is conducting mental gymnastics! You’re a gold medalist!

It’ll all be over with soon, douchebag.

[Tgo01]

you literally didn't show any proof of it happening.

i literally can't show proof of it not happening.

Whoa! Is this a breakthrough for joeyb? We can't possibly prove fraud is happening because we literally aren't allowed to watch them count the votes. You can't prove voter fraud isn't happening.

So maybe...MAYBE...the solution is to push these cities/counties to count their votes in a timely manner (like literally every other fucking democracy on the planet can do) so they can build trust with people that voter fraud isn't happening.

Again, just answer my simple question: What possible explanation is there for why it takes them so fucking long to count the votes? Fucking India has their votes counted much faster, a country almost 5 times the size of the US in terms of population.

And again, since you can't read all too goodly, I'm NOT asking you to prove voter fraud isn't happening, I'm asking you to defend why it takes just these blue areas so long to count their votes.

[Tgo01]

The nazi is conducting mental gymnastics! You’re a gold medalist!

It’ll all be over with soon, douchebag.

I'm just asking for you fucks to give a decent explanation for why it takes just these Democrat run areas so long to count their votes. Just one simple, reasonable explanation. But to be fair, it is mean of me to expect you fucks to think for yourselves. Go sit in front of your TV with MSNBC running 24/7.

Also, you have me on ignore, remember? You lie about as good as you think.

[Solkern]

Also, you have me on ignore, remember? You lie about as good as you think.

You can still view people’s post when they are on ignore. But of course I’m not surprised at all, much like everything you post, you don’t bother to check if what you are actually spouting is nonsense, which all of it is, as you just proved.

[Methais]

Why do you even try? He honestly believes when Trump says his rallies are always full…

https://i.imgur.com/DCwjsvp.png

It's 2024, there's no excuse to not crop your photos like a noob.

https://i.imgur.com/ddsIXCa.png

See how quick and easy that is?





In other news...

https://i.imgur.com/JKO5p0T.png
https://i.imgur.com/vh8HscQ.png


Just tested it and it'I doubt it's going to make any actual difference at this point, but that doesn't make it less stupid.

Or maybe google thinks black people are too stupid to find out where they go to vote. Your thoughts Solkern?

[Methais]

The nazi is conducting mental gymnastics! You’re a gold medalist!

It’ll all be over with soon, douchebag.

You are literally Seran on meth.

You:
https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.3400928103.4384/st,small,507x507-pad,600x600,f8f8f8.jpg

[joeyb]

Whoa! Is this a breakthrough for joeyb? We can't possibly prove fraud is happening because we literally aren't allowed to watch them count the votes. You can't prove voter fraud isn't happening.

So maybe...MAYBE...the solution is to push these cities/counties to count their votes in a timely manner (like literally every other fucking democracy on the planet can do) so they can build trust with people that voter fraud isn't happening.

Again, just answer my simple question: What possible explanation is there for why it takes them so fucking long to count the votes? Fucking India has their votes counted much faster, a country almost 5 times the size of the US in terms of population.

And again, since you can't read all too goodly, I'm NOT asking you to prove voter fraud isn't happening, I'm asking you to defend why it takes just these blue areas so long to count their votes.

firstly, that reply was to Shaps.

secondly, are you saying there is no other explanation as to why it takes them a long time to count votes other than voter fraud? you realize certain states have different processes to count votes by law? have you tried googling why this is a thing you complete fucking moron?

thirdly, the implication here is that it's taking so long to count votes because of voter fraud.

fourthly, if you can't prove it's happening, then...like, what? so, let's just believe that voter fraud is happening, even though we can't prove it's happening. we had this conversation about the eating cats and dogs thing. do you understand what a burden of proof is? for example, if I were to make the statement that you're an extremely stupid person to someone, I would show them your posts as proof, and then why would agree

fifthly, you are literally the dumbest person to ever post on this board.

[Methais]

It’s not enough that our election is fair and free. People need to believe that our voting process is fair. When it takes this Democrat county several days to count their votes and each election cycle they seem to magically come up with just the right number necessary to win the state, that invites a perception of corruption. The mere perception of said corruption is a problem for America.

https://i.imgur.com/Aln8rtL.png (https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1853855638243377351)
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1853855638243377351


"tHiS iS aLl ToTaLly nOrMaL!!!!"

[Solkern]

It’s not enough that our election is fair and free. People need to believe that our voting process is fair. When it takes this Democrat county several days to count their votes and each election cycle they seem to magically come up with just the right number necessary to win the state, that invites a perception of corruption. The mere perception of said corruption is a problem for America.


You do realize that these Democratic counties have A LOT more people, right? Some have millions and or even tens of millions of votes, that they check and recheck, and that can take time.

Some don’t even allow counting until the day of the election for early voting.

[Methais]

In other news...

https://i.imgur.com/JKO5p0T.png
https://i.imgur.com/vh8HscQ.png


Just tested it and it'I doubt it's going to make any actual difference at this point, but that doesn't make it less stupid.

Or maybe google thinks black people are too stupid to find out where they go to vote. Your thoughts Solkern?

https://i.imgur.com/SOc7qws.png

https://media1.tenor.com/m/BtIKegt0WE0AAAAd/wow-monkey.gif

I'm sure it was just a harmless error with no malicious intent.

[Tgo01]

You do realize that these Democratic counties have A LOT more people, right? Some have millions and or even tens of millions of votes, that they check and recheck, and that can take time.


But seriously, can you give us a reasonable explanation for why the same blue cities need days, sometimes weeks, to count their ballots when 99% of the US has their votes counted the day of the election? Don't give me no shit about not enough resources, they are large cities, they can afford to hire a few more people who have the difficult to obtain skill to count to a number higher than 10.

You fucks are so predictable.

[~Rocktar~]

why would it matter how long it takes to count the votes if they are Democrat held large cities? are you saying that large cities don't almost always vote for democrats?

the question should be, why are you so fucking stupid?

Because the constitution says we have a day of election, not a week, couple weeks, month and so on.

[~Rocktar~]

You do realize that these Democratic counties have A LOT more people, right? Some have millions and or even tens of millions of votes, that they check and recheck, and that can take time.

Some don’t even allow counting until the day of the election for early voting.

France can count 43 million votes by 9 PM. That's not even a believable excuse in Europe.

[Parkbandit]

You do realize that these Democratic counties have A LOT more people, right? Some have millions and or even tens of millions of votes, that they check and recheck, and that can take time.

Some don’t even allow counting until the day of the election for early voting.

Which cities, specifically, have more people than the entire state of Florida?

Stop being a fucking retard.

This has nothing to do with population and everything to do with Democrats running shitty cities.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

You do realize that these Democratic counties have A LOT more people, right? Some have millions and or even tens of millions of votes, that they check and recheck, and that can take time.

Some don’t even allow counting until the day of the election for early voting.

Explain Florida vs Pennsylvania.

[~Rocktar~]

Explain Florida vs Pennsylvania.

Hey now, even Pennsylvania can't explain Pennsylvania.