Rittenhouse trial

[Tgo01]

So far from the PROSECUTION'S own witnesses we have learned:

One of the men Rittenhouse killed was acting belligerently and threatened to kill Rittenhouse and Rittenhouse shot him after the man had lunged for his gun.
The one dude Rittenhouse shot but survived admitted he chased Rittenhouse down the street with a loaded gun on his person, pulled out his gun and pointed it at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shot him.

Again these are statements from the PROSECUTION'S own witnesses. The defense really doesn't even have to call any witnesses at this point. It sure as shit sounds like a few crazy fuckers threatened his life, then chased him down the street, then proceeded to attack him, reach for his gun, AND pulled out a loaded gun and pointed it at Rittenhouse.

Oh yeah and that dude with the gun didn't even have a valid conceal carry permit that night. OOPS!

[Parkbandit]

Not sure how Rittenhouse isn't completely exonerated after that testimony.

[~Rocktar~]

I wonder how much his college fund will be after this politically motivated witch hunt?

I mean Nick Sandman got an "undisclosed settlement amount" which is likely enough to live off the rest of his life even after paying his lawyers. You know it had to be pretty big if CNN stipulated not disclosing it.

[Tgo01]

Not sure how Rittenhouse isn't completely exonerated after that testimony.

Oh yeah I almost forgot the best part. According to the prosecution's own witnesses one of the men he shot was shouting racial slurs against blacks before he was shot, which is funny because the Democrat pundits and politicians were all over the "news" claiming the people Rittenhouse shot were there protesting for racial justice. They sure had a funny way of showing it apparently.

[Neveragain]

So far from the PROSECUTION'S own witnesses we have learned:

One of the men Rittenhouse killed was acting belligerently and threatened to kill Rittenhouse and Rittenhouse shot him after the man had lunged for his gun.
The one dude Rittenhouse shot but survived admitted he chased Rittenhouse down the street with a loaded gun on his person, pulled out his gun and pointed it at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse shot him.

Again these are statements from the PROSECUTION'S own witnesses. The defense really doesn't even have to call any witnesses at this point. It sure as shit sounds like a few crazy fuckers threatened his life, then chased him down the street, then proceeded to attack him, reach for his gun, AND pulled out a loaded gun and pointed it at Rittenhouse.

Oh yeah and that dude with the gun didn't even have a valid conceal carry permit that night. OOPS!

I don't think the prosecuting attorney is going to have a job after this.

I also give credit to the dude that drew on Rittenhouse for telling the truth. Maybe after nearly being killed he had a moment of clarity.

[Tgo01]

I also give credit to the dude that drew on Rittenhouse for telling the truth. Maybe after nearly being killed he had a moment of clarity.

He admitted to it but he still tried to portray Rittenhouse as the one in the wrong. I think the only reason he told the truth was because there was video evidence showing he drew his gun on Rittenhouse and he couldn't very well argue that he didn't have a loaded gun on his person while he was chasing Rittenhouse down the street.

Really the defense is just tearing these witnesses apart in cross examination. I'm betting the prosecution is hoping the jurors are all just political activists who don't really care what the evidence is.

[Alfster]

Y'all plan to lie in court? Like, your bar is so low you actively expect people to lie?

[Alfster]

Oh yeah and that dude with the gun didn't even have a valid conceal carry permit that night. OOPS!

And Rittenhouse wasn't even old enough to openly carry in the state. His gun was also part of a straw purchase. OOOPS! Zingerz omg.

I live in Wisconsin and know the gun laws inside and out. It's going to come down to that. Should a kid that is illegally holding a straw purchased gun allowed to shoot in self defense?

Basically everyone involved is fucking retarded.

[Tgo01]

Y'all plan to lie in court? Like, your bar is so low you actively expect people to lie?

Okay?

[Tgo01]

And Rittenhouse wasn't even old enough to openly carry in the state. His gun was also part of a straw purchase. OOOPS! Zingerz omg.

So that totally means he's guilty of murder right?! And yet he's the only one on trial. So weird.

My beyond obvious point is it typically isn't wise for the prosecution to call up a witness who openly admits he too was breaking the law that night, especially when it comes to illegally possessing a gun while they are charging the other person for violating gun laws. Just like it would be beyond retarded to call up Rittenhouse as a witness against the one-armed bandit, but let's get real, this maniac will never be charged with a crime because he has the "correct" politics.


I live in Wisconsin and know the gun laws inside and out. It's going to come down to that. Should a kid that is illegally holding a straw purchased gun allowed to shoot in self defense?

I mean...yes? Is this even a fucking real question?

"You're only allowed to protect yourself if you're following the law! Otherwise go ahead and die or be charged with murder!"

Get the fuck outta here. If he wasn't old enough to openly carry then charge him for that.

[Neveragain]

And Rittenhouse wasn't even old enough to openly carry in the state. His gun was also part of a straw purchase. OOOPS! Zingerz omg.

I live in Wisconsin and know the gun laws inside and out. It's going to come down to that. Should a kid that is illegally holding a straw purchased gun allowed to shoot in self defense?

Basically everyone involved is fucking retarded.

I have an honest question.

WTF are your police doing allowing this shit to get out of hand?

We're sitting here in Iowa and wondering what the fuck is going on with Wisconsin and Minnesota. The cops here would have been allover that shit before rioting like that happened.

[Tgo01]

I have an honest question.

WTF are your police doing allowing this shit to get out of hand?

We're sitting here in Iowa and wondering what the fuck is going on with Wisconsin and Minnesota. The cops here would have been allover that shit before rioting like that happened.

Just like what happened a lot during the past 4 years, Democrat areas allowed the rioters to do pretty much whatever they wanted as long as the rioters claimed to be Democrats.

[Alfster]

Just like what happened a lot during the past 4 years, Democrat areas allowed the rioters to do pretty much whatever they wanted as long as the rioters claimed to be Democrats.

It's cute that you think Wisconsin is a democratic state. You are retarded if you think that.

[Alfster]

I have an honest question.

WTF are your police doing allowing this shit to get out of hand?

We're sitting here in Iowa and wondering what the fuck is going on with Wisconsin and Minnesota. The cops here would have been allover that shit before rioting like that happened.

I wish I could answer that. I like to believe its select areas, but who knows? Milwaukee police are shit too. Feels a lot like their response was basically, not my job.

[Alfster]

So that totally means he's guilty of murder right?! And yet he's the only one on trial. So weird.

My beyond obvious point is it typically isn't wise for the prosecution to call up a witness who openly admits he too was breaking the law that night, especially when it comes to illegally possessing a gun while they are charging the other person for violating gun laws. Just like it would be beyond retarded to call up Rittenhouse as a witness against the one-armed bandit, but let's get real, this maniac will never be charged with a crime because he has the "correct" politics.



I mean...yes? Is this even a fucking real question?

"You're only allowed to protect yourself if you're following the law! Otherwise go ahead and die or be charged with murder!"

Get the fuck outta here. If he wasn't old enough to openly carry then charge him for that.

Look. Everyone involved is retarded. I personally think Rittenhouse guilty of murder due to the fact that he had an illegally purchased gun that he wasn't even legally allowed to carry and he wasn't even protecting his own property. Bottom line: if the retarded kid didn't have a gun, none of this shit would have happened.

You also lose self defense when commiting a crime. In my opinion he committed two. Straw purchase. Open carrying under the legal age


Pisses me off because what is going to happen? Gun laws will get stricter because of this retard.

[Neveragain]

I wish I could answer that. I like to believe its select areas, but who knows? Milwaukee police are shit too. Feels a lot like their response was basically, not my job.

That's too bad, man. Hopefully you all get things worked out, Wisconsin is good people.

[Tgo01]

It's cute that you think Wisconsin is a democratic state. You are retarded if you think that.

Governor of Wisconsin is a Democrat.

State Attorney General is a Democrat.

Mayor of Kenosha is a Democrat.

It's almost as if I'm 100% correct but as usual you just have to take the contrary position because you are a sad sad little man.

[Tgo01]

I personally think Rittenhouse guilty of murder due to the fact that he had an illegally purchased gun

lol okay.

So let me get this straight: whether or not he acted in self defense has to do with the legality of the gun he used in which he defended himself with?

This isn't the most reaching I have seen someone do, but damn it's gotta be in the top 5 at least.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Based on the trial that I've listened too and/or read about, I think the kid will walk on everything. Not sure how I feel about it, but the prosecution has done a shit job so far.

[Parkbandit]

I live in Wisconsin and know the gun laws inside and out.


I personally think Rittenhouse guilty of murder due to the fact that he had an illegally purchased gun that he wasn't even legally allowed to carry and he wasn't even protecting his own property.

https://c.tenor.com/gifuotNWX3kAAAAC/awkward-smile.gif

[Gelston]

And Rittenhouse wasn't even old enough to openly carry in the state. His gun was also part of a straw purchase. OOOPS! Zingerz omg.

I live in Wisconsin and know the gun laws inside and out. It's going to come down to that. Should a kid that is illegally holding a straw purchased gun allowed to shoot in self defense?

Basically everyone involved is fucking retarded.

Yes. He can be charged for illegally possessing a firearm and found guilty on that, which is a class A Misdemeanor. That is why it is a completely different charge. It isn't like "Oh, you had this firearm illegally, so you are also a murderer now for using it to defend yourself."

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://abcnews.go.com/US/kyle-rittenhouse-homicide-trial-key-takeaways-day/story?id=81034238


"The way this case turns out has an impact on your ability to collect your $10 million, right?" Chirafisi asked.
Grosskreutz responded, "That is correct."
"When you were standing 3 to 5 feet from him with your arms up in the air, he never fired, right?" Chirafisi asked Grosskreutz, referring to Rittenhouse.
"Correct," Grosskreutz responded.
"It wasn't until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him, with your gun, now your hands down pointed at him, that he fired, right?" Chirafisi asked.
"Correct," Grosskreutz said.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Grosskreutz is a super douche.

[Tgo01]

Grosskreutz is a super douche.

Yup. It’s pretty amazing the state thought he would be a good witness. They either totally expected him to lie (even though this is all on video so he would be committing perjury) or like I said earlier they know the facts are totally on Rittenhouse’s side and are hoping the jury is filled with political activists who don’t care about the facts.

[~Rocktar~]

If he wasn't on the prosecution list, I would have called him for the defense.

Also, they may feel that this is a political prosecution and they are trying to do their jobs in the face of their bosses and the political climate.

[Parkbandit]

Yup. It’s pretty amazing the state thought he would be a good witness. They either totally expected him to lie (even though this is all on video so he would be committing perjury) or like I said earlier they know the facts are totally on Rittenhouse’s side and are hoping the jury is filled with political activists who don’t care about the facts.

Difficult to lie since the entire thing was on video.

What choice did he have?

He can kiss that 10 million dollar payday goodbye though.

Maybe he should sue the state. There are enough brain dead liberals who would pay him.

[~Rocktar~]

Difficult to lie since the entire thing was on video.

What choice did he have?

He can kiss that 10 million dollar payday goodbye though.

Maybe he should sue the state. There are enough brain dead liberals who would pay him.

Has he put up a go fund me yet?

[Tgo01]

Remember this is the PROSECUTION'S own witness under questioning FROM THE PROSECUTION:

Witness (in regards to one of the people Rittenhouse shot): He said "fuck you" and then reached for the weapon.

For real. Is the prosecution even trying here or what?

Oh yeah the "lone survivor" as the media is referring to him as has also admitted that he is affiliated with and has spoken at rallies for a far left revolutionary group and made statements such as "Long Live the Revolution!" while at these rallies, but at the same time he wants you to believe he was only at this "peaceful protest" while carrying a loaded gun (that he was illegally carrying) to administer first aid to those in need and that even though he pulled a gun out and pointed it at Rittenhouse he had no intention of shooting Rittenhouse.

[Tgo01]

Holy shit. I'm not entirely sure the prosecution's "star witness" was really a witness for the prosecution at all. So the "lone survivor", who the prosecution spent several minutes building him up as a great person because he has some EMT or medical training, admitted that based on his medical experience one of the people Rittenhouse shot put Rittenhouse in "physical danger" before Rittenhouse shot him (this was the dude who tried to stomp on Rittenhouse's head). He also said the other person Rittenhouse shot, the one who hit him over the head with his skateboard, said the guy put Rittenhouse at risk of "head trauma."

Okay so one guy who was shot put him in "physical danger", the other guy put him at risk for "head trauma", and the third guy, the one admitting to all of this, admits he followed Rittenhouse with a loaded weapon, pulled out his weapon and pointed it Rittenhouse and only then did Rittenhouse shoot him.

Seriously what the fuck are we even doing anymore? The judge should just throw this case out of court and humiliate the prosecution as he does so.

Alfster: Nope! None of this matters! He wasn't legally allowed to carry that gun so therefore murder!

[Parkbandit]

Holy shit. I'm not entirely sure the prosecution's "star witness" was really a witness for the prosecution at all. So the "lone survivor", who the prosecution spent several minutes building him up as a great person because he has some EMT or medical training, admitted that based on his medical experience one of the people Rittenhouse shot put Rittenhouse in "physical danger" before Rittenhouse shot him (this was the dude who tried to stomp on Rittenhouse's head). He also said the other person Rittenhouse shot, the one who hit him over the head with his skateboard, said the guy put Rittenhouse at risk of "head trauma."

Okay so one guy who was shot put him in "physical danger", the other guy put him at risk for "head trauma", and the third guy, the one admitting to all of this, admits he followed Rittenhouse with a loaded weapon, pulled out his weapon and pointed it Rittenhouse and only then did Rittenhouse shoot him.

Seriously what the fuck are we even doing anymore? The judge should just throw this case out of court and humiliate the prosecution as he does so.

Alfster: Nope! None of this matters! He wasn't legally allowed to carry that gun so therefore murder!

What an absolute shit show this is become. Prosecution's key witness has exonerated Rittenhouse by his own testimony and cross examination.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Kyle is on the stand right now if you want to listen in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9YXq0A1Vk

[Parkbandit]

The prosecutor is getting shit on by the Judge.

One of the things you want to do as a lawyer is not to make people on the jury dislike you.

He's doing a terrible job of this.

[Neveragain]

The prosecutor is getting shit on by the Judge.

One of the things you want to do as a lawyer is not to make people on the jury dislike you.

He's doing a terrible job of this.

I think the judge is going to have a word with the prosecutor during lunch break. Judge didn't seem too happy about the exploding bullet definition.

[Parkbandit]

I think the judge is going to have a word with the prosecutor during lunch break. Judge didn't seem too happy about the exploding bullet definition.

I love how the lawyer was trying to act innocent.. and the Judge wasn't having any of it.

[Neveragain]

FFS, they busted a person trying to video the jury...........

[Gelston]

lol, Defense is moving for a mistrial.

[Sighisoara]

lol, Defense is moving for a mistrial.

If the judge even half-way entertains it, they will withdraw that motion in a hurry.

[Neveragain]

I really don't like the precedence the prosecution is setting. He's literally saying you should sit back and let the mob burn the town to the ground. I don't think that's going to sit well with the jury.

[Gelston]

I really don't like the precedence the prosecution is setting. He's literally saying you should sit back and let the mob burn the town to the ground. I don't think that's going to sit well with the jury.

He is just saying whatever he can to try and snag a conviction.

[Tgo01]

Prosecution is doing so poorly they are trying to get a mistrial so they can start over again with a fresh jury.

If things weren't so bat shit insane right now this guy would be fired immediately after this trial. But since his bosses are all Democrats and he's pushing the Democrat agenda he'll probably get a promotion.

[Lord Orbstar]

Not Guilty.

[Gelston]

Prosecution is doing so poorly they are trying to get a mistrial so they can start over again with a fresh jury.

If things weren't so bat shit insane right now this guy would be fired immediately after this trial. But since his bosses are all Democrats and he's pushing the Democrat agenda he'll probably get a promotion.

No, the Defense was asking for a mistrial. They probably wouldn't attempt to bring up charges again.

[~Rocktar~]

No, the Defense was asking for a mistrial. They probably wouldn't attempt to bring up charges again.

It would be better to just get an acquittal than a mistrial. That way this is done and settled and doesn't hang over him the rest of his life as a threat. Maybe a misdemeanor with a fine and time served, no loss of rights, no BS and be done with this circus.

[Gelston]

It would be better to just get an acquittal than a mistrial. That way this is done and settled and doesn't hang over him the rest of his life as a threat. Maybe a misdemeanor with a fine and time served, no loss of rights, no BS and be done with this circus.

There are two charges he is getting found guilty on regardless. A mistrial prevents this. Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18 and the curfew violation.

[~Rocktar~]

There are two charges he is getting found guilty on regardless. A mistrial prevents this. Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18 and the curfew violation.

Curfew was thrown out in court and the possession could be a misdemeanor depending on how they want to go. After this trial, the prosecutor is in serious enough trouble, he needs to seek a plea at best. This circus needs to end.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

No, the Defense was asking for a mistrial. They probably wouldn't attempt to bring up charges again.


It would be better to just get an acquittal than a mistrial. That way this is done and settled and doesn't hang over him the rest of his life as a threat. Maybe a misdemeanor with a fine and time served, no loss of rights, no BS and be done with this circus.

I heard from a friend that the request was for a mistrial with prejudice, which apparently means he can never be tried for it by the state again.

[Tgo01]

I heard from a friend that the request was for a mistrial with prejudice, which apparently means he can never be tried for it by the state again.

That makes a lot more sense because otherwise a mistrial is exactly what the prosecution wants right now. They must realize how badly this is going for them, a fresh jury with possibly a new judge is their best hope.

[LOL BRIELUS]

Definite acquittal on all but the dangerous weapon charge. Unsure of the nuances of that one bc there is some hunting provision that I don't know enough about. I'm calling it now

[~Rocktar~]

Apparently the weapon charge is worth 9 mo in jail, misdemeanor and so on since he was a minor at the time. Like I said, fine and time served.

[Tgo01]

Kyle Rittenhouse sobbing shows what's wrong with America (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kyle-rittenhouse-sobbing-shows-what-s-wrong-with-america/ar-AAQz2tu?cvid=5c5a6b8a87124871b60135883ce6b2fd)

An actual adult and presumably someone in control of their mental faculties actually wrote this article.

The fuck is wrong with the Democrat media?


Kyle Rittenhouse, in an unusual move for a defendant, took the witness stand Wednesday. He cried. His defense team then made a motion for a mistrial with prejudice, which means Rittenhouse couldn’t be retried. But whatever the court rules, he has already won.

He’s charged with ​​reckless homicide, intentional homicide and attempted intentional homicide for shooting three people (killing two of them) who were protesting the police shooting of yet another Black man, Jacob Blake, in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last summer. The protest followed many George Floyd-inspired ones that erupted across the world calling for police accountability and justice for Black lives. White allies, like the ones Rittenhouse shot, were among the protesters. Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty.

If Rittenhouse is convicted, he will likely stop being a right-wing mascot and become a right-wing martyr. If he isn’t convicted, he will set a precedent for others like him to pick up guns they shouldn’t have and thrust themselves into the middle of unrest they should avoid — confident in knowing that prison won’t be in their future.

To his supporters, and even many of his detractors, Rittenhouse isn’t a monster. Not really. He was a young, dumb kid hyped up on the Foxification or Fox News effect of American discourse on the Black Lives Matter movement in a country that fetishes guns — for show, for sport and for killing — not a white supremacist, like, say Dylann Roof. Not really. He wore no hoods and didn’t wrap himself in the Confederate flag. He’s a patriot who tried to bring calm to chaos because, as Fox News prime-time host Tucker Carlson told us at the time of the shooting, the adults around him wouldn’t “maintain order.” He was so nonviolent that police officers greeted him and those like him like fellow guardians of the community before he killed anyone.

He didn’t open fire until absolutely necessary. It was “self-defense,” his supporters have told us outside the courtroom and his lawyers have argued inside the courtroom. Had “criminals,” whom many of us prefer to call Rittenhouse’s victims — though the judge said they can’t be called that during the trial — not rushed him, had not provoked him, they would be alive and he would never have been charged. None of his decisions before the moments he pulled the trigger seem to matter. He defended himself. That’s all.

I mean, look at his red, tear-stained face on the stand, so compelling that the judge stopped the trial for 10 minutes to allow Rittenhouse to compose himself. His tears tell the story.

Those protesters made him shoot them. It was their fault, and only theirs, not Rittenhouse’s. He was trying to do good, to protect this dying nation.

And that’s the same nonsense claim people have been using throughout the U.S.

Predominantly white voters were trying to defend their freedom, so they flocked to an open bigot like Donald Trump and stormed the U.S. Capitol. Angry parents, most of them white, are storming school board meetings demanding an end to critical race theory lessons to protect white children from feeling “guilt” about America’s violent racist history and how it has created the foundation of inequity we still see today. Politicians and local officials — again, many of them white — have stoked this by framing the teaching of race and books that explore its context as something constituents should defend their communities from.

The truth is that too many white Americans probably see themselves in Rittenhouse — afraid of anyone, whether white or of color, who wants to live in a more equitable country — even if some don’t want to say so out loud.

So many things have pointed to their being “scared” as Rittenhouse was described to have been during the protest and in the aftermath of the shooting. Frightened of losing the country their hardworking salt-of-the-Earth parents and grandparents built. Of becoming a minority among minorities. Of being displaced as the de facto right way to be a real patriotic American, of being able to define just what that means. But it wasn’t just fear that convinced Rittenhouse that he had a right — a responsibility, even — to take a gun into the middle of unrest that didn’t directly affect him. It was an entitlement, as well. An entitlement to make and uphold the rules, to make America great again.

Rittenhouse’s story is a microcosm of what America is facing, a perilous journey toward becoming something the world has never known: a fully functioning multiracial, multiethnic democracy emerging from the blood of slaves, the genocide of Native Americans and the notion that all men are created equal. No matter what you’ve heard or what you’ve been told, we aren’t there yet. We weren’t there on July 4, 1776. We weren’t there in 1865 in the smoke, ashes and shadow of the Civil War, and not even in the wake of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act a half-century ago.

If he is freed, the status quo of America’s flawed criminal justice system, in which white offenders are less likely to be convicted, can remain just a little bit longer, the inevitable merely delayed, if not denied. If he’s imprisoned, those sympathetic to his plight have even more reason to use him as an example of how their way of life could be threatened if they don’t fight, and hard. His supporters have basically guaranteed those outcomes.

This is why, regardless of the verdict — in this case and others that are forcing the nation to grapple with what it means to be Black and white in America — it’s up to the rest of us to guarantee different outcomes. We need to make sure the disparity in who is afforded life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is honestly and continually discussed (regardless of how uncomfortable it is for people to confront the truth) and see to it that those tenets of American democracy are extended to those who have historically been left out.

If you care about saving this democracy from the Kyle Rittenhouses of the world, you shouldn’t look to a judge and a jury. Because a “guilty” or “not guilty” verdict in a lone case can’t fix what ails us.

How dare an 18 year old, who at the time he defended himself from violent thugs was only 17, cry when he was reliving the moment he shot and killed 2 people. What a monster!

Oh! Right! Like the asshole in the article states they weren't violent thugs, they were "white allies" who were "protesting" against police brutality against black people. You know those wonderful "white allies" who were shouting as many racial slurs against black people as they can and this was all caught on video.

[Alashir]

Kyle Rittenhouse sobbing shows what's wrong with America (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kyle-rittenhouse-sobbing-shows-what-s-wrong-with-america/ar-AAQz2tu?cvid=5c5a6b8a87124871b60135883ce6b2fd)

An actual adult and presumably someone in control of their mental faculties actually wrote this article.

The fuck is wrong with the Democrat media?



How dare an 18 year old, who at the time he defended himself from violent thugs was only 17, cry when he was reliving the moment he shot and killed 2 people. What a monster!

Oh! Right! Like the asshole in the article states they weren't violent thugs, they were "white allies" who were "protesting" against police brutality against black people. You know those wonderful "white allies" who were shouting as many racial slurs against black people as they can and this was all caught on video.

"Sobbing" is a strong word.

[Gelston]

According to eyewitness, Rosenbaum, deceased child rapist, also attempted to push a flaming dumpster into an occupied cop car.

[Parkbandit]

According to eyewitness, Rosenbaum, deceased child rapist, also attempted to push a flaming dumpster into an occupied cop car.

Racist.

[Gelston]

The prosecutor done went unconstitutional again when he was asking why someone got a lawyer. I know this stuff from simple Criminal Law courses, how is this dude a lawyer?

[Parkbandit]

The prosecutor done went unconstitutional again when he was asking why someone got a lawyer. I know this stuff from simple Criminal Law courses, how is this dude a lawyer?

And he's supposedly an experienced lawyer too...

He comes across as a gigantic douchebag.

I bet he's a Democrat.

[Astray]

That dude who got his arm wrecked is the Soy Champion of the World.

[Gelston]

That dude who got his arm wrecked is the Soy Champion of the World.

Backlash got his arm wrecked?

[Astray]

Backlash got his arm wrecked?

He's the faggot champ, not the soy one.

[Neveragain]

Backlash got his arm wrecked?

What's your take on the unspent .40 from the Glock they put into evidence?

Was it a misfire or did he rack with one already in the chamber?

[Gelston]

What's your take on the unspent .40 from the Glock they put into evidence?

Was it a misfire or did he rack with one already in the chamber?

My first thought was that he racked a round not knowing he already had one in the chamber. He was probably going to shoot Rittenhouse.

[Neveragain]

My first thought was that he racked a round not knowing he already had one in the chamber. He was probably going to shoot Rittenhouse.

I think that pretty much has to be what happened.

[Astray]

My first thought was that he racked a round not knowing he already had one in the chamber. He was probably going to shoot Rittenhouse.

Same.

[kutter]

How is this trial even being allowed? There is way more than reasonable doubt that he is innocent.

[Tgo01]

How is this trial even being allowed? There is way more than reasonable doubt that he is innocent.

Because as usual Democrats eventually make a mockery of everything once they get into power.

[Tgo01]

I'm a day behind on watching the trial but I have to laugh at the prosecutor trying to make the case that since the one-armed bandit "only" had a pistol and Rittenhouse had a big bad scary AR-15 that the one-armed bandit wasn't a threat to Rittenhouse.

Is this even real life anymore? Whether a pistol or an AR-15 it only takes one bullet to seriously injure or kill someone. This isn't a fucking pissing contest here. "Mine's bigger!"

[kutter]

I'm a day behind on watching the trial but I have to laugh at the prosecutor trying to make the case that since the one-armed bandit "only" had a pistol and Rittenhouse had a big bad scary AR-15 that the one-armed bandit wasn't a threat to Rittenhouse.

Is this even real life anymore? Whether a pistol or an AR-15 it only takes one bullet to seriously injure or kill someone. This isn't a fucking pissing contest here. "Mine's bigger!"


By his crazy logic then if I bring out my 9mm AR pistol then I will always be the victim and can do what I want.

[Tgo01]

By his crazy logic then if I bring out my 9mm AR pistol then I will always be the victim and can do what I want.

Apparently so. If someone has a bigger gun you're apparently supposed to lay down your weapons and surrender.

The prosecutor then goes on to give Rittenhouse shit by saying something along the lines of "You thought he was going to shoot you with his pistol, but he never did, did he?"

Of fucking course not because Rittenhouse shot him before the one-armed bandit could shoot him. Is this the bar for self defense in Wisconsin with Democrats in charge? You're only allowed to defend yourself AFTER you get shot at? I'm sure Alfster would agree with that statement, he seems to want the government in complete control over his life.

[Tgo01]

The first guy you shot didn't have a gun, knife, club, or any other weapon correct?

The second guy you shot didn't have a gun, knife, club, or any other weapon correct?

The third guy you shot only had a pistol and it wasn't pointed directly at you when you shot him correct?

Like what even is this shit? I sure hope the jury is a real jury and not a bunch of political activists because surely they must see right through this prosecutor's bullshit.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I was confident Rittenhouse would walk on everything, but I think the prosecutor made up ground today. Who knows what's going to happen, I think it's how politically charged the jurors are will determine the outcome.

[Archigeek]

Not really paying attention becauseI have better things to do, but if he's so obviously innocent what idiot lawyer let him take the stand?

[LOL BRIELUS]

Archigeek, the maxim about never putting your client on the stand (actually the client decides, not counsel) is a little more nuances than that. There are definitely cases where you might want to consider doing it. A self defense case, would be one. A sexual offense where consent is the defense is another. Your client has to be likeable and or believable. I think Rittenhouse is probably neutral on likeable, but definitely believable

[Alashir]

Not really paying attention becauseI have better things to do, but if he's so obviously innocent what idiot lawyer let him take the stand?

At this rate he'll not only go free but be awarded millions in damages and soon to appear on dancing with the stars.

[Neveragain]

Not really paying attention becauseI have better things to do, but if he's so obviously innocent what idiot lawyer let him take the stand?

Not having him take the stand would have placed doubt in public opinion when public opinion is already leaning in your direction.

The stream I watched today the channel did a live poll with 40,000 people watching, 87% of the viewers chose not guilty.

TyT even reneged on their previous opinion, that's 5.1 million followers.

[Parkbandit]

Not really paying attention becauseI have better things to do, but if he's so obviously innocent what idiot lawyer let him take the stand?

lol.

[Archigeek]

Not having him take the stand would have placed doubt in public opinion when public opinion is already leaning in your direction.

The stream I watched today the channel did a live poll with 40,000 people watching, 87% of the viewers chose not guilty.

TyT even reneged on their previous opinion, that's 5.1 million followers.

Who cares? Why would you risk losing because some young kid said something dumb on the stand because you wanted to win good favor with the public? That makes zero sense. The only opinions that matter are in that courtroom.

[Neveragain]

Who cares? Why would you risk losing because some young kid said something dumb on the stand because you wanted to win good favor with the public? That makes zero sense. The only opinions that matter are in that courtroom.

I think you're being a little naive.

[Archigeek]

I think you're being a little naive.

It's not like the jurors go home and check the public opinion polls at night. They'd get expelled for that if the judge found out. Most jurors take their responsibility seriously and would not do that.

[Neveragain]

It's not like the jurors go home and check the public opinion polls at night. They'd get expelled for that if the judge found out. Most jurors take their responsibility seriously and would not do that.

If public opinion didn't matter the media wouldn't spin the story like they have.

You're being naive.

[Archigeek]

If public opinion didn't matter the media wouldn't spin the story like they have.

You're being naive.

Public opinion matters to the public, politicians, etc. It doesn't matter to the jury. I think you're underestimating the integrity of jurors.

[Parkbandit]

Public opinion matters to the public, politicians, etc. It doesn't matter to the jury. I think you're underestimating the integrity of jurors.
...

I think you're being a little naive.

[Astray]

Public opinion matters to the public, politicians, etc. It doesn't matter to the jury. I think you're underestimating the integrity of jurors.

Uh. Real?

[kutter]

Who cares? Why would you risk losing because some young kid said something dumb on the stand because you wanted to win good favor with the public? That makes zero sense. The only opinions that matter are in that courtroom.

Because in the unlikely event of a serious conviction the jurors for the appeal will come from that group watching the TV. All it takes is one for a mistrial. Play the long game and hedge all your bets.

[Gelston]

Because in the unlikely event of a serious conviction the jurors for the appeal will come from that group watching the TV. All it takes is one for a mistrial. Play the long game and hedge all your bets.

And a guarantee you not a single current Juror hasn't heard of the Kyle Rittenhouse case before they were selected. Especially being from the area.

On a case that has gotten this much media attention for the length of time it has, a fully impartial jury is impossible.

[kutter]

And a guarantee you not a single current Juror hasn't heard of the Kyle Rittenhouse case before they were selected. Especially being from the area.

On a case that has gotten this much media attention for the length of time it has, a fully impartial jury is impossible.

I agree that a completely impartial jury is impossible, but an awful lot has come out at trial that was not common knowledge, hell it seems like the prosecution did not even bother to learn half of it. If this goes to a hung jury, and like I said, it only takes one person, then the defense has a much better chance of either an acquittal or a second hung jury.

[Parkbandit]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FD7MikyWQAMHmOS?format=jpg&name=900x900


I hope Rittenhouse and his attorneys decide to go after every single person who committed libel like this.

[Tgo01]

The judge is going to allow the jury to consider that Rittenhouse provoked people into attacking him, which would mean if they buy that argument from the prosecution then Rittenhouse couldn't simply say he was defending himself, he would have had to use all other options to remove himself from the dangerous situation before killing his attackers.

This is after the judge allowed drone footage from something like 100 yards away that the prosecution zoomed in on which supposedly made it look like Rittenhouse pointed his gun at the first person he killed, thus provoking him. Which is all kinds of bullshit because not only can you hardly see anything in the image even when zoomed in, but it's just one still image which means exactly jack shit because we don't live our lives one still image at a time, and to top it all off the PROSECUTION'S OWN EXPERT WITNESS testified that when you zoom in on digital images such as this that the software uses an algorithm to sort of "fill in the blanks" by adding pixels to the image. So when you're looking at the image you're not just simply seeing a bigger version of the image, the software is literally guessing where to add pixels.

And then you have far leftists such as Seran whining that the judge is being a big meanie head to the prosecution. My fucking ass. The judge has practically bent over backwards to give the prosecution everything they have wanted. The only thing he didn't allow them to do was to refer to the people shot as "victims" in court, because why the fuck would any judge allow that? In a trial where the jury is tasked in determining who was the victim and who was the guilty party the prosecution sure as shit shouldn't be able to refer to one party as the victim.

If the jury comes back with "not guilty" then Democrats/rioters have no right to claim that the judge was being biased and made it harder for the prosecution to prove their case. The prosecution had everything they wanted handed to them to prove their case. But Democrats/rioters don't care about facts anymore, they just care about rage.

[LOL BRIELUS]

Judge not allowing prosecution to say victim prior to conviction is standard. It is also a routine motion made by defense attorneys and every time I asked for the same motion in my practice, it was granted.

The reason is that it unfairly prejudices the defendant and fails to recognize due process,which is, the legal and factual finding of criminality and guilt before someone is a criminal, and someone is a victim.

[Methais]

Kyle Rittenhouse sobbing shows what's wrong with America (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kyle-rittenhouse-sobbing-shows-what-s-wrong-with-america/ar-AAQz2tu?cvid=5c5a6b8a87124871b60135883ce6b2fd)

An actual adult and presumably someone in control of their mental faculties actually wrote this article.

The fuck is wrong with the Democrat media?



How dare an 18 year old, who at the time he defended himself from violent thugs was only 17, cry when he was reliving the moment he shot and killed 2 people. What a monster!

Oh! Right! Like the asshole in the article states they weren't violent thugs, they were "white allies" who were "protesting" against police brutality against black people. You know those wonderful "white allies" who were shouting as many racial slurs against black people as they can and this was all caught on video.

That's some seriously butthurt writing. It sounds like he's still getting all his trial info from CNN instead of the actual trial.

And here's the author:

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/027f98_38a9797d9b734899968f20e97baf9686~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_800,h_478,al_c,q_90/027f98_38a9797d9b734899968f20e97baf9686~mv2.jpg

[Methais]

Public opinion matters to the public, politicians, etc. It doesn't matter to the jury.

If all the jurors lived in a bubble all the way until the trial began, you might have had a point.


I think you're underestimating the integrity of jurors.

With literally everything these days being political and people not giving a shit about facts over feelings or whatever, this is probably also debatable.

[Jeril]

If all the jurors lived in a bubble all the way until the trial began, you might have had a point.



With literally everything these days being political and people not giving a shit about facts over feelings or whatever, this is probably also debatable.

YOUR FACE IS DEBATABLE!

[Gelston]

And the weapon charge is gone.

Judge dismisses weapons charge in Kyle Rittenhouse homicide trial


A Wisconsin judge on Monday dismissed a weapons charge against Kyle Rittenhouse, the teen who fatally shot two people and wounded a third during a protest in Kenosha last year.

Moments before closing arguments were set to start, Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed one count of illegal possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

The misdemeanor, punishable by up to nine months in jail, was considered one of the stronger counts against Rittenhouse. No one disputes he was 17 last year when he walked the streets of Kenosha armed with an AR-15-style weapon.

But the judge cited an exception within the law, dealing with age of the defendant, length of the barrel and hunting, for dismissing that count.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/closing-arguments-begin-kyle-rittenhouse-homicide-trial-rcna5584?fbclid=IwAR0IdzENisTJGoeBLRXwuVgf3Xrdj3s5 Zpugr8jU9HkJ9o21o-u3ZqIyTXM

He migh get absolutely no penalties at all.

[Parkbandit]

And the weapon charge is gone.

Judge dismisses weapons charge in Kyle Rittenhouse homicide trial

He migh get absolutely no penalties at all.

IT'S NOT FAIR! HE'S A RACIST AND A WHITE SUPREMACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Gelston]

IT'S NOT FAIR! HE'S A RACIST AND A WHITE SUPREMACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He actually still might get hit with the recklessly endangering safety charges. Apparently self defense doesn't cover those. Both are felony charges, and if run consecutively he could be put away for almost 40 years.

[Methais]

YOUR FACE IS DEBATABLE!


https://youtu.be/jRuTh0BsH-c

[Neveragain]

https://youtu.be/jRuTh0BsH-c

They dropped the ball by not having McConaughey from Dazed and confused.

https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/70859073.jpg

[Gelston]

And Rittenhouse wasn't even old enough to openly carry in the state. His gun was also part of a straw purchase. OOOPS! Zingerz omg.

I live in Wisconsin and know the gun laws inside and out. It's going to come down to that. Should a kid that is illegally holding a straw purchased gun allowed to shoot in self defense?

Basically everyone involved is fucking retarded.

Now that his possession of the weapon has been found to be perfectly legal, is he in the clear now for self defense? Or do you have some other reason he was wrong?

[LOL BRIELUS]

The possession of the firearm being legal or not is not really in the calculus for deadly force self defense. It is really fact specific and needs to be justified in a response to deadly force or serious bodily harm. Once that element is satisfied, it doesn't matter how you apply the deadly force - gun, knife, tire iron, karate, or 10x claid.

Also my prediction is that a jury verdict will be reached today

[SonoftheNorth]

He's gonna walk.

[Neveragain]

Two things that piss me off about all of this. 1. The police even letting the riots happen. 2. The home owners that line the streets doing nothing as people riot outside their homes.

[SonoftheNorth]

2. The home owners that line the streets doing nothing as people riot outside their homes.

They are scared to get in a self defense situation look at what happened with a 17 year old being physically beaten with clubs by a mob.

[Parkbandit]

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/11/1236583942.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1024

Fucking liberals...

No wonder you are so scared of guns.. you don't know how to even hold one.

[Methais]

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/11/1236583942.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1024

Fucking liberals...

No wonder you are so scared of guns.. you don't know how to even hold one.

Nice fingertip grip :lol:

[Gelston]

The possession of the firearm being legal or not is not really in the calculus for deadly force self defense. It is really fact specific and needs to be justified in a response to deadly force or serious bodily harm. Once that element is satisfied, it doesn't matter how you apply the deadly force - gun, knife, tire iron, karate, or 10x claid.

Also my prediction is that a jury verdict will be reached today

No, that was a specific question for him, because he said the rifle being illegal makes self defense irrelevant.

[kutter]

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/11/1236583942.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1024

Fucking liberals...

No wonder you are so scared of guns.. you don't know how to even hold one.

This idiot is living proof he knows nothing about firearm safety he is violating the first 4 rules.

Treat all guns as if they are always loaded.
Never let the muzzle point at anything that you are not willing to destroy.
Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on target and you have made the decision to shoot.
Be sure of your target and what is behind it.

And while I would never hold an AR with only my fingertips, they recoil so little it is possible to do it.

[SonoftheNorth]

This idiot is living proof he knows nothing about firearm safety he is violating the first 4 rules.

Treat all guns as if they are always loaded.
Never let the muzzle point at anything that you are not willing to destroy.
Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on target and you have made the decision to shoot.
Be sure of your target and what is behind it.

And while I would never hold an AR with only my fingertips, they recoil so little it is possible to do it.



Also by his logic everyone in the courtroom now has the right to mob and beat him to death for holding a rifle

[kutter]

After I posted I was looking at the picture again and realized that the rifle does not have any sights on it. I wonder if they removed whatever was on there for some reason or of the kid is good enough to shoot without sights.

[SonoftheNorth]

After I posted I was looking at the picture again and realized that the rifle does not have any sights on it. I wonder if they removed whatever was on there for some reason or of the kid is good enough to shoot without sights.


Looked like it had a holographic sight or a reddot in other pictures, he probably took it off when they made him surrender the rifle cuz those shits are kinda expensive

[Gelston]

This idiot is living proof he knows nothing about firearm safety he is violating the first 4 rules.

Treat all guns as if they are always loaded.
Never let the muzzle point at anything that you are not willing to destroy.
Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on target and you have made the decision to shoot.
Be sure of your target and what is behind it.

And while I would never hold an AR with only my fingertips, they recoil so little it is possible to do it.

He also needs to close his fucking ejection port cover. Fuckin boot.

[kutter]

He also needs to close his fucking ejection port cover. Fuckin boot.

None of my AR's have an ejection port cover or forward assist, I am not humping through the 'Nam or the Sandpit so don't really need it, plus I just think it looks a lot cleaner. But you're right, if it has it then it should be closed until you cycle the bolt.

But hey, give him credit, at least the bolt is forward.

[Gelston]

None of my AR's have an ejection port cover or forward assist, I am not humping through the 'Nam or the Sandpit so don't really need it, plus I just think it looks a lot cleaner. But you're right, if it has it then it should be closed until you cycle the bolt.

But hey, give him credit, at least the bolt is forward.

I always had a sort of nervous tick where I always checked my ejection port cover over and over.

It is because right before this he had someone clear it, likely because he had no idea how. The way he was talking about the ammo and all that leads me to believe he learned everything from movies.

He is sitting there acting like FMJ isn't the standard ammo that is available for ARs. And then he is all "It goes through vests!" Well yeah, all rifles do. Soft armor is only made to stop pistols.

[Neveragain]

None of my AR's have an ejection port cover or forward assist, I am not humping through the 'Nam or the Sandpit so don't really need it, plus I just think it looks a lot cleaner. But you're right, if it has it then it should be closed until you cycle the bolt.

But hey, give him credit, at least the bolt is forward.

Hm, I always thought forward assists was standard on the AR. Never could afford an AR, so I went with the mini-14.

[Neveragain]

I always had a sort of nervous tick where I always checked my ejection port cover over and over.

It is because right before this he had someone clear it, likely because he had no idea how. The way he was talking about the ammo and all that leads me to believe he learned everything from movies.

He is sitting there acting like FMJ isn't the standard ammo that is available for ARs. And then he is all "It goes through vests!" Well yeah, all rifles do. Soft armor is only made to stop pistols.

I'm pretty sure he knew what full metal jacket is, it just sounds scary.

[Gelston]

Hm, I always thought forward assists was standard on the AR. Never could afford an AR, so I went with the mini-14.

Forward assists were added with the shittier M16s of the vietnam era. You don't really need them as much anymore. I can count on one hand how many times I've ever used it through the thousands upon thousands of rounds I've fired, and that was generally only when I had an A2. Never had to use it on my A4.

[Neveragain]

Forward assists were added with the shittier M16s of the vietnam era. You don't really need them as much anymore. I can count on one hand how many times I've ever used it through the thousands upon thousands of rounds I've fired, and that was generally only when I had an A2. Never had to use it on my A4.

I always thought it was crazy that they issued a rifle that needed that shit. I know when my dad went into basic they were still training with the M1, never even held an m16 until they were shipped over.

Vietnam was fucking stupid.

[Gelston]

I always thought it was crazy that they issued a rifle that needed that shit. I know when my dad went into basic they were still training with the M1, never even held an m16 until they were shipped over.

Vietnam was fucking stupid.

So, the creator of the rifle didn't think they did. The Army said they did. So he caved and put it on the M16A1.

Although I do take it back, I did use it a lo when I'd pull back the bolt just enough to observe the chamber and see if a round was in. I'd hit the bolt assist to get it back forward.

[Tgo01]

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/11/1236583942.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1024

Fucking liberals...

No wonder you are so scared of guns.. you don't know how to even hold one.

And of course his fucking finger is on the trigger. This prosecutor is a menace to society.

[Tgo01]

Also by his logic everyone in the courtroom now has the right to mob and beat him to death for holding a rifle

And even if he runs towards police to turn himself in the mob can continue to chase him and beat him because they are “stopping an active shooter.”

If anyone on the jury actually buys his lame arguments then they deserve jail time.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Hm, I always thought forward assists was standard on the AR. Never could afford an AR, so I went with the mini-14.

Probably a good investment now, mini-14's have really appreciated in value.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

After I posted I was looking at the picture again and realized that the rifle does not have any sights on it. I wonder if they removed whatever was on there for some reason or of the kid is good enough to shoot without sights.

The Hero of Kenosha needs no sights

[Neveragain]

Probably a good investment now, mini-14's have really appreciated in value.

I got it new back in the late 90's so it doesn't have the cheap ass plastic shit. I've put thousands of rounds through it and it's never jammed once. They are a pretty solid gun for the price.

[kutter]

I got it new back in the late 90's so it doesn't have the cheap ass plastic shit. I've put thousands of rounds through it and it's never jammed once. They are a pretty solid gun for the price.

That's because they are for all intensive purposes a .223 M-14, with some minor mods to the gas system and obviously not full auto capable. And it would be hard to argue with the ruggedness of an M-14.

[Tgo01]

This is an actual quote from the prosecution's closing arguments: "Everyone takes a beating sometime."

Yes that's right! Rittenhouse should have allowed himself to be beat, possibly to death, instead of defending himself because "everyone takes a beating sometime." He then went on to claim Rittenhouse was "too cowardly" to "fight his way out with his fists" and instead used a gun.

Also this same piece of shit, who looks like the most physical trouble he has gotten into is when they kicked him out of the buffet, said Rittenhouse shouldn't have been afraid of the one dude because the dude was "only" armed with a Glock and Rittenhouse had an AR-15.

Again if anyone on the jury buys this dumb shit they deserve to be on trial. What even is this dumb shit? Suddenly guns aren't dangerous as long as someone else has a bigger gun? I guess we just need to station a single police officer in every school with the biggest gun possible and suddenly no more school shootings because school shooters will know it's pointless because they have a smaller gun.

[Alfster]

Governor of Wisconsin is a Democrat.

State Attorney General is a Democrat.

Mayor of Kenosha is a Democrat.

It's almost as if I'm 100% correct but as usual you just have to take the contrary position because you are a sad sad little man.

Lol. Your ignorance is bliss here. Wisconsin's as purple as it gets man.

[Gelston]

And the prosecution got busted holding back video footage from the defense. Maybe they’ll disbar the prosecutor too.

[Tgo01]

Lol. Your ignorance is bliss here. Wisconsin's as purple as it gets man.

Alfster: You are retarded if you think Wisconsin is a blue state!
Tgo01: Governor of Wisconsin is a Democrat, State AG is a Democrat, Mayor of Kenosha is a Democrat. You know, all of the high level politicians who would be involved in this situation are Democrats.
Alfster: LOL! Wisconsin is purple!
Everyone: ...

[Tgo01]

And the prosecution got busted holding back video footage from the defense. Maybe they’ll disbar the prosecutor too.

If the jury is filled with political activists and they come back with a guilty verdict I hope the judge dismisses the case with prejudice due to the prosecution's malfeasance.

But I doubt anything will happen with this corrupt prosecution team. People like Alfster probably want them to get raises.

[Alfster]

Dude, this prosecution team is beyond incompetent. How does that make me want them promoted?

I'm just trying to figure out if it's even an accident. Like they thought a mistrial would be better for the city or some shit?

[Alfster]

Alfster: You are retarded if you think Wisconsin is a blue state!
Tgo01: Governor of Wisconsin is a Democrat, State AG is a Democrat, Mayor of Kenosha is a Democrat. You know, all of the high level politicians who would be involved in this situation are Democrats.
Alfster: LOL! Wisconsin is purple!
Everyone: ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/politics/wisconsin-political-geography/

[Tgo01]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/politics/wisconsin-political-geography/

Just to clarify again: I never once said Wisconsin was a Democrat/blue state. I specifically said Democrat areas let shit like this happen and allowed people to be killed because they wanted to let left wing rioters burn cities down.

Now let's get back to how innocent Rittenhouse is and how Binger himself should be thrown in jail.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Now let's get back to how innocent Rittenhouse is and how Binger himself should be thrown in jail.

I don't hate the prosecutor, he's just (trying) to do his job. I think the kid did what he did in self defense, also. I think I said it here in this thread, it'll be good if he goes free of any charges IMO, because then it puts the rioters on notice. Maybe we'll get back to normal instead of the swing towards chaos.

[Parkbandit]

I don't hate the prosecutor, he's just (trying) to do his job. I think the kid did what he did in self defense, also. I think I said it here in this thread, it'll be good if he goes free of any charges IMO, because then it puts the rioters on notice. Maybe we'll get back to normal instead of the swing towards chaos.

Hope he's found innocent of all charges... and he gets rich off all the woke "journalists" that libeled him.

[Tgo01]

I don't hate the prosecutor, he's just (trying) to do his job.

I don't hate him for doing his job, I hate him for doing shady shit that no decent lawyer would ever dream of doing. First he implies in front of the jury that Rittenhouse is hiding something because he chose not to speak about the events until the trial, which is well within his rights to do. Then he tried to sneak evidence in, again in front of the jury, that the judge had already said he was leaning towards not allowing, then he brought in drone footage from a hundred feet away that doesn't really show anything but he basically says to the jury: see this one little tiny pixel here? Trust us, that's totally Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Rosenbaum first.

And that's shit he did in court in front of a live video feed. Now there's talk about him not sharing video evidence with the defense that he is required to do.

The fat guy wasn't too bad, he just lied a lot, but he's a lawyer. It's the other guy that is shady and I'm willing to bet within the next 2 or 3 years he will be announcing his run for a political office and he'll be using this trial in his campaign ads.

I can see the bullshit already: "I took on white supremacists in court and the justice system failed. Elect me and I'll make sure this never happens again."

[Tgo01]

Holy shit. They are now saying that the first man Rittenhouse shot at (the one who tried to jump on his face and didn't get hit with any bullets) is in fact known by the prosecution even though they claimed this person hadn't been identified yet. And better yet! He also has quite the criminal past (I'm noticing a theme here....) and he told the prosecution he would only testify if they would drop other unrelated charges against him and surprisingly (no seriously I'm surprised about this) the prosecution said no.

I wonder if he'll be charged for trying to cause bodily harm to Rittenhouse? I'm guessing no.

[LOL BRIELUS]

Brady violations, wonder if the judge is sitting on the mistrial motion and waiting to grant it if jury doesn't acquit.

[Flap]

I think this little shit got exactly what he wanted. I think he wanted to get into fights with protestors and use his shiny new rifle on them. I think he and all his car dealership buddies are racist good ol' boys who would have been JUST FINE and recovered from any property damage if they'd stayed home. I think he and all his Proud Boys buddies fantasize about killing minorities every day. I think this little lump of future-right-wing-mouthpiece-clay is a certified TURD.

However, I also think he's not guilty and that this trial has been a complete shitshow. It's really sad that it has come to this.

[LOL BRIELUS]

Why is it a sh**show? Maybe to the lay person, but what you're seeing is what happens when a prosecutor brings a case with horrible facts (for them), with high publicity with accompanying political polarization. Human nature is to try to win, which is also why you are seeing a seasoned prosecutor make errors in judgment like with how they questioned the defendant, disclosure errors ,etc.

[Flap]

Why is it a sh**show? Maybe to the lay person, but what you're seeing is what happens when a prosecutor brings a case with horrible facts (for them), with high publicity with accompanying political polarization. Human nature is to try to win, which is also why you are seeing a seasoned prosecutor make errors in judgment like with how they questioned the defendant, disclosure errors ,etc.

If he wanted to win he wouldn't have gone for murder. He knew that was a longshot and a fuckin' half.

Also Kyle's disgusting performance. Ol' crocodile did manage to squeeze out one single tear tho!

[Gelston]

I don't hate him for doing his job, I hate him for doing shady shit that no decent lawyer would ever dream of doing. First he implies in front of the jury that Rittenhouse is hiding something because he chose not to speak about the events until the trial, which is well within his rights to do. Then he tried to sneak evidence in, again in front of the jury, that the judge had already said he was leaning towards not allowing, then he brought in drone footage from a hundred feet away that doesn't really show anything but he basically says to the jury: see this one little tiny pixel here? Trust us, that's totally Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Rosenbaum first.

And that's shit he did in court in front of a live video feed. Now there's talk about him not sharing video evidence with the defense that he is required to do.

The fat guy wasn't too bad, he just lied a lot, but he's a lawyer. It's the other guy that is shady and I'm willing to bet within the next 2 or 3 years he will be announcing his run for a political office and he'll be using this trial in his campaign ads.

I can see the bullshit already: "I took on white supremacists in court and the justice system failed. Elect me and I'll make sure this never happens again."

I doubt that. Even the people I know that hate Rittenhouse think he is a shit prosecutor.

[audioserf]

If he wanted to win he wouldn't have gone for murder. He knew that was a longshot and a fuckin' half.

Also Kyle's disgusting performance. Ol' crocodile did manage to squeeze out one single tear tho!

he's more of a pig than a crocodile really. extraordinary piggy energy coming off that kid

also the prosecutor is a dogshit garbage moron they basically hired lionel hutz this whole thing has been laughable as hell. this kid was never going to go to jail when there was video of him about to get his fuckin head caved in with a skateboard. do i think he loaded up his call of duty accessory kit and drove to the protests hoping he could put himself in a position where he'd get away with shooting some people? 100%. can you prove that? nope. he's gonna walk

[LOL BRIELUS]

Yeah those two are so unlikeable. I would want a prosecutor like the Arbery one - no nonsense, direct/to the point and knows the law. Juries gravitate to someone they can trust, not these law school professor nerdy snooty types that need to snipe at everything

[Gelston]

he's more of a pig than a crocodile really. extraordinary piggy energy coming off that kid

also the prosecutor is a dogshit garbage moron they basically hired lionel hutz this whole thing has been laughable as hell. this kid was never going to go to jail when there was video of him about to get his fuckin head caved in with a skateboard. do i think he loaded up his call of duty accessory kit and drove to the protests hoping he could put himself in a position where he'd get away with shooting some people? 100%. can you prove that? nope. he's gonna walk

I don't think he was intending to shoot anyone. He just wanted to look cool. If you look at his history, that is basically what he has always done. He is a kid trying to look cool in all the wrong ways. That being said, I'm pretty sure he isn't sad about what he did and I guarantee you he only cried because he is scared he might go to jail for a long fucking time.

[Flap]

he's more of a pig than a crocodile really. extraordinary piggy energy coming off that kid

also the prosecutor is a dogshit garbage moron they basically hired lionel hutz this whole thing has been laughable as hell. this kid was never going to go to jail when there was video of him about to get his fuckin head caved in with a skateboard. do i think he loaded up his call of duty accessory kit and drove to the protests hoping he could put himself in a position where he'd get away with shooting some people? 100%. can you prove that? nope. he's gonna walk
I don't think he was intending to shoot anyone. He just wanted to look cool. If you look at his history, that is basically what he has always done. He is a kid trying to look cool in all the wrong ways. That being said, I'm pretty sure he isn't sad about what he did and I guarantee you he only cried because he is scared he might go to jail for a long fucking time.

You're probably right about his intents, if I'm charitable. He was talking about first aid a lot and I'm sure he helped some folks. But the crowd he's aligning with has some questionable intents if I'm continuing to be charitable.

The crocodile thing was just a reference to crocodile tears. I think he looks like the offspring of a pig and Elmer Fudd With Hair.

[Gelston]

MSNBC has been booted out of the courthouse for following the Jury bus around.

[Parkbandit]

MSNBC has been booted out of the courthouse for following the Jury bus around.

LOL

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

MSNBC has been booted out of the courthouse for following the Jury bus around.

I really hope charges are brought. Jury tampering is still considered illegal right?

[Shaps]

I really hope charges are brought. Jury tampering is still considered illegal right?

Depends.. is the jury voting the way the ideologues want? If yes - then it's illegal. If no - then it's not. Welcome to modern America.

[Gelston]

Depends.. is the jury voting the way the ideologues want? If yes - then it's illegal. If no - then it's not. Welcome to modern America.

The judge fir the Rittenhouse case is a lifelong Democrat. Not everyone sees party over justice.

[Astray]

MSNBC has been booted out of the courthouse for following the Jury bus around.

The producer that (allegedly) ordered it also deleted her Linkedin and Twitter.

[Parkbandit]

The producer that (allegedly) ordered it also deleted her Linkedin and Twitter.

Just a coincidence.....

[~Rocktar~]

The producer that (allegedly) ordered it also deleted her Linkedin and Twitter.

Guess she didn't want doxed like she was trying to do with the jurors huh?

[Flap]

Damn. Did I say shitshow? I meant three-ring shitcircus!

[Shaps]

The judge fir the Rittenhouse case is a lifelong Democrat. Not everyone sees party over justice.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...163211061.html

Just how blatant can they be... LOL.

Title: "Rittenhouse Spokesman Rejects Tucker Carlson’s False Claim of Juror Intimidation on ‘Fox & Friends’"

Actual Statement: "Protesters, he said, “sure are trying” to influence the verdict, but Hancock insisted the family is confident the defense’s statements that the teen was acting in self defense when he shot three people — killing two — will produce a not-guilty verdict. “They’re trying but I don’t believe the jury is gonna let that actually take effect on their decision.”

Seriously, these fucking hacks hiding behind the title "journalist" need to be told to shut the fuck up. State run media at this point.

"They're trying" is actual jury intimidation... the spokesman said he doesn't think the intimidation will affect the decision.

This is what I'm referring to Gelston. Not a particular judge, but how "media"/"ideologues" try to spin things... and hope that their fear tactics work on weaker people. Thankfully this Judge isn't cowering to the pressure, and is applying the law. Wish more would.

[Flap]

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...163211061.html

Just how blatant can they be... LOL.

Title: "Rittenhouse Spokesman Rejects Tucker Carlson’s False Claim of Juror Intimidation on ‘Fox & Friends’"

Actual Statement: "Protesters, he said, “sure are trying” to influence the verdict, but Hancock insisted the family is confident the defense’s statements that the teen was acting in self defense when he shot three people — killing two — will produce a not-guilty verdict. “They’re trying but I don’t believe the jury is gonna let that actually take effect on their decision.”

Seriously, these fucking hacks hiding behind the title "journalist" need to be told to shut the fuck up. State run media at this point.

"They're trying" is actual jury intimidation... the spokesman said he doesn't think the intimidation will affect the decision.

This is what I'm referring to Gelston. Not a particular judge, but how "media"/"ideologues" try to spin things... and hope that their fear tactics work on weaker people. Thankfully this Judge isn't cowering to the pressure, and is applying the law. Wish more would.

Man. This makes me really hate that I missed the GS Players' Corner coverage of the conviction of murderer Derek Chauvin!

[Gelston]

Man. This makes me really hate that I missed the GS Players' Corner coverage of the conviction of murderer Derek Chauvin!

Why? We pretty much all said he was guilty.

[Gelston]

Jury has a verdict.

[Parkbandit]

Jury has a verdict.

Took too long for him to be found innocent of all charges.

[Gelston]

Took too long for him to be found innocent of all charges.

They are allowed to find him guilty on lesser charges too.

[Gelston]

Not guilty on all counts. Unanimous.

[Parkbandit]

Not guilty on all counts. Unanimous.

Damn. I'm honestly surprised.

Now, I hope he goes on a lawsuit spree and sues every single news media outlet that libeled him.

[Gelston]

Damn. I'm honestly surprised.

Now, I hope he goes on a lawsuit spree and sues every single news media outlet that libeled him.

MSNBC seems like a prime target.

[Methais]

Seran must be comfort-dildoing himself so hard right now. :lol:

When do the riots begin that Seran will justify all of the crime it produces because soy?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I feel like justice has been served.

[SonoftheNorth]

He's gonna walk.


Wishing all commies a really bad weekend

[Candor]

From "The Reidout Blog" on MSNBC:

Kyle Rittenhouse trial was designed to protect white conservatives who kill
The shooter’s homicide acquittal coddles conservatives and may lead to even more violence.

[Gelston]

From "The Reidout Blog" on MSNBC:

Kyle Rittenhouse trial was designed to protect white conservatives who kill
The shooter’s homicide acquittal coddles conservatives and may lead to even more violence.

He killed two white people and shot a third white person though. This doesn't make sense.

[Menos]

Given the evidence I saw on the trial feed, this seems like the right outcome. I hope anyone upset with it expresses their displeasure peacefully.

[Gelston]

Given the evidence I saw on the trial feed, this seems like the right outcome. I hope anyone upset with it expresses their displeasure peacefully.

We can just send Kyle back out.

[Astray]

Guess she didn't want doxed like she was trying to do with the jurors huh?

That's one theory.

The dude who got his arm blown out also deleted some social media accounts.

[audioserf]

https://twitter.com/nycguidovoice/status/1461761790652686342?s=20

https://i.ibb.co/ccYB8ML/Screenshot-2021-11-19-142920.png (https://imgbb.com/)

[Gelston]

That's one theory.

The dude who got his arm blown out also deleted some social media accounts.

I'm surprised he didn't do that immediately after he got out of the hospital. Also, since Rittenhouse is innocent, and this dude admitted to aiming a weapon at him, shouldn't he be charged with brandishing at least?

[Parkbandit]

We can just send Kyle back out.

https://img.tickld.com/quill/a/1/f/0/2/0/a1f02013b2e3429956d9a1b4d73d99f18bcde6d4.gif

[Astray]

I'm surprised he didn't do that immediately after he got out of the hospital. Also, since Rittenhouse is innocent, and this dude admitted to aiming a weapon at him, shouldn't he be charged with brandishing at least?

Right?

I mean, I would press charges, but he'd probably get a sympathetic judge or jury that's like, "Well he was shot and had his asshole blown out. Maybe that's enough of a lesson."

[Parkbandit]

Right?

I mean, I would press charges, but he'd probably get a sympathetic judge or jury that's like, "Well he was shot and had his asshole blown out. Maybe that's enough of a lesson."

Wait.. he got shot in the arm but his asshole was blown out?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

We can just send Kyle back out.

2x.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

The outrage in the media is fucking outstanding. The ACLU is tweeting about how this was a white supremacist and Jacob Blake (I think that's the black guy that got shot for assaulting his girlfriend with a knife while violating a restraining order) was just at a social family event or something.

For fucking real, please somebody sue every fucking "journalist", politician and organization that think they're better than 12 jurors into oblivion.

[Gelston]

Andrew Cuomo is upset.

[Gelston]

I turned it to MSNBC for the lols now.

[Gelston]

https://scontent-atl3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/258824652_10157861003641511_1817069959006696600_n. jpg?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=v-kzHtj46TQAX8GBuxG&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-2.xx&oh=de744f7970cb0cd49c7fac799a8049b6&oe=619C4D97

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/styles/content_full_width_img_lg/public/2020-10/kenosha%20mile.jpg?itok=8Nl2tHl9

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

http://nbatitlechase.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/PHOTO-The-Kyle-Rittenhouse-Trial-Just-Proved-To-The-World-That-BLM-Are-Criminals-The-Media-Lies-And-That-Kyle-Acted-In-Self-Defense-Meme.jpg

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://images7.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED674/6194470972439.jpeg

[Astray]

Wait.. he got shot in the arm but his asshole was blown out?

Correct.

[Methais]

He killed two white people and shot a third white person though. This doesn't make sense.

"bUt It WaS a GeOrge FlOyD rIoT!!!!!!!" Is probably the logic they're using. Because they're stupid.

[Gelston]

"bUt It WaS a GeOrge FlOyD rIoT!!!!!!!" Is probably the logic they're using. Because they're stupid.

but the riot was for Jacob Blake.

[Parkbandit]

Someone on Fox said "If you are surprised by this verdict, you are probably consuming the wrong media"

I'm watching CNN and their take is fucking hilarious.

[Gelston]

Someone on Fox said "If you are surprised by this verdict, you are probably consuming the wrong media"

I'm watching CNN and their take is fucking hilarious.

I'm watching MSNBC and they keep talking about curfew and him being too young to have the rifle. Both charges that didn't pass muster.

[Tgo01]

I'm watching MSNBC and they keep talking about curfew and him being too young to have the rifle. Both charges that didn't pass muster.

I especially love the curfew argument, which the prosecution also brought up during trial. With all of this concern over a curfew and the riots being video taped all night you would think thousands of people were being charged for violating the curfew. I guess the curfew only matters when you’re defending yourself against a violent mob.

[Astray]

I'm watching MSNBC and they keep talking about curfew and him being too young to have the rifle. Both charges that didn't pass muster.

Feels like a weak, 'YEAH WELL HE STILL DID X' from a bunch of morons that can't see the obvious.

[Shaps]

So are they still for defunding the police, or supporting the police? I'm confused.... because if they still want to defund and abolish the police...

I mean... how they think that's going to turn out?

Hint: They should use this as a test case.

[Shaps]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djCB8vnXnZs

Damn, that's savage.

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/l9uoWuM.png

[~Rocktar~]

I have a black friend that was calling out on FB about what the community was gonna do about this verdict. I asked her "Why would you do anything about a white kid shooting 3 white criminals trying to beat him to death in the middle of a riot?"

Then I saw this:

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/259244888_2966951476967238_7527488657693406031_n.j pg?_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=XlGEBssxJbYAX9jkLhi&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=7a2d4ccae3ba1113da9af20e00b4b388&oe=619D9838

[Tgo01]

I have a black friend that was calling out on FB about what the community was gonna do about this verdict. I asked her "Why would you do anything about a white kid shooting 3 white criminals trying to beat him to death in the middle of a riot?"

Then I saw this:

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/259244888_2966951476967238_7527488657693406031_n.j pg?_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=XlGEBssxJbYAX9jkLhi&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=7a2d4ccae3ba1113da9af20e00b4b388&oe=619D9838

Almost as bad as the DCCC who had to correct their president (or whoever it was) after they put out a statement which said the rioters were "only" protesting against the police killing of Jacob Blake. Except OOPS! Jacob Blake wasn't killed. Almost as if all the media and Democrats do is lie.

[Gelston]

Someone on my FB called Rittenhouse a murderer and the three he shot heroes. The dude really said a child rapist and a wife beater was a hero. The dude that survived beat the shit out of his own grandmother.

People are losing their goddamn minds.

[Tgo01]

Christ almighty. Looks like one of Rittenhouse's lawyers is a raging liberal who is doing damage control for his own image now. (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kyle-rittenhouse-attorney-says-he-did-not-approve-tucker-carlson-s-film-crew-following-them-at-trial/ar-AAQWg7R?cvid=da5b568cc9904039abe613a592af2291)


“I did not approve of that,” Richards told CNN’s Chris Cuomo of the film crew. “I threw them out of the room several times. I don’t think a film crew is appropriate for something like this.”

Richards said that part of the efforts by Rittenhouse’s family and a family adviser to raise money to help pay for the 18-year-old’s defense included having Carlson’s team present for filming. The attorney described the film crew’s presence as “a definite distraction.”

“And I didn’t approve of it, but I’m not always the boss,” he told CNN.

So he goes running to CNN of all places to do an interview less than 48 hours after the trial to bash Fox News.


“Are you worried that we’re making it too easy to kill in self-defense?” Cuomo asked.

Richards replied, “To me — and I know people will go nuts when I say this — but there’s too many guns in our society. And that might seem like a hollow statement coming from me. I do own firearms. I don’t conceal carry. I don’t want to carry a firearm. I think too many people run around with guns in our society.”

So brother of the rapist governor asks him if "we’re making it too easy to kill in self-defense" and the lawyer responds with there are too many guns in our society, which sure as shit could be perceived as him answering: yes, yes I do think we're making it too easy to kill in self-defense.


Cuomo then asked the attorney whether Rittenhouse thought he did anything wrong.

“Legally, no,” Richards said.

Oh for fuck's sake. Really? So legally he didn't do anything wrong, morally? Meh, maybe.

Then it ends with:


“Kyle’s going to have some hard choices in his life about the direction he goes and what he stands for,” Richards said. “Those will have to be made by Kyle, eventually.”

"Does Kyle REALLY wanna be associated with the likes of Fox News? Or would he rather atone for his evil ways and be associated more with the likes of CNN who keeps a "journalist" employed there who advised his rapist governor brother on how to smear his victims so he can keep his political career."

[Stolis]

“Kyle’s going to have some hard choices in his life about the direction he goes and what he stands for,” Richards said. “Those will have to be made by Kyle, eventually.”

The hardest decisions he's gonna have to make are which news outlets he sues, who he sues first, and who has the highest tab for pain and suffering.

[Tgo01]

“Kyle’s going to have some hard choices in his life about the direction he goes and what he stands for,” Richards said. “Those will have to be made by Kyle, eventually.”

The hardest decisions he's gonna have to make are which news outlets he sues, who he sues first, and who has the highest tab for pain and suffering.

I really do hope he sues them all and sues Biden. But unfortunately he probably won’t.

[Stolis]

I really do hope he sues them all and sues Biden. But unfortunately he probably won’t.

If he learned anything from Nick Sandmann, he absolutely will be suing some major networks. Biden, I don't see that being more than a giant waste of time. That one will get locked up in courts or blah blah blah. Maybe they can just get Kamala to awkwardly giggle on Biden's behalf.

[Shaps]

I just hate the actual questions, I don't deny the Lawyer having his own personal views... so long as he provides an adequate defense for his client.. which apparently he did.

I'm not sure I would want a news crew watching everything, documentary style, while in the middle of murder case either.

Where my real issue lies with him is the question, and his response, to 'Are you worried were making it to easy to kill in self defense?"... He bitched out, and the question is a setup.. wrongly worded.. and misleading in nature.. singularly designed to lead the idiots watching the show to subconsciously insert the idea that if you are being attacked, all options should not be on the table to defend yourself. It's grooming people to think a certain way, so that when they are subjugated (whether physically or mentally) they should submit. It's disgusting and very clever.

People will say I'm seeing something not there, but you have to watch the wording and framing of this issue in "mainstream media" and how it is presented. Small wording/sentence structure/framing of an issue is how.. over time.. you alter peoples thoughts to become more compliant.

So fuck the lawyer for being a bitch about that question, and fuck CNN and mainstream media for pushing their bullshit. Oh yea.. and Fuck Joe Biden for being a shill.

[~Rocktar~]

I just hate the actual questions, I don't deny the Lawyer having his own personal views... so long as he provides an adequate defense for his client.. which apparently he did.

I'm not sure I would want a news crew watching everything, documentary style, while in the middle of murder case either.

Where my real issue lies with him is the question, and his response, to 'Are you worried were making it to easy to kill in self defense?"... He bitched out, and the question is a setup.. wrongly worded.. and misleading in nature.. singularly designed to lead the idiots watching the show to subconsciously insert the idea that if you are being attacked, all options should not be on the table to defend yourself. It's grooming people to think a certain way, so that when they are subjugated (whether physically or mentally) they should submit. It's disgusting and very clever.

People will say I'm seeing something not there, but you have to watch the wording and framing of this issue in "mainstream media" and how it is presented. Small wording/sentence structure/framing of an issue is how.. over time.. you alter peoples thoughts to become more compliant.

So fuck the lawyer for being a bitch about that question, and fuck CNN and mainstream media for pushing their bullshit. Oh yea.. and Fuck Joe Biden for being a shill.

Correct

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/OiH4e9Y.jpg

[Gelston]

Grosskreutz was legally allowed to have a firearm. He isn't a convicted felon. He was charged with crimes that would be a felony, but they were either dropped or downgraded.

That being said, it'll be harder for hi mto beat on his grandmother with only one good arm now.

[Methais]

Grosskreutz was legally allowed to have a firearm. He isn't a convicted felon. He was charged with crimes that would be a felony, but they were either dropped or downgraded.

That being said, it'll be harder for hi mto beat on his grandmother with only one good arm now.

Grandma's gonna fuck him up now

https://i.gifer.com/origin/3f/3f3affeafccd61ca4f2eb3c54d222bcb.gif

[Tgo01]

Grosskreutz was legally allowed to have a firearm. He isn't a convicted felon. He was charged with crimes that would be a felony, but they were either dropped or downgraded.

That being said, it'll be harder for hi mto beat on his grandmother with only one good arm now.

During the trial he admitted he had a concealed gun even though his concealed carry permit had expired.

[Gelston]

During the trial he admitted he had a concealed gun even though his concealed carry permit had expired.

That still doesn’t infer he wasn’t legally allowed to have a gun, he just carried it in an illegal way.

[Parkbandit]

I wish Rittenhouse would just sue everyone who wronged him.. but stop doing interviews.. because now he's just looking like a little twerp who got away with killing some people.

[Flap]

I wish Rittenhouse would just sue everyone who wronged him.. but stop doing interviews.. because now he's just looking like a little twerp who got away with killing some people.

Wow. Must've been bad, which interview are you referring to?

[Gelston]

I wish Rittenhouse would just sue everyone who wronged him.. but stop doing interviews.. because now he's just looking like a little twerp who got away with killing some people.

I mean, yeah. He is a dumbass 18 year old kid with some fame now. Some people even idolize him. Honestly, he should really just stfu and fade into obscurity.

[Parkbandit]

Wow. Must've been bad, which interview are you referring to?

Not anything specific.. but there's no reason to tell LeBron James to fuck off, challenge Joe Biden to a debate (talk about your low fruit), etc...

Just sue the fuckers that wronged you and collect. He's turning this 15 minutes of fame into trying to be some conservative rockstar.

He reminds me of that twerp David Hogg who went on a talking tour after the Parkland School shootings a few years back that was trying to become some anti-gun rockstar.

[Methais]

He reminds me of that twerp David Hogg who went on a talking tour after the Parkland School shootings a few years back that was trying to become some anti-gun rockstar.

I wish Celebrity Deathmatch was still on so we could see Rittenhouse and Hogg fight.

[Gelston]

I wish Celebrity Deathmatch was still on so we could see Rittenhouse and Hogg fight.

I think Rittenhouse would win. Hogg is a massive bitch. Rittenhouse at least stands up for himself.

[Parkbandit]

I think Rittenhouse would win. Hogg is a massive bitch. Rittenhouse at least stands up for himself.

https://media0.giphy.com/media/CZlAx4kvxHHPy/200.gif

[Methais]

I think Rittenhouse would win. Hogg is a massive bitch. Rittenhouse at least stands up for himself.

Yes. I'm pretty sure that only Seran would think Hogg could put up any sort of fight.

[Flap]

He's turning this 15 minutes of fame into trying to be some conservative rockstar.

He'd be a fool not to, IMHO. His career future looks like this:

1) Conservative mouthpiece.

or

2) Try to go back to regular life but be unable to because half the country hates you with questionable justification. End up getting hired by someone who wants you because you're the Hero of Kenosha and not because you're a good lifeguard or whatevz.

Basically he can lean into it or try to live it down, and he'll never live it down. That may or may not be right, but that's how it be.

[Parkbandit]

He'd be a fool not to, IMHO. His career future looks like this:

1) Conservative mouthpiece.

or

2) Try to go back to regular life but be unable to because half the country hates you with questionable justification. End up getting hired by someone who wants you because you're the Hero of Kenosha and not because you're a good lifeguard or whatevz.

Basically he can lean into it or try to live it down, and he'll never live it down. That may or may not be right, but that's how it be.

He will be a multi-millionaire when it's all said and done.. money / job is the least of his worries.