Seriously WTF is going on?

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/pfizer-covid-vaccine-ages-2-to-11-042109513.html

Pushing to vaccinate kids aged 2 to 11??

Some seriously fucked up shit going on. I don't claim to know what is going on, but the statistics don't back it up at all.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

Numbers straight from the CDC.

Data as of 28 APR 2021 - All Deaths age 0-17 from Covid-19: 277

Let me say that again: 277 deaths for anyone from 0-17 during this whole time from Covid - out of a total of 41,811 deaths from all causes during that same time frame.

In that same time frame deaths from Influenza: 179 - and that's with it being a time tested annual vaccine that most get yearly.

Summary: Flu vaccine administered still 179 deaths - No vaccine for Covid-19 277 deaths; yet they want to vaccinate millions of kids with a vaccine which has not had any long term studies done on it.

If you're an adult, especially over 50+ I highly recommend the vaccine. 20+ sure, I can see it - but numbers don't really back it up as much (for personal - still have to be diligent with who you're around). But for kids?

Shit seems shady as fuck to me. Look at the numbers yourself, but it seems extremely suspect.

[Shaps]

And in before the - "but they pass it on blah blah blah" crowd.

Show me the data to support that, because I have yet to find any - and most say there is no real threat of it. Their words, not mine.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science- briefs/transmission_k_12_schools.html

[Tgo01]

People are dumb.

[Shaps]

People are dumb.

I get ya, but specifically when it comes to kids it pisses me off. Would be much safer to wait 2 years, allow scientists/doctors to see if any oddities occur because of the vaccine - I don't mean deadly, etc. - but shoot people react all different types of ways to different things.

But I can't think of one good reason to mass vaccinate kids without the data to solidify potential long term effects - especially during their formative years when they are not at risk.

And I can't understand why trained scientists would push for something like that, with the current data available to them. Just doesn't make sense.

[LOL BRIELUS]

My understanding is children not just dying, (apparently very unlikely) but also suffering from MIS-C when infected by the Rona which looks like it had horrible side effects. I don't think that was a concern with the common flu. To me, those are two different things, but both part of a calculus of how to mitigate that risk.

I would need to talk to my pediatrician about this and make an informed decision then. My understanding is that the current vaccine is a derivative from proven vaccines, so it seems like there is very low risk from what its being made out to be. Is that untrue?

[Neveragain]

My understanding is children not just dying, (apparently very unlikely) but also suffering from MIS-C when infected by the Rona which looks like it had horrible side effects. I don't think that was a concern with the common flu. To me, those are two different things, but both part of a calculus of how to mitigate that risk.

I would need to talk to my pediatrician about this and make an informed decision then. My understanding is that the current vaccine is a derivative from proven vaccines, so it seems like there is very low risk from what its being made out to be. Is that untrue?

Pretty much any illness that drives your body temp. up, can cause any number of side effects.

I would consider maybe using this vaccine.....in 5 years or so.

[Shaps]

My understanding is children not just dying, (apparently very unlikely) but also suffering from MIS-C when infected by the Rona which looks like it had horrible side effects. I don't think that was a concern with the common flu. To me, those are two different things, but both part of a calculus of how to mitigate that risk.

I would need to talk to my pediatrician about this and make an informed decision then. My understanding is that the current vaccine is a derivative from proven vaccines, so it seems like there is very low risk from what its being made out to be. Is that untrue?

I'm not a doctor so not sure on the MIS-C honestly. I'll just go with the latest from the CDC:

"CDC continues to investigate multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19. Children and adolescents with MIS-C have presented with a persistent fever and a variety of signs and symptoms including involvement of multiple organs (e.g., cardiac, gastrointestinal, renal, hematologic, dermatologic, neurologic) and elevated inflammatory markers. CDC is collaborating with domestic and international partners to better understand this new syndrome, including how common it is and its risk factors."

Here's the kicker though Brielus:

"The risk of complications for healthy children is higher for flu compared to COVID-19. However, infants and children with underlying medical conditions are at increased risk for both flu and COVID-19." and "Young children are at higher risk of severe illness from flu."

"School-aged children infected with COVID-19 are at higher risk of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C), a rare but severe complication of COVID-19."

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/flu-vs-covid19.htm#:~:text=The%20risk%20of%20complication s%20for,and%20COVID%2D19.

Those are all from the CDC... so you tell me?

All I know, no long-term study or information is available on potential side effects - for something that has extremely low affects upon children.

I'm not against vaccines either - if they make sense. To me - the numbers don't support pushing vaccinating millions of children.

What's so strange is the data is available... it just never gets presented to people. And how many people will go sift through stuff that is available? Because their own data doesn't support what gets pushed publicly on media or others.

I just support people listening to their personal doctors and making their own informed decisions, because the talking heads are saying all types of shit. Hopefully it's safe for kids and the studies prove it out - but without studies, logically in my mind, it seems odd to promote mass vaccination of children.

[Ashliana]

Pushing to vaccinate kids aged 2 to 11??

Some seriously fucked up shit going on. I don't claim to know what is going on, but the statistics don't back it up at all.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

Numbers straight from the CDC.

Data as of 28 APR 2021 - All Deaths age 0-17 from Covid-19: 277

Let me say that again: 277 deaths for anyone from 0-17 during this whole time from Covid - out of a total of 41,811 deaths from all causes during that same time frame.

Breaking news: Virologists know more about viruses than Shaps does!

It's almost like the young can still contract and spread the disease to vulnerable populations even if they, themselves, don't suffer much from the disease themselves.

Who knew Shaps wasn't a doctor, or capable of rational thought at all? (Everyone who isn't retarded. Oh).

[Bhaalizmo]

Breaking news: Everyone seems to know more about everything than Shaps does!

It's almost like the young can still contract and spread the disease to vulnerable populations even if they, themselves, don't suffer much from the disease themselves.

Who knew Shaps wasn't a doctor, or capable of rational thought at all? (Everyone who isn't retarded. Oh).

Fixed

[~Rocktar~]

Breaking news: Virologists know more about viruses than Shaps does!

It's almost like the young can still contract and spread the disease to vulnerable populations even if they, themselves, don't suffer much from the disease themselves.

Who knew Shaps wasn't a doctor, or capable of rational thought at all? (Everyone who isn't retarded. Oh).

Breaking news, you are still hydrocephalicly retarded.

[Ashliana]

Breaking news, you are still hydrocephalicly retarded.

Breaking News: Noted local racist Rocktar not only completely unable to come up with a substantive response, was forced to resort only with insult that just emphasized his inability to substantively comment. More at 11.

[Astray]

Cunts.

You're all cunts and I hate you.

[Bhaalizmo]

Cunts.

You're all cunts and I hate you.

This just in

Cunt is back in fashion amongst fans of ancient text based role playing games.

[Neveragain]

Breaking news: Virologists know more about viruses than Shaps does!

It's almost like the young can still contract and spread the disease to vulnerable populations even if they, themselves, don't suffer much from the disease themselves.

Who knew Shaps wasn't a doctor, or capable of rational thought at all? (Everyone who isn't retarded. Oh).

If the vulnerable are vaccinated, what's the problem?

The vaccine works, right?

Suddenly "My body my choice" doesn't matter...only if you want to kill babies.

[Ashliana]

If the vulnerable are vaccinated, what's the problem?

The vaccine works, right?

Suddenly "My body my choice" doesn't matter...only if you want to kill babies.

Some people can't be vaccinated. Because they're vulnerable, and other people's immunity protects those who can't get vaccinated themselves, as with the MMR vaccine.

You are a mouth-breathing imbecile, on top of being a racist. Not like those two things are unconnected. But you earned one for yourself:

Breaking news: Virologists know more about viruses than Neveragain does!

[Tgo01]

Democrats: Trust the experts!
Experts: Go out and protest in the streets by the hundreds of thousands in the middle of a world wide pandemic!
Democrats: ...well okay I'm not gonna do that...but still! Trust the experts!

If Democrats held themselves to even just 10% of the standards they hold everyone else to they would be crying in the fetal position within a few days.

[~Rocktar~]

Breaking News: Noted local racist Rocktar not only completely unable to come up with a substantive response, was forced to resort only with insult that just emphasized his inability to substantively comment. More at 11.

BREAKING NEWS: No matter how many times you proclaim yourself the winner or me a racist it still isn't true. Also, I am not a Democrat so I am not a racist. Have a nice day.

[Neveragain]

Some people can't be vaccinated. Because they're vulnerable, and other people's immunity protects those who can't get vaccinated themselves, as with the MMR vaccine.

You are a mouth-breathing imbecile, on top of being a racist. Not like those two things are unconnected. But you earned one for yourself:

Breaking news: Virologists know more about viruses than Neveragain does!


And some people will choose not to get vaccinated. See how that works.

No way I would give my kids that shit, it hasn't been tested to the FDA standards.

[Ashliana]

Democrats: Trust the experts!
Experts: Go out and protest in the streets by the hundreds of thousands in the middle of a world wide pandemic!
Democrats: ...well okay I'm not gonna do that...but still! Trust the experts!

If Democrats held themselves to even just 10% of the standards they hold everyone else to they would be crying in the fetal position within a few days.

Civil injustice doesn't stop in the middle of a pandemic, and every picture of the protesters I saw had mask wearing and at least some social distancing. Anything else except fallacious appeals to hypocrisy fallacies?


BREAKING NEWS: No matter how many times you proclaim yourself the winner or me a racist it still isn't true. Also, I am not a Democrat so I am not a racist. Have a nice day.

BREAKING NEWS: Your failure to substantively respond was the concession; not anything that I said in response, which also wasn't "declaring myself the winner." Similarly, it isn't my assertion that revealed you as a racist; it was your numerous racist statements. Best of luck figuring out why Blacks and other people of color don't support Republicans, though. (Spoiler Alert: It's because your party is racist, and your last president and nominee was a transparently racist game show host). Have a nice day.


And some people will choose not to get vaccinated. See how that works.

No way I would give my kids that shit, it hasn't been tested to the FDA standards.

And some people -- like you -- are retarded, and don't understand risk mitigation. See how that works?

[Neveragain]

Civil injustice doesn't stop in the middle of a pandemic, and every picture of the protesters I saw had mask wearing and at least some social distancing. Anything else except fallacious appeals to hypocrisy fallacies?



BREAKING NEWS: Your failure to substantively respond was the concession; not anything that I said in response, which also wasn't "declaring myself the winner." Similarly, it isn't my assertion that revealed you as a racist; it was your numerous racist statements. Best of luck figuring out why Blacks and other people of color don't support Republicans, though. (Spoiler Alert: It's because your party is racist, and your last president and nominee was a transparently racist game show host). Have a nice day.



And some people -- like you -- are retarded, and don't understand risk mitigation. See how that works?

Risk mitigation as in, a full FDA screen of a new drug before it's placed on the market?

Killing babies "It's my body", everything else "Do as I say"

[Solkern]

I get ya, but specifically when it comes to kids it pisses me off. Would be much safer to wait 2 years, allow scientists/doctors to see if any oddities occur because of the vaccine - I don't mean deadly, etc. - but shoot people react all different types of ways to different things.

But I can't think of one good reason to mass vaccinate kids without the data to solidify potential long term effects - especially during their formative years when they are not at risk.

And I can't understand why trained scientists would push for something like that, with the current data available to them. Just doesn't make sense.

My father is 80, he has underlining health conditions, due to this, he’s not allowed to take the Covid vaccine. So yeah, children should get it.

[Ashliana]

Risk mitigation as in, a full FDA screen of a new drug before it's placed on the market?

Risk mitigation as in, the CDC and FDA know more about medicine and public health -- and gave the vaccines approval, given the data and circumstances - than you do. Who knew?


Killing babies "It's my body", everything else "Do as I say"

A person's decision to have an abortion doesn't have the potential infect multiple people with disease, which can then spread even further. Nice attempt to tie everything back to your frustration in your inability to control women, though. :)

[Neveragain]

My father is 80, he has underlining health conditions, due to this, he’s not allowed to take the Covid vaccine. So yeah, children should get it.

This is going to sound cold, but. The entire world doesn't orient around your 80 year old father.

[Neveragain]

Risk mitigation as in, the CDC and FDA know more about medicine and public health -- and gave the vaccines approval, given the data and circumstances - than you do. Who knew?



A person's decision to have an abortion doesn't have the potential infect multiple people with disease, which can then spread even further. Nice attempt to tie everything back to your frustration in your inability to control women, though. :)

The CDC and the FDA can't know because they are not following standard screening procedures. This is how science works.


A person's decision to have an abortion doesn't have the potential infect multiple people with disease

No, they are just murdering a person.

[Astray]

This just in

Cunt is back in fashion amongst fans of ancient text based role playing games.

This just in

It never fell out of style.

[Ashliana]

The CDC and the FDA can't know because they are not following standard screening procedures. This is how science works.

Your fantasies about how scientific bodies operate has no effect on the CDC, no effect on the FDA, no effect on the scientific method, no effect on the laws and policies under which they operate.


No, they are just murdering a person.

Alas, a zygote isn't a person. Perhaps you should actually read Roe.

[Neveragain]

Your fantasies about how scientific bodies operate has no effect on the CDC, no effect on the FDA, no effect on the scientific method, no effect on the laws and policies under which they operate.



Alas, a zygote isn't a person. Perhaps you should actually read Roe.

Scientific method doesn't change for your ignorance.

Let the dehumanization continue, the language is strikingly familiar to every human genocide.

[Ashliana]

Scientific method doesn't change for your ignorance.

While true, that doesn't address or change anything that I said. So, I'll repeat: Your fantasies about how scientific bodies operate has no effect on the CDC, no effect on the FDA, no effect on the scientific method, no effect on the laws and policies under which they operate. Your ignorance of the scientific method doesn't change the scientific method.


Let the dehumanization continue, the language is strikingly familiar to every human genocide.

Only one of us supports efforts that lead to fewer abortions. Spoiler Alert: It isn't you.

[Ashliana]

This is going to sound cold, but. The entire world doesn't orient around your 80 year old father.

It's not just cold of you: it's retarded of you.

Your ignorance about why scientific bodies recommend that young people get vaccinated to protect the vulnerable doesn't mean anything. Except that you're stupid enough to think that standing up and shouting "LOOK HOW IGNORANT NEVERAGAIN IS! LAUGH AT THE VILLAGE IDIOT!" was somehow a good decision on your part.

[Solkern]

The CDC and the FDA can't know because they are not following standard screening procedures. This is how science works.



No, they are just murdering a person.


Please show us evidence to back up your claim from a non-bias news source or government agency that shows standard screening procedure wasn’t followed. You are aware of what operation warp speed did? It allowed companies to bypass a lot of red tape(none of that red tape had anything to do with how safe the vaccine is, just basic bureaucratic red tape) that slowed down the process and allowed them to do multiple steps simultaneously instead of having to wait for one to finish, before proceeding. As one scientist has said that was working on a Covid vaccine. Operation warp speed really help streamline the vaccine.. which it why it could be done so quickly.

[Solkern]

This is going to sound cold, but. The entire world doesn't orient around your 80 year old father.

Did I say it did? You fail to see the point. My father’s life is worth just as much as the next person. And there are A LOT of vulnerable people of all ages including children in school, that can’t take the vaccine, having as many people take it as possible helps stop the spread to others, will save lives and end this pandemic quicker.

[Neveragain]

Did I say it did? You fail to see the point. My father’s life is worth just as much as the next person. And there are A LOT of vulnerable people of all ages including children in school, that can’t take the vaccine, having as many people take it as possible helps stop the spread to others, will save lives and end this pandemic quicker.

You're asking the majority to risk the health of their loved ones to maybe help a very small minority. This is an unproven vaccine, what's being asked by you and the other control freaks is selfish as fuck.

[Neveragain]

Please show us evidence to back up your claim from a non-bias news source or government agency that shows standard screening procedure wasn’t followed. You are aware of what operation warp speed did? It allowed companies to bypass a lot of red tape(none of that red tape had anything to do with how safe the vaccine is, just basic bureaucratic red tape) that slowed down the process and allowed them to do multiple steps simultaneously instead of having to wait for one to finish, before proceeding. As one scientist has said that was working on a Covid vaccine. Operation warp speed really help streamline the vaccine.. which it why it could be done so quickly.

It takes years to screen new medicines. The scientific method doesn't just fucking change over whims. No one is stopping anyone from taking the vaccine, others don't want to risk their childs well being on an unproven and rushed vaccine. It's a little thing called freedom, obviously you hate freedom.

[Ashliana]

Did I say it did? You fail to see the point. My father’s life is worth just as much as the next person. And there are A LOT of vulnerable people of all ages including children in school, that can’t take the vaccine, having as many people take it as possible helps stop the spread to others, will save lives and end this pandemic quicker.You're asking the majority to risk the health of their loved ones to maybe help a very small minority. This is an unproven vaccine, what's being asked by you and the other control freaks is selfish as fuck.

Something isn't "risky and selfish" just because you, in your spectacularly uninformed opinion, declare it to be so. There's a reason you don't have a license to practice medicine, and aren't charged with the nation's health.


It takes years to screen new medicines. The scientific method doesn't just fucking change over whims. No one is stopping anyone from taking the vaccine, others don't want to risk their childs well being on an unproven and rushed vaccine. It's a little thing called freedom, obviously you hate freedom.

You don't know anything about medicine, risk mitigation OR the scientific method. Neither medicine nor the pursuit of science exist in a magical vacuum where complete inaction is always the most informed choice compared to doing nothing, as you retardedly assert, in the middle of a pandemic where inaction has various costs.

Spoiler Alert: You're free to make a (retarded) choice. Other people are free to (correctly) identify you as an imbecile for doing so.

[Neveragain]

Something isn't "risky and selfish" just because you, in your spectacularly uninformed opinion, declare it to be so. There's a reason you don't have a license to practice method, and aren't charged with the nation's health.



You don't know anything about medicine, risk mitigation OR the scientific method. Neither medicine nor the pursuit of science exist in a magical vacuum where complete inaction is always the most informed choice compared to doing nothing, as you retardedly assert, in the middle of a pandemic where inaction has various costs.

Spoiler Alert: You're free to make a (retarded) choice. Other people are free to (correctly) identify you as an imbecile for doing so.

Why so angry?

The fact is they are not following scientific method:


Phases of Human Testing for Investigational Drugs
If the FDA gives the green light, the investigational drug will then enter three phases of clinical trials:

Phase 1: About 20 to 80 healthy volunteers to establish a drug's safety and profile, and takes about 1 year. Safety, metabolism and excretion of the drug are also emphasized.

Phase 2: Roughly 100 to 300 patient volunteers to assess the drug's effectiveness in those with a specific condition or disease. This phase runs about 2 years. Groups of similar patients may receive the actual drug compared to a placebo (inactive pill) or other active drug to determine if the drug has an effect. Safety and side effects are reviewed.

Phase 3: Typically, several thousand patients are monitored in clinics and hospitals to carefully determine effectiveness and identify further side effects. Different types and age ranges of patients are evaluated. The manufacturer may look at different doses as well as the experimental drug in combination with other treatments. This phase runs about about 3 years on average.

https://www.drugs.com/fda-approval-process.html

[Ashliana]

The fact is they are not following scientific method:

https://www.drugs.com/fda-approval-process.html

Wrong. Your failure to comprehend the circumstances under which the FDA justifiably authorizes exceptions to their normal approval process in the middle of a pandemic has nothing to do with the FDA "not following" the scientific method.

You retardedly thinking "the FDA's normal process = following the scientific method. Anything else = not following the scientific method" only reveals your own spectacular ignorance. It doesn't confer anything on anyone else. You're an ignorant halfwit posting on a video game forum, not a practitioner of medicine, not a scientist, not charged with the nation's health. You are an idiot.

[Solkern]

Why so angry?

The fact is they are not following scientific method:



https://www.drugs.com/fda-approval-process.html


You do realize the approval method and the scientific method are completely different things right?

[Neveragain]

Wrong. Your failure to comprehend the circumstances under which the FDA justifiably authorizes exceptions to their normal approval process in the middle of a pandemic has nothing to do with the FDA "not following" the scientific method.

You retardedly thinking "the FDA's normal process = following the scientific method. Anything else = not following the scientific method" only reveals your own spectacular ignorance. It doesn't confer anything on anyone else. You're an ignorant halfwit posting on a video game forum, not a practitioner of medicine, not a scientist, not charged with the nation's health. You are an idiot.

Poor you. Not risking my kids health for anyone, especially over a bad cold.

[Neveragain]

You do realize the approval method and the scientific method are completely different things right?

Those are standardized screenings, that is a part of scientific method. The whole idea is to have the same standard for every new drug being tested, if we don't you get gigo.

[Ashliana]

Poor you. Not risking my kids health for anyone, especially over a bad cold.

Praise Jeebus that imbeciles like you aren't charged with public health.



You do realize the approval method and the scientific method are completely different things right?The whole idea is to have the same standard for every new drug being tested, if we don't you get gigo.

... so it's pretty clear you don't know what the scientific method is. Nothing about the scientific method implies that differing circumstances can't justify different approaches or timelines. You are an idiot.

[Neveragain]

Praise Jeebus that imbeciles like you aren't charged with public health.



... so it's pretty clear you don't know what the scientific method is. Nothing about the scientific method implies that differing circumstances can't justify different approaches or timelines. You are an idiot.

Poor, Ass. People won't do what I demand so I'm going to insult religion.

I'm pretty sure we should make AIDS patients carry identification cards too. Oh, you have AIDS, sorry you can't eat here.......

[Ashliana]

Poor, Ass. People won't do what I demand so I'm going to insult religion. Right....


I'm pretty sure we should make AIDS patients carry identification cards too. Oh, you have AIDS, sorry you can't eat here.......

You're on a nonsense roll this evening. Kudos on the bonus ignorance to match your scientific illiteracy.

[Neveragain]

Right....



You're on a nonsense roll this evening. Kudos on the bonus ignorance to match your scientific illiteracy.

Poor Ass, spreading AIDS no problem. Boys are girls, girls are boys, the insanity of the rainbow jihad knows no bounds.

[Ashliana]

Poor Ass, spreading AIDS no problem. Boys are girls, girls are boys, the insanity of the rainbow jihad knows no bounds.

Best of luck figuring out how medicine and science works, and why conservatives have lost on every social issue in history. Stay mad. :)

[Neveragain]

Best of luck figuring out how medicine and science works, and why conservatives have lost on every social issue in history. Stay mad. :)


Assliana:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-3Gl-3gMeY

[Ashliana]

You have weird fantasies.

[Solkern]

Those are standardized screenings, that is a part of scientific method. The whole idea is to have the same standard for every new drug being tested, if we don't you get gigo.

Standardize screenings that are apart of the Scientific method? Are you on crack? You do know the scientific method can vary based on results? Do you even know what the Scientific method is? There is no such thing as a standardized screening for the scientific method. For the approval procedures there is.

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/who-chief-vaccinating-children-moral-catastrophe-200925951.html

HAHAHAHAHA

"Kids can be infected with the coronavirus, but they are much less likely than adults to develop severe symptoms. Less than 2% of all COVID-19 cases involving children in the U.S. have resulted in hospitalization, according to data collated by the American Academy of Pediatrics."

Where the clowns at? ROFL

This cracks me the fuck up...

What happens when someone actually follows facts, science, data, understands minutia, and actually takes a bit of time to think about a situation - instead of listening to the talking heads.

ROFL

BTW - Fuck the WHO, those pieces of shit sold out long ago - but doesn't change the science in this part.



***Insert Sarcasm****

If you vaccinate your kids, you hate people from other countries. You are xenophobic mass murderers hoping to wipe out countries of POCs. Don't vaccinate your kids, if you do - you're contributing to genocide!

/bow - My impression of a Leftist activist.

[Solkern]

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/who-chief-vaccinating-children-moral-catastrophe-200925951.html

HAHAHAHAHA

"Kids can be infected with the coronavirus, but they are much less likely than adults to develop severe symptoms. Less than 2% of all COVID-19 cases involving children in the U.S. have resulted in hospitalization, according to data collated by the American Academy of Pediatrics."

Where the clowns at? ROFL

This cracks me the fuck up...

What happens when someone actually follows facts, science, data, understands minutia, and actually takes a bit of time to think about a situation - instead of listening to the talking heads.

ROFL

BTW - Fuck the WHO, those pieces of shit sold out long ago - but doesn't change the science in this part.



***Insert Sarcasm****

If you vaccinate your kids, you hate people from other countries. You are xenophobic mass murderers hoping to wipe out countries of POCs. Don't vaccinate your kids, if you do - you're contributing to genocide!

/bow - My impression of a Leftist activist.

Huh? You do realize that’s old news? The entire point of vaccinating kids is because they have zero clue about hygiene, and they are more likely to spread it to adults and vulnerable people than to get sick themselves

[Shaps]

Huh? You do realize that’s old news? The entire point of vaccinating kids is because they have zero clue about hygiene, and they are more likely to spread it to adults and vulnerable people than to get sick themselves

Seriously.. stop being stupid... either get the point or don't.

[~Rocktar~]

Seriously.. stop being stupid... either get the point or don't.

He chose "don't".

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/period-came-back-having-coronavirus-152222037.html

I'm sure it will all be just fine. No problem at all. /shrug