Don't you feel stupid for believing Biden now?

[Parkbandit]

Poor Backlash...

Dems have the House, the Senate and the White House... so this is the time where they can get shit done! This is the time where they can FINALLY get their agenda passed through the legislative process!

Well... say goodbye to the Federally mandated $15 minimum wage. The Democrats have decided to drop it from their "Covid Relief" Bill (a bill that spends a whopping $.10 for every dollar on actual Covid relief and $.90 on whatever else they want to) and just pass the rest of it. Survey says: PROMISE BROKEN. :(

And in before anyone chimes in to say the Republicans blocked it... they can't. Only need a majority and the Democrats have it. They had no real intention to pass $15/min.. they just told really stupid people that so they would get their vote.

[caelric]

So much for back's raise.

I'm sure it's somehow Trumps fault, though.

[Gelston]

The Senate is pretty tight on it. They absolutely have to talk with Republicans on it, because 1 democrat Senator said he doesn't favor payments at all. That puts it 51-50 even if Harris throws in a vote. I imagine they'll return to address the minimum wage point on an actual budget bill, but it was the Parliamentarian that removed it from the bill.

She is a non-elected official that has been in office since 2012. The VP can overrule the Parliamentarian, but it is rare. Democrat senators are calling on her to do exactly that today and re-add the minimum wage part.

[Parkbandit]

The Senate is pretty tight on it. They absolutely have to talk with Republicans on it, because 1 democrat Senator said he doesn't favor payments at all. That puts it 51-50 even if Harris throws in a vote. I imagine they'll return to address the minimum wage point on an actual budget bill, but it was the Parliamentarian that removed it from the bill.

She is a non-elected official that has been in office since 2012. The VP can overrule the Parliamentarian, but it is rare. Democrat senators are calling on her to do exactly that today and re-add the minimum wage part.

Appointed in 2012 by Dirty Harry Reid himself. They had to put that in the "Covid Relief" bill to appease the Socialists in the Party... but they had very little faith it would be passed as is.

And I haven't heard about the 1 Democrat that will not be voting for it because of the payments. Who's that? I heard Manchin wouldn't vote yes with the min wage.

[caelric]

I heard Manchin wouldn't vote yes with the min wage.

That pretty much makes him literally Hitler, right?

[Parkbandit]

That pretty much makes him literally Hitler, right?

He's using his white privilege.

Or his toxic masculinity.

Not sure which page they are on currently.

[caelric]

Toxic masculine white privelege.

I have seen a number of articles lately blaming all the bad things on white women, though.

So, pretty, if you're white, you're evil.

[Gelston]

Yeah, Manchin said no. He doesn't like the idea of direct payments either.

That is why it is really iffy on if Harris will overrule the Parliamentarian to have the min wage part put back in. Better to have something pass than nothing at all.

[Shaps]

https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2021/02/28/when-will-biden-hold-a-solo-press-conference.cnn

Don't worry - any time now. I mean, what could possibly be wrong? ROFL

This is so sad.

[Neveragain]

$21,000 dollars for federal employees, nothing if you make over $80,000 and work in the private sector.

Bidens America.

A veteran nurse gets nothing, Joe Bidens fluffer gets $21,000.

[Parkbandit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMaIYGDBh5w&ab_channel=ChristoAivalis

Biden is being led around by a very, very short leash. They don't want him to fuck up this great opportunity to pilfer from the American public with this "Covid Relief" bill that spends a whole ten cents for actual covid relief and ninety percent on bailing out their pals.

Biden is such a beta bitch.

[caelric]

$21,000 dollars for federal employees, nothing if you make over $80,000 and work in the private sector.

Bidens America.

A veteran nurse gets nothing, Joe Bidens fluffer gets $21,000.

What's this in reference to?

[Neveragain]

What's this in reference to?

That's part of the new covid relief bill. Federal employees with children get up to $21,000. Private sector workers that make over $80,000 get nothing. The bill is a literal shakedown of the middle class.

[caelric]

That's part of the new covid relief bill. Federal employees with children get up to $21,000. Private sector workers that make over $80,000 get nothing. The bill is a literal shakedown of the middle class.

I haven't heard of that, and I'm a federal employee. I mean, I know about the cutoffs for the stimulus, and my family is well above the cutoffs, so no stimulus for me. I haven't seen or heard of the $21k for anyone, much less federal employees. Can you point me to that?

[Neveragain]

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/covid19-aid-bill-to-pay-federal-workers-up-to-21-000-for-kids-staying-at-home-101614171032077.html


In US, Covid-19 aid bill to pay federal workers up to $21,000 for kids staying at home.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/23/paid-to-stay-home--coronavirus-aid-bill-pays-federal-employees-with-kids-out-of-school-up-to-21k/?sh=677252c91223


Paid To Stay Home— Coronavirus Aid Bill Pays Federal Employees With Kids Out Of School Up To $21K

[Neveragain]

It's also possible that we will be forced to make cuts to medicare to pay for this.


Covid relief bill may trigger $36 billion cut to Medicare, higher student loan fees

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/27/covid-relief-may-trigger-cuts-to-medicare-student-loans.html

[caelric]

Ah, I was unaware of that. Bunch of bullshit if you ask me.

How about we 'Trust the science' that says the risk of transmission in schools has been very low, and that they are among the safer places. Also 'trust the science' that has shown that kids that have been doing elearning have incredibly lower tests scores, and incredibly higher rates of mental issues, and mandate that schools open, rather than giving more handouts for people whose kids can't go to school because the schools are closed.

[Neveragain]

This shit gets even worse. They ran a story last night about a store front that was scamming unemployment, there was cash hidden in every nook and cranny of this shop. The highest number thus far that I'm seeing reported is $63 billion in fraudulent unemployment claims have been paid out since this whole kung-flu debacle has started. It's also being reported that most of this money will be unrecoverable because it's been moved to off-shore bank accounts.


State unemployment systems face ‘epidemic of fraud’; $63 billion paid out wrongly across US

https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-unemployment-fraud-phony-claims-20210301-tcn4rvtcm5czzfq5uvnogrwuem-story.html

[Neveragain]

Ah, I was unaware of that. Bunch of bullshit if you ask me.

How about we 'Trust the science' that says the risk of transmission in schools has been very low, and that they are among the safer places. Also 'trust the science' that has shown that kids that have been doing elearning have incredibly lower tests scores, and incredibly higher rates of mental issues, and mandate that schools open, rather than giving more handouts for people whose kids can't go to school because the schools are closed.

I don't understand why it costs, whatever ridiculous amount of money they are wanting, to open schools. You literally just turn the fucking lights on and tell the kids to go to school. If the prol's can work the cash registers, the teachers can show up for their job as well.

[caelric]

Because teacher's unions have an inordinate amount of power in many states.

[drauz]

I don't understand why it costs, whatever ridiculous amount of money they are wanting, to open schools. You literally just turn the fucking lights on and tell the kids to go to school.

Cause kids are literal germ magnets. So yes you could just turn the lights on and be like "good luck" but you'd be an asshole to do that to people.


If the prol's can work the cash registers, the teachers can show up for their job as well.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

[caelric]

Cause kids are literal germ magnets.

So, sure, you can believe that if you want. But all the research and studies have shown that transmission of COVID at elementary and middle schools has been incredibly low, lower than the average trasmission rate.

But sure, let's keep fucking the kids over in their mental and emotional development by consigning them to elearning hell.

[Neveragain]

Cause kids are literal germ magnets. So yes you could just turn the lights on and be like "good luck" but you'd be an asshole to do that to people.



Two wrongs don't make a right.

Says the guy who has no children..

https://media1.tenor.com/images/17d85c6ea9673f988e68954d09ffaa9c/tenor.gif?itemid=12401432

[drauz]

So, sure, you can believe that if you want. But all the research and studies have shown that transmission of COVID at elementary and middle schools has been incredibly low, lower than the average trasmission rate.

But sure, let's keep fucking the kids over in their mental and emotional development by consigning them to elearning hell.

Way to argue something I didn't say. I don't want them to just flip the lights on and be like "have at it". I'm no expert so I don't know the best way to go about it but it has to be something more than "figure it out".

I agree that e-learning isn't good for kids and they need to socialize at those ages but there has to be precautions taken.

[Methais]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMaIYGDBh5w&ab_channel=ChristoAivalis

Biden is being led around by a very, very short leash. They don't want him to fuck up this great opportunity to pilfer from the American public with this "Covid Relief" bill that spends a whole ten cents for actual covid relief and ninety percent on bailing out their pals.

Biden is such a beta bitch.

In Biden's defense, he probably still doesn't know he's president.

[caelric]

Way to back out of what you said, then. Because school districts that are opening are doing a pretty damn good job of figuring it out, regardless of the bullshit antics of the teacher's unions.

It's only in leftists strongholds like Los Angeles and Chicago that the kids are continuing to be punished, again because of the bullshit teacher's unions.

[drauz]

Says the guy who has no children..

https://media1.tenor.com/images/17d85c6ea9673f988e68954d09ffaa9c/tenor.gif?itemid=12401432

Yeah...not like I have family members who have kids or anything....

https://i.gifer.com/WgpF.gif

[drauz]

Way to back out of what you said, then.

https://media.tenor.com/images/ae5ae70674472fdd2841667c2b0aec5c/tenor.gif

[caelric]

JFC, Drauz, you're better than this. You're one of the few left leaning posters who actually has a brain.

Be better.

[Neveragain]

Yeah...not like I have family members who have kids or anything....

https://i.gifer.com/WgpF.gif

http://24.media.tumblr.com/6275ff86099ed92a2351b0c20c0698eb/tumblr_ml3yiiEsLb1rsm741o1_250.gif

[Parkbandit]

Way to back out of what you said, then. Because school districts that are opening are doing a pretty damn good job of figuring it out, regardless of the bullshit antics of the teacher's unions.

It's only in leftists strongholds like Los Angeles and Chicago that the kids are continuing to be punished, again because of the bullshit teacher's unions.

Teacher's union have never been about teaching or the children and always about the teachers and offering protections to really shitty teachers.

[caelric]

Teacher's union have never been about teaching or the children and always about the teachers and offering protections to really shitty teachers.

No argument there. Latest statement from the LA Teacher's Union is that reopening the schools is structural racism.

Never mind that the majority of students being harmed by LA schools remaining closed are minorities.

[drauz]

JFC, Drauz, you're better than this. You're one of the few left leaning posters who actually has a brain.

Be better.

I don't know what you're up and arms about, so let me clarify my position for you.

1. I want schools to open so kids can get back to socializing
2. I think the government (local, state, or federal, idc which) needs to have a plan in place that helps protect teachers.

[Shaps]

I don't know what you're up and arms about, so let me clarify my position for you.

1. I want schools to open so kids can get back to socializing
2. I think the government (local, state, or federal, idc which) needs to have a plan in place that helps protect teachers.

Maybe use the plans that private and religious schools have been using?

Seems those institutions have been chugging right along. Wonder what the difference is?

***as nothing is said, but the words "teachers union" hangs in the air***

Edit: Serious note though, it's a money grab. Unfortunate that's the fact, but it is.

[Solkern]

So, sure, you can believe that if you want. But all the research and studies have shown that transmission of COVID at elementary and middle schools has been incredibly low, lower than the average trasmission rate.

But sure, let's keep fucking the kids over in their mental and emotional development by consigning them to elearning hell.

Maybe because the majority of schools have been closed this entire time? I remember a school district reopening a few months ago, and had to shut down after just a few days due to a Covid outbreak.

That’s like saying, you know the radiation sickness from people visiting Chernobyl is extremely low. Let’s have people move back there and reopen the city.

[caelric]

Maybe because the majority of schools have been closed this entire time? I remember a school district reopening a few months ago, and had to shut down after just a few days due to a Covid outbreak.

I don't know how to explain so a complete fucktard like yourself could understand, but of the schools that have remained open, with proper precautions (kids wearing masks, etc...), the transmission rate is vert low.

[Solkern]

I don't know how to explain so a complete fucktard like yourself could understand, but of the schools that have remained open, with proper precautions (kids wearing masks, etc...), the transmission rate is vert low.

https://mississippitoday.org/2020/08/19/covid-19-outbreak-closes-mississippi-elementary-school-just-one-week-after-it-reopened/

COVID-19 outbreak closes Mississippi elementary school just one week after it reopened

They followed all the proper procedures, still closed.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-are-reopening-then-quickly-closing-due-to-coronavirus-outbreaks-11597700886

Yup, schools really got it under control.

[Solkern]

While children are less likely to have major issues from coronavirus, it’s not about just that. It’s when they spread it to teachers, or spread it to their families back home, that’s the main concern. Maybe you should think a little bigger.


Here’s a nice study that refutes your claim.

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2020-12-02/shut-them-down-why-schools-might-not-be-safe-during-covid-19

[caelric]

How about a reputable and non-paywalled source, like maybe the CDC? (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/science-and-research/transmission_k_12_schools.html)

From the report:



Based on the data available, in-person learning in schools has not been associated with substantial community transmission. Although national COVID-19 case incidence rates among children and adolescents have risen over time, this trend parallels trends observed among adults.17 Increases in case incidence among school-aged children and school reopenings do not appear to pre-date increases in community transmission.17,32-34

[caelric]

And another one from the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7004e3.htm)



Not from the CDC, but from another reputable source (https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/01/scientists-highlight-low-risk-covid-19-spread-schools)


And this one from the WHO (as little as I trust the WHO, this one makes sense (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/risk-comms-updates/update39-covid-and-schools.pdf?sfvrsn=320db233_2) with a very relevant quote from the link:



Schools being open did not lead to rise incommunity spread where infection was low1,3Ø
Preventive measures, prompt case detection and contact-tracing averted larger outbreaks

[caelric]

In other words, Trust the Fucking Science, Idiot and stop fear mongering.

[Solkern]

How about a reputable and non-paywalled source, like maybe the CDC? (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/science-and-research/transmission_k_12_schools.html)

From the report:


Some studies using such methods have demonstrated infection rates in children similar to those observed in adults.7 Other evidence suggests that differences in susceptibility between children and adults is not entirely due to lack of testing because children are more likely to be asymptomatic or show mild symptoms.5,18-20,22,29,30 For example, several population screening studies found lower incidences of SARS-CoV-2 infection among children under age 10 compared with adolescents or adults.18,21,24 Studies that traced household contacts and tested all contacts of index cases, regardless of symptom status, have also found lower rates of infection among children compared with adults.19,20,23,25 The questions of susceptibility and infectivity among children and adolescents require further study to explore potential explanations and mechanisms.

From the report.

[Solkern]

And another one from the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7004e3.htm)



Not from the CDC, but from another reputable source (https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/01/scientists-highlight-low-risk-covid-19-spread-schools)


And this one from the WHO (as little as I trust the WHO, this one makes sense (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/risk-comms-updates/update39-covid-and-schools.pdf?sfvrsn=320db233_2) with a very relevant quote from the link:

The cdc reports states:
Though outbreaks do occur in school settings, multiple studies have shown that transmission within school settings is typically lower than – or at least similar to – levels of community transmission, when mitigation strategies are in place in schools.

That’s a far car from the transmission rate is very low compared to community spread.

[caelric]

The cdc reports states:
Though outbreaks do occur in school settings, multiple studies have shown that transmission within school settings is typically lower than – or at least similar to – levels of community transmission, when mitigation strategies are in place in schools.

That’s a far car from the transmission rate is very low compared to community spread.

Look, I can bold things too!

Bottom line: all the data is showing the opening schools is safe. You can ignore that if you want, and it appears you will, but you are flat out, dead wrong, AND you're hurting a generation of kids by advocating for schools to stay closed. So, in fact, you're a child abuser. Well done, Solken, well done.

[Orthin]

Teacher's union have never been about teaching or the children and always about the teachers and offering protections to really shitty teachers.

You are pretty much just describing any union.

[Shaps]

Didn't want to start another thread for it, but interesting thought just hit that somewhat applies to the title...

Biden has yet to give a press conference for open questions to be done by the press pool, nor has he addressed Congress or done a State of the Union. One or the other, I don't find interesting. The two in conjunction, I do find interesting.

Transparent right? Thoughts?

[Parkbandit]

You are pretty much just describing any union.

https://media.tenor.com/images/204318ea66dc29ea6925f29c2b02f4e5/tenor.gif

[Parkbandit]

Didn't want to start another thread for it, but interesting thought just hit that somewhat applies to the title...

Biden has yet to give a press conference for open questions to be done by the press pool, nor has he addressed Congress or done a State of the Union. One or the other, I don't find interesting. The two in conjunction, I do find interesting.

Transparent right? Thoughts?

If you were a Democrat and responsible for staying on point and babysitting the old man.. would you let him have a press conference?

They need to get the "Covid Relief" bill, that has very little to do with actual covid relief.. passed before they let President Biden out in public without strict adult supervision.

[Solkern]

Look, I can bold things too!

Bottom line: all the data is showing the opening schools is safe. You can ignore that if you want, and it appears you will, but you are flat out, dead wrong, AND you're hurting a generation of kids by advocating for schools to stay closed. So, in fact, you're a child abuser. Well done, Solken, well done.


Lol, rage moar! I have children, I want them no where near a school till it’s safe. For my child, for myself and my family. Guess that too much for you to wrap your little head around.

[Neveragain]

Lol, rage moar! I have children, I want them no where near a school till it’s safe. For my child, for myself and my family. Guess that too much for you to wrap your little head around.

If you want to ignore the science, you are more than welcome to keep your kids home. If you were that concerned with their well being you wouldn't be sending your children to public schools in the first place.

[Solkern]

If you want to ignore the science, you are more than welcome to keep your kids home. If you were that concerned with their well being you wouldn't be sending your children to public schools in the first place.

Science told us to wear mask, science told us to lock down, yet 90% of you, including you, were like NO! It’s funny how you pick and choose the science that’s convenient for you.

And also, my child will go to a private play school. Wouldn’t go near a public school!

[Methais]

Science told us to wear mask, science told us to lock down, yet 90% of you, including you, were like NO! It’s funny how you pick and choose the science that’s convenient for you.

Science also changed its mind 98792074209343 times over the past year too and can't decide how many masks you should wear, or if you should even wear a mask at all.

If we're supposed to wear 2 masks, then wouldn't that indicate that wearing one mask is ineffective, for example?

[Solkern]

Science also changed its mind 98792074209343 times over the past year too and can't decide how many masks you should wear, or if you should even wear a mask at all.

If we're supposed to wear 2 masks, then wouldn't that indicate that wearing one mask is ineffective, for example?

Science does evolve the more you know. We’d still be at the wheel or some shit if it didn’t. I know nothing about this two mask shit.

Still doesn’t change the fact that most here pick the science that’s convenient for them, and the rest is fake news.

[Solkern]

Science also changed its mind 98792074209343 times over the past year too and can't decide how many masks you should wear, or if you should even wear a mask at all.

If we're supposed to wear 2 masks, then wouldn't that indicate that wearing one mask is ineffective, for example?


Regarding the double mask, it seems there’s a reason behind it.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends universal mask wearing as an important way to slow the spread of COVID-19.

At this time, the CDC recommends wearing a face mask with two to three layers that fits snugly over your face. The CDC recently published new research suggesting that layering a cloth mask over a surgical mask (double masking) when a mask only has one layer, or knotting and tucking a single mask, may improve the fit of masks and provide additional protection from potentially infectious particles.

However, if your mask already has multiple layers and fits tightly, it’s not necessary to double mask.

[Methais]

Science does evolve the more you know. We’d still be at the wheel or some shit if it didn’t. I know nothing about this two mask shit.

Still doesn’t change the fact that most here pick the science that’s convenient for them, and the rest is fake news.

Science is static.

Our understanding of it can evolve though, sure. But the CDC and WHO and all that changes their mind about something every week, so it's not unreasonable to assume that people would lose confidence in them over time and stop giving a shit what they have to say, even moreso with everything COVID related being tainted by politics since the beginning.

[Gelston]

Gorilla gluing your mouth and nostrils will prevent transmission of the virus.

[Jeril]

Science is static.

Our understanding of it can evolve though, sure. But the CDC and WHO and all that changes their mind about something every week, so it's not unreasonable to assume that people would lose confidence in them over time and stop giving a shit what they have to say, even moreso with everything COVID related being tainted by politics since the beginning.

You do know science is just the process by which you figure things out? So, it is always changing based on what we are trying to figure out and as we learn new things. I agree completely about the CDC and WHO though.

I forget if I saw it on here before or not but heard it said recently. "Trust the science is about as unscientific as you can get." And that's because science is all about questioning things. People who say trust the science don't want you questioning anything, it is just another way for them to tell people to shut up and do what their told.

[Methais]

You do know science is just the process by which you figure things out? So, it is always changing based on what we are trying to figure out and as we learn new things. I agree completely about the CDC and WHO though.

I forget if I saw it on here before or not but heard it said recently. "Trust the science is about as unscientific as you can get." And that's because science is all about questioning things. People who say trust the science don't want you questioning anything, it is just another way for them to tell people to shut up and do what their told.

Fair enough.

Therefore, whatever word I should have used in place of "science" is what's static.

EDIT: What word am I looking for here? :lol:

[caelric]

laws of the universe. Natural laws.

[Methais]

:yeahthat:

[Ashliana]

Science is static.

This is one of the single dumbest things you've ever said, and that's out of 42,000+ posts. If I didn't know you for most of that time, I'd suspect you of being a deliberate parody of a pseudo-intellectual conservative.


Our understanding of it can evolve though, sure. But the CDC and WHO and all that changes their mind about something every week, so it's not unreasonable to assume that people would lose confidence in them over time and stop giving a shit what they have to say ...

Your failure to understand the scientific method is your problem, not the CDC's. If they make absolute idiots like you "lose faith," the answer is to address the education failures occurring in the schools you attended, not making arbitrary changes at the behest of some imbecile named Methais.


even moreso with everything COVID related being tainted by politics since the beginning.

The only thing "tainted by politics" is the conservative understanding of science, which has the same root cause as always -- conservatives have been primed for the past 70 years to disregard what science has to say on any matter that threatens a corporate, private interest. Conservatives getting repeatedly conned -- at their own expense -- by the tobacco industry, the fossil fuel industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and in the pandemic, the interests threatened by people staying home.

At this point, disregarding science has become a point of pride for conservatives. Example: People at Trump's rallies booing requests to wear masks, since it's en vogue to cut your nose off to spite your face -- I'm sorry, "own the libs" -- and endanger yourself/your family because some snooty scientist told you how to protect yourself.

[Solkern]

Fair enough.

Therefore, whatever word I should have used in place of "science" is what's static.

EDIT: What word am I looking for here? :lol:


The big issue imo, is we are living the Scientific experiment/method out in real life, real time. Many people are seeing it play out for the first time in their lives. Failures are part of it, a BIG part. Changing things is as well. People see failure as we fucked up can’t trust the science! When it’s a natural part of the process.

[Solkern]

Gorilla gluing your mouth and nostrils will prevent transmission of the virus.

And eyes, don’t forget the eyes!

[Solkern]

laws of the universe. Natural laws.

I disagree, we are basing these things as static based on the minuscule information/knowledge we have. Things in space have already broken some natural laws we held before, and I believe they will continue to be broken.


https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/04/200427102544.htm

[Solkern]

Jeremy England of MIT and one of the brightest minds we have, is looking at the laws of Thermodynamics, and entropy and is constantly testing the natural laws.

[Methais]

This is one of the single dumbest things you've ever said, and that's out of 42,000+ posts. If I didn't know you for most of that time, I'd suspect you of being a deliberate parody of a pseudo-intellectual conservative.



Your failure to understand the scientific method is your problem, not the CDC's. If they make absolute idiots like you "lose faith," the answer is to address the education failures occurring in the schools you attended, not making arbitrary changes at the behest of some imbecile named Methais.



The only thing "tainted by politics" is the conservative understanding of science, which has the same root cause as always -- conservatives have been primed for the past 70 years to disregard what science has to say on any matter that threatens a corporate, private interest. Conservatives getting repeatedly conned -- at their own expense -- by the tobacco industry, the fossil fuel industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and in the pandemic, the interests threatened by people staying home.

At this point, disregarding science has become a point of pride for conservatives. Example: People at Trump's rallies booing requests to wear masks, since it's en vogue to cut your nose off to spite your face -- I'm sorry, "own the libs" -- and endanger yourself/your family because some snooty scientist told you how to protect yourself.

Look how mad and dramatic you are over semantics, like a little fat smelly girl crying at her princess party because nobody showed up.

I’m a libertarian btw, not a conservative, and everything you just said is retarded and full of WAAAHHHH.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/JwNPAckJDiPsI/200.gif

[Ashliana]

Look how mad and dramatic you are over semantics, like a little fat smelly girl crying at her princess party because nobody showed up.

I’m a libertarian btw, not a conservative, and everything you just said is retarded and full of WAAAHHHH.




Didn't engage with the substance of the post? Check.

Didn't engage with your abjectly retarded misunderstanding of science? Check.

Accused someone of "playing semantics" out of one side of their mouth while then claiming "I'm a libertarian, not a conservative!" out of the other in a failed attempt to dishonestly win an argument? Check.


Oh, and by the way -- if it:

looks like a duck
walks like a duck
self-identifies as a duck
posts the results of political compass tests identifying itself as a duck


https://i.imgur.com/zKdgIuc.png
https://i.imgur.com/kuc6gSL.png
https://i.imgur.com/t0mlsep.png
https://i.imgur.com/ej1ltix.png

It's a fucking duck.


Methais' abject dishonesty blown out of the water for the bazillionth time? Check.

[Parkbandit]

This is one of the single dumbest things you've ever said, and that's out of 42,000+ posts. If I didn't know you for most of that time, I'd suspect you of being a deliberate parody of a pseudo-intellectual conservative.

Your failure to understand the scientific method is your problem, not the CDC's. If they make absolute idiots like you "lose faith," the answer is to address the education failures occurring in the schools you attended, not making arbitrary changes at the behest of some imbecile named Methais.

The only thing "tainted by politics" is the conservative understanding of science, which has the same root cause as always -- conservatives have been primed for the past 70 years to disregard what science has to say on any matter that threatens a corporate, private interest. Conservatives getting repeatedly conned -- at their own expense -- by the tobacco industry, the fossil fuel industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and in the pandemic, the interests threatened by people staying home.

At this point, disregarding science has become a point of pride for conservatives. Example: People at Trump's rallies booing requests to wear masks, since it's en vogue to cut your nose off to spite your face -- I'm sorry, "own the libs" -- and endanger yourself/your family because some snooty scientist told you how to protect yourself.

Imagine if he brought up the Doomsday Clock as a "fact" of anything scientific...

Yikes...

[Parkbandit]

Didn't engage with the substance of the post? Check.
Didn't engage with your abjectly retarded misunderstanding of science? Check.
Accused someone of "playing semantics" out of one side of their mouth while then claiming "I'm a libertarian, not a conservative!" out of the other in a failed attempt to dishonestly win an argument? Check.


Oh, and by the way -- if it:

looks like a duck
walks like a duck
self-identifies as a duck
posts the results of political campus tests identifying itself as a duck


https://i.imgur.com/zKdgIuc.png
https://i.imgur.com/kuc6gSL.png
https://i.imgur.com/t0mlsep.png
https://i.imgur.com/ej1ltix.png

It's a fucking duck.


Methais' abject dishonesty blown out of the water for the bazillionth time? Check.



So if you identified as a conservative 18 years ago, you will always be a conservative?

Imagine being the Retard Champion and making that claim.

But thank you for taking the time to clip all that from 2003.. uploading it.. and then posting that... you really showed him!

METHAIS IDENTIFIED AS A CONSERVATIVE 18 YEARS AGO AND NOT A LIBERTARIAN!!!!

GOT HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Ashliana]

Imagine if he brought up the Doomsday Clock as a "fact" of anything scientific...

Yikes...

Imagine if you couldn't wrap your head around the fact that pointing out a historical occurrence is factual, nobody ever claimed that "the Doomsday Clock is scientific," and you, out of rank desperation, have been screaming at a straw man you've made rooted in your comical lack of ability to read your native language, and you were so convinced of your error, you spent weeks doubling down on it, to the point where a fellow right-winger had to gently explain it to you only for you to STILL keep doubling down.

Yikes...

[Ashliana]

So if you identified as a conservative 18 years ago, you will always be a conservative?

Parkbandit's bazillionth straw man argument? Check.

Reality: There's a bunch of examples, consistently spread out through Methais' entire tenure here.


Imagine being the Retard Champion and making that claim.

Imagine having been demonstrably incorrect, and shitting out this assertion without a shred of self-irony or awareness in the trillionth example of your desperate overreach and subsequent fall flat on your face. I know you're super butthurt since you got humiliated in the other thread, having to be corrected by a fellow right-winger, and and your Alzheimer's riddled brain absolutely imploded, but that's your problem.


But thank you for taking the time to clip all that from 2003.. uploading it.. and then posting that... you really showed him!

METHAIS IDENTIFIED AS A CONSERVATIVE 18 YEARS AGO AND NOT A LIBERTARIAN!!!!

GOT HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

See above. There's a ton of examples in his 42,000+ posts, not just "one from 2003." Bullshit defense of your clique: Failed. Better luck next time!

[~Rocktar~]

Parkbandit's bazillionth straw man argument? Check.

Reality: There's a bunch of examples, consistently spread out through Methais' entire tenure here.



Imagine having been demonstrably incorrect, and shitting out this assertion without a shred of self-irony or awareness in the trillionth example of your desperate overreach and subsequent fall flat on your face. I know you're super butthurt since you got humiliated in the other thread, having to be corrected by a fellow right-winger, and and your Alzheimer's riddled brain absolutely imploded, but that's your problem.



See above. There's a ton of examples in his 42,000+ posts, not just "one from 2003." Bullshit defense of your clique: Failed. Better luck next time!

Are you butthurt? You sound butthurt. And it's not a straw man if it describes exactly what you did. You went off the rails claiming one thing citing a very old example, then got it pointed out that someone's position changed and now you are butthurt. This is literally, in the classic sense of the word, the definition of what you have done.

All you Leftist shills go off the deep end when one of your heroes or yourself are called out for shit like this and then whine and complain about how people should be accommodating when a politician changes their mind or something and yet here you are, hypocrisy central, the epitome of hypocrisy in this area, calling someone out over the fact they changed their position or opinion.

I would suggest you use some of that $1400 stimulus check to get help except that I know it's wasted effort and I don't think there is any mental health professional on the planet that can help you find the path out of your particular kind of insanity. Maybe you can afford meds? Or maybe, just maybe you might catch on to the fact that in this case you are completely wrong and butthurt over being called out on it.

Either way, enough entertaining text vomit from you, I have to get back to greenhouse construction.

[caelric]

Oh, and by the way -- if it:

looks like a duck
walks like a duck
self-identifies as a duck
posts the results of political compass tests identifying itself as a duck



So, by that measurement, you are a complete, flaming, utter retard.

[Solkern]

So if you identified as a conservative 18 years ago, you will always be a conservative?

Imagine being the Retard Champion and making that claim.

But thank you for taking the time to clip all that from 2003.. uploading it.. and then posting that... you really showed him!

METHAIS IDENTIFIED AS A CONSERVATIVE 18 YEARS AGO AND NOT A LIBERTARIAN!!!!

GOT HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hmmm 18 years ago, those post were made/edited in 2013 and 2010, 2021-2013 = 18? 2021-2010 = 18?
Not only is your reading comprehension shit, so is your math. Not surprised. You continuously show us how fucking stupid you are. Good job. Calling someone a retard in the very same post you failed horribly at BASIC math is quite amusing. You’re the one that wears the retard crown.
Go back and tell us more about the peace Donald Trump brought to the Middle East, that you were pushing as a fact.

[Ashliana]

Are you butthurt? You sound butthurt. And it's not a straw man if it describes exactly what you did.

Except I didn't, which makes it a straw man, no matter how many of Methais' desperate defenders crawl out of the woodworks.


You went off the rails claiming one thing citing a very old example, then got it pointed out that someone's position changed and now you are butthurt. This is literally, in the classic sense of the word, the definition of what you have done.

Wrong. Methais' positions haven't "changed," and I'm not pointing out something he "used to" identify as that somehow changed. You took Parkbandit's demonstrably incorrect assertion as gospel without verifying anything, then your comically poor reading comprehension led you to misunderstand even Parkbandit's retarded "argument."

I quoted four examples spanning over the course of over a decade, and as I pointed out to PB, there are bunches more, including from less than a year ago. Your inability or unwillingness to read only reflects on you, and PB's on his.


All you Leftist shills go off the deep end when one of your heroes or yourself are called out for shit like this and then whine and complain about how people should be accommodating when a politician changes their mind or something and yet here you are, hypocrisy central, the epitome of hypocrisy in this area, calling someone out over the fact they changed their position or opinion.

:rofl: Again, this is rooted in your reading comprehension failure, based on PB's evidence-free position. Methais' positions haven't magically changed and I'm somehow holding him accountable for past statements, as you're fallaciously asserting. He's dishonestly disavowing the "conservative" label in a single thread to try (and fail) to win a semantic point despite having no problem with that label for 20 years and having acknowledged the label recently, and will inevitably try to rationalize it with "But I'm the cool kind of conservative who's right-wing in every way, except for the types of drug use in which I personally like to participate!" Intellectual dishonesty on your part doesn't constitute a reasoned position.


I would suggest you use some of that $1400 stimulus check to get help except that I know it's wasted effort and I don't think there is any mental health professional on the planet that can help you find the path out of your particular kind of insanity. Maybe you can afford meds? Or maybe, just maybe you might catch on to the fact that in this case you are completely wrong and butthurt over being called out on it.

Either way, enough entertaining text vomit from you, I have to get back to greenhouse construction.

Alas, I make too much to benefit from the stimulus, which I'm fine with. On the flip side, though, you may want to use yours to sign up for remedial reading classes at your local community college.

[Ashliana]

So, by that measurement, you are a complete, flaming, utter retard.

https://i.redd.it/27vvitv08c701.jpg

[caelric]

https://i.redd.it/27vvitv08c701.jpg

Thanks for posting a portrait of yourself!

[Ashliana]

Thanks for posting a portrait of yourself!

Alas, the MAGA hat is a dead give-away for being yours. You see, that's how you guys identify yourselves as belonging to the Trump cult. Don't disavow your point of pride now.

[Methais]

Didn't engage with the substance of the post? Check.

Didn't engage with your abjectly retarded misunderstanding of science? Check.

Accused someone of "playing semantics" out of one side of their mouth while then claiming "I'm a libertarian, not a conservative!" out of the other in a failed attempt to dishonestly win an argument? Check.


- Butthurt because I'm not replying the way you want me to because you're so desperate for my attention and are getting laughed at instead
- Butthurt because you're a fat little princess drama queen who isn't getting his way
- Butthurt because nobody wants to have actual conversations with you unless it's purely for entertainment purposes
- Super mad about all of the above
- Even more mad


Oh, and by the way -- if it:

looks like a duck
walks like a duck
self-identifies as a duck
posts the results of political compass tests identifying itself as a duck


https://i.imgur.com/zKdgIuc.png
https://i.imgur.com/kuc6gSL.png
https://i.imgur.com/t0mlsep.png
https://i.imgur.com/ej1ltix.png

It's a fucking duck.


Methais' abject dishonesty blown out of the water for the bazillionth time? Check.


This might be the most butthurt post you've ever made. Grats buddy!

Since we're going so far back though, using Ashliana logic, you must hate Obama for being against gay marriage and all. Right?

Since you love to tell people they can't read all the time, perhaps you should go refer to the part in the screenshots you posted where I stated I was more of a fiscal conservative and social libertarian. It's literally right there in the screenshot. Or did you just CTFL+F and type in CONSERVATIVE and hyperfocused on that while ignoring everything else? But I guess some quiz rated me as a "moderate conservative" which to you I'm sure is some far right super extremist, because you're a huge retard like that and the only one who doesn't know this is you. Or does that just make it more difficult for you to attach labels to people, so you ignore the inconvenient parts? Of course it does, and of course you do. That's why you constantly project your dishonesty onto everyone else in every post you make, as well as your illiteracy.



The part where you failed was the part where you thought everyone else was as dumb as you are.

Look on the bright side...you can always log into your Kierphe account to agree with yourself about any of this.

Go take a shower already and stop smelling like cat piss.

Also lol @ you having to go back 11+ years to try and make a point, and still falling flat on your face because you're an illiterate retard.


So, by that measurement, you are a complete, flaming, utter retard.

This is correct.

In before huge wall of text reply 30 seconds from now from Ashliana mashing F5 all day.

[Ashliana]

- Butthurt because I'm not replying the way you want me to because you're so desperate for my attention and are getting laughed at instead
- Butthurt because you're a fat little princess drama queen who isn't getting his way
- Butthurt because nobody wants to have actual conversations with you unless it's purely for entertainment purposes
- Super mad about all of the above
- Even more mad

This might be the most butthurt post you've ever made. Grats buddy!

Ah, the predictable and desperate attempt to characterize your demonstrated inability to deal with 1) your hilarious ignorance of science, 2) your rank hypocrisy in accusing someone of "playing semantics" while dishonestly playing semantics as "you not replying the way I want." :rofl:



Since we're going so far back though, using Ashliana logic, you must hate Obama for being against gay marriage and all. Right?

Doubling down on Parkbandit's straw man (or outright reading comprehension failure) doesn't say anything about me, and neither does your ignorance and confusion about why the LGBT community supported Obama over George W. Bush's campaign, which organized the passage of two dozen anti-LGBT state constitutional amendments.



Since you love to tell people they can't read all the time, perhaps you should go refer to the part in the screenshots you posted where I stated I was more of a fiscal conservative and social libertarian. It's literally right there in the screenshot.

It's like I can see the future and knew what kind of dishonest bullshit you'd try to pull -- let's blow it up in big, bold letters so that you have less of a chance of failing to grasp it.

He's dishonestly disavowing the "conservative" label in a single thread to try (and fail) to win a semantic point despite having no problem with that label for 20 years and having acknowledged the label recently, and will inevitably try to rationalize it with "But I'm the cool kind of conservative who's right-wing in every way, except for the types of drug use in which I personally like to participate!"


Or did you just CTFL+F and type in CONSERVATIVE and hyperfocused on that while ignoring everything else? But I guess some quiz rated me as a "moderate conservative" which to you I'm sure is some far right super extremist, because you're a huge retard like that and the only one who doesn't know this is you.

Except I never claimed you were a "far right super extremist." That's a straw man -- ever your precious, face-saving fallback you're forced to rely on -- the point stands, you've self-identified as a conservative, you've stated support for conservative politicians, you've posted the results of tests identifying you as a conservative, consistently, for more than a decade, including recently. Dishonestly trying to characterize yourself with "AKSHULLY, I'm a Libertarian!" doesn't rewrite history and warp reality to suit your delusions.


Or does that just make it more difficult for you to attach labels to people, so you ignore the inconvenient parts? Of course it does, and of course you do. That's why you constantly project your dishonesty onto everyone else in every post you make, as well as your illiteracy.

Ignoring the inconvenient parts is your schtick (remember the earlier part of this conversation, about your ignorance of science)? -- not mine, and that's why I've broken down your retarded post into chunks. :) As always, your stated assertions are undermined by your own actions, self-identified with the label you're claiming other people are "attaching to you," and right after you got done talking about projecting dishonesty onto other people without a shred of self-awareness, shame or irony.


The part where you failed was the part where you thought everyone else was as dumb as you are.

You just fell flat on your face, yet again, and the only saving grace (contained solely in your mind) is that your clique rarely calls each other out on it. The only recent exception being Parkbandit having to be told his error by a fellow right-winger.


Look on the bright side...you can always log into your Kierphe account to agree with yourself about any of this.

Go take a shower already and stop smelling like cat piss.

Also lol @ you having to go back 11+ years to try and make a point, and still falling flat on your face because you're an illiterate retard.

And we're back to your hilarious projection and lack of self-awareness. But it just wouldn't be a Methais post if it wasn't screaming "look how poorly conceived what I wrote was" in neon letters. Speaking of "going back 11 years" -- like your Kierphe reference -- perhaps you should have actually looked at the examples of your posts which I wrote, since they weren't all that old, and as I've stated repeatedly, there are recent examples. But since you always put the least amount of effort in, and fell on your face because you're an illiterate retard, let's give an easy one. And there are tons to choose from, as your 42,000+ history leaves tons of choices.

https://i.imgur.com/hjkq1hi.png

"I'm more of a fiscal conservative." July 2020. No "18 years old" per PB. No "But 11 years old!" from you. And how you spin what flavor of conservative you are is irrelevant. Your claim -- "I'm a libertarian, not a conservative" is directly undercut by your thousands of posts on here supporting conservative causes/issues and identifying as a conservative, including within the last year.



This is correct.

In before huge wall of text reply 30 seconds from now from Ashliana mashing F5 all day.

Best of luck learning how to deal with reality.

[caelric]

Ashy poo, did you forget to take your meds today? We're all concerned about your emotional stability and mental health.

Ah, who am I kidding. You could die in a fire, and the world would be a better place.

[Ashliana]

Oh no! A right-winger's nonsensical post got called out in a conversation I'm too stupid to participate in! I'd better stop by for a snipe!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[caelric]

Have you died in a fire yet? Better get to it!

[Ashliana]

Have you died in a fire yet? Better get to it!

Have you made your appointment for a sledgehammer vasectomy yet? Better get to it!

[caelric]

Still haven't died in a fire yet? We're all pulling for you!

[Ashliana]

Still haven't died in a fire yet? We're all pulling for you!

Still haven't had your testicles smashed by a mallet? We're all pulling for you!

[Solkern]

Still haven't had your testicles smashed by a mallet? We're all pulling for you!

He would need a pair to begin with, for this to happen. Sadly, it’s just not the case.

[Parkbandit]

Ashy poo, did you forget to take your meds today? We're all concerned about your emotional stability and mental health.

Ah, who am I kidding. You could die in a fire, and the world would be a better place.

Where in the history of this forum, do you believe Ashliana is behaving differently in this thread than any other?

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/5S4RfCR.png

Please continue to be mad and wrong. I mean that sincerely.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/runZ2zCpsqQdW/200.gif

[Ashliana]

Please continue to be mad and wrong. I mean that sincerely.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/runZ2zCpsqQdW/200.gif

That might be the lowest effort concession you've ever been forced to give. Kudos! Meanwhile, please continue to be unable to reconcile your dishonest, opportunistic denial of being a conservative with your two-decade spanning history of self-identifying as a conservative, including less than six months ago. :)

I mean that sincerely.

[Parkbandit]

That might be the lowest effort concession you've ever been forced to give. Kudos! Meanwhile, please continue to be unable to reconcile your dishonest, opportunistic denial of being a conservative with your two-decade spanning history of self-identifying as a conservative, including less than six months ago. :)

I mean that sincerely.

It's pretty close minded of you that you believe that people can't self identify themselves differently.

When did you stop identifying as a man? You know we've been very supportive of your transition.

This is nothing but being a political bigot.

Don't be that "guy".

[Ashliana]

It's pretty close minded of you that you believe that people can't self identify themselves differently.

When did you stop identifying as a man? You know we've been very supportive of your transition.

This is nothing but being a political bigot.

Don't be that "guy".

Alas, he never made the argument "I had these views for the past 20 years, they changed," or your argument might have validity. He tried, and failed, to pull a fast one in order to ineptly dodge the point about conservatives being conned into buying anti-scientific rhetoric (which he has absolutely bought into himself).

Better luck with the desperate mental gymnastics next time!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

That might be the lowest effort concession you've ever been forced to give. Kudos! Meanwhile, please continue to be unable to reconcile your dishonest, opportunistic denial of being a conservative with your two-decade spanning history of self-identifying as a conservative, including less than six months ago. :)

I mean that sincerely.

It's because you're a worthless human being and are a waste of time in any context. Regardless of what is said about anything by anyone, you twist it into what you want it to be and then double down on it forever, despite you always being wrong and stupid and having it proven multiple times while you continually ignore the parts that rip your whiny bitch posts to shreds.

But grats on still being unable to read though and ignoring the part where I said in the very screenshots you posted that I'm a "fiscal conservative" and more of a "social libertarian," which you decided means "LOL I'M A REPUBLICAN WHO LIKES DRUGS AND THAT'S ALL!!!!!" because it doesn't suit the narrative you want to make up, so instead you just keep getting more and more mad about it because you're mentally unstable.

And because you smell bad and your parents probably wish they aborted you.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/runZ2zCpsqQdW/200.gif

In before you double down on your same whiny idiocy and then get laughed at some more. Consider taking a shower before 2022.

This post is at least 9001x the effort a pile of sludge like you should even get, so be grateful someone's even talking to you, since everyone in your real life probably avoids you like toxic waste.

[Methais]

Alas, he never made the argument "I had these views for the past 20 years, they changed," or your argument might have validity. He tried, and failed, to pull a fast one in order to ineptly dodge the point about conservatives being conned into buying anti-scientific rhetoric (which he has absolutely bought into himself).

Better luck with the desperate mental gymnastics next time!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

Back then I was a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian. You know, just like I said in the screenshots you posted that you thought was some "gotcha" moment but instead you simply failed like usual.

Here in 2021, I'm still a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian. I understand that this makes you very angry. But everything makes you angry, because you're a miserable person all around and quite possibly the most miserable most self loathing poster on this entire forum, even worse than Backlash. And that's saying something.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Ashliana]

Back then I was a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian. You know, just like I said in the screenshots you posted that you thought was some "gotcha" moment but instead you simply failed like usual.

Translation: No, you weren't able to point out any false assertion I made. But thanks for confirming that the 20 year old example is still accurate, the 10 year old example is still accurate, and the 6 month old example is still accurate, and your mental gymnastics about what specific flavor you're now trying to pass yourself off as make no difference. You destroyed Parkbandit's retarded argument, though! :clap:


Here in 2021, I'm still a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian. I understand that this makes you very angry. But everything makes you angry, because you're a miserable person all around and quite possibly the most miserable most self loathing poster on this entire forum, even worse than Backlash. And that's saying something.

Why would you validating my assertion, and undercutting your own make me "very angry"? :rofl: I know English isn't your strong suit, but seriously.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Ashliana]

It's because you're a worthless human being and are a waste of time in any context. Regardless of what is said about anything by anyone, you twist it into what you want it to be and then double down on it forever, despite you always being wrong and stupid and having it proven multiple times while you continually ignore the parts that rip your whiny bitch posts to shreds.

Um, no, it's because what I said was accurate -- you're a conservative -- and what you said was demonstrable bullshit -- and you admitted to it in your next post. You weren't able to contradict anything that I said, but managed to destroy Parkbandit's argument for me. Well done!


But grats on still being unable to read though and ignoring the part where I said in the very screenshots you posted that I'm a "fiscal conservative" and more of a "social libertarian," which you decided means "LOL I'M A REPUBLICAN WHO LIKES DRUGS AND THAT'S ALL!!!!!" because it doesn't suit the narrative you want to make up, so instead you just keep getting more and more mad about it because you're mentally unstable.

No one "ignored that part," it just doesn't make a difference since you clarifying what specific flavor of conservative you're identifying as doesn't change the accuracy of my statement. You did manage to be butthurt that your entirely predictable fallback response, that I called in advance (and you were too lazy to read) undercut your argument. That's your problem, buddy, not mine. :) Better luck with the low effort shitposting next time!



And because you smell bad and your parents probably wish they aborted you.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/runZ2zCpsqQdW/200.gif

In before you double down on your same whiny idiocy and then get laughed at some more. Consider taking a shower before 2022.

This post is at least 9001x the effort a pile of sludge like you should even get, so be grateful someone's even talking to you, since everyone in your real life probably avoids you like toxic waste.

And yet, here you are, responding yet again. At least this time, you appear to have read the thread instead of just embarrassing yourself for the second consecutive time. Too bad you're still an idiot, though.

[Methais]

Translation: No, you weren't able to point out any false assertion I made. But thanks for confirming that the 20 year old example is still accurate, the 10 year old example is still accurate, and the 6 month old example is still accurate, and your mental gymnastics about what specific flavor you're now trying to pass yourself off as make no difference. You destroyed Parkbandit's retarded argument, though! :clap:



Why would you validating my assertion, and undercutting your own make me "very angry"? :rofl: I know English isn't your strong suit, but seriously.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

Ohh...I'm sorry, I see what's happening now. You're looking for a title shot. I've got good news. I believe that you've definitely earned there #1 contender spot, and since Back hasn't been doing much to defend his title, you could be retard champion possibly by the end of today.

Back, you've been put on notice.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/7ziCYA7nIrozIjTno2/giphy.gif

[Ashliana]

Ohh...I'm sorry, I see what's happening now. You're looking for a title shot. I've got good news. I believe that you've definitely earned there #1 contender spot, and since Back hasn't been doing much to defend his title, you could be retard champion possibly by the end of today.

Back, you've been put on notice.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/7ziCYA7nIrozIjTno2/giphy.gif

Translation: Couldn't refute anything I said, forced to resort only to a personal insult. Aww. And you were so close (in your mind) to showing how anything I said was inaccurate!

Better luck next time you dishonestly deny being a conservative as a cheap dodge!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

Translation: Couldn't refute anything I said, forced to resort only to a personal insult. Aww. And you were so close (in your mind) to showing how anything I said was inaccurate!

Better luck next time you dishonestly deny being a conservative as a cheap dodge!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

You showed your own inaccuracy by not reading the actual words, or at least leaving out the inconvenient ones while making up your own narrative behind it, in the screenshots you already posted in one of your most fail attempts at a "gotcha" ever.

Other than the fact that you thrive on being a toxic parasite, is it physically painful to fail so hard all day every day like you do? Asking for Backlash, since he's hopefully preparing for his upcoming title defense.

It's funny how you legitimately believe that anyone here should want to and should have to have a "real" good faith conversation with you about anything, or that people should think you you're even capable of it, despite you throwing nonstop tantrums for years and years every time you post, even moreso when you're not getting your way, like a little fat smelly girl at her princess party because she didn't get her way.

It's sad and pathetic too, but your entertaining meltdowns make up for it, so I see it as a net gain.

Keep being big mad and projecting it on everyone else though.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/LGShl9I1rsNW/source.gif

[Ashliana]

You showed your own inaccuracy by not reading the actual words, or at least leaving out the inconvenient ones while making up your own narrative behind it, in the screenshots you already posted in one of your most fail attempts at a "gotcha" ever.

Other than the fact that you thrive on being a toxic parasite, is it physically painful to fail so hard all day every day like you do? Asking for Backlash, since he's hopefully preparing for his upcoming title defense.

You can assert whatever you like. You denied being a conservative, then admitted being a conservative, validating what I said, contradicting what you said. The specific flavor of conservative you're identifying as doesn't magically render my assertion inaccurate, though it does render your "I'm not a conservative" bullshit inaccurate. Your inability to deal with that only reflects on you.


It's funny how you legitimately believe that anyone here should want to and should have to have a "real" good faith conversation with you about anything, or that people should think you you're even capable of it, despite you throwing nonstop tantrums for years and years every time you post, even moreso when you're not getting your way, like a little fat smelly girl at her princess party because she didn't get her way.

It's sad and pathetic too, but your entertaining meltdowns make up for it, so I see it as a net gain.

Keep being big mad and projecting it on everyone else though.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/LGShl9I1rsNW/source.gif

It's funny you're talking about "good faith discussions" and "projecting" after spending multiple pages throwing a tantrum because you're butthurt that your attempt to inartfully dodge your ignorance of science by dishonestly claiming you're "not a conservative" didn't pan out. Next time, don't resort to bullshit, then you won't have to embarrass yourself like this again. In the end, though, you don't have anything substantive to say, so I'm not sure why you don't just take me up on my advice and write the shorter form version of the only thing you do have to say: an expression of antipathy. :)

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

You can assert whatever you like. You denied being a conservative, then admitted being a conservative, validating what I said, contradicting what you said. The specific flavor of conservative you're identifying as doesn't magically render my assertion inaccurate, though it does render your "I'm not a conservative" bullshit inaccurate. Your inability to deal with that only reflects on you.



It's funny you're talking about "good faith discussions" and "projecting" after spending multiple pages throwing a tantrum because you're butthurt that your attempt to inartfully dodge your ignorance of science by dishonestly claiming you're "not a conservative" didn't pan out. Next time, don't resort to bullshit, then you won't have to embarrass yourself like this again. In the end, though, you don't have anything substantive to say, so I'm not sure why you don't just take me up on my advice and write the shorter form version of the only thing you do have to say: an expression of antipathy. :)

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

Your projection is unreal.

Your inability to read and comprehend words is equally unreal, but also very real.

Good job loser.

[Ashliana]

Your projection is unreal.

Your inability to read and comprehend words is equally unreal, but also very real.

Good job loser.

Couldn't substantively respond? Check.

Accused the other side of "projection" and "reading issues" without a shred of irony or self-awareness? Check.

Had to resort to an insult again? Check.

I wish you the best of luck finding a way to reconcile your statements, though!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Parkbandit]

Ohh...I'm sorry, I see what's happening now. You're looking for a title shot. I've got good news. I believe that you've definitely earned there #1 contender spot, and since Back hasn't been doing much to defend his title, you could be retard champion possibly by the end of today.

Back, you've been put on notice.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/7ziCYA7nIrozIjTno2/giphy.gif

As the Commissioner, I already held a title shot when Ashliana busted out "TRUMP CAN'T BE TEH MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT!!! HE ALMOST STARTED WW3, ALMOST GOT US IN A NUCLEAR WARZ WITH NORTH KOREA AND THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK MOVED AHEAD TO 100 SECONDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" and he actually used this as his "facts"............................

Backlash was a lazy champion and didn't bother showing up. Title changed hands last week.

Pay the fuck attention to important events like this in the future.

Now maybe you should apologize to your rightful Retard Champion.

[Ashliana]

As the Commissioner, I already held a title shot when Ashliana busted out "TRUMP CAN'T BE TEH MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT!!! HE ALMOST STARTED WW3, ALMOST GOT US IN A NUCLEAR WARZ WITH NORTH KOREA AND THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK MOVED AHEAD TO 100 SECONDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" and he actually used this as his "facts"............................

PB: TRUMP IS THE MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF (A)
Ashliana: What about (B) and (C)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Back: What about (D)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!

Best of luck figuring out how to address the totality of Trump's actions, and why a fellow right-winger had to gently explain to you that you were wrong on the issue of what does, and doesn't, constitute a fact. :)



Backlash was a lazy champion and didn't bother showing up. Title changed hands last week.

Pay the fuck attention to important events like this in the future.

Now maybe you should apologize to your rightful Retard Champion.

Your and Methais' spectacular post-Trump loss butthurt has been a thing of beauty to behold. You'll get through it, though, Parkbandit! Just hold on!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Solkern]

PB: TRUMP IS THE MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF (A)
Ashliana: What about (B) and (C)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Back: What about (D)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!

Best of luck figuring out how to address the totality of Trump's actions, and why a fellow right-winger had to gently explain to you that you were wrong on the issue of what does, and doesn't, constitute a fact. :)



Your and Methais' spectacular post-Trump loss butthurt has been a thing of beauty to behold. You'll get through it, though, Parkbandit! Just hold on!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

I think it’s quite amusing and sad that PB, can’t spell, doesn’t know basic grammar, math, or basic terminology, is calling other people a retard. He’s 100% projecting himself onto others.. well I guess he may not be retarded, just extremely stupid and uneducated.

[Methais]

Couldn't substantively respond? Check.

Accused the other side of "projection" and "reading issues" without a shred of irony or self-awareness? Check.

Had to resort to an insult again? Check.

I wish you the best of luck finding a way to reconcile your statements, though!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

I love watching you be all all big mad while accidentally describing yourself because you don't get to dictate the rules of your desperate pleas for my attention.

But I have a serious question....are you saying that we can't be friends?

[Ashliana]

I love watching you be all all big mad while accidentally describing yourself because you don't get to dictate the rules of your desperate pleas for my attention.

Since you're just going around in circles, I'll re-post the response to the last time you shat out that excuse. "Ah, the predictable and desperate attempt to characterize your demonstrated inability to deal with 1) your hilarious ignorance of science, 2) your rank hypocrisy in accusing someone of "playing semantics" while dishonestly playing semantics as "you not replying the way I want." Plus now, your hilarious butthurt from being unable to reconcile the fact that you contradicted yourself, validated what I said, AND wrecked Parkbandit's nonsensical argument in a single post. Well done!


But I have a serious question....are you saying that we can't be friends?

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Parkbandit]

I think it’s quite amusing and sad that PB, can’t spell, doesn’t know basic grammar, math, or basic terminology, is calling other people a retard. He’s 100% projecting himself onto others.. well I guess he may not be retarded, just extremely stupid and uneducated.

Bro... you're not funny, cute or intelligent.

Stop trying to be.

And you are most certainly retarded, in every sense of the word.

[Parkbandit]

I love watching you be all all big mad while accidentally describing yourself because you don't get to dictate the rules of your desperate pleas for my attention.

But I have a serious question....are you saying that we can't be friends?

You really believe It has any friends??

Bro.. what has happened to you!?!?

[Ashliana]

Bro..

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/mO8UICqmeSd97l09w_FgSP1TDPQ=/13x0:1409x785/1600x900/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/55701645/Screen_Shot_2017_07_13_at_1.09.20_PM.0.png

[Methais]

Since you're just going around in circles, I'll re-post the response to the last time you shat out that excuse. "Ah, the predictable and desperate attempt to characterize your demonstrated inability to deal with 1) your hilarious ignorance of science, 2) your rank hypocrisy in accusing someone of "playing semantics" while dishonestly playing semantics as "you not replying the way I want." Plus now, your hilarious butthurt from being unable to reconcile the fact that you contradicted yourself, validated what I said, AND wrecked Parkbandit's nonsensical argument in a single post. Well done!



https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

So in other words, you need every last little tiny thing spelled out for you because you're incapable of thought. Because everyone else seemed to know what I was saying except you, whether I used the wrong word or not. Which means you're just really fucking dense. And a drama queen. A rather colossal one.

But your chronic desperate and unhinged state is entertaining, so keep it up. You're helping the day go by just a little bit faster for me.

EDIT: And lol @ you telling anyone "You're just running around in circles."

https://media4.giphy.com/media/J4HP3FcGqP6Yo/giphy.gif

[Parkbandit]

PB: TRUMP IS THE MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF (A)
Ashliana: What about (B) and (C)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Back: What about (D)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!

Best of luck figuring out how to address the totality of Trump's actions, and why a fellow right-winger had to gently explain to you that you were wrong on the issue of what does, and doesn't, constitute a fact. :)


Fill in the blanks!

PB: TRUMP IS THE MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF THE (A) NUMBER OF WARS HE STARTED (zero) AND BRINGING BACK SOLDIERS FROM OTHER WARS.
Ashliana: WHAT ABOUT (B) HE ALMOST STARTED WW3 AND (C) HE ALMOST STARTED A NUCLEAR WAR WITH NORTH KOREA!?
PB: Those aren't facts.. those are opinions.
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: We're only dealing with facts.
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: Do you have any real facts?
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: You're repeating yourself again and again. Doesn't make opinions facts.
Ashliana: WHAT ABOUT THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK!?!?! IT MOVED AHEAD!!!
PB: Yikes... you do realize that the Doomsday Clock is based upon opinions right?
Ashliana: TEH DOOMSDAY CLOCK IS REAL! IT EXISTS THEREFORE IT IS A FACT!!
PB: Ok, you are dumber than Backlash at this point in time. Title switch.
Back: I'll be back.. I just can't think of something dumber than the Doomsday Clock.

Except for the last sentence, this was an actual argument with our resident Retard Champion: Ashliana

[Parkbandit]

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/mO8UICqmeSd97l09w_FgSP1TDPQ=/13x0:1409x785/1600x900/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/55701645/Screen_Shot_2017_07_13_at_1.09.20_PM.0.png

While you probably don't understand... "Bro" has been in use for decades. I know, because I've been using it. I even named my dog that.

[Ashliana]

While you probably don't understand... "Bro" has been in use for decades. I know, because I've been using it. I even named my dog that.

If only the date of origin was the relevant distinction there. Alas..

https://i.gifer.com/3O7zR.gif

[Ashliana]

So in other words, you need every last little tiny thing spelled out for you because you're incapable of thought. Because everyone else seemed to know what I was saying except you, whether I used the wrong word or not. Which means you're just really fucking dense. And a drama queen. A rather colossal one.

But your chronic desperate and unhinged state is entertaining, so keep it up. You're helping the day go by just a little bit faster for me.

Calling you out on your inability to reconcile your dishonest denial of being a conservative as a cheap dodge with the reality that you've repeatedly self-identified as a conservative -- and confirmed it again today -- doesn't constitute "needing every little last tiny thing spelled out," no matter how butthurt you are that you painted yourself into a corner with dishonesty and somehow think a tantrum is going to get you out of it.


EDIT: And lol @ you telling anyone "You're just running around in circles."

https://media4.giphy.com/media/J4HP3FcGqP6Yo/giphy.gif

There's that classic, Methais-defining lack of self-awareness at work again. You haven't been able to move past your inability to reconcile your statements for multiple pages now, and as always, your only move is to double-down. When you cycle through the same two nonsensical defenses, you're going to get the same two deconstructions of your argument. You're like a dog running into an electrified fence, puzzled over why the mean old fence keeps shocking you. Perhaps you should adapt.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Ashliana]

Fill in the blanks!

PB: TRUMP IS THE MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF THE (A) NUMBER OF WARS HE STARTED (zero) AND BRINGING BACK SOLDIERS FROM OTHER WARS.
Ashliana: WHAT ABOUT (B) HE ALMOST STARTED WW3 AND (C) HE ALMOST STARTED A NUCLEAR WAR WITH NORTH KOREA!?
PB: Those aren't facts.. those are opinions.
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: We're only dealing with facts.
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: Do you have any real facts?
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: You're repeating yourself again and again. Doesn't make opinions facts.
Ashliana: WHAT ABOUT THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK!?!?! IT MOVED AHEAD!!!
PB: Yikes... you do realize that the Doomsday Clock is based upon opinions right?
Ashliana: TEH DOOMSDAY CLOCK IS REAL! IT EXISTS THEREFORE IT IS A FACT!!
PB: Ok, you are dumber than Backlash at this point in time. Title switch.
Back: I'll be back.. I just can't think of something dumber than the Doomsday Clock.

Except for the last sentence, this was an actual argument with our resident Retard Champion: Ashliana

Reality:


PB: TRUMP IS THE MOST PEACEFUL PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF (A)
Ashliana: What about (B) and (C)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Ashliana: So you're pretending (B) and (C) don't exist?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
Back: What about (D)?
PB: ONLY (A) EXISTS!!
PB: (B) AND (C) ARE OPINIONS, NOT FACTS!!!
Ashliana: (B) is a fact. That (C) occurred is a fact, even if the reasons (C) happened were based on expert opinion. If you were interested in what Trump's actions caused, two seconds of searching would show you.
PB: ASHLIANA SAID THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK IS A FACT!
Ashliana: No, I said the historical record that the Atomic Bulletin of Scientists moved the Doomsday Clock in response to Trump's actions is a fact, as you can demonstrate it occurred.
PB: ASHLIANA SAID THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK IS A FACT!
Ashliana: Again, no, you're making a straw man argument because you can't read your native language.
PB: ASHLIANA SAID THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK IS A FACT!
Calael: Uh, Parkbandit.. You do know that the fact it happened is a fact, right?
PB: ASHLIANA SAID THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK IS A FACT!
Ashliana: Still wrong, PB. Your inability to read and think reflects on you.


Not only were you so monumentally stupid, you're proud enough of your repeated error to keep bringing up your self-own in thread after thread. :rofl: Best of luck getting a refund from the mail-in correspondence GED program that fleeced you, since that's the only explanation for your inability to read English.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

Calling you out on your inability to reconcile your dishonest denial of being a conservative as a cheap dodge with the reality that you've repeatedly self-identified as a conservative -- and confirmed it again today -- doesn't constitute "needing every little last tiny thing spelled out," no matter how butthurt you are that you painted yourself into a corner with dishonesty and somehow think a tantrum is going to get you out of it.



There's that classic, Methais-defining lack of self-awareness at work again. You haven't been able to move past your inability to reconcile your statements for multiple pages now, and as always, your only move is to double-down. When you cycle through the same two nonsensical defenses, you're going to get the same two deconstructions of your argument. You're like a dog running into an electrified fence, puzzled over why the mean old fence keeps shocking you. Perhaps you should adapt.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

If you can't understand the difference between having one stance on economic issues and another stance on social issues...well that's literally what's happening here, so we'll just agree that you're a gigantic retard who does nothing but project and lack self-awareness 24/7.

In before more butthurt because I'm not playing by your made up "rules" for arguing on the internet over a narrative that you're getting more and more mad that you can't shape with your typical Ashliana retardedness.

Keep crying.

[Ashliana]

If you can't understand the difference between having one stance on economic issues and another stance on social issues...well that's literally what's happening here, so we'll just agree that you're a gigantic retard who does nothing but project and lack self-awareness 24/7.

In before more butthurt because I'm not playing by your made up "rules" for arguing on the internet over a narrative that you're getting more and more mad that you can't shape with your typical Ashliana retardedness.

Keep crying.

You shifted your defense from "I'm not a conservative" to "Well, yes, I'm a conservative, but you see, I'm a specific flavor of conservative," which in no way changes anything that I said. Your inability to wrap your acorn-sized brain around that reality is your problem, and no one else's, no matter how butthurt you get about your mental gymnastics not panning out.

Keep crying.

[Parkbandit]

Reality

Which part of the conversation wasn't what you actually said though?

AFTER I explained that the conversation will be dealing with factual events, you STILL insisted on bringing up:

B) TRUMP ALMOST STARTED WW3!!! - Which is nonsense.
C) TRUMP ALMOST STARTED A NUCLEAR WAR WITH NORTH KOREA!!! - Which is retarded nonsense
D) TRUMP CAUSED THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK TO MOVE FORWARD TO 100 SECONDS TO MIDNIGHT!!! - Which is literally one of the dumbest thing ever posted on this forum. Top 10 for sure.. I'll even rank it top 5. It honestly should replace your "I created my Kierphe account back in the day to mess with the reputation system" even though the reputation system didn't come out for another 3 months. Even dumber is you going back to all the posts you made on that account and deleting them... later claiming there were only a handful of posts.

I could create an entire Retard Hall of Fame for the newly crowned champion. SO MANY dumb moments in just over 12 years...

[Methais]

You shifted your defense from "I'm not a conservative" to "Well, yes, I'm a conservative, but you see, I'm a specific flavor of conservative," which in no way changes anything that I said. Your inability to wrap your acorn-sized brain around that reality is your problem, and no one else's, no matter how butthurt you get about your mental gymnastics not panning out.

Keep crying.

You do realize that in the screenshots you posted from 2010, I was saying then too that I was more of a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian, right?

You did read and comprehend those words right? No, no you didn't. Because you're stupid and incapable.

Let's play a game.

When it comes to economic issues, I am more of a __________?

When it comes to social issues, I am more of a ___________?


Please fill in the blanks. And be as detailed as you like. Just try to keep the whining and shitting your pants to a minimum.

[Parkbandit]

You shifted your defense from "I'm not a conservative" to "Well, yes, I'm a conservative, but you see, I'm a specific flavor of conservative," which in no way changes anything that I said. Your inability to wrap your acorn-sized brain around that reality is your problem, and no one else's, no matter how butthurt you get about your mental gymnastics not panning out.

Keep crying.

Can you specifically describe the difference between a fiscal conservative and a libertarian? Maybe give Methais a test of some sort so we can finally figure out what he is? Like if he answers (A), he is a fiscal conservative.. if he answers (B) then he leans libertarian...

Your "GOTCHA" moment is pretty silly at this point.

[Methais]

Can you specifically describe the difference between a fiscal conservative and a libertarian? Maybe give Methais a test of some sort so we can finally figure out what he is? Like if he answers (A), he is a fiscal conservative.. if he answers (B) then he leans libertarian...

Your "GOTCHA" moment is pretty silly at this point.

In before Ashliana tells you about how he put you in your place again and how UTTERLY HUMILIATED you are, along with the usual tired and worn out list of Ashliana fail content...

https://media.tenor.com/images/394e9dba5ea2a1dd7f6056564a459ca8/tenor.gif

[Ashliana]

Which part of the conversation wasn't what you actually said though?

AFTER I explained that the conversation will be dealing with factual events, you STILL insisted on bringing up:

B) TRUMP ALMOST STARTED WW3!!! - Which is nonsense.
C) TRUMP ALMOST STARTED A NUCLEAR WAR WITH NORTH KOREA!!! - Which is retarded nonsense
D) TRUMP CAUSED THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK TO MOVE FORWARD TO 100 SECONDS TO MIDNIGHT!!! - Which is literally one of the dumbest thing ever posted on this forum. Top 10 for sure.. I'll even rank it top 5.

I:


1) asserted "Trump caused panic" -- panic is a subjective concept, but you can factually point to historical examples of that panic that Trump created -- which you then responded to "WELL, THAT WAS THEIR OPINION!!!!" -- Yes, imbecile, that's what we were talking about, the chaos that Trump sowed and panic he caused.
2) asserted "Trump was threatening 'fire and fury' on North Korea via TV interviews/Twitter/etc." That's, once again, a fact, as you can demonstrate it happened, as you can the international community's uproar to what was going on.



Your inability to follow, or lack of interest in following (then) current events only reflects on you. Your inability to figure out why you made an absolute fool of yourself claiming Trump was a paragon of peace reflects on you and your inability to criticize the con artist who fleeced you.


It honestly should replace your "I created my Kierphe account back in the day to mess with the reputation system" even though the reputation system didn't come out for another 3 months. Even dumber is you going back to all the posts you made on that account and deleting them... later claiming there were only a handful of posts.

I could create an entire Retard Hall of Fame for the newly crowned champion. SO MANY dumb moments in just over 12 years...

https://i.imgur.com/ABSNHER.png

FYI, your prized screenshot shows how many posts that account had, so you can scrap your latest retarded addition to your fantastical accounting of history. :)

[Methais]

I

1) asserted "Trump caused panic" -- panic is a subjective concept, but you can factually point to historical examples of that panic that Trump created -- which you then responded to "WELL, THAT WAS THEIR OPINION!!!!" -- Yes, imbecile, that's what we were talking about, the chaos that Trump sowed and panic he caused.

2) asserted "Trump was threatening 'fire and fury' on North Korea via TV interviews/Twitter/etc." That's, once again, a fact, as you can demonstrate it happened, as you can the international community's uproar to what was going on.

Your inability to follow, or lack of interest in following (then) current events only reflects on you. Your inability to figure out why you made an absolute fool of yourself claiming Trump was a paragon of peace reflects on you and your inability to criticize the con artist who fleeced you.



https://i.imgur.com/ABSNHER.png

FYI, your prized screenshot shows how many posts that account had, so you can scrap your latest retarded addition to your fantastical accounting of history. :)

https://i.imgur.com/Vq4nfHK.png

[Parkbandit]

FYI, your prized screenshot shows how many posts that account had, so you can scrap your latest retarded addition to your fantastical accounting of history. :)

This one?

https://i.imgur.com/QwT2LIC.jpg

You realize that is your "main" account.. not the Kierphe account.. that shows the number of posts.. right?

I know.. it's very confusing when you use multiple accounts for the multiple personalities in your head.. but that doesn't show Kierphe's post number :(

Remember when you used the excuse that you used the wrong account? How specifically did you use the wrong account to respond to yourself again?

Good times...

[Ashliana]

You do realize that in the screenshots you posted from 2010, I was saying then too that I was more of a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian, right?

You did read and comprehend those words right? No, no you didn't. Because you're stupid and incapable.

Let's play a game.

When it comes to economic issues, I am more of a __________?

When it comes to social issues, I am more of a ___________?

Please fill in the blanks. And be as detailed as you like. Just try to keep the whining and shitting your pants to a minimum.

You self-identified repeatedly, consistently, as a conservative throughout your decades-spanning posts here, including half a year ago. You dishonestly, opportunistically claimed here "I'm not a conservative (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2200861#post2200861)" before being forced to admit today: "Here in 2021, I'm still a fiscal conservative (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2201015#post2201015)."

You shifted your defense from "I'm not a conservative" to "Well, yes, I'm a conservative, but you see, I'm a specific flavor of conservative," which in no way changes anything that I said. Your inability to wrap your acorn-sized brain around that reality is your problem, and no one else's, no matter how butthurt you get about your mental gymnastics not panning out.


Can you specifically describe the difference between a fiscal conservative and a libertarian? Maybe give Methais a test of some sort so we can finally figure out what he is? Like if he answers (A), he is a fiscal conservative.. if he answers (B) then he leans libertarian...

Your "GOTCHA" moment is pretty silly at this point.

It doesn't matter, either way. Conservatives of all flavors have had long-running problems with science - from social conservatives opposing the teaching of evolution and aspects of astronomy - to fiscal conservatives being conned by the tobacco industry, the petrochemical industry, etc. Methais' attempt to explain his own ignorance of science was rationalized with "I'm not a conservative!" as if that somehow constituted a defense. It doesn't. He just decided to throw a tantrum in response to it being pointed out that yes, he's been a self-identifying conservative across decades, including in 2020. You guys need to more selectively pick your battles.

[Parkbandit]

It doesn't matter, either way. Conservatives of all flavors have had long-running problems with science - from social conservatives opposing the teaching of evolution and aspects of astronomy - to fiscal conservatives being conned by the tobacco industry, the petrochemical industry, etc. Methais' attempt to explain his own ignorance of science was rationalized with "I'm not a conservative!" as if that somehow constituted a defense. It doesn't. He just decided to throw a tantrum in response to it being pointed out that yes, he's been a self-identifying conservative across decades, including in 2020. You guys need to more selectively pick your battles.

LOL..

Wasn't it you that picked the battle? You spent all that time sifting through his posts, uploading them then posting them...

And your best "gotcha" moment was "UR NOT A LIBERTARIAN, UR A CONSERVATIVE!"

And now you don't want to be specific about the differences because there really aren't any?

Fantastic as usual.

[Solkern]

Bro... you're not funny, cute or intelligent.

Stop trying to be.

And you are most certainly retarded, in every sense of the word.

But Methais posted that in 2010... EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO!!!!!!!!!!!
PB you’re such a fucking idiot. Must be that jet lag, or are you still trying to dig up information about Trump bringing peace to the Middle East?

PB, the real retard champ, shows it everytime he posts and fails at basic math, grammar, terminology and just life in general.

Edited: PB I know you are stupid, and when people write a lot like Ashliana does, you got confused and have suicidal tendencies. I’ll try to use less words for your simple mind.

Methais recently said: I’m not conservative, I’m a libertarian.
Methais then also said: I’m fiscally conservative and socially a libertarian.

Get it? Probably not, too many words still.
I know Methais gets it, he’s just trolling for the laughs, you don’t though. So sad.

[Ashliana]

This one?

https://i.imgur.com/QwT2LIC.jpg

You realize that is your "main" account.. not the Kierphe account.. that shows the number of posts.. right?

I know.. it's very confusing when you use multiple accounts for the multiple personalities in your head.. but that doesn't show Kierphe's post number :(

You're right! The precious memory you've held on to for 13 years and using to rationalize your almost 20 years of stupidity does not, in fact, have the other account's number of posts. I left the posts up originally, until you -- years later -- kept obsessing over them. There's an unedited-from-2008 post (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?37312-Ashliana-Kierphe&p=830919#post830919) identifying the volume involved, though, which still serves as an imperfect record, contradicting your fantasized assertion here that I'm somehow "lying about it being a 'handful of posts.'" How unfortunate for you.


Remember when you used the excuse that you used the wrong account? How specifically did you use the wrong account to respond to yourself again?

Good times...

It's funny that you've held on to the memory for 13 years.. and yet your Alzheimer's-riddled brain is robbing you of the details. The fact that I logged into the wrong account and gave myself away isn't an "excuse." What are you smoking? Are you imagining that you somehow sleuthed your way into figuring it out? No, moron, I messed that shit up after only a handful of posts -- making the fact that I broke your brain into hysterically claiming every other person on this forum=Ashliana even more hilariously unhinged.


LOL..

Wasn't it you that picked the battle? You spent all that time sifting through his posts, uploading them then posting them...

And your best "gotcha" moment was "UR NOT A LIBERTARIAN, UR A CONSERVATIVE!"

And now you don't want to be specific about the differences because there really aren't any?

Fantastic as usual.

Methais is the one trying to defend his ignorance of science with the notion that "oh, I'm not a conservative," which, again, doesn't address the point. There is no "difference," as conservatives of all types -- including Methais' -- have long-standing issues with understanding science. Keep up.

[Parkbandit]

But Methais posted that in 2010... EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO!!!!!!!!!!!
PB you’re such a fucking idiot. Must be that jet lag, or are you still trying to dig up information about Trump bringing peace to the Middle East?

PB, the real retard champ, shows it everytime he posts and fails at basic math, grammar, terminology and just life in general.

Edited: PB I know you are stupid, and when people write a lot like Ashliana does, you got confused and have suicidal tendencies. I’ll try to use less words for your simple mind.

Methais recently said: I’m not conservative, I’m a libertarian.
Methais then also said: I’m fiscally conservative and socially a libertarian.

Get it? Probably not, too many words still.
I know Methais gets it, he’s just trolling for the laughs, you don’t though. So sad.

You're a retard, in every clinical sense of the word.

[Solkern]

You're a retard, in every clinical sense of the word.

Says the person that can’t do basic math, struggles with the basics of the English language, and doesn’t even know how to use proper terms.

You’re a twatwaffle, a retarded twatwaffle.

Between us two: I’m the one that knows math, and English. Not you, as you have demonstrated over and over, again and again.

[Solkern]

I’m an idiot that still uses my fingers and toes to count to 23!

I mean how dumb can someone be to get such BASIC math wrong? 21-10.. twenty-one minus ten.. LIKE HOW FUCKING STUPID CAN A GROWN MAN-CHILD BE?
Oh I know the answer: PB dumb. It’s 18!!!!!! EIGHTEEN!!!!!111!!!!1!!!1!!!!!

[Wrathbringer]

I mean how dumb can someone be to get such BASIC math wrong? 21-10.. twenty-one minus ten.. LIKE HOW FUCKING STUPID CAN A GROWN MAN-CHILD BE?
Oh I know the answer: PB dumb. It’s 18!!!!!! EIGHTEEN!!!!!111!!!!1!!!1!!!!!

Umadbro?

[Parkbandit]

You're right! The precious memory you've held on to for 13 years and using to rationalize your almost 20 years of stupidity does not, in fact, have the other account's number of posts. I left the posts up originally, until you -- years later -- kept obsessing over them. There's an unedited-from-2008 post (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?37312-Ashliana-Kierphe&p=830919#post830919) identifying the volume involved, though, which still serves as an imperfect record, contradicting your fantasized assertion here that I'm somehow "lying about it being a 'handful of posts.'" How unfortunate for you.

lol.. well, you posted the "number", so that must be a fact........................


It's funny that you've held on to the memory for 13 years.. and yet your Alzheimer's-riddled brain is robbing you of the details.

Despite your "ZOMGUROLD" stupidity, I have a decent memory.


The fact that I logged into the wrong account and gave myself away isn't an "excuse." What are you smoking? Are you imagining that you somehow sleuthed your way into figuring it out? No, moron, I messed that shit up after only a handful of posts -- making the fact that I broke your brain into hysterically claiming every other person on this forum=Ashliana even more hilariously unhinged.

So.. let's go through this step by step...

Which account were you supposed to be using to agree with your other account? See.. it just takes an IQ over 13 to see you're just doing what you always do: Lie You didn't make any mistake in which account you were using... you literally were on the right account because it would make zero sense to be on your Kierphe account to quote a Kierphe post to agree with Kierphe. Did you forget you are also Kierphe? Because I imagine all the voices in your tiny head could be pretty confusing... but you didn't log into the wrong account. Stop being stupid.. you have nothing to prove at this point: You're the champ.


Methais is the one trying to defend his ignorance of science with the notion that "oh, I'm not a conservative," which, again, doesn't address the point. There is no "difference," as conservatives of all types -- including Methais' -- have long-standing issues with understanding science. Keep up.

So you "proved" Methais isn't a libertarian, but really a closet Conservative in disguise? What's the difference between the two? It's not like he pulled an Androidpk and was a RandPaulFanboi one week and the following week he was "Feeling the Bern". As usual, you made a mountain out of a mole hill and made yourself look retarded. Good job?

[Parkbandit]

Umadbro?

He's very mad... and clinically retarded.

[Ashliana]

lol.. well, you posted the "number", so that must be a fact........................

That doesn't address anything that I said. But you do you, champ. Best of luck demonstrating your assertion.


Despite your "ZOMGUROLD" stupidity, I have a decent memory.

Right.


So.. let's go through this step by step...

Which account were you supposed to be using to agree with your other account? See.. it just takes an IQ over 13 to see you're just doing what you always do: Lie You didn't make any mistake in which account you were using... you literally were on the right account because it would make zero sense to be on your Kierphe account to quote a Kierphe post to agree with Kierphe. Did you forget you are also Kierphe? Because I imagine all the voices in your tiny head could be pretty confusing... but you didn't log into the wrong account. Stop being stupid.. you have nothing to prove at this point: You're the champ.

What you're saying makes absolutely no sense, and I see you once again dodged my question: How exactly do you think it became known that I had a second account? That it was just something that you, forum "genius," magically figured out? How do you think my fucking up my posts, revealing I was using two accounts, is some kind of "defense" to my behavior? How are you this retarded?

You can see Gan quoting (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?37278-Obama-effigy-from-tree-on-University-of-Kentucky-campus&p=830664#post830664) the (now-deleted, thanks to you) post where I said: "Aww, damn. You caught me! Careless. Booo!"

What, in your Alzheimer's-riddled brain, do you imagine that's referring to? Of all the bizarre hills to die on, the fact that you remember so few details about something you've obsessed over for 13 years is an amazing testament to 1) your mental illness, 2) your demonstrably poor memory.


So you "proved" Methais isn't a libertarian, but really a closet Conservative in disguise? What's the difference between the two? It's not like he pulled an Androidpk and was a RandPaulFanboi one week and the following week he was "Feeling the Bern". As usual, you made a mountain out of a mole hill and made yourself look retarded. Good job?

Methais is a conservative, who opportunistically denied being a conservative in a comically poorly conceived attempt at a "GOTCHA THERE, PAL" defense which, in no way, shape or form addressed anything I said. Not only was it demonstrably false -- as proved by his later admission -- his ignorance of the scientific method would stand either way. You, and he, are both retarded.

[Wrathbringer]

That doesn't address anything that I said. But you do you, champ. Best of luck demonstrating your assertion.



Right.



What you're saying makes absolutely no sense, and I see you once again dodged my question: How exactly do you think it became known that I had a second account? That it was just something that you, forum "genius," magically figured out? How do you think my fucking up my posts, revealing I was using two accounts, is some kind of "defense" to my behavior? How are you this retarded?

You can see Gan quoting (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?37278-Obama-effigy-from-tree-on-University-of-Kentucky-campus&p=830664#post830664) the (now-deleted, thanks to you) post where I said: "Aww, damn. You caught me! Careless. Booo!"

What, in your Alzheimer's-riddled brain, do you imagine that's referring to? Of all the bizarre hills to die on, the fact that you remember so few details about something you've obsessed over for 13 years is an amazing testament to 1) your mental illness, 2) your demonstrably poor memory.



Methais is a conservative, who opportunistically denied being a conservative in a comically poorly conceived attempt at a "GOTCHA THERE, PAL" defense which, in no way, shape or form addressed anything I said. Not only was it demonstrably false -- as proved by his later admission -- his ignorance of the scientific method would stand either way. You, and he, are both retarded.

I find myself wondering if you just really don't have anything else better to do.

[Ashliana]

I find myself wondering if you just really don't have anything else better to do.

My characters are saturated, and I'm watching a documentary on my second monitor, so: multitasking! The power of the information age. :) And I have lots of downtime at the office to do the same.

[Parkbandit]

That doesn't address anything that I said. But you do you, champ. Best of luck demonstrating your assertion.

"Best of luck proving it.. I deleted every single message!"

Bravo?


What you're saying makes absolutely no sense, and I see you once again dodged my question: How exactly do you think it became known that I had a second account? That it was just something that you, forum "genius," magically figured out? How do you think my fucking up my posts, revealing I was using two accounts, is some kind of "defense" to my behavior? How are you this retarded?

You made the claim that you weren't actually posting to agree with yourself.. you just made a mistake using the wrong account. Well, that makes no sense whatsoever. No one is talking about how you got outted... because no one is surprised by your stupidity. Way to get confused as usual.


You can see Gan quoting (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?37278-Obama-effigy-from-tree-on-University-of-Kentucky-campus&p=830664#post830664) the (now-deleted, thanks to you) post where I said: "Aww, damn. You caught me! Careless. Booo!"

#1: I didn't go through and delete all the Keirphe posts.. that was you, trying to erase the monumentally stupidity you bring to this forum. SPOILER: Didn't work.
#2: You keep getting confused. No one is talking about you getting caught... what makes this so.fucking.stupid. is that you not only were agreeing with your other "personality", but you were then coming up with illogical reasons why you were doing it.


What, in your Alzheimer's-riddled brain, do you imagine that's referring to? Of all the bizarre hills to die on, the fact that you remember so few details about something you've obsessed over for 13 years is an amazing testament to 1) your mental illness, 2) your demonstrably poor memory.

You're conflating or confused.. not sure which one. Probably both.. because you're so mentally ill.

Here, I can't make it anymore clear: NO ONE CARES THAT YOUR STUPIDITY GOT YOU OUTTED. No one.


Methais is a conservative, who opportunistically denied being a conservative in a comically poorly conceived attempt at a "GOTCHA THERE, PAL" defense which, in no way, shape or form addressed anything I said. Not only was it demonstrably false -- as proved by his later admission -- his ignorance of the scientific method would stand either way. You, and he, are both retarded.

So, what specifically is the difference between a fiscal conservative and a libertarian that you believe Methais would not like to have as a political trait?

[Ashliana]

"Best of luck proving it.. I deleted every single message!"

Bravo?

I wonder why that happened? Could it be because of an obsessed sixty year old man? Still haven't demonstrated your contention, though.


You made the claim that you weren't actually posting to agree with yourself.. you just made a mistake using the wrong account. Well, that makes no sense whatsoever. No one is talking about how you got outted... because no one is surprised by your stupidity. Way to get confused as usual.



I never denied using the second account to agree with myself, but that wasn't how I messed up and gave my game away. You've gotten confused about the circumstances, and this isn't the first time.


#1: I didn't go through and delete all the Keirphe posts.. that was you, trying to erase the monumentally stupidity you bring to this forum. SPOILER: Didn't work.

Speaking of getting confused, nobody made the claim that you deleted them, but that I deleted them because of your behavior, years later, when you started one of your obsessive sprees.



#2: You keep getting confused. No one is talking about you getting caught... what makes this so.fucking.stupid. is that you not only were agreeing with your other "personality", but you were then coming up with illogical reasons why you were doing it.

You're still confused. :( Today, you said: "Remember when you used the excuse that you used the wrong account?" That didn't happen, I never "made up an excuse" about "how I 'accidentally' agreed with my other self." I was explaining how I originally gave my game away, you had yet another Alzheimer's flare-up, began yet another straw man argument, and were forced to double down on it in thread after thread, just like your error RE: the Doomsday Clock.


You're conflating or confused.. not sure which one. Probably both.. because you're so mentally ill.

Your reading comprehension is so off-the-charts poor, you don't know what you're arguing anymore.


Here, I can't make it anymore clear: NO ONE CARES THAT YOUR STUPIDITY GOT YOU OUTTED. No one.

Again, you're the one who brought it up. As always, the 13-year old second account that posted a dozen or so times is your fallback "HELP! I'VE RUN OUT OF WAYS TO ARGUE THE TOPIC AND I NEED A WAY TO DEFLECT!" strategy. Except you can't argue about that for shit, either. Since you're an idiot.


So, what specifically is the difference between a fiscal conservative and a libertarian that you believe Methais would not like to have as a political trait?

He didn't put that much thought into it. And neither, clearly, have you. :)

[Parkbandit]

I just happen to think Solkern is one of the dumbest people on the board.

A tiny nugget of intelligence from you.... the smallest spec, but still a very astute observation.


Think of me what you will. I was already pretty unpopular, this doesn't make much difference to me.

And you're still that unpopular... might be your lack of real personality.

Spoiler: Toxic trash isn't a personality :(

[Ashliana]

A tiny nugget of intelligence from you.... the smallest spec, but still a very astute observation.

And you're still that unpopular... might be your lack of real personality.

Spoiler: Toxic trash isn't a personality :(

Neither is the severe mental illness that went into your obsessive, decades-spanning stalking of other men by cycling through the reputation system in order to send them as many sexually graphic messages full of impotent rage as possible.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Candor]

Neither is the severe mental illness that went into your obsessive, decades-spanning stalking of other men by cycling through the reputation system in order to send them as many sexually graphic messages full of impotent rage as possible.

Does it hurt to be so retarded, or does the lack of active brain cells provide a numbing effect?

[Ashliana]

Does it hurt to be so retarded, or does the lack of active brain cells provide a numbing effect?

https://media.giphy.com/media/CRbU5KUe7TTxK/giphy.gif

[Shaps]

Does it hurt to be so retarded, or does the lack of active brain cells provide a numbing effect?

You understand you can't call retarded people, retarded anymore right?

Goodness. That's just mean man, just mean. Tugg Speedman knows.

[Solkern]

Umadbro?

Idiot number 2 arrives, who doesn’t know the difference between isolation and quarantine! The retarded idiots are out in full force!

I’m mad? Mad that I know basic math and proper English grammar? Lol sure.

[Methais]

You self-identified repeatedly, consistently, as a conservative throughout your decades-spanning posts here, including half a year ago. You dishonestly, opportunistically claimed here "I'm not a conservative (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2200861#post2200861)" before being forced to admit today: "Here in 2021, I'm still a fiscal conservative (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2201015#post2201015)."

You shifted your defense from "I'm not a conservative" to "Well, yes, I'm a conservative, but you see, I'm a specific flavor of conservative," which in no way changes anything that I said. Your inability to wrap your acorn-sized brain around that reality is your problem, and no one else's, no matter how butthurt you get about your mental gymnastics not panning out.



It doesn't matter, either way. Conservatives of all flavors have had long-running problems with science - from social conservatives opposing the teaching of evolution and aspects of astronomy - to fiscal conservatives being conned by the tobacco industry, the petrochemical industry, etc. Methais' attempt to explain his own ignorance of science was rationalized with "I'm not a conservative!" as if that somehow constituted a defense. It doesn't. He just decided to throw a tantrum in response to it being pointed out that yes, he's been a self-identifying conservative across decades, including in 2020. You guys need to more selectively pick your battles.

I also self identified as a "social libertarian" but you can't seem to stop going out of your way to ignore that, despite it being in the screenshots you posted yourself that you thought was some big clever "gotcha" moment, but was just another of the 898242739423 instances of you failing again and not knowing how to read, and then projecting your massive retardedness onto everyone else like you've been doing for years.

All you're doing is repeatedly proving how incredibly stupid and dense you are. But I can tell that the inner workings of my political beliefs are very important to you, and it clearly enrages you to the point where you haven't slept in days because I don't fit into the little political box you're attempting to put me in.

HOW HUMILIATING THIS MUST BE FOR YOU OMG OMG OMG

But back on topic, I'm here to be entertained by your stupidity and mental illness, and you never disappoint. Unless the subject is your parents, in which case you always disappoint.

https://media4.giphy.com/media/xUOxfklxQaopCeGM92/giphy.gif



It doesn't matter, either way.

Interesting concession.

[Methais]

But Methais posted that in 2010... EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO!!!!!!!!!!!

Maybe I'm just using common sense here, but since the dates were cropped out of some of the screenshots Ashliana posted, PB most likely just had "2003" in his head, since that's when this forum started, which just happens to be 18 years ago. Holy fuck we're old.

It shouldn't be all that hard to figure this out.


Methais recently said: I’m not conservative, I’m a libertarian.
Methais then also said: I’m fiscally conservative and socially a libertarian.

The only one here who can't understand this is Ashliana despite it being right there in his failed "gotcha" screenshots. That's why he's so mad now and keeps ignoring that in favor of barfing his fat princess diarrhea all over the place. Now he's at the point of "What difference does it make?"


I know Methais gets it, he’s just trolling for the laughs

This is literally the only thing that Ashliana is good for.

[Ashliana]

Methais recently said: I’m not conservative, I’m a libertarian.
Methais then also said: I’m fiscally conservative and socially a libertarian.
The only one here who can't understand this is Ashliana despite it being right there in his failed "gotcha" screenshots. That's why he's so mad now and keeps ignoring that in favor of barfing his fat princess diarrhea all over the place. Now he's at the point of "What difference does it make?"

That's because it doesn't make a difference. You seem to think by attempting to dodge the "conservative" label in bad faith, that somehow your demonstrated ignorance of the scientific method disappears. Alas, no such luck. The fact that you denied being (X), then admitted to being (variant of X) is funny, and makes you an absolute retard for spending a half-dozen pages doubling down on.



I know Methais gets it, he’s just trolling for the laughsThis is literally the only thing that Ashliana is good for.

I doubt you do, in fact, "get it." You really are that idiotic. :) Either way, you're just giving me opportunity after opportunity to put you in your place, which is what I wanted.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

That's because it doesn't make a difference. You seem to think by attempting to dodge the "conservative" label in bad faith, that somehow your demonstrated ignorance of the scientific method disappears. Alas, no such luck. The fact that you denied being (X), then admitted to being (variant of X) is funny, and makes you an absolute retard for spending a half-dozen pages doubling down on.



I doubt you do, in fact, "get it." You really are that idiotic. :) Either way, you're just giving me opportunity after opportunity to put you in your place, which is what I wanted.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

Now there's no difference between "fiscal conservative" and "social libertarian?" :lol:

Good job being a retard, retard. Keep being super hung up over the misuse of a word too. It makes you look super mentally stable and not desperate at all, because all you've ever done is fail it up in every possible way for 100% of your time posting on this forum, so I guess you'll take any "win" you can get, even though you still have to make up this big grand story to go around it. Because you're a pathetic drama queen like that. The best part of all that is everything you try to be is completely based around anti-science.

But if it helps to keep you from 41%'ing yourself, then I'll be a sport and let you have it. Because I'd much rather you be here for me to laugh at and provide unlimited fat princess entertainment.


Unrelated:

Here's actual footage of the day Ashliana's parents gave up on him, which Ashliana views as putting his parents "in their place"


https://youtu.be/JVcbY3Tf_TE


EDIT: I would like to retract my use of the term "fat princess" when describing Ashliana, because Fat Princess was a pretty fun video game, and I do not wish to taint its title by associating it with this mongoloid.

[Ashliana]

Now there's no difference between "fiscal conservative" and "social libertarian?" :lol:

Good job being a retard, retard. Keep being super hung up over the misuse of a word too. It makes you look super mentally stable and not desperate at all, because all you've ever done is fail it up in every possible way for 100% of your time posting on this forum, so I guess you'll take any "win" you can get, even though you still have to make up this big grand story to go around it. Because you're a pathetic drama queen like that. The best part of all that is everything you try to be is completely based around anti-science.

But if it helps to keep you from 41%'ing yourself, then I'll be a sport and let you have it. Because I'd much rather you be here for me to laugh at and provide unlimited fat princess entertainment.


Unrelated:

Here's actual footage of the day iAshliana's parents gave up on him, which Ashliana views as putting his parents "in their place"


https://youtu.be/JVcbY3Tf_TE


EDIT: I would like to retract my use of the term "fat princess" when describing iAshliana, because Fat Princess was a pretty fun video game, and I do not wish to taint its title by associating it with this mongoloid.

:rofl: You typed 174 words in order to make a straw man argument. I never said "there's no difference between "fiscal conservative" and "social libertarian," I said that you identifying as a variant of conservative makes no difference with respect to my charge that you're ignorant of the scientific method, and you just so happen to suffer from the same issues with science as many conservatives.

Perhaps next time you should try reading!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

:rofl: You typed 174 words in order to make a straw man argument. I never said "there's no difference between "fiscal conservative" and "social libertarian," I said that you identifying as a variant of conservative makes no difference with respect to my charge that you're ignorant of the scientific method, and you just so happen to suffer from the same issues with science as many conservatives.

Perhaps next time you should try reading!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

This entire conversation is literally due to your inability to read. But you're way too stupid to ever realize that, so the result here is endless entertainment for the rest of us at your expense.

https://media4.giphy.com/media/J4HP3FcGqP6Yo/giphy.gif

And lol @ you counting words in a post as if you're making some kind of point.

[Ashliana]

This entire conversation is literally due to your inability to read. But you're way too stupid to ever realize that, so the result here is endless entertainment for the rest of us at your expense.

https://media4.giphy.com/media/J4HP3FcGqP6Yo/giphy.gif

You can keep insisting "YOU'RE NOT LOOKING AT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN (X) AND (VARIANT OF X)! YOU'RE NOT READING!" all you want. The reality is, identifying as any given flavor of conservative in no way changes your demonstrated ignorance of the scientific method, nor that your variety of ignorance fits the known pattern of problems conservatives have with regard to science.


And lol @ you counting words in a post as if you're making some kind of point.

It serves to show how truly butthurt you are that your disingenuous attempt to dodge the "conservative" label failed. You'll get over it eventually, though.

https://i.gifer.com/3O80s.gif

[Methais]

You can keep insisting "YOU'RE NOT LOOKING AT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN (X) AND (VARIANT OF X)! YOU'RE NOT READING!" all you want. The reality is, identifying as any given flavor of conservative in no way changes your demonstrated ignorance of the scientific method, nor that your variety of ignorance fits the known pattern of problems conservatives have with regard to science.



It serves to show how truly butthurt you are that your disingenuous attempt to dodge the "conservative" label failed. You'll get over it eventually, though.

Now you're twisting the misuse of the word "science" into not understanding the entire scientific method. All while accusing other people of straw man arguments even. :lol:

Dumbass. This is your MO though. You find something, anything at all to latch onto, make up a bunch of dumb shit to go around it, then are like "omg I just put u in ur place omg omg omg!" while normal people laugh at you for being so monumentally retarded.

It's ok buddy, I still remember all that from junior high and how it works. You apparently didn't, since your existence is based around anti-science and "feelings."

The difference here though is I'm ok with admitting an error. You on the other hand, are still trying to lie your way out of agreeing with yourself on another account, but you can't keep your story straight, and then you get super mad when called out on it, then you double down on your bullshit even more, and it's been happening for years.

Keep it up. I'm not ready for the laughs to end just yet.

[Ashliana]

Now you're twisting the misuse of the word "science" into not understanding the entire scientific method. All while accusing other people of straw man arguments even. :lol:

Dumbass. This is your MO though. You find something, anything at all to latch onto, make up a bunch of dumb shit to go around it, then are like "omg I just put u in ur place omg omg omg!" while normal people laugh at you for being so monumentally retarded.

It's ok buddy, I still remember all that from junior high and how it works. You apparently didn't, since your existence is based around anti-science and "feelings."

The difference here though is I'm ok with admitting an error.

Another 181 words in yet another show of your stumbling inability to follow a conversation you're going out of your way to paticipate in. Nothing you wrote has anything to do with what we've been talking about. You demonstrated your ignorance of science and the scientific method in the exchange that spurred this thread. The apparent brain aneurysm that caused you to lose sight of it is amusing, but your issue. And no, we're not talking about some "mistake" you made and that I'm seizing upon.. We're talking about your demonstrated ignorance of science and how it fits the conservative mold, which you then tried to dodge, with trademark ineptitude, by claiming "oh, I'm not a conservative!" as if, even if true, that would change anything, before admitting you are, indeed, a flavor of conservative.


You on the other hand, are still trying to lie your way out of agreeing with yourself on another account, but you can't keep your story straight, and then you get super mad when called out on it, then you double down on your bullshit even more, and it's been happening for years.

Keep it up. I'm not ready for the laughs to end just yet.

:rofl: Nope. That notion was based on PB's inability to read. You'd think after dealing with him for 20 years, you'd be smart enough not to uncritically take his word as gospel, but by all means, if you want to make the charge, cite your sources. Best of luck!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

Another 181 words in yet another show of your stumbling inability to follow a conversation you're going out of your way to paticipate in. Nothing you wrote has anything to do with what we've been talking about. You demonstrated your ignorance of science and the scientific method in the exchange that spurred this thread. The apparent brain aneurysm that caused you to lose sight of it is amusing, but your issue. And no, we're not talking about some "mistake" you made and that I'm seizing upon.. We're talking about your demonstrated ignorance of science and how it fits the conservative mold, which you then tried to dodge, with trademark ineptitude, by claiming "oh, I'm not a conservative!" as if, even if true, that would change anything.



:rofl: Nope. That notion was based on PB's inability to read. You'd think after dealing with him for 20 years, you'd be smart enough not to uncritically take his word as gospel, but by all means, if you want to make the charge, cite your sources. Best of luck!

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

Let's pretend for a minute, extra emphasis on pretend, that everything you're claiming is correct. And since you're going to latch onto that sentence and edit out the word "pretend" at some point and then quote it back and then say "This is proof of me putting you in your place!" because you're a tard like that, allow me to state that you're still dumb and wrong 100% of the time, especially in this thread.

But anyway aside from that, let's go back to your world or pretend for a minute where you're correct.

What now? What do you do next?

[Ashliana]

Let's pretend for a minute, extra emphasis on pretend, that everything you're claiming is correct. And since you're going to latch onto that sentence and edit out the word "pretend" at some point and then quote it back and then say "This is proof of me putting you in your place!" because you're a tard like that, allow me to state that you're still dumb and wrong 100% of the time, especially in this thread.

But anyway aside from that, let's go back to your world or pretend for a minute where you're correct.

What now? What do you do next?

Well, let's see. Where did you begin the mental gymnastics as a desperate dodge to try and rationalize away what I said? Page 7. 9 pages of you obstinately, nonsensically insisting "But I'm not a conservative, so what you said somehow doesn't apply!"

You could try substantively responding to the criticism of your misunderstanding of the CDC and WHO's actions, or the lack of self-awareness that went into your statement about "COVID being politicized," since it was conservatives who did so, at the behest of the private, corporate interests that drive the GOP, and drive all the conservative issues with science - the very same ones that you just happen to share, despite your attempt to defend yourself by declaring "But I'm not a conservative!!shift+!1!."

[Methais]

Well, let's see. Where did you begin the mental gymnastics as a desperate dodge to try and rationalize away what I said? Page 7. 9 pages of you obstinately, nonsensically insisting "But I'm not a conservative, so what you said somehow doesn't apply!"

You could try substantively responding to the criticism of your misunderstanding of the CDC and WHO's actions, or the lack of self-awareness that went into your statement about "COVID being politicized," since it was conservatives who did so, at the behest of the private, corporate interests that drive the GOP, and drive all the conservative issues with science - the very same ones that you just happen to share, despite your attempt to defend yourself by declaring "But I'm not a conservative!!shift+!1!."

Setting aside the part where everything you just said is wrong and stupid, what I said was what do YOU do next?

There you go not knowing how to read or comprehend words again.

https://media.tenor.com/images/1da6bb86ef23dc4dff5051209843a296/tenor.gif

[Ashliana]

Setting aside the part where everything you just said is wrong and stupid, what I said was what do YOU do next?

There you go not knowing how to read or comprehend words again.

https://media.tenor.com/images/1da6bb86ef23dc4dff5051209843a296/tenor.gif

There you go not knowing how to read or comprehend words again. I responded to something you said on page 7, you responded with a nonsensical objection. I've been addressing your subsequent nonsensical objections for 9 pages. The only other action for me to take would be a response to a substantive reply that you'd have to write. But since you're incapable of making a coherent argument, we'll have to stick to deconstructing each and every one of your nonsensical objections for another 9 pages. :)

[Methais]

There you go not knowing how to read or comprehend words again. I responded to something you said on page 7, you responded with a nonsensical objection. I've been addressing your subsequent nonsensical objections for 9 pages. The only other action for me to take would be a response to a substantive reply that you'd have to write. But since you're incapable of making a coherent argument, we'll have to stick to deconstructing each and every one of your nonsensical objections for another 9 pages. :)

You responded to something I said on page 7 by digging up screenshots from 2010 where I said the same thing, and then were like OMG HE'S BEING A LIARFACE LOOK HERE'S PROOF!!!!

Then you got super mad when you realized how fucking dumb you are, and have been throwing a tantrum and doubling down on your stupid ever since.

Anyway back to the original question, since you still can't understand it...

Let's pretend for a minute, again, emphasis on pretend, that you're correct and I'll just concede (remember, we're pretending here so don't get too excited) to all the dumb shit you're barfing everywhere.

Now what? What do you, Ashliana, do next?

[Ashliana]

You responded to something I said on page 7 by digging up screenshots from 2010 where I said the same thing, and then were like OMG HE'S BEING A LIARFACE LOOK HERE'S PROOF!!!!

Then you got super mad when you realized how fucking dumb you are, and have been throwing a tantrum and doubling down on your stupid ever since.

Page 7 was my calling out your monumentally ignorant comments about scientific organizations, and how conservatives caused the "politicization of COVID" (for the same reasons that conservatives typically have issues with science) that you were decrying, with no self-awareness. To which you disingenuously responded "But I'm not a conservative!" as if that would have erased your ignorant comments even if it were true -- and despite your decades-spanning history on here self-identifying as a conservative, constant shitting out of conservative apologia, stated support for conservative politicians, and eventual admission that yes, you are indeed a conservative.


Anyway back to the original question, since you still can't understand it...

Let's pretend for a minute, again, emphasis on pretend, that you're correct and I'll just concede (remember, we're pretending here so don't get too excited) to all the dumb shit you're barfing everywhere.

Now what? What do you, Ashliana, do next?

Bide my time until the next time one of you makes a monumentally stupid statement that's fun to deconstruct, of course.

[Solkern]

Maybe I'm just using common sense here, but since the dates were cropped out of some of the screenshots Ashliana posted, PB most likely just had "2003" in his head, since that's when this forum started, which just happens to be 18 years ago. Holy fuck we're old.

It shouldn't be all that hard to figure this out.



The only one here who can't understand this is Ashliana despite it being right there in his failed "gotcha" screenshots. That's why he's so mad now and keeps ignoring that in favor of barfing his fat princess diarrhea all over the place. Now he's at the point of "What difference does it make?"



This is literally the only thing that Ashliana is good for.


Nah, he looked at the “join date” and thought that was the post date, instead of looking at the bottom of each post and clearly seeing the post/edit date.

And yeah, holy shit, we’ve been posting here for 18 years! Damn!

[Methais]

Page 7 was my calling out your monumentally ignorant comments about scientific organizations, and how conservatives caused the "politicization of COVID" (for the same reasons that conservatives typically have issues with science) that you were decrying, with no self-awareness. To which you disingenuously responded "But I'm not a conservative!" as if that would have erased your ignorant comments even if it were true -- and despite your decades-spanning history on here self-identifying as a conservative, constant shitting out of conservative apologia, stated support for conservative politicians, and eventual admission that yes, you are indeed a conservative.



Bide my time until the next time one of you makes a monumentally stupid statement that's fun to deconstruct, of course.

What's the difference between a social conservative, and a social libertarian? Can you answer that?

In before a 6 paragraph non-answer.

[Methais]

Nah, he looked at the “join date” and thought that was the post date, instead of looking at the bottom of each post and clearly seeing the post/edit date.

And yeah, holy shit, we’ve been posting here for 18 years! Damn!

So you're equating what was at worst a brain fart/oversight/whatever with legitimate stupidity?

Protip: It's never a good idea to do anything that Ashliana would also do.

[Ashliana]

What's the difference between a social conservative, and a social libertarian? Can you answer that?

In before a 6 paragraph non-answer.

1) Your statement "I'm not a conservative" was false. You are a fiscal conservative, as you have repeatedly self-identified, and yesterday, admitted again.
2) Conservatives of all stripes have issues with science, so your "I'm (X) variant of conservative" was never a defense of your observed ignorance. Social conservatives have issues with the teaching of evolution, secularism in general, etc. Fiscal conservatives, like you, have issues with any matter that impacts a private, corporate interest, like the tobacco industry, oil and gas companies, businesses impacted by COVID, etc.

That's why I said it didn't make a difference. I know it's very difficult to wrap your brain around, but that's on you.

[Methais]

1) Your statement "I'm not a conservative" was false. You are a fiscal conservative, as you have repeatedly self-identified, and yesterday, admitted again.
2) Conservatives of all stripes have issues with science, so your "I'm (X) variant of conservative" was never a defense of your observed ignorance. Social conservatives have issues with the teaching of evolution, secularism in general, etc. Fiscal conservatives, like you, have issues with any matter that impacts a private, corporate interest, like the tobacco industry, oil and gas companies, etc.

That's why I said it didn't make a difference. I know it's very difficult to wrap your brain around, but that's on you.

Again, can you explain the difference between a social conservative, and a social libertarian?

You should be happy about this, because even though you're a toxic pile of mentally ill ass pudding, I still believe that losers like you have a right to exist and live in your little world of fantasy as long as you're not trampling on other peoples' rights.

But then I remembered that you're miserable no matter what, which is why these endless Ashliana threads happen to begin with.

You will be miserable no matter what, because you're a miserable person, regardless of my politics, or even my existence.

Have fun living that life.

[Ashliana]

Again, can you explain the difference between a social conservative, and a social libertarian?

You should be happy about this, because even though you're a toxic pile of mentally ill ass pudding, I still believe that losers like you have a right to exist and live in your little world of fantasy as long as you're not trampling on other peoples' rights.

Can you explain what the difference between a social conservative and a social libertarian has to do with 1) your demonstrated ignorance of science on page 7, and 2) how your demonstrated ignorance fits the conservative mold?


But then I remembered that you're miserable no matter what, which is why these endless Ashliana threads happen to begin with.

You will be miserable no matter what, because you're a miserable person, regardless of my politics, or even my existence.

Have fun living that life.

You're the one who, for whatever incomprehensible reason, thought it would be a good idea to double down for 10 pages over your dishonest assertion that you're "not a conservative" 1) as if that weren't demonstrably untrue, including by your own later admission, and 2) as if, even if true, that would magically erase your observed ignorance. All because you couldn't rationalize your ignorance and thought this conversation would somehow deflect from it. It doesn't, no matter how butthurt you get about it nor how many pages you insist this exchange go on for.

[Methais]

Can you explain what the difference between a social conservative and a social libertarian has to do with 1) your demonstrated ignorance of science on page 7, and 2) how your demonstrated ignorance fits the conservative mold?



You're the one who, for whatever incomprehensible reason, thought it would be a good idea to double down for 10 pages over your dishonest assertion that you're "not a conservative" 1) as if that weren't demonstrably untrue, including by your own later admission, and 2) as if, even if true, that would magically erase your observed ignorance. All because you couldn't rationalize your ignorance and thought this conversation would somehow deflect from it. It doesn't, no matter how butthurt you get about it nor how many pages you insist this exchange go on for.

So you keep refusing to answer, because you know that answering honestly is going to make you look like a huge tard.

Know who else does this all the time? Backlash.

Grats on that, Backliana.

[Ashliana]

So you keep refusing to answer, because you know that answering honestly is going to make you look like a huge tard.

Know who else does this all the time? Backlash.

Grats on that, Backliana.

Couldn't substantively respond to how your non-sequitur applies to the conversation? Check.

And after all that whining over the past two days about not getting to dictate how the other person responds, without a shred of self-awareness or irony.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/029/831/spongebobmeme.jpg

[Methais]

Couldn't substantively respond to how your non-sequitur applies to the conversation? Check.

And after all that whining over the past two days about not getting to dictate how the other person responds, without a shred of self-awareness or irony.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/029/831/spongebobmeme.jpg

Cool projection. Again.

So are you going to explain the difference between a social conservative and a social libertarian or not?

[Ashliana]

Cool projection. Again.

How is calling you out on your hilarious, brand-defining hypocrisy "projection"?

This is you (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2200914#post2200914):

"- Butthurt because I'm not replying the way you want me to because you're so desperate for my attention and are getting laughed at instead
- Butthurt because you're a fat little princess drama queen who isn't getting his way"

This is you (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2201047#post2201047):

"I love watching you be all all big mad while accidentally describing yourself because you don't get to dictate the rules of your desperate pleas for my attention."


So are you going to explain the difference between a social conservative and a social libertarian or not?

Are you going to explain what the difference between those two things has to do with 1) your demonstrated ignorance of science on page 7, and 2) how your demonstrated ignorance fits the conservative mold?

You're making yet another non-sequitur in yet another desperate, flailing attempt to deflect. Explain how the difference relates to the matter at hand, and I'll answer it. Otherwise, sorry, you don't get to veer off into a random, unrelated tangent and then demand, with any moral authority, that the other person answer the way you want.

[Methais]

How is calling you out on your hilarious, brand-defining hypocrisy "projection"?

This is you (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2200914#post2200914):

"- Butthurt because I'm not replying the way you want me to because you're so desperate for my attention and are getting laughed at instead
- Butthurt because you're a fat little princess drama queen who isn't getting his way"

This is you (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?128526-Don-t-you-feel-stupid-for-believing-Biden-now&p=2201047#post2201047):

"I love watching you be all all big mad while accidentally describing yourself because you don't get to dictate the rules of your desperate pleas for my attention."



Are you going to explain what the difference between those two things has to do with 1) your demonstrated ignorance of science on page 7, and 2) how your demonstrated ignorance fits the conservative mold?

You're making yet another non-sequitur in yet another desperate, flailing attempt to deflect. Explain how the difference relates to the matter at hand, and I'll answer it. Otherwise, sorry, you don't get to veer off into a random, unrelated tangent and then demand, with any moral authority, that the other person answer the way you want.

You're the one throwing a huge tantrum over the social libertarian thing while overtly ignoring the point being made so that you can keep shrieking about "fiscal conservatism" and then when called out on it, you cry even more.

This is why your parents hate you.

You're the one going nuts over the whole conservative/libertarian thing, so the onus is on you to prove your point. And so far all you've done is dodge doing that, and everyone including you knows why.

The best part is you legitimately believe you're being witty and clever and had another "gotcha" moment, which just like all your other "gotcha" moments, you failed spectacularly at all of it. Just like you do at everything else in your miserable life.

Be sure to say the word "non-sequitur" some more too. Don't disappoint me.

[Ashliana]

You're the one throwing a huge tantrum over the social libertarian thing

Erm, no, that would be you. Clearly, you're very upset that you haven't been able to tie your non-sequitur to your argument. Your problem, not mine.


while overtly ignoring the point being made so that you can keep shrieking about "fiscal conservatism" and then when called out on it, you cry even more.

Except for that inconvenient part where, no, you didn't "make a point." My criticism of your demonstrated ignorance applies regardless of what flavor of conservative you are, so your mental gymnastics about identifying as one over the other make no difference, as has been pointed out to you multiple times. Your inability or unwillingness to read only reflects on you.


This is why your parents hate you.

Just like you do at everything else in your miserable life.

Speaking of projection..


You're the one going nuts over the whole conservative/libertarian thing, so the onus is on you to prove your point. And so far all you've done is dodge doing that, and everyone including you knows why.

The best part is you legitimately believe you're being witty and clever and had another "gotcha" moment, which just like all your other "gotcha" moments, you failed spectacularly at all of it.

Be sure to say the word "non-sequitur" some more too. Don't disappoint me.

You've "gone nuts" for 11 pages over your dishonest assertion that you're "not a conservative" 1) as if that weren't demonstrably untrue, including by your own later admission, and 2) as if, even if true, that would magically erase your observed ignorance. All because you couldn't rationalize your ignorance and thought this conversation would somehow deflect from it. It doesn't, no matter how butthurt you get about it nor how many pages you insist this exchange go on for.

[Solkern]

So you're equating what was at worst a brain fart/oversight/whatever with legitimate stupidity?

Protip: It's never a good idea to do anything that Ashliana would also do.

A brain fart would be a one off thing, he’s has multiple brain farts, that would equate to stupidity.

[Methais]

Erm, no, that would be you. Clearly, you're very upset that you haven't been able to tie your non-sequitur to your argument. Your problem, not mine.



Except for that inconvenient part where, no, you didn't "make a point." My criticism of your demonstrated ignorance applies regardless of what flavor of conservative you are, so your mental gymnastics about identifying as one over the other make no difference, as has been pointed out to you multiple times. Your inability or unwillingness to read only reflects on you.



Speaking of projection..



You've "gone nuts" for 11 pages over your dishonest assertion that you're "not a conservative" 1) as if that weren't demonstrably untrue, including by your own later admission, and 2) as if, even if true, that would magically erase your observed ignorance. All because you couldn't rationalize your ignorance and thought this conversation would somehow deflect from it. It doesn't, no matter how butthurt you get about it nor how many pages you insist this exchange go on for.

I've pointed out what a colossal retard you are for 11 pages while you double down on your retard fueled tantrums saturated in mental illness and being wrong, yes.

You are incapable of making me upset though. You literally don't matter enough to be upset over anything in any context. You can make me laugh, sure. But you do it accidentally every time, just by being you. You try to push that "I matter to you" shit onto everyone, and you can't stand the fact that you don't actually matter, at least outside of mindless entertainment to kill time at work, at least until Backlash returns to reclaim his retard champion title from you.

But it's funny, in a sad and pathetic way, how you really believe that you do matter.

The drama is winding down now, and you're starting to panic because then you'll have to go cancer up another thread to get your fix.

But since you're so sad and pathetic, I will allow you to have the last word here. Which will be more of your usual whining and projection and probably at least 2 uses of the word "non-sequitur." But still...

http://gif-finder.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Ken-Jeong-I%E2%80%99ll-allow-it.gif

[Ashliana]

I've pointed out what a colossal retard you are for 11 pages while you double down on your retard fueled tantrums saturated in mental illness and being wrong, yes.

If that's what you call your 11 pages of colossally retarded tantrums following your dishonest assertion that you're "not a conservative" 1) as if that weren't demonstrably untrue, including by your own later admission, and 2) as if, even if true, that would magically erase your observed ignorance. All because you couldn't rationalize your ignorance and thought this conversation would somehow deflect from it. It doesn't, no matter how butthurt you get about it nor how many pages you insist this exchange go on for.


You are incapable of making me upset though. You literally don't matter enough to be upset over anything in any context. You can make me laugh, sure. But you do it accidentally every time, just by being you. You try to push that "I matter to you" shit onto everyone, and you can't stand the fact that you don't actually matter, at least outside of mindless entertainment to kill time at work, at least until Backlash returns to reclaim his retard champion title from you. But it's funny, in a sad and pathetic way, how you really believe that you do matter.

:rofl: Your butthurt is transparently obvious, Methais. You drip it with every deluded post, just like your claim here that I said "I matter to you," which you fabricated. But you could prove me wrong with a citation. :) Which, predictably, you won't (read: can't) provide.


The drama is winding down now, and you're starting to panic because then you'll have to go cancer up another thread to get your fix.

But since you're so sad and pathetic, I will allow you to have the last word here. Which will be more of your usual whining and projection and probably at least 2 uses of the word "non-sequitur." But still...

http://gif-finder.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Ken-Jeong-I%E2%80%99ll-allow-it.gif

Did you even read these two sentences together? Nothing's "winding down, causing panic" -- you're trying to create a flimsy pretext for your concession, which I'll accept, since absolutely nothing you do or say changes the fact that your understanding of science was comically poor, in line with the typical conservative ignorance of science, you falsely denied being a conservative only to end up admitting it, and nothing you say now has the power to warp and twist history to suit your delusions. It's kind of funny that it took you 11 pages of doubling down to realize it, though. But we knew you were slow in the head, so we'll have to forgive you this time.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Methais]

If that's what you call your 11 pages of colossally retarded tantrums following your dishonest assertion that you're "not a conservative" 1) as if that weren't demonstrably untrue, including by your own later admission, and 2) as if, even if true, that would magically erase your observed ignorance. All because you couldn't rationalize your ignorance and thought this conversation would somehow deflect from it. It doesn't, no matter how butthurt you get about it nor how many pages you insist this exchange go on for.



:rofl: Your butthurt is transparently obvious, Methais. You drip it with every deluded post, just like your claim here that I said "I matter to you," which you fabricated. But you could prove me wrong with a citation. :) Which, predictably, you won't (read: can't) provide.



Did you even read these two sentences together? Nothing's "winding down, causing panic" -- you're trying to create a flimsy pretext for your concession, which I'll accept, since absolutely nothing you do or say changes the fact that your understanding of science was comically poor, in line with the typical conservative ignorance of science, you falsely denied being a conservative only to end up admitting it, and nothing you say now has the power to warp and twist history to suit your delusions. It's kind of funny that it took you 11 pages of doubling down to realize it, though. But we knew you were slow in the head, so we'll have to forgive you this time.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

No, you're just too boring and repetitive now and not entertaining enough for me to continue. If that's a "concession" in your world, then...well everyone knows your world consists of fantasy and delusion, so have fun with that.

Now you may have the last last word. Don't forget to say "non-sequitur" at least twice and "concession/concede" at least 4 times while you're telling us some more about your delusions.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Ashliana]

No, you're just too boring and repetitive now and not entertaining enough for me to continue. If that's a "concession" in your world, then...well everyone knows your world consists of fantasy and delusion, so have fun with that.

When you cycle through the same two nonsensical defenses, you're going to get the same two deconstructions of your argument. You're like a dog running into an electrified fence, puzzled over why the mean old fence keeps shocking you. Perhaps you should have adapted, rather than blaming the proverbial fence.


Now you may have the last last word. Don't forget to say "non-sequitur" at least twice and "concession/concede" at least 4 times while you're telling us some more about your delusions.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

I know you're butthurt about not being able to defend your observed ignorance of science, and that your disingenuous denial of being conservative (which you then admitted to) didn't constitute a defense of your ignorance regardless. Choose your battles more selectively next time.

https://i.gifer.com/3aqY.gif

[Arqueto]

A brain fart would be a one off thing, he’s has multiple brain farts, that would equate to stupidity.

Didn't you use the plural noun "racists" for like an entire thread when you meant to be using the adjective "racist"?

Just saying, glass houses and all.

[Wrathbringer]

My characters are saturated, and I'm watching a documentary on my second monitor, so: multitasking! The power of the information age. :) And I have lots of downtime at the office to do the same.

I do understand downtime at the office, however, with the amount of downtime you apparently have, have you considered learning every language currently spoken in the world, curing cancer and negotiating peace in the middle east? Just seems like all of this time could have been better spent, maybe?

[Ashliana]

I do understand downtime at the office, however, with the amount of downtime you apparently have, have you considered learning every language currently spoken in the world, curing cancer and negotiating peace in the middle east? Just seems like all of this time could have been better spent, maybe?

:rofl: You make a fair point, but on the other hand, I have but a fraction of the number of posts that PB/Methais/even you do, so I'm not sure I agree with the premise. What are you doing with all your free time?

[Methais]

:rofl: You make a fair point, but on the other hand, I have but a fraction of the number of posts that PB/Methais/even you do, so I'm not sure I agree with the premise. What are you doing with all your free time?

I've already learned every language currently spoken in the world, cured cancer, and negotiated peace in the middle east though.

[Solkern]

Didn't you use the plural noun "racists" for like an entire thread when you meant to be using the adjective "racist"?

Just saying, glass houses and all.

Mistyping using a phone and making the mistake once, is far different than repeatedly using your/you’re wrong. Failure at basic understanding of terms such as “jet lag”, and failure at basic math isn’t really the same as making a mistake once while typing.
And thanks for validating my point, I made a mistake with one word. “A one off thing”.

[Solkern]

I've already learned every language currently spoken in the world, cured cancer, and negotiated peace in the middle east though.

Ого! Супермэн!

Methais, you don’t to lie to kick it, Trump already brought peace to the Middle East! Don’t take credit for his work.

[Parkbandit]

“A one off thing”.

A couple minutes later....


Methais, you don’t to lie to kick it,

You should get a new phone. Your current one makes you sound like a retard.

[Methais]

Mistyping using a phone and making the mistake once, is far different than repeatedly using your/you’re wrong. Failure at basic understanding of terms such as “jet lag”, and failure at basic math isn’t really the same as making a mistake once while typing.
And thanks for validating my point, I made a mistake with one word. “A one off thing”.

He did specify it was for an entire thread though, which implies multiple instances.


Ого! Супермэн!

Methais, you don’t to lie to kick it, Trump already brought peace to the Middle East! Don’t take credit for his work.

I worked very hard on this and received no credit. It was very tiring.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/HardOrangeHerculesbeetle-max-1mb.gif

[Shaps]

He did specify it was for an entire thread though, which implies multiple instances.



I worked very hard on this and received no credit. It was very tiring.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/HardOrangeHerculesbeetle-max-1mb.gif

We see you John Kerry. /salute

[Solkern]

A couple minutes later....



You should get a new phone. Your current one makes you sound like a retard.

You sound like a retard, phone or no phone.

Like when you posted “your a faggot” ten times in a row.

[Methais]

We see you John Kerry. /salute

https://us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/gunaxin/2013/05/kneel-before-zod-2-560x254.jpg

[Shaps]

https://us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/gunaxin/2013/05/kneel-before-zod-2-560x254.jpg

LOL.

I like it.

[Candor]

https://us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/gunaxin/2013/05/kneel-before-zod-2-560x254.jpg

Double thumbs up :)

[Parkbandit]

You sound like a retard, phone or no phone.

Solkern, you don’t to lie to kick it,


Like when you posted “your a faggot” ten times in a row.

your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
your a faggot
And a retard in every clinical sense of the word.

[~Rocktar~]

You should get a new phone. Your current one makes you sound like a retard.

It's not the phone.

[Solkern]

It's not the phone.

OMG you can’t kill someone who enters your home in any court in the country because breaking and entering isn’t a threatening action!
Omg you can’t kill someone who enters your home in most states in the country!

Show me out any court where they didn’t feel threatened?!
Fuck you’re stupid, keep moving those goal posts.

Rocktard, go back to eating cheeseburgers, it’s all you’re good at.

[Methais]

Show me out any court...

https://media4.giphy.com/media/3WmWdBzqveXaE/giphy.gif


You might wanna chill for a while with going nuts over other peoples' typos and grammatical errors.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0e346bc3fa24dccbab7b88b5eeeedad8/tenor.gif?itemid=8191392

[Gelston]

OMG you can’t kill someone who enters your home in any court in the country because breaking and entering isn’t a threatening action!
Omg you can’t kill someone who enters your home in most states in the country!

Show me out any court where they didn’t feel threatened?!
Fuck you’re stupid, keep moving those goal posts.

Rocktard, go back to eating cheeseburgers, it’s all you’re good at.

The bar in many castle doctrine states only requires that the intruder attempted to use force to enter a place he/she wasn't supposed to be in. They don't even have to actually be in the residence, or in some case business. You don't have to show that you are threatened.

[Shaps]

https://media4.giphy.com/media/3WmWdBzqveXaE/giphy.gif


You might wanna chill for a while with going nuts over other peoples' typos and grammatical errors.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0e346bc3fa24dccbab7b88b5eeeedad8/tenor.gif?itemid=8191392

Please, for god's sake, please never use that old lady picture again. I won't be able to get that out of my head. /shiver

[Methais]

Please, for god's sake, please never use that old lady picture again. I won't be able to get that out of my head. /shiver

How have you made it to the year 2021 on the internet without having seen WAT LADY?

https://media1.giphy.com/media/ToMjGpq7Zd9Z1ITDnOg/giphy.gif

[Parkbandit]

I made a mistake with one word. “A one off thing”.


Show me out any court where they didn’t feel threatened?!

You might be using the wrong kind of phone.............

https://media1.giphy.com/media/8FfoUVX6ULvxPLyJeV/giphy.gif

[Parkbandit]

How have you made it to the year 2021 on the internet without having seen WAT LADY?

https://media1.giphy.com/media/ToMjGpq7Zd9Z1ITDnOg/giphy.gif

https://media0.giphy.com/media/9ak1b5vudNnEI/giphy.gif

[Bhaalizmo]

SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM & HAM

Bad bot.

https://media.giphy.com/media/xdnytp8742kg0/giphy.gif