NYC To Ban Hot Dogs and Processed Meats To Improve Climate

[Methais]

NYC To Ban Hot Dogs and Processed Meats To Improve Climate (https://wrno.iheart.com/content/2019-04-23-nyc-to-ban-hot-dogs-and-processed-meats-to-improve-climate/)

New York City is the first city in the United States to eliminate processed meats.

Mayor Bill de Blasio approved an ambitious $14 billion Green New Deal (https://onenyc.cityofnewyork.us/) on Monday, April 22, to combat climate change. The plan will cut purchases of red meat by 50 percent in its city-controlled facilities such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. The new commitment builds off of the Meatless Mondays campaign that was adopted by all NYC schools in 2017.

“It is a difficult plan. It is a necessary plan.... Estimates that tell us that we have only 12 years to get it right. Let’s be clear, we have until 2030 to change things fundamentally, or our lives won’t be the same,” de Blasio said (http://www.weatherboy.com/hot-dogs-banned-nyc-improve-weather-climate/?fbclid=IwAR2KdcesLkFH2f7CufETB9myh-boby2gj00AP-tC2YcSkcWfInEQ14vNhXg) at an Earth Day event yesterday.

By 2030, New York City's Green New Deal will reduce greenhouse emissions by 30% while also creating new jobs. Additionally, all buildings that are 25,000 square feet or more, of which there are 50,000 citywide, will be required to make efficiency upgrades that lower their energy usage and emissions or they will face steep penalties.

More details on the Green New Deal can be found here (https://onenyc.cityofnewyork.us/).

https://i.imgur.com/a1sPK4D.png

https://i.imgur.com/PVoxv8g.png

https://wrno.iheart.com/content/2019-04-23-nyc-to-ban-hot-dogs-and-processed-meats-to-improve-climate/

I'm have no doubt that students demanded "Meatless Monday" and it wasn't at all some bullshit that these tards forced on them.

Can't wait to see how much this wrecks their shit and then watch them blame it on Trump.

It's funny how AOC pretty much runs the democrat party now though. :lol:

https://media1.tenor.com/images/5f8a278267a7c76b8abbbaf1b27ff558/tenor.gif?itemid=6152061

[Astray]

I'm all for a more humane, ethical method of harvesting our food.

Also this feels like satire. Am I alive in the real world anymore?

[Methais]

I'm all for a more humane, ethical method of harvesting our food.

Also this feels like satire. Am I alive in the real world anymore?

I thought it was satire at first. I think I might still be a little bit in denial that it isn't.

There are like 473298407230324 hot dog vendors in NYC. I'm assuming he just put them all out of business?

[Stumplicker]

NYC To Ban Hot Dogs and Processed Meats To Improve Climate (https://wrno.iheart.com/content/2019-04-23-nyc-to-ban-hot-dogs-and-processed-meats-to-improve-climate/)

New York City is the first city in the United States to eliminate processed meats.

Mayor Bill de Blasio approved an ambitious $14 billion Green New Deal (https://onenyc.cityofnewyork.us/) on Monday, April 22, to combat climate change. The plan will cut purchases of red meat by 50 percent in its city-controlled facilities such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. The new commitment builds off of the Meatless Mondays campaign that was adopted by all NYC schools in 2017.

“It is a difficult plan. It is a necessary plan.... Estimates that tell us that we have only 12 years to get it right. Let’s be clear, we have until 2030 to change things fundamentally, or our lives won’t be the same,” de Blasio said (http://www.weatherboy.com/hot-dogs-banned-nyc-improve-weather-climate/?fbclid=IwAR2KdcesLkFH2f7CufETB9myh-boby2gj00AP-tC2YcSkcWfInEQ14vNhXg) at an Earth Day event yesterday.

By 2030, New York City's Green New Deal will reduce greenhouse emissions by 30% while also creating new jobs. Additionally, all buildings that are 25,000 square feet or more, of which there are 50,000 citywide, will be required to make efficiency upgrades that lower their energy usage and emissions or they will face steep penalties.

More details on the Green New Deal can be found here (https://onenyc.cityofnewyork.us/).

https://wrno.iheart.com/content/2019-04-23-nyc-to-ban-hot-dogs-and-processed-meats-to-improve-climate/

I'm have no doubt that students demanded "Meatless Monday" and it wasn't at all some bullshit that these tards forced on them.

Can't wait to see how much this wrecks their shit and then watch them blame it on Trump.

It's funny how AOC pretty much runs the democrat party now though. :lol:


A lot of this stuff likely refers to programs that have been in place in New York for a long time already, before AOC was even in office. It just sounds like they're mandating it now. I can't speak to the meats thing because I haven't done anything in regards to that, but the building efficiency upgrades, huge swaths of the city have already taken advantage of. New York has had some crazy incentives going tax-wise for about a decade now. For example, if you change out fluorescent lighting with LED in a building in New York, even after paying the contractors to do it and buying the new lights, the tax breaks have you turning a profit off of the whole thing. Then your electricity bill is lower forever, as is your bill to replace lights and fixtures and ballasts. Then you can sell your old ballasts on ebay and make even more money. One of my old clients sold hundreds of thousands of those T8 LED tubes over the past decade specifically to New York because it was a no brainer.

I don't think the mandating efficiency standards will have too far to go in most of the city.

[Tgo01]

I'm all for a more humane, ethical method of harvesting our food.

Also this feels like satire. Am I alive in the real world anymore?

Democrats used to be the party of "legalize it!" They are quickly becoming the party of "criminalize it!"

Abortions? Legalize it!
Illegal immigration? Legalize it!
Drugs? Legalize it!
Shitting on the sidewalk? Legalize it!

But when it comes to law abiding citizens minding their own business and enjoying some perks of living in a modern society they want to criminalize everything.

Guns? Criminalize it!
Owning nice buildings? Criminalize it!
Enjoying hamburgers? Criminalize it!
Having "too much" money? Criminalize it!
Practicing speech they don't like? Criminalize it!

[Methais]

I wouldn't mind knowing what students "demanded" Meatless Mondays.

As if Mondays don't suck enough.

[Stumplicker]

I wouldn't mind knowing what students "demanded" Meatless Mondays.

As if Mondays don't suck enough.

Probably the same ones that demanded meatless fridays. Damn Catholics with their fancy pope hats.

[Tgo01]

I don't think the mandating efficiency standards will have too far to go in most of the city.

Depends on how efficient they want buildings to get. Lighting typically accounts for less than 10% of a buildings total electrical cost. Even assuming they could cut that in half by going to more energy efficient standards, that's only 5% off their electricity. If NYC is going to mandate a 30% reduction then these buildings have a long way to go and it won't be as simple or cheap as just replacing a bunch of bulbs.

Don't get me wrong, I think everyone should switch to LED when their old bulbs burn out, possibly even sooner. But it's not the energy savings bonanza people make it out to be, especially if they are already using fluorescent.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

This whole announcement reminds me of one of my all time favorite anigifs.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/61978b89dca03b499ccade2433bc0af2/tenor.gif?itemid=5018622

[Stumplicker]

Depends on how efficient they want buildings to get. Lighting typically accounts for less than 10% of a buildings total electrical cost. Even assuming they could cut that in half by going to more energy efficient standards, that's only 5% off their electricity. If NYC is going to mandate a 30% reduction then these buildings have a long way to go and it won't be as simple or cheap as just replacing a bunch of bulbs.

Don't get me wrong, I think everyone should switch to LED when their old bulbs burn out, possibly even sooner. But it's not the energy savings bonanza people make it out to be, especially if they are already using fluorescent.

Yeah. They have a bunch of those incentives going I know and have for a while. I just only have direct experience with the lighting one. I think the only parts of the city that have big buildings that won't have already taken advantage of most of them are the sketchier parts anyway. It costs too much to do anything in NYC for most of the big rich ones to not already be running super efficiently. The giant LCDs in Times Square are probably run on a thimble full of corn oil that wouldn't power the Wright Flyer at this point.

[Methais]

Probably the same ones that demanded meatless fridays. Damn Catholics with their fancy pope hats.

You're either trying too hard or not trying hard enough.

I'M NOT TELLING YOU WHICH ONE THIS IS THOUGH!!!!11

[Methais]

This whole announcement reminds me of one of my all time favorite anigifs.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/61978b89dca03b499ccade2433bc0af2/tenor.gif?itemid=5018622

https://media.tenor.com/images/0fb29c90e0af1711365af7917903d3fb/tenor.gif

[Back]

NYC To Ban Hot Dogs and Processed Meats To Improve Climate (https://wrno.iheart.com/content/2019-04-23-nyc-to-ban-hot-dogs-and-processed-meats-to-improve-climate/)

New York City is the first city in the United States to eliminate processed meats.

Mayor Bill de Blasio approved an ambitious $14 billion Green New Deal (https://onenyc.cityofnewyork.us/) on Monday, April 22, to combat climate change. The plan will cut purchases of red meat by 50 percent in its city-controlled facilities such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. The new commitment builds off of the Meatless Mondays campaign that was adopted by all NYC schools in 2017.

“It is a difficult plan. It is a necessary plan.... Estimates that tell us that we have only 12 years to get it right. Let’s be clear, we have until 2030 to change things fundamentally, or our lives won’t be the same,” de Blasio said (http://www.weatherboy.com/hot-dogs-banned-nyc-improve-weather-climate/?fbclid=IwAR2KdcesLkFH2f7CufETB9myh-boby2gj00AP-tC2YcSkcWfInEQ14vNhXg) at an Earth Day event yesterday.

By 2030, New York City's Green New Deal will reduce greenhouse emissions by 30% while also creating new jobs. Additionally, all buildings that are 25,000 square feet or more, of which there are 50,000 citywide, will be required to make efficiency upgrades that lower their energy usage and emissions or they will face steep penalties.

More details on the Green New Deal can be found here (https://onenyc.cityofnewyork.us/).4106891066

Headline is false. There is no ban on hotdogs or processed meats in NYC. The plan will cut purchases of red meat by 50 percent in its city-controlled facilities such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Everyone in NY, city or state, can still buy as much red meat as they want whether its steak, burgers, Grey's Papya, or the corner cart.

Of course this bogus shit has probably spread like wildfire across social media and is popping up on all the right-wing aggregate websites to fuel more outrage against an invisible enemy so they can get your votes and donations to their political campaigns.


I'm have no doubt that students demanded "Meatless Monday" and it wasn't at all some bullshit that these tards forced on them.

Can't wait to see how much this wrecks their shit and then watch them blame it on Trump.

It's funny how AOC pretty much runs the democrat party now though. :lol:

Why do you hate kids? Kids are pretty in touch with earth and animal related issues actually.

[Gelston]

Why do you hate kids? Kids are pretty in touch with earth and animal related issues actually.

You straight up advocate murdering babies.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

You straight up advocate murdering babies.

haha

[Back]

Depends on how efficient they want buildings to get. Lighting typically accounts for less than 10% of a buildings total electrical cost. Even assuming they could cut that in half by going to more energy efficient standards, that's only 5% off their electricity. If NYC is going to mandate a 30% reduction then these buildings have a long way to go and it won't be as simple or cheap as just replacing a bunch of bulbs.

Don't get me wrong, I think everyone should switch to LED when their old bulbs burn out, possibly even sooner. But it's not the energy savings bonanza people make it out to be, especially if they are already using fluorescent.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/08/climate/light-bulb-efficiency.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage


After climbing for decades, electricity use by American households has declined over the past eight years.

“That’s a staggering change,” said Lucas Davis, an energy economist at the Haas School of Business, part of the University of California, Berkeley.



The economic recession in the late 2000s contributed to an initial dip in electricity demand, but as the economy improved, lighting and other energy-efficiency improvements continued to drive down household electricity use.


Check out the whole article. Its pretty amazing we have made this kind of change just by switching light bulbs.

[Methais]

Headline is false. There is no ban on hotdogs or processed meats in NYC. The plan will cut purchases of red meat by 50 percent in its city-controlled facilities such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Everyone in NY, city or state, can still buy as much red meat as they want whether its steak, burgers, Grey's Papya, or the corner cart.

Of course this bogus shit has probably spread like wildfire across social media and is popping up on all the right-wing aggregate websites to fuel more outrage against an invisible enemy so they can get your votes and donations to their political campaigns.



Why do you hate kids? Kids are pretty in touch with earth and animal related issues actually.

Kid also like meat and typically aren't giant vegan hipster faggots.

Why do you hate kids who eat meat?


You straight up advocate murdering babies.

Back ---> https://media3.giphy.com/media/BNI9OXeGGnSmI/giphy.gif <---- Gelston

[Tgo01]

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/08/climate/light-bulb-efficiency.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage




Check out the whole article. Its pretty amazing we have made this kind of change just by switching light bulbs.

Again lighting accounts for a small portion of a building's energy usage. Let's say your electric bill is 100 dollars a month and for a whole month you didn't turn on a single light bulb, your next bill will be around 90 bucks a month. That's with a 100% reduction in electricity usage from lighting. Sure it's nice, every penny counts, but to suggest it is making a noticeable difference on our energy demands is absurd. Everything is getting more energy efficient; computers, TVs, phone chargers, etc. Shit remember when plasma TVs were all the rage and everyone was upgrading from a 40 inch CRT to an energy hogging 65 inch plasma? Plasma TVs are no longer really sold and instead everyone is now buying much more energy efficient LCD and LED TVs.

Same goes for monitors; people moved away from CRT monitors to LCD and LED monitors, even though they are typically bigger now they still use less electricity than older CRT monitors. Even computer parts are getting more energy efficient. I was looking at processors the other day and a more modern and more powerful processor today uses less electricity than the processor I currently have in my computer.

Everything is getting more energy efficient, and that's great. But as things get more energy efficient people buy more and more things that consume electricity. 40 years ago people didn't have a TV in every bedroom so 4 different people can watch 4 different TVs, they didn't have a game system and a computer running constantly.

In short: Yes energy efficient light bulbs are a good thing, but people really need to stop acting like they are making a dent in the amount of electricity we use. Think about everything that uses electricity in your home: AC, refrigerators, computers, TVs, lights. You really think replacing that one 60 watt bulb in your living room with an LED bulb that uses 20 watts is making a huge difference? Do you? Well? DO YA?!

/Tgo01 smash!

[Back]

In short: Yes energy efficient light bulbs are a good thing, but people really need to stop acting like they are making a dent in the amount of electricity we use. Think about everything that uses electricity in your home: AC, refrigerators, computers, TVs, lights. You really think replacing that one 60 watt bulb in your living room with an LED bulb that uses 20 watts is making a huge difference? Do you? Well? DO YA?!

/Tgo01 smash!

LEDs use 85% less energy than incadecent. The average home has 45 light bulbs. There are 127.59 million homes in the US. Thats not so insignificant.

I'd say that changing light bulbs has had a huge impact along with other energy saving measures.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Do you know how much energy is used aborting babies?

[Gelston]

My home has 106 lightbulbs.

[Tgo01]

LEDs use 85% less energy than incadecent. The average home has 45 light bulbs. There are 127.59 million homes in the US. Thats not so insignificant.

I'd say that changing light bulbs has had a huge impact along with other energy saving measures.

And how often do you use those lights? If it's a room with a window probably near 0% during the day. I'm also going to assume 0% while you're sleeping, at work, not home, and not using that room.

In general a light bulb is used for 4 hours during a day for rooms that are used a lot, e.g. a living room or bedroom. Just because I have a light bulb in my laundry room doesn't mean it's on for anywhere near 4 hours a day. I would be surprised if it's on for an average of 3 minutes a day.

Let's say a typical family of 4 uses 4 60 watt light bulbs for 4 hours a day, just because I like the number 4. Let's use your suggestion that LEDs use 85% less energy.

That's 960 watts a day for the old bulb compared to 144 watts for the LED bulbs. Or about 3.75 dollars compared to 57 cents assuming 13 cents per KwH.

For comparison's sake a typical clothes dryer uses about 3500 watts of electricity. Using that dryer for just 2 hours a week uses more electricity than those old incandescent bulbs. Ovens and AC units use similar amounts of electricity and the AC unit is probably running a lot more than 2 hours a day.

[Tgo01]

My home has 106 lightbulbs.

Look at Mr. Moneybags over here with all of his lightbulbs. I bet they are each 100 watt old fashioned bulbs too, just sucking away at that energy while there are poor people all huddled around their 60 watt bulb, desperately trying to do their homework so they can afford a better life.

[Gelston]

Look at Mr. Moneybags over here with all of his lightbulbs. I bet they are each 100 watt old fashioned bulbs too, just sucking away at that energy while there are poor people all huddled around their 60 watt bulb, desperately trying to do their homework so they can afford a better life.

The ones I don't use a lot are, because they haven't burned out yet.

[Back]

And how often do you use those lights? If it's a room with a window probably near 0% during the day. I'm also going to assume 0% while you're sleeping, at work, not home, and not using that room.

In general a light bulb is used for 4 hours during a day for rooms that are used a lot, e.g. a living room or bedroom. Just because I have a light bulb in my laundry room doesn't mean it's on for anywhere near 4 hours a day. I would be surprised if it's on for an average of 3 minutes a day.

Let's say a typical family of 4 uses 4 60 watt light bulbs for 4 hours a day, just because I like the number 4. Let's use your suggestion that LEDs use 85% less energy.

That's 960 watts a day for the old bulb compared to 144 watts for the LED bulbs. Or about 3.75 dollars compared to 57 cents assuming 13 cents per KwH.

For comparison's sake a typical clothes dryer uses about 3500 watts of electricity. Using that dryer for just 2 hours a week uses more electricity than those old incandescent bulbs. Ovens and AC units use similar amounts of electricity and the AC unit is probably running a lot more than 2 hours a day.

So your example family with incandescents would pay $1368.75 a year where the family with LEDs would pay $208.05 a year. Not only that but the LED family would draw that much less KwHs. Multiply that by the number of homes in the US, 127.59 million and it adds up to a fuckton.

Its one way to save like turning down your thermostat or taking shorter showers or more efficient laundry practices.

[Gelston]

Back pees in the shower.

[Taernath]

Even if LEDs didn't use less energy, they'd still be worth it because of how long they last.

[Gelston]

Even if LEDs didn't use less energy, they'd still be worth it because of how long they last.

That is the reason I got them, tbh. I buy the more expensive brighter ones too.

[Tgo01]

So your example family with incandescents would pay $1368.75 a year where the family with LEDs would pay $208.05 a year.

My bad, I forgot the word "month" when talking about the cost, so that's a savings of 38 dollars a year. It is interesting how you readily accepted 4 light bulbs being on for 4 hours a day would cost almost 115 bucks a month though. Might want to start questioning things you read.

[Stumplicker]

Even if LEDs didn't use less energy, they'd still be worth it because of how long they last.

Fo sheezy. Plus with the lighting fixtures in replacement of fluorescent, they have the tubes that don't use ballasts either. Ballasts are even more expensive than the fluorescent lights and have to be replaced every 10-15 years themselves. So you save all that too.

[Neveragain]

Look at Mr. Moneybags over here with all of his lightbulbs. I bet they are each 100 watt old fashioned bulbs too, just sucking away at that energy while there are poor people all huddled around their 60 watt bulb, desperately trying to do their homework so they can afford a better life.

I use whale oil lamps to light my home and the lights are always on.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

No way am I replacing my incandescent bulbs with LEDs. I know it. You know it. There is no reason we even discuss the semantics of why I should try to save the planet for your germ donkey, dream killing money sucking mouth breathers. I'll drive my v8 pickup without a muffler while I'm at it.

If you don't have kids because no one wants to procreate with you, I'm doing it anyway.

I also keep my house at 68 in the summer, and 75 in the winter.

[Parkbandit]

LEDs use 85% less energy than incadecent. The average home has 45 light bulbs. There are 127.59 million homes in the US. Thats not so insignificant.

I'd say that changing light bulbs has had a huge impact along with other energy saving measures.

http://www.ohiohomeenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/energy-usage-pie-graph-600-450.gif

You are focusing all your tiny brain power on less than 12% of your total electric usage, while ignoring 78% of usage.

Stop being fucking stupid JUST BECAUSE.

[Parkbandit]

So your example family with incandescents would pay $1368.75 a year where the family with LEDs would pay $208.05 a year. Not only that but the LED family would draw that much less KwHs. Multiply that by the number of homes in the US, 127.59 million and it adds up to a fuckton.

Its one way to save like turning down your thermostat or taking shorter showers or more efficient laundry practices.

It's like you beg to be made fun of.

Androidpk isn't posting anymore because fee fees hurt. You don't have to go this hard as champion. Make the next challenger come to you.

[Gelston]

http://www.ohiohomeenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/energy-usage-pie-graph-600-450.gif

You are focusing all your tiny brain power on less than 12% of your total electric usage, while ignoring 78% of usage.

Stop being fucking stupid JUST BECAUSE.

Hah, heating is probably my lowest usage. I turn all that shit off during winter and just let it be cold.

Also, mine uses gas for heating too.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Hah, heating is probably my lowest usage. I turn all that shit off during winter and just let it be cold.

Also, mine uses gas for heating too.

I burn coal with all the windows open.

[Taernath]

http://www.ohiohomeenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/energy-usage-pie-graph-600-450.gif

You are focusing all your tiny brain power on less than 12% of your total electric usage, while ignoring 78% of usage.

Stop being fucking stupid JUST BECAUSE.

You'd pass on ~10% off your electric bill?

[Methais]

Back pees in the shower.

It's very efficient. Almost as efficient as taking a dump in the shower.

2x if you have diarrhea.

[Methais]

I burn coal with all the windows open.

I grill in the house with the windows closed.

[Parkbandit]

You'd pass on ~10% off your electric bill?

No, but he's laser focused on one of the smallest portions of an electric bill.

LEDs are amazing. I have them throughout my home. The only incandescent lights we have are in 3 chandeliers where the LEDs just don't look as good.

But if you want to save the most money on your electric bill: Put in more insulation, check your ductwork and make sure it's sealed and in good shape and have your AC/furnace serviced once a year.

[Neveragain]

No, but he's laser focused on one of the smallest portions of an electric bill.

LEDs are amazing. I have them throughout my home. The only incandescent lights we have are in 3 chandeliers where the LEDs just don't look as good.

But if you want to save the most money on your electric bill: Put in more insulation, check your ductwork and make sure it's sealed and in good shape and have your AC/furnace serviced once a year.

LED's are a perfect example of how capitalism is far superior to socialism, I'm surprised Back likes them.

[Neveragain]

NY is just banning the fuck out of everything. They're in full retard beast mode.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y12VlGOx1iQ

[Methais]

It's amazing that anyone at all, even ultra tards like Back, buy into this "We only have 12 years!!!!" bullshit. :lol:

[Parkbandit]

LED's are a perfect example of how capitalism is far superior to socialism, I'm surprised Back likes them.

Explain?

[Murrandii]

NYC and Quebec will be in discussions for our electricity

From the information we have, a 10 billion contract would be discussed and in our end, that would mean building more wind centrals and more dams.

details:

Hydro-Québec said it would be “happy to engage in discussions with New York City” to firm up the Champlain Hudson Power Express transmission line project, which would have a capacity of eight terawatt-hours of electricity. Cables would be buried under ground and under water for more than 530 kilometres. The project has been on the table for at least 10 years. The original plan was to start construction in 2018 and have the network live in 2021.

If it's happening, 15% of NYC's power needs would be fulfilled by Quebec.

We already have deals with (in french but easy to understand)

D’autres contrats d’Hydro-Québec aux États-Unis
Contrat avec le Vermont
Durée : 26 ans
Début du contrat : 2012
Puissance : 225 mégawatts (MW)
Prix : 4,5 cents du kilowattheure
Contrat avec le Massachusetts
Durée : 20 ans
Début du contrat : 2022
Puissance : 1100 mégawatts (MW)
Prix : 6,6 cents US (8,8 cents CA) du kilowattheure

You guys will be green cause of Quebec.. LOL!

[Stumplicker]

Prix : 6,6 cents US (8,8 cents CA) du kilowattheure

No YOU'RE a kilowatt-whore!

Du sprechen 'Murican!

Sag es, Frenchie! CHOWDAH!

[Methais]

No YOU'RE a kilowatt-whore!

Du sprechen 'Murican!

Sag es, Frenchie! CHOWDAH!

https://media1.tenor.com/images/5ff6db5f1867ca2cfd1d37f59d5bf8c4/tenor.gif?itemid=10041217

[Neveragain]

Explain?

Without delving too deeply. New technology will replace current technology when the consumer/developer deems it a better value. A socialist would argue that those technologies would still be developed through government spending, which is true to a certain degree. The downfall to the socialists theory is that government is far less efficient with money than the consumer is at the individual level and will more times than not demand a less efficient technology than a private consumer.

[Murrandii]

Without delving too deeply. New technology will replace current technology when the consumer/developer deems it a better value. A socialist would argue that those technologies would still be developed through government spending, which is true to a certain degree. The downfall to the socialists theory is that government is far less efficient with money than the consumer is at the individual level and will more times than not demand a less efficient technology than a private consumer.

it's like the paradox that the more industrial a country is, the more it pollutes but since the said country get richer, the less pollution will be produced since they got the money to updates their industries

In CAnada, our way to force that changes is by taxing the hell out of everything polluting. That way, the "individual" (either consummers or company) will changes, huh?

[Stumplicker]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/5ff6db5f1867ca2cfd1d37f59d5bf8c4/tenor.gif?itemid=10041217

I don't know what this image is, so I'm going to assume it's a unicorn flying over a double rainbow. And you're a kilowatt-whore too.

[Methais]

I don't know what this image is, so I'm going to assume it's a unicorn flying over a double rainbow. And you're a kilowatt-whore too.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/5ff6db5f1867ca2cfd1d37f59d5bf8c4/tenor.gif?itemid=10041217

[Methais]

In CAnada, our way to force that changes is by taxing the hell out of everything polluting. That way, the "individual" (either consummers or company) will changes, huh?

Sounds pretty stupid. Good thing it's Canada.

[Murrandii]

Sounds pretty stupid. Good thing it's Canada.

Liar, i know you buy your weed from us

[Astray]

Liar, i know you buy your weed from us

Pffffft. Canadian weed.

[Methais]

Liar, i know you buy your weed from us

I said Canada, not Colorado.

Reported to Astray.

[Stumplicker]

I said Canada, not Colorado.

Reported to Astray.

I haven't smoked pot in probably 15 years, but even I know that British Columbian pot is the best. And I live in a state where you can walk down to the corner store and get it.

[Astray]

Amsterdam doesn't even have the best weed in the world. Can you believe that shit?

[sellstuff1]

Practicing speech they don't like? Criminalize it!

Remember when you were begging Kranar to ban me because I had the audacity to call you out on your retarded doublethink, you NPC muppet?

Here you are, as doublethink as ever.

[Ashlander]

Remember when you were begging Kranar to ban me because I had the audacity to call you out on your retarded doublethink, you NPC muppet?

Here you are, as doublethink as ever.

Aww look who remembered his password.

[Methais]

Remember when you were begging Kranar to ban me because I had the audacity to call you out on your retarded doublethink, you NPC muppet?

Here you are, as doublethink as ever.

Did you and your brother and your cousin ever patch things up?

https://i.imgur.com/vui9uUc.jpg

[Tgo01]

Remember when you were begging Kranar to ban me because I had the audacity to call you out on your retarded doublethink, you NPC muppet?

Here you are, as doublethink as ever.

Considering I haven't seen Kranar around here nor spoken to him in years I think you're full of shit.

Also since when is getting someone banned from an internet forum anywhere near the same as criminalizing speech?

I know you're dumb, but no need to prove you're dumber than Androidpk.

[Murrandii]

Maybe i'm too old school but, I don't like when full grown up men violently insult a woman

SEriously, even if the men in question are rights, I despise them instinctivaly.

that's a no go and I raised my oldest kid, a man, to never cross that line. Never ever.

[Tgo01]

Maybe i'm too old school but, I don't like when full grown up men violently insult a woman

SEriously, even if the men in question are rights, I despise them instinctivaly.

that's a no go and I raised my oldest kid, a man, to never cross that line. Never ever.

What the hell are you referring to?

[Gelston]

Maybe i'm too old school but, I don't like when full grown up men violently insult a woman

SEriously, even if the men in question are rights, I despise them instinctivaly.

that's a no go and I raised my oldest kid, a man, to never cross that line. Never ever.

wut? are you high?

[Murrandii]

Would you speak to your mother like that?

No?

Then have the same decency with her.

[Tgo01]

Would you speak to your mother like that?

No?

Then have the same decency with her.

Are you under the impression sellstuff1 or Androidpk is a woman?

Your white knighting is for nothing here, cowboy. And even if sellstuff1 is a woman why should I give a shit about how I talk to "her"? He has called almost everyone here a racist, sexist, white supremacist Nazi. If you think such a delicate flower can't be spoken to in "that way" then that makes you the sexist here.

[Murrandii]

sellstuff is a woman.

I don't know who is android pk

If you give yourself the right to insult that violently a woman, bro, just to prove your point or defend yourself, I'd revaluate your moral code.

2019 is knocking at your door, man, embrace the changes.

[Tgo01]

sellstuff is a woman.

I don't know who is android pk

If you give yourself the right to insult that violently a woman, bro, just to prove your point or defend yourself, I'd revaluate your moral code.

2019 is knocking at your door, man, embrace the changes.

LOL

Holy shit you're dumb.

Here's a tip for you, sellstuff1 and any real woman here is not going to fuck you because of this post.

[Murrandii]

LOL

Holy shit you're dumb.

Here's a tip for you, sellstuff1 nor any real woman here is going to fuck you because of this post.

Why do you imply sexual relationship when speaking about being a gentleman with a girl?

MAn, what's the link between the 2?

When I open a door to a woman, it doesn't mean I want to bed her? When I smile when I see a beautiful woman on the street, it doesn't mean I wanna jump her? Are you in 1925?

Again, 2019 bro is knocking at your door at the moment, let it in!

[Tgo01]

Why do you imply sexual relationship when speaking about being a gentleman with a girl?

MAn, what's the link between the 2?

When I open a door to a woman, it doesn't mean I want to bed her? When I smile when I see a beautiful woman on the street, it doesn't mean I wanna jump her? Are you in 1925?

Again, 2019 bro is knocking at your door at the moment, let it in!

Why you only smiling at beautiful women? Why does beauty matter at all? Don't you know that's ugly shaming?

Why are you smiling at women you don't know on the street? That's catcalling and harassment.

I don't think you're as woke as you think you are.

[Murrandii]

Why you only smiling at beautiful women? Why does beauty matter at all? Don't you know that's ugly shaming?

Why are you smiling at women you don't know on the street? That's catcalling and harassment.

I don't think you're as woke as you think you are.

LOL!

You wanna have the last word? So be it. Have it.

And keep your elastic moral code that allow you to be violent with a woman if you decide it's worth it.

I had respect for you but seriously, that's sick

[Tgo01]

LOL!

You wanna have the last word? So be it. Have it.

And keep your elastic moral code that allow you to be violent with a woman if you decide it's worth it.

I had respect for you but seriously, that's sick

Oh no! No respect from whoever you are!

A "woman" calling me a racist, sexist, white supremacist is okay, me calling "her" dumb is "violent" towards her?

At this point I hope you're Macguyver because I don't want to believe someone is this dense in real life.

Since I'm getting the last word let me close with a few things:

sellstuff1 is not a woman. You've fallen hard for the mangina, man.
A real strong, independent woman does not need you to defend her by saying her precious sensibilities can't handle it. In fact she would probably be pissed with you for thinking she needs a man to protect her.
Would I ever talk to my mother that way? Of course not. But my mother isn't a raging, psychotic lunatic so she has that going for her.
Would I ever speak to my dad the way I am speaking to you? No, for much the same reasons I described above.

[Murrandii]

Oh no! No respect from whoever you are!

A "woman" calling me a racist, sexist, white supremacist is okay, me calling "her" dumb is "violent" towards her?

At this point I hope you're Macguyver because I don't want to believe someone is this dense in real life.

Since I'm getting the last word let me close with a few things:

sellstuff1 is not a woman. You've fallen hard for the mangina, man.
A real strong, independent woman does not need you to defend her by saying her precious sensibilities can't handle it. In fact she would probably be pissed with you for thinking she needs a man to protect her.
Would I ever talk to my mother that way? Of course not. But my mother isn't a raging, psychotic lunatic so she has that going for her.
Would I ever speak to my dad the way I am speaking to you? No, for much the same reasons I described above.

so…. if a woman goes psycho and hits you, you'll hit her in retaliation?

you'll have the last word, no worry

[Tgo01]

You wanna have the last word? So be it. Have it.


you'll have the last word, no worry

I'm beginning to think the last word is a lie!

[Murrandii]

answer

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

answer

question

[Gelston]

sellstuff is a woman.

I don't know who is android pk

If you give yourself the right to insult that violently a woman, bro, just to prove your point or defend yourself, I'd revaluate your moral code.

2019 is knocking at your door, man, embrace the changes.

Sellstuff1 is a dude, lolz

[Ososis]

Women in kitchen: animals in their own natural habitat: good stuff.

Men usualy have faster metabolism and usualy (at least here) have more physical job.

When I see a girl eating a double dose of mayonnaise in her sandwich for dinner and then going to study, I'm pitying her boyfriend :(

Women pass 20 should ban mayonnaise beside if they jog and workout!

Stay gold phoneyboy.

[Murrandii]

Sellstuff1 is a dude, lolz

Man, I confused sellstuff with time4fun

OUPSY!

Dreaven, you can have the last word now

[Back]

You'd pass on ~10% off your electric bill?

Its PB's mission in life to mischaracterize me on this forum. After 15 years of me calling out his bullshit, and laughing at his insults, I guess hes a little butthurt over it.

[Taernath]

Man, I confused sellstuff with time4fun

OUPSY!

Dreaven, you can have the last word now

lol you'd defend time4fun just because she's a woman?

Someone link him the Aka titty thread.

[Tgo01]

lol you'd defend time4fun just because she's a woman?

Someone link him the Aka titty thread.

That was my reaction too. It was better when he thought sellstuff1 was a woman than for him to be going through this much trouble over time4fun of all people. She even threw her most ardent defender Androidpk under the bus when it was convenient to her argument.

[Murrandii]

That was my reaction too. It was better when he thought sellstuff1 was a woman than for him to be going through this much trouble over time4fun of all people. She even threw her most ardent defender Androidpk under the bus when it was convenient to her argument.

My apologize, bro Dreaven

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Its PB's mission in life to mischaracterize me on this forum. After 15 years of me calling out his bullshit, and laughing at his insults, I guess hes a little butthurt over it.

To be fair, just about everything you post is retarded.

[Parkbandit]

Its PB's mission in life to mischaracterize me on this forum.

My mission in life has nothing to do with you, this forum or the Internet.

Sorry. You just aren't worth much effort.


After 15 years of me calling out his bullshit, and laughing at his insults, I guess hes a little butthurt over it.

Jesus.. dellusions of grandeur much?

Ok, I'll play. Be specific: can you give us all examples of you "calling me out" on my "bullshit"?

Remember: Be specific. A few quotes would suffice.

Also, you realize you haven't quoted me once in this thread. How would you have called me out?

You were focusing on the smallest portion of an electric bill. I'm not surprised, given your computer ventilation ideas in the past...

Spoiler: If you want to lower your electric bill, there are better ways to do it with a far bigger impact and a quicker ROI.

[Fortybox]

My apologize, bro Dreaven

Shut up Macguyver.

[Murrandii]

Shut up Macguyver.

Shut up Macguyver.

[Gelston]

Shut up Macguyver.

Shut up necro

[Murrandii]

Shut up necro

Shut up Sean Digital

[Gelston]

Shut up Sean Digital

Fuck off michaelous

[Murrandii]

Fuck off michaelous

Fuck off Chadj rubbing his manhood while talking on phone with Lady_teeoncy

[Gelston]

Fuck off Chadj rubbing his manhood while talking on phone with Lady_teeoncy

Suck a dick bobmuhthol

[Murrandii]

Suck a dick bobmuhthol

suck a klaive at the stoner.com

[Gelston]

suck a klaive at the stoner.com

Get banged by ciston after snorting 6 lines of coke at ebay.com

[Murrandii]

go eat Harmnone's stinky bowling shoes

[Fortybox]

Shut up Macguyver.

https://media.giphy.com/media/SvonsdXbSiWWNGJW1e/giphy.gif

[Methais]

Why do you imply sexual relationship when speaking about being a gentleman with a girl?

MAn, what's the link between the 2?

When I open a door to a woman, it doesn't mean I want to bed her? When I smile when I see a beautiful woman on the street, it doesn't mean I wanna jump her? Are you in 1925?

Again, 2019 bro is knocking at your door at the moment, let it in!

Just because you don’t act on it doesn’t mean you wouldn’t bang her.

[Methais]

so…. if a woman goes psycho and hits you, you'll hit her in retaliation?

you'll have the last word, no worry

Equal rights. And lefts.

[Methais]

Its PB's mission in life to mischaracterize me on this forum. After 15 years of me calling out his bullshit, and laughing at his insults, I guess hes a little butthurt over it.

All that’s required is to quote the things you post if someone is trying to make you look stupid.

[Methais]

Get banged by ciston after snorting 6 lines of coke at ebay.com

Shut up Sorchia

[Murrandii]

lol

[Back]

Ok, I'll play. Be specific: can you give us all examples of you "calling me out" on my "bullshit"?

Every thread we post in I am usually calling out your bullshit. Like this one.


You were focusing on the smallest portion of an electric bill. I'm not surprised, given your computer ventilation ideas in the past...

Spoiler: If you want to lower your electric bill, there are better ways to do it with a far bigger impact and a quicker ROI.

You mischaracterize what was happening in the thread. Tgo said lighting wasn't a big deal in energy savings and I countered that it was having a pretty big effect with an article to back it up. Not that it was the only way to save energy. Not that I thought it was going to get you the biggest savings.

You have literacy issues. You are constantly jumping to incorrect conclusions about things nobody really ever says.

[Parkbandit]

Every thread we post in I am usually calling out your bullshit. Like this one.

So you can't. Just because you post something retarded, doesn't mean you are right or that you are calling out anyone. You do realize that, right?


You mischaracterize what was happening in the thread. Tgo said lighting wasn't a big deal in energy savings and I countered that it was having a pretty big effect with an article to back it up. Not that it was the only way to save energy. Not that I thought it was going to get you the biggest savings.

You have literacy issues. You are constantly jumping to incorrect conclusions about things nobody really ever says.

So, Tgo said lighting wasn't a big deal, you said it was, I said it wasn't and illustrated with a picture that even you could understand with just a tiny bit of help.... and you say I have a literacy issue.

Dude. We get it. You being the Retard Champion here is all you literally have and you want to make sure it never, ever leaves your side again.

We get it.