Jared Kushner

[Androidpk]

.

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/iNK39qN.png

Yes.

[Parkbandit]

https://i.imgur.com/iNK39qN.png

Yes.

Yes.

[Gelston]

https://i.imgur.com/iNK39qN.png

Yes.


Yes.

Yes.

[Ashlander]

Yes.

Taco...I mean Yes.

[Wrathbringer]

https://i.imgur.com/iNK39qN.png

Yes.

Yes.

[Androidpk]

https://i.imgur.com/XN6DvZu.png


https://t.co/yq4H1zbhux

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/Bw6nElA.png


https://t.co/yq4H1zbhux

Sounds pretty serious. You should get in contact with your pro-bono lawyer.

[~Rocktar~]

https://i.imgur.com/XN6DvZu.png


https://t.co/yq4H1zbhux

Subpoena, subpoena, subpoena!

[Tgo01]

https://i.imgur.com/XN6DvZu.png


https://t.co/yq4H1zbhux

Who would have thought the guy who told our intelligence agencies to not share information with Kushner is now asking charges be brought against him? It boggles the mind!

[Alfster]

The form that he fucked up on carries some fairly stiff penalties for lying or omitting things. I don't like that he is clearly going after it for political reasons, but an average Joe who filled it out incorrectly would end up in prison.

Allegedly Ivanka is in the same boat.

[time4fun]

The form that he fucked up on carries some fairly stiff penalties for lying or omitting things. I don't like that he is clearly going after it for political reasons, but an average Joe who filled it out incorrectly would end up in prison.

Allegedly Ivanka is in the same boat.

The guy in charge of background checks said he had never seen mistakes and omissions at the level he saw on Kushner's forms (https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/jared-kushner-background-check-form/index.html).

At this point, the only reasons *not* to charge him would be political.

[Tgo01]

The guy in charge of background checks said he had never seen mistakes and omissions at the level he saw on Kushner's forms (https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/jared-kushner-background-check-form/index.html).

At this point, the only reasons *not* to charge him would be political.

Wait so he has seen "mistakes and omissions" on this form before? Were all of those people charged with a crime? Or is it only when it reaches "this level" that we charged people with a crime?

Unless all of those people were also charged with a crime it sure as shit sounds like going after Kushner IS political.

[Roiken]

lol Dreaven with the mic drop..

[Gelston]

Wait so he has seen "mistakes and omissions" on this form before? Were all of those people charged with a crime? Or is it only when it reaches "this level" that we charged people with a crime?

Unless all of those people were also charged with a crime it sure as shit sounds like going after Kushner IS political.

I've never heard of anyone charged with a crime for lying or making mistakes on that shit either. They usually just get denied on their clearance.

And honestly, unless they can prove he is lying, they can't charge him. They could hit him if he knowingly omitted or concealed a fact though, but again, I've never heard of that happening.

It really just seems 100% political to me.

[Wrathbringer]

The guy in charge of background checks said he had never seen mistakes and omissions at the level he saw on Kushner's forms (https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/jared-kushner-background-check-form/index.html).

At this point, the only reasons *not* to charge him would be political.

9283

[time4fun]

I've never heard of anyone charged with a crime for lying or making mistakes on that shit either. They usually just get denied on their clearance.

And honestly, unless they can prove he is lying, they can't charge him. They could hit him if he knowingly omitted or concealed a fact though, but again, I've never heard of that happening.

It really just seems 100% political to me.

Why would you have heard about it?

[time4fun]

Wait so he has seen "mistakes and omissions" on this form before? Were all of those people charged with a crime? Or is it only when it reaches "this level" that we charged people with a crime?

Unless all of those people were also charged with a crime it sure as shit sounds like going after Kushner IS political.

Did you actually just make the argument that because you personally haven't heard about something happening, it clearly doesn't happen?

And did Roiken just call that a mic drop?

LMAO

[Wrathbringer]

Did you actually just make the argument that because you personally haven't heard about something happening, it clearly doesn't happen?

And did Roiken just call that a mic drop?

LMAO

Keep telling yourself that the problem here is everyone else and not you. It's extremely entertaining to see you double and triple down on retarded butthurt desperation with each new post.

[Tgo01]

Did you actually just make the argument that because you personally haven't heard about something happening, it clearly doesn't happen?

And did Roiken just call that a mic drop?

LMAO

That's actually not what I said at all, but I know reading isn't your strong suit.

I asked if every single person who has ever made a mistake or omitted information on this form has been charged with a crime, because if not then it sure as shit seems political in this instance.

Or let me explain this in a language you can understand: "ROFL! Oh honey, I'm soooo smart and you're soooo stupid!"

[Androidpk]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1BSmwJb6gs

[Methais]

Did you actually just make the argument that because you personally haven't heard about something happening, it clearly doesn't happen?

And did Roiken just call that a mic drop?

LMAO

Remember how you once said you used to teach a class on logic?

This is an instance where you accidentally proved that you were lying. Not that we didn’t all already know this though.

[Methais]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1BSmwJb6gs

No one cares about your posts it’s amazing you’re still clinging onto hope that someone does.

[Gelston]

Why would you have heard about it?

Because they post it in the blotter. Plus when I was at the MFP G3 I had to deal with IMADETs a lot, they had to renew shit and I helped them out. Sometimes they get denied. Out of the probably 50 or 60 I've never seen anyone charged. Just denied.

[Androidpk]

People have absolutely been arrested and charged with lying to federal investigators over lies on the security forms.

[Gelston]

People have absolutely been arrested and charged with lying to federal investigators over lies on the security forms.

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2016/04/02/consequences-lying-withholding-information-background-investigation/

Sure. And it is a very, very rare occurrence.

This is a political thing, plain and simple.

[Parkbandit]

People have absolutely been arrested and charged with lying to federal investigators over lies on the security forms.

And sent to jail?

Got a list handy.. or should we just take your word for it?

[Gelston]

And sent to jail?

Got a list handy.. or should we just take your word for it?

From everything I can see, it is usually a charge added on to other charges. They aren't going after someone JUST for lying on an SF86. It typically isn't worth the time, effort, or money. They just refuse the clearance.

[Neveragain]

Because they post it in the blotter. Plus when I was at the MFP G3 I had to deal with IMADETs a lot, they had to renew shit and I helped them out. Sometimes they get denied. Out of the probably 50 or 60 I've never seen anyone charged. Just denied.

Your real life experiences mean nothing in the TDS universe.

[Androidpk]

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2016/04/02/consequences-lying-withholding-information-background-investigation/

Sure. And it is a very, very rare occurrence.

This is a political thing, plain and simple.

It's not a "political thing", it's an issue of national security. Jared Kushner should not have access to any classified information and yet here we are.

[Androidpk]

https://news.clearancejobs.com/2015/10/16/former-fox-commentator-arrested-allegedly-lying-federal-security-clearance-process/
https://news.clearancejobs.com/2015/06/15/florida-man-indicted-lying-sex-life-sf-86/

[Wrathbringer]

It's not a "political thing", it's an issue of national security. Jared Kushner should not have access to any classified information and yet here we are.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! I'M A HUGE CRYING RETARD!!!!!!!!!! WWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Gelston]

It's not a "political thing", it's an issue of national security. Jared Kushner should not have access to any classified information and yet here we are.

Jared Kushner has a security clearance because the President wanted him to have one. Security clearances and classifications derive from the executive branch. He could declassify every fucking document that exists (other than census records) and it'd be 100% legal. Again, this is purely political. Quite frankly, I'm surprised he even did an SF-86.

[Androidpk]

Jared Kushner has a security clearance because the President wanted him to have one. Security clearances and classifications derive from the executive branch. He could declassify every fucking document that exists (other than census records) and it'd be 100% legal. Again, this is purely political. Quite frankly, I'm surprised he even did an SF-86.

Just because the POTUS has the authority to do something doesn't mean it can't be questioned. At the end of the day the president is still a civil servant and not a king.

[Methais]

At the end of the day the I'm still a massive retard and not a king.

This is correct.

[Gelston]

Just because the POTUS has the authority to do something doesn't mean it can't be questioned. At the end of the day the president is still a civil servant and not a king.

Questioned and charging someone with a felony is the same thing to you huh?

[Androidpk]

Questioned and charging someone with a felony is the same thing to you huh?

Nope

[Gelston]

Nope

What exactly do you think an indictment it?

[Androidpk]

What exactly do you think an indictment it?

What does any of this have to do with Congress questioning Kushner's clearance?

[Parkbandit]

What does any of this have to do with Congress questioning Kushner's clearance?

Isn't this thread poll titled: "Jared Kushner - Is he going to get indicted?"

That doesn't sound like questioning to me.

[Androidpk]

Isn't this thread poll titled: "Jared Kushner - Is he going to get indicted?"

That doesn't sound like questioning to me.

Congress can question all they want. Congress isn't going to be the one indicting. Pay attention, troll.

[Parkbandit]

Congress can question all they want. Congress isn't going to be the one indicting. Pay attention, troll.

Where did I said Congress can't or that Congress would be indicting? You got called out for being so dumb to think that if indicted it wouldn't be political, given the lack of history of indictments for the same type of behavior.. and suddenly you were "I was just talking about Congress questioning!"

If you weren't so fucking retarded.. I'd feel badly for how this went for you.

[Androidpk]

Lack of indictments? I posted about 2 people that were arrested/indicted for lying on their SF-86.

Unlike you, I don't feel bad at all over how fucking retarded you are. Tell us again how there are only 7 Justices in the Supreme Court :lol:

Seriously though, maybe if you spent just a little less time being an obnoxious troll you'd actually learn a thing or two.

[time4fun]

Because they post it in the blotter. Plus when I was at the MFP G3 I had to deal with IMADETs a lot, they had to renew shit and I helped them out. Sometimes they get denied. Out of the probably 50 or 60 I've never seen anyone charged. Just denied.

First- I want to commend you on understanding what happens with the thousands of instances of this form being filled out every year based on 50 or 60 cases that happened in your own personal life. Also on you apparently having 50 or 60 extremely close friends, all of whom would definitely let you know about their legal troubles.

Hey guess what- I've seen thousands of people drive through traffic lights, and I've never seen anyone pulled over from one. I guess it never happens, and, if it does happen, it's for purely political reasons.

Kushner failed to disclose his meeting with a representative of the Russian government offering illegal campaign aid. And that was AFTER he amended the form- originally it didn't list any foreign contacts. Then it listed 100. And this was STILL missing. WHY do you think these laws are on the books? Seriously- have you stopped for a second to ask yourself that question? You really think it's okay to set the example that it's totally cool to leave out meetings with foreign enemies who are offering to meddle in our elections? Can you say yes to that with a straight face?

The person in charge of these says that his errors were the worst he had ever seen, and the only explanation you can come to is that the head of these background checks in a Republican administration is clearly resorting to political bias if he refers the most extreme case of errors he has ever seen- filled out by another member of the same Republican administration- for prosecution?

Seriously- did this argument actually seem like a good one to you? Because if so....you really shouldn't be calling other people stupid. Like ever.

[time4fun]

Lack of indictments? I posted about 2 people that were arrested/indicted for lying on their SF-86.

Unlike you, I don't feel bad at all over how fucking retarded you are. Tell us again how there are only 7 Justices in the Supreme Court :lol:

Seriously though, maybe if you spent just a little less time being an obnoxious troll you'd actually learn a thing or two.

That moment when you realize that these people are too stupid to realize that they're stupid and too ignorant to realize they don't understand anything they're talking about.

[Fortybox]

First- I want to commend you on understanding what happens with the thousands of instances of this form being filled out every year based on 50 or 60 cases that happened in your own personal life. Also on you apparently having 50 or 60 extremely close friends, all of whom would definitely let you know about their legal troubles.

Hey guess what- I've seen thousands of people drive through traffic lights, and I've never seen anyone pulled over from one. I guess it never happens, and, if it does happen, it's for purely political reasons.

Kushner failed to disclose his meeting with a representative of the Russian government offering illegal campaign aid. And that was AFTER he amended the form- originally it didn't list any foreign contacts. Then it listed 100. And this was STILL missing. WHY do you think these laws are on the books? Seriously- have you stopped for a second to ask yourself that question? You really think it's okay to set the example that it's totally cool to leave out meetings with foreign enemies who are offering to meddle in our elections? Can you say yes to that with a straight face?

The person in charge of these says that his errors were the worst he had ever seen, and the only explanation you can come to is that the head of these background checks in a Republican administration is clearly resorting to political bias if he refers the most extreme case of errors he has ever seen- filled out by another member of the same Republican administration- for prosecution?

Seriously- did this argument actually seem like a good one to you? Because if so....you really shouldn't be calling other people stupid. Like ever.

Someone lost their job and has too much time on their hands.

[Neveragain]

First- I want to commend you on understanding what happens with the thousands of instances of this form being filled out every year based on 50 or 60 cases that happened in your own personal life. Also on you apparently having 50 or 60 extremely close friends, all of whom would definitely let you know about their legal troubles.

Hey guess what- I've seen thousands of people drive through traffic lights, and I've never seen anyone pulled over from one. I guess it never happens, and, if it does happen, it's for purely political reasons.

Kushner failed to disclose his meeting with a representative of the Russian government offering illegal campaign aid. And that was AFTER he amended the form- originally it didn't list any foreign contacts. Then it listed 100. And this was STILL missing. WHY do you think these laws are on the books? Seriously- have you stopped for a second to ask yourself that question? You really think it's okay to set the example that it's totally cool to leave out meetings with foreign enemies who are offering to meddle in our elections? Can you say yes to that with a straight face?

The person in charge of these says that his errors were the worst he had ever seen, and the only explanation you can come to is that the head of these background checks in a Republican administration is clearly resorting to political bias if he refers the most extreme case of errors he has ever seen- filled out by another member of the same Republican administration- for prosecution?

Seriously- did this argument actually seem like a good one to you? Because if so....you really shouldn't be calling other people stupid. Like ever.

Offering illegal campaign aid?

Has this been been confirmed? Last I knew this has yet to be proven, of course I have been paying little attention to it as I have no reason to care. The improved economy alone has proven that Trump was the best candidate in 2016.

[Tgo01]

First- I want to commend you on understanding what happens with the thousands of instances of this form being filled out every year based on 50 or 60 cases that happened in your own personal life. Also on you apparently having 50 or 60 extremely close friends, all of whom would definitely let you know about their legal troubles.

Hey guess what- I've seen thousands of people drive through traffic lights, and I've never seen anyone pulled over from one. I guess it never happens, and, if it does happen, it's for purely political reasons.

To think time4fun actually thinks this is a good analogy. It's mind blowing.

[Tgo01]

That moment when you realize that these people are too stupid to realize that they're stupid and too ignorant to realize they don't understand anything they're talking about.

"I'm soooooo smart and you all are sooooo stupid!"

Hey didn't you call Androidpk himself stupid just a few days ago? And he totally pretended like it never happened because he's such a beta cuck?

[Tgo01]

Lack of indictments? I posted about 2 people that were arrested/indicted for lying on their SF-86.

Oh wow a whole 2! That proves this isn't a political witch hunt!

Hey, guys! A whole TWO people have been indicted for this before! A WHOLE 2!

Yeah, you're just about the most retarded person to ever live if you think this proves it isn't political to go after Kushner for this.

[time4fun]

Offering illegal campaign aid?

Has this been been confirmed? Last I knew this has yet to be proven, of course I have been paying little attention to it as I have no reason to care. The improved economy alone has proven that Trump was the best candidate in 2016.

Yeah this was established like a year and a half ago. It's illegal to accept or solicit anything of value for your campaign from a foreign government. The Trump Tower meeting in which they were offered aid by the Russian government in the form of hacked Clinton emails, in return for lessening sanctions- remember that? The email about the meeting clearly offered campaign help from the Russian government, and they took the meeting instead of, you know, informing the FBI.

The act of accepting that meeting was a violation of one of the most important Federal campaign laws- regardless of whether or not they got aid afterwards (spoiler alert- they clearly did).

Also, it's really great that you think it's okay to sell our elections out to foreign governments in exchange for a strong economy. Sorry, not great- I meant to type "disgusting".

But, as usual, you are demonstrating a breathtaking lack of understanding of the world around you. First, we were on an Obama budget until September of 2017. So all of that growth you suddenly started touting in 2017? Yeah that had nothing to do with Trump. Now let's look at the economy over the last few years:


The unemployment rate?
It's been on a continuous upward climb since 2010. Here's how many jobs were created over the last few years:

2018: 2.6m <--- First year of full Trump-era budget
2017: 2.2m <---last year of Obama-era budget
2016: 2.24m
2015: 2.7m
2014: 3m

So we're clear- 2018 was nothing more than a continuation of am 8 year trend that started under Obama.
(https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2018/10/30/two-charts-show-trumps-job-gains-are-just-a-continuation-from-obamas-presidency/#167d70951af3)

Stock Market Growth?

The stock market has been on an overall upward climb since 2009. Trump didn't do anything that magically made it increase. Beyond that, market performance in Trump's first two years in office have underperformed relative to Obama's first two years. (https://twitter.com/crampell/status/1074832540677091328)

Of course, Presidents generally have very little impact on the market. Obama is one exception- because of the heavy bailouts/government investment in the economy that helped get things back up and running again. Trump is actually another exception -with his constant threat of stoking international trade wars.

So it's probably not surprising that Dec of 2018 (the end of the first full year on a Trump budget) was the worst closing month for Dow since the Great Depression, and that 2018 was the worst performing year since the financial crisis. (https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-news-on-track-worst-december-since-great-depression-2018-12-1027837251)

GDP is the one metric that Trump doesn't come out looking terrible on in the economy, but even that has more or less been in range of the GDP growth we've had over the last 6 or so years. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/188165/annual-gdp-growth-of-the-united-states-since-1990/)

Does it bother you that so many of your opinions absolutely rely on you being abjectly ignorant of reality?

[Tgo01]

Look at time4fun giving Obama credit for 2017. I'm surprised she isn't STILL giving him credit. Oh wait, the stock market rebounded and is only 1000 points off from the all time high, does this mean we give Obama for the stock market again?

[Neveragain]

It's illegal to accept or solicit anything of value for your campaign from a foreign government

I was still under the assumption that they are still deciding if this has actual value. I know me as a voter, if the information being provided showed Hillary Clinton being the shit bag human being that she is, I don't really care who provided it. Let's not forget at minimum, Hillary hijacked the Democrat nomination.

I really wish you, PK and Back would just accept that Hillary Clinton is why you lost the election. Quit trying to out communist each other and accept people like their money better than your retardation. I really do pray for you retards but as your TDS grows you test my belief in baby jesus.

[Wrathbringer]

Yeah this was established like a year and a half ago. It's illegal to accept or solicit anything of value for your campaign from a foreign government. The Trump Tower meeting in which they were offered aid by the Russian government in the form of hacked Clinton emails, in return for lessening sanctions- remember that? The email about the meeting clearly offered campaign help from the Russian government, and they took the meeting instead of, you know, informing the FBI.

The act of accepting that meeting was a violation of one of the most important Federal campaign laws- regardless of whether or not they got aid afterwards (spoiler alert- they clearly did).

Also, it's really great that you think it's okay to sell our elections out to foreign governments in exchange for a strong economy. Sorry, not great- I meant to type "disgusting".

But, as usual, you are demonstrating a breathtaking lack of understanding of the world around you. First, we were on an Obama budget until September of 2017. So all of that growth you suddenly started touting in 2017? Yeah that had nothing to do with Trump. Now let's look at the economy over the last few years:


The unemployment rate?
It's been on a continuous upward climb since 2010. Here's how many jobs were created over the last few years:

2018: 2.6m <--- First year of full Trump-era budget
2017: 2.2m <---last year of Obama-era budget
2016: 2.24m
2015: 2.7m
2014: 3m

So we're clear- 2018 was nothing more than a continuation of am 8 year trend that started under Obama.
(https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2018/10/30/two-charts-show-trumps-job-gains-are-just-a-continuation-from-obamas-presidency/#167d70951af3)

Stock Market Growth?

The stock market has been on an overall upward climb since 2009. Trump didn't do anything that magically made it increase. Beyond that, market performance in Trump's first two years in office have underperformed relative to Obama's first two years. (https://twitter.com/crampell/status/1074832540677091328)

Of course, Presidents generally have very little impact on the market. Obama is one exception- because of the heavy bailouts/government investment in the economy that helped get things back up and running again. Trump is actually another exception -with his constant threat of stoking international trade wars.

So it's probably not surprising that Dec of 2018 (the end of the first full year on a Trump budget) was the worst closing month for Dow since the Great Depression, and that 2018 was the worst performing year since the financial crisis. (https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-news-on-track-worst-december-since-great-depression-2018-12-1027837251)

GDP is the one metric that Trump doesn't come out looking terrible on in the economy, but even that has more or less been in range of the GDP growth we've had over the last 6 or so years. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/188165/annual-gdp-growth-of-the-united-states-since-1990/)

Does it bother you that so many of your opinions absolutely rely on you being abjectly ignorant of reality?

Doesn't seem to bother you. The reality is that you're a hugely butthurt tard. You're welcome.

[Wrathbringer]

Look at time4fun giving Obama credit for 2017. I'm surprised she isn't STILL giving him credit. Oh wait, the stock market rebounded and is only 1000 points off from the all time high, does this mean we give Obama for the stock market again?

I guess she also attributes economic gains during obummer's term to Bush's policies, so I guess we should be thanking Bush for all this current growth, right, time4dung? :jerkit:

[Gelston]

First- I want to commend you on understanding what happens with the thousands of instances of this form being filled out every year based on 50 or 60 cases that happened in your own personal life. Also on you apparently having 50 or 60 extremely close friends, all of whom would definitely let you know about their legal troubles.

Hey guess what- I've seen thousands of people drive through traffic lights, and I've never seen anyone pulled over from one. I guess it never happens, and, if it does happen, it's for purely political reasons.

Kushner failed to disclose his meeting with a representative of the Russian government offering illegal campaign aid. And that was AFTER he amended the form- originally it didn't list any foreign contacts. Then it listed 100. And this was STILL missing. WHY do you think these laws are on the books? Seriously- have you stopped for a second to ask yourself that question? You really think it's okay to set the example that it's totally cool to leave out meetings with foreign enemies who are offering to meddle in our elections? Can you say yes to that with a straight face?

The person in charge of these says that his errors were the worst he had ever seen, and the only explanation you can come to is that the head of these background checks in a Republican administration is clearly resorting to political bias if he refers the most extreme case of errors he has ever seen- filled out by another member of the same Republican administration- for prosecution?

Seriously- did this argument actually seem like a good one to you? Because if so....you really shouldn't be calling other people stupid. Like ever.

I mean, I posted a link from a guy that did thousands and he said it is also very, very rare, but go ahead and continue to be retarded. My knowledge on the issue is 10000x more than yours.

And the blotter covered the entire Marine Corps. That is every, single person charged. Not just guys I helped out. Never saw one for fraudulent information on an SF-86 and I read that fucker every morning. Because I had a boring job at the G3. Unlike you, I'm not creating my work experiences with shit out of thin air. Now, I'm not claiming I was a security manager or some shit, but yeah. Blotter.

[Androidpk]

Oh wow a whole 2! That proves this isn't a political witch hunt!

Hey, guys! A whole TWO people have been indicted for this before! A WHOLE 2!

Yeah, you're just about the most retarded person to ever live if you think this proves it isn't political to go after Kushner for this.

Weird, you criticized Hillary for being negligent with classified information but the moment a Republican does the same or worse you scream witch hunt. When are you going to start holding your party accountable instead of pretending they can do no wrong?

[Tgo01]

Weird, you criticized Hillary for being negligent with classified information but the moment a Republican does the same or worse you scream witch hunt.

You're comparing being accused of lying or omitting information on some form to be the same or worse as storing classified information on your bathroom server? Your comment is especially dumb because Hillary was never indicted, just like literally everyone on the PC BUT you said would happen.

How do you get more and more retarded with each passing day? You would think there would be a point where a human couldn't possibly get any dumber, but somehow you manage to defy all expectations. Amazing.

[Androidpk]

You're comparing being accused of lying or omitting information on some form to be the same or worse as storing classified information on your bathroom server? Your comment is especially dumb because Hillary was never indicted, just like literally everyone on the PC BUT you said would happen.

How do you get more and more retarded with each passing day? You would think there would be a point where a human couldn't possibly get any dumber, but somehow you manage to defy all expectations. Amazing.

Yes, I'm comparing the Secretary of State having a private server in her house to a senior White House advisor who was denied a security clearance because the CIA/FBI considered him a huge risk, and yet was granted a TS clearance just because he's the President's son in law. That's not even including the chatter that he handed over classified information to MBS. But once again all you have is deflections and ad hominem attacks. Predictable as always Tgo. Sad.

[Wrathbringer]

Yes, I'm comparing the Secretary of State having a private server in her house to a senior White House advisor who was denied a security clearance because the CIA/FBI considered him a huge risk, and yet was granted a TS clearance just because he's the President's son in law. That's not even including the chatter that he handed over classified information to MBS. But once again all you have is deflections and ad hominem attacks. Predictable as always Tgo. Sad.

You're stupid. Extremely stupid. Get a life and do something besides posting retardation on pc.

[Tgo01]

That's not even including the chatter that he handed over classified information to MBS.

"Chatter." Does time4fun promise to anally violate you extra well if you embarrass yourself on the PC every day? Is this your special kink?

[Androidpk]

"Chatter." Does time4fun promise to anally violate you extra well if you embarrass yourself on the PC every day? Is this your special kink?

Want me to go back and link all the times you've posted about chatter and rumors? Or is this more of the "it's okay when I do something but not others." Only one embarrassing themselves is you. You do nothing but troll and attack posters for what they say. It's old and lame.

[Androidpk]

https://theintercept.com/2018/03/21/jared-kushner-saudi-crown-prince-mohammed-bin-salman/

https://www.businessinsider.com/saudi-crown-prince-jared-kushner-relationship-2018-3

[LaVerdad]

Weird, you criticized Hillary for being negligent with classified information but the moment a Republican does the same or worse you scream witch hunt. When are you going to start holding your party accountable instead of pretending they can do no wrong?

Did you advocate for Hillary being prosecuted? I missed those posts :(

[Methais]

First- I want to commend you on understanding what happens with the thousands of instances of this form being filled out every year based on 50 or 60 cases that happened in your own personal life. Also on you apparently having 50 or 60 extremely close friends, all of whom would definitely let you know about their legal troubles.

Hey guess what- I've seen thousands of people drive through traffic lights, and I've never seen anyone pulled over from one. I guess it never happens, and, if it does happen, it's for purely political reasons.

Kushner failed to disclose his meeting with a representative of the Russian government offering illegal campaign aid. And that was AFTER he amended the form- originally it didn't list any foreign contacts. Then it listed 100. And this was STILL missing. WHY do you think these laws are on the books? Seriously- have you stopped for a second to ask yourself that question? You really think it's okay to set the example that it's totally cool to leave out meetings with foreign enemies who are offering to meddle in our elections? Can you say yes to that with a straight face?

The person in charge of these says that his errors were the worst he had ever seen, and the only explanation you can come to is that the head of these background checks in a Republican administration is clearly resorting to political bias if he refers the most extreme case of errors he has ever seen- filled out by another member of the same Republican administration- for prosecution?

Seriously- did this argument actually seem like a good one to you? Because if so....you really shouldn't be calling other people stupid. Like ever.

You're a retarded twatmonster. The blue waffle kind.


That moment when you realize that these people are too stupid to realize that they're stupid and too ignorant to realize they don't understand anything they're talking about.

This is the ultimate irony coming from you and your blue waffle.


Look at time4fun giving Obama credit for 2017. I'm surprised she isn't STILL giving him credit. Oh wait, the stock market rebounded and is only 1000 points off from the all time high, does this mean we give Obama for the stock market again?

It's funny because anytime the stock market goes down they're the first ones to be like OMG TRUMP IS RUINING THE ECONOMY SEE WE TOLD YOU THIS WOULD HAPPEN BUT YOU IDIOTS WOULDN'T LISTEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Then 2 days later it goes back up and they're like LOL @ U IDIOTS GIVING TRUMP CREDIT FOR OBAMA'S POLICIES THAT HAVE THE ECONOMY BOOMING!!!!!!!!!

I'm sure there's more mental illness happening than just TDS with these retards. Especially the supertards like time4bluewaffle.

[Tgo01]

Want me to go back and link all the times you've posted about chatter and rumors? Or is this more of the "it's okay when I do something but not others." Only one embarrassing themselves is you. You do nothing but troll and attack posters for what they say. It's old and lame.

See how Androidpk mixes up his crazy, time4fun? First he posts some outlandish bullshit, then deflects to Hillary for no real reason, now he's engaging in his patented "NOU!" style of "comebacks."

Learn from him, time4fun, entertain us with your crazy. Don't just stick to "Me so smart and you so stupid!"

[Gelston]

Did you advocate for Hillary being prosecuted? I missed those posts :(

He did. And he wouldn't stfu about Hillary for months.

[Methais]

I mean, I posted a link from a guy that did thousands and he said it is also very, very rare, but go ahead and continue to be retarded. My knowledge on the issue is 10000x more than yours.

In before time4fupa pulls a new PhD out of her pocket.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-PY7Op2r53M/hqdefault.jpg

[LaVerdad]

He did. And he wouldn't stfu about Hillary for months.

Well, that's good then. I agree, she should have been prosecuted, Kushner too if he did the same. Everyone should be treated the same, or the laws changed.

[Stumplicker]

In before time4fupa pulls a new PhD out of her pocket.

This is completely unrelated..well, mostly. But remember that scene in Spies Like Us where all the doctors greet each other a hundred times? Vishra's 700 fake degrees reminded me of that, but my question is....when Dan Aykroyd accidentally killed that Pashtun man in the following scene...is he now a retroactive terrorist-fighting hero?

[Methais]

"Chatter." Does time4fun promise to anally violate you extra well if you embarrass yourself on the PC every day? Is this your special kink?

https://i.imgur.com/N5xWyFm.png

[Parkbandit]

Yeah this was established like a year and a half ago. It's illegal to accept or solicit anything of value for your campaign from a foreign government. The Trump Tower meeting in which they were offered aid by the Russian government in the form of hacked Clinton emails, in return for lessening sanctions- remember that? The email about the meeting clearly offered campaign help from the Russian government, and they took the meeting instead of, you know, informing the FBI.

The act of accepting that meeting was a violation of one of the most important Federal campaign laws- regardless of whether or not they got aid afterwards (spoiler alert- they clearly did).

Also, it's really great that you think it's okay to sell our elections out to foreign governments in exchange for a strong economy. Sorry, not great- I meant to type "disgusting".

But, as usual, you are demonstrating a breathtaking lack of understanding of the world around you. First, we were on an Obama budget until September of 2017. So all of that growth you suddenly started touting in 2017? Yeah that had nothing to do with Trump. Now let's look at the economy over the last few years:


The unemployment rate?
It's been on a continuous upward climb since 2010. Here's how many jobs were created over the last few years:

2018: 2.6m <--- First year of full Trump-era budget
2017: 2.2m <---last year of Obama-era budget
2016: 2.24m
2015: 2.7m
2014: 3m

So we're clear- 2018 was nothing more than a continuation of am 8 year trend that started under Obama.
(https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2018/10/30/two-charts-show-trumps-job-gains-are-just-a-continuation-from-obamas-presidency/#167d70951af3)

Stock Market Growth?

The stock market has been on an overall upward climb since 2009. Trump didn't do anything that magically made it increase. Beyond that, market performance in Trump's first two years in office have underperformed relative to Obama's first two years. (https://twitter.com/crampell/status/1074832540677091328)

Of course, Presidents generally have very little impact on the market. Obama is one exception- because of the heavy bailouts/government investment in the economy that helped get things back up and running again. Trump is actually another exception -with his constant threat of stoking international trade wars.

So it's probably not surprising that Dec of 2018 (the end of the first full year on a Trump budget) was the worst closing month for Dow since the Great Depression, and that 2018 was the worst performing year since the financial crisis. (https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-news-on-track-worst-december-since-great-depression-2018-12-1027837251)

GDP is the one metric that Trump doesn't come out looking terrible on in the economy, but even that has more or less been in range of the GDP growth we've had over the last 6 or so years. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/188165/annual-gdp-growth-of-the-united-states-since-1990/)

Does it bother you that so many of your opinions absolutely rely on you being abjectly ignorant of reality?

Oh honey....


In the field of psychology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology), the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias) in which people of low ability have illusory superiority (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority) and mistakenly assess their cognitive ability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognition) as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority comes from the inability of low-ability people to recognize their lack of ability. Without the self-awareness (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-awareness) of metacognition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacognition), low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their competence or incompetence

ROFL

And just so we're clear..

"2018 was nothing more than a continuation of am 8 year trend that started under Obama." and "2018 was the worst performing year since the financial crisis." leads me to believe that you blame Obama for the worst performing year since the financial crisis?

I don't agree. Obama left office in January 2017.. let him just stay there.

[Parkbandit]

Weird, you criticized Hillary for being negligent with classified information but the moment a Republican does the same or worse you scream witch hunt. When are you going to start holding your party accountable instead of pretending they can do no wrong?

How, specifically, was Jared Kushner negligent with classified information again?

Stop trying to out dumb time4dum. When she's on her game.. it can't be done.

And today, she's on her game.

[Androidpk]

See how Androidpk mixes up his crazy, time4fun? First he posts some outlandish bullshit, then deflects to Hillary for no real reason, now he's engaging in his patented "NOU!" style of "comebacks."

Learn from him, time4fun, entertain us with your crazy. Don't just stick to "Me so smart and you so stupid!"


Rumor has it that Chicago police have known for over a week the identities of the persons of interest caught on video i the Jussie Smollett attack, and they have reason to believe the entire thing was staged.


Rumor has it that the woman who accused Fairfax of rape has hired Ford's legal team.

You were saying, troll?

[Androidpk]

Officials and staffers in the U.S. embassy in Riyadh said they were not read in on the details of Jared Kushner’s trip to Saudi Arabia or the meetings he held with members of the country’s royal court last week, according to three sources with knowledge of the trip. And that’s causing concern not only in the embassy but also among members of Congress.

On his trip to the Middle East, Kushner stopped in Riyadh. While there, he met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and King Salman to discuss U.S.-Saudi cooperation, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and economic investment in the region, according to the White House.

But no one from the embassy in Riyadh was in the meetings, according to those same sources. The State Department did have a senior official in attendance, but he was not part of the State Department team in Saudi. He is a senior member of the department focused on Iran, according to a source with direct knowledge of the official’s presence in Riyadh.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/embassy-staffers-say-jared-kushner-shut-them-out-of-saudi-meetings?source=twitter&via=desktop?ref=home

Just like with Trump meeting with Putin alone this is not acceptable, especially considering the recent developments of the Trump administration trying to bypass regulations to give Saudi Arabia highly sensitive nuclear technology.

[Methais]

Officials and staffers in the U.S. embassy in Riyadh said they were not read in on the details of Jared Kushner’s trip to Saudi Arabia or the meetings he held with members of the country’s royal court last week, according to three sources with knowledge of the trip. And that’s causing concern not only in the embassy but also among members of Congress.

On his trip to the Middle East, Kushner stopped in Riyadh. While there, he met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and King Salman to discuss U.S.-Saudi cooperation, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and economic investment in the region, according to the White House.

But no one from the embassy in Riyadh was in the meetings, according to those same sources. The State Department did have a senior official in attendance, but he was not part of the State Department team in Saudi. He is a senior member of the department focused on Iran, according to a source with direct knowledge of the official’s presence in Riyadh.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/embassy-staffers-say-jared-kushner-shut-them-out-of-saudi-meetings?source=twitter&via=desktop?ref=home

Just like with Trump meeting with Putin alone this is not acceptable, especially considering the recent developments of the Trump administration trying to bypass regulations to give Saudi Arabia highly sensitive nuclear technology.

OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG THIS IS IT FOR KUSHNER AND THEN HE'S GONNA SERVE TRUMP UP ON A SILVER PLATTER AND GET HIM AND PENCE IMPEACHED AND THEN PRESIDENT PELOSI WILL SAVE US ALL OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Parkbandit]

Officials and staffers in the U.S. embassy in Riyadh said they were not read in on the details of Jared Kushner’s trip to Saudi Arabia or the meetings he held with members of the country’s royal court last week, according to three sources with knowledge of the trip. And that’s causing concern not only in the embassy but also among members of Congress.

On his trip to the Middle East, Kushner stopped in Riyadh. While there, he met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and King Salman to discuss U.S.-Saudi cooperation, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and economic investment in the region, according to the White House.

But no one from the embassy in Riyadh was in the meetings, according to those same sources. The State Department did have a senior official in attendance, but he was not part of the State Department team in Saudi. He is a senior member of the department focused on Iran, according to a source with direct knowledge of the official’s presence in Riyadh.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/embassy-staffers-say-jared-kushner-shut-them-out-of-saudi-meetings?source=twitter&via=desktop?ref=home

Just like with Trump meeting with Putin alone this is not acceptable, especially considering the recent developments of the Trump administration trying to bypass regulations to give Saudi Arabia highly sensitive nuclear technology.

The daily beast?

Dude.. I'm embarrassed for you at this point.

[Androidpk]

The daily beast?

Dude.. I'm embarrassed for you at this point.

Be embarrassed over thinking there were only 7 judges on the Supreme Court. Parkbandit spends all his time on the PC calling people idiots and dumbasses.. turns out he's the stupidest one here!

[Methais]

Parkbandit spends all his time on the PC calling people idiots and dumbasses.. turns out he's the stupidest one here!

No one except maybe Backlash or time4fun could take that title away from you.

PS: Try logging out once in a while. There's a whole world out there for you to try and get free stuff from without having to take monster dildos up your ass in exchange for.

[Tgo01]

Be embarrassed over thinking there were only 7 judges on the Supreme Court. Parkbandit spends all his time on the PC calling people idiots and dumbasses.. turns out he's the stupidest one here!

Okay Mr. "Democrats had the biggest election win in 40 decades."

[Methais]

Okay Mr. "Democrats had the biggest election win in 40 decades."


If I had any self respect, I'd be embarrassed over me saying Democrats had the biggest election win in 40 decades when the US hasn't even existed for 40 decades. I spend all my time on the PC calling people idiots and dumbasses.. turns out I'm the stupidest one here!

Yes.

[Androidpk]

Okay Mr. "Democrats had the biggest election win in 40 decades."

Rumor has it you and your bf parkbandit are a couple of useless internet trolls.

[Methais]

Rumor has it you and your bf parkbandit are a couple of useless internet trolls.

Fact has it that you're a creepy stalker pile of garbage covered in cat piss that is incapable of any original thoughts.

[LaVerdad]

I prefer the term sealion to troll.

[Tgo01]

Rumor has it you and your bf parkbandit are a couple of useless internet trolls.

Someone sounds angry.

[Androidpk]

Someone sounds angry.

Someone's project. Again.

[Methais]

That's just me projecting. Again.

This is correct.

[Androidpk]

And once again the deranged Trump cultists gotta spam every political thread with their trolling.

[Methais]

Me:
https://media.giphy.com/media/Gt4FaBEFngjL2/giphy.gif

https://media.giphy.com/media/MedY19R13SECc/giphy.gif

[Parkbandit]

Rumor has it you and your bf parkbandit are a couple of useless internet trolls.

#5: "OMG UR GAY!"

Stay the same, useless lump of shit you've always been. Never, ever change.

[~Rocktar~]

And once again the deranged Trump cultists gotta spam every political thread with their trolling.


https://youtu.be/1Y3FzVQi-R8