PDA

View Full Version : Romney



ClydeR
01-01-2019, 08:41 PM
I was wondering if Romney would be a quiet hard working Senator or an outspoken troublemaker. He answered that question in his op-ed in today's Washington Post..


The Trump presidency made a deep descent in December. The departures of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly, the appointment of senior persons of lesser experience, the abandonment of allies who fight beside us, and the president’s thoughtless claim that America has long been a “sucker” in world affairs all defined his presidency down.

It is well known that Donald Trump was not my choice for the Republican presidential nomination. After he became the nominee, I hoped his campaign would refrain from resentment and name-calling. It did not. When he won the election, I hoped he would rise to the occasion. His early appointments of Rex Tillerson, Jeff Sessions, Nikki Haley, Gary Cohn, H.R. McMaster, Kelly and Mattis were encouraging. But, on balance, his conduct over the past two years, particularly his actions this month, is evidence that the president has not risen to the mantle of the office.

More... (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-romney-the-president-shapes-the-public-character-of-the-nation-trumps-character-falls-short/2019/01/01/37a3c8c2-0d1a-11e9-8938-5898adc28fa2_story.html)

Wrathbringer
01-01-2019, 08:44 PM
I was wondering if Romney would be a quiet hard working Senator or an outspoken troublemaker. He answered that question in his op-ed in today's Washington Post..

No one cares what losers think. I'm referring to both Romney and you.

Fortybox
01-01-2019, 08:52 PM
No one cares what losers think. I'm referring to both Romney and you.

Romney is a moron. I can't believe Utah elected him.

Androidpk
01-01-2019, 08:53 PM
I was wondering if Romney would be a quiet hard working Senator or an outspoken troublemaker. He answered that question in his op-ed in today's Washington Post..

So how many Republican challengers are going after Trump in 2020? ROmney, Corker, Flake.. Rubio?

Gelston
01-01-2019, 09:58 PM
So how many Republican challengers are going after Trump in 2020? ROmney, Corker, Flake.. Rubio?

None. Dont be a retard.

Androidpk
01-01-2019, 10:03 PM
None. Dont be a retard.

You're actually dumb enough to think no one is going to try and primary the country's worst POTUS ever.

Tgo01
01-01-2019, 10:09 PM
You're actually dumb enough to think no one is going to try and primary the country's worst POTUS ever.

Sure there will be challengers, I think Obama had like 50 in 2012. The thing is there will be no serious challengers.

Androidpk
01-01-2019, 10:21 PM
Trump has 18 ongoing criminal investigations and it's only going to increase before 2020. He's done. The MAGA experiment has been a total flop.

Tgo01
01-01-2019, 10:27 PM
Trump has 18 ongoing criminal investigations and it's only going to increase before 2020. He's done. The MAGA experiment has been a total flop.

k

Guess we can go ahead and chalk this up as yet another failed prediction by Androidpk.

time4fun
01-01-2019, 10:32 PM
Trump has 18 ongoing criminal investigations and it's only going to increase before 2020. He's done. The MAGA experiment has been a total flop.

It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out, but Romney's op-ed is definitely noteworthy. The wheels are genuinely starting to come off of the bus. Senate Republicans are ducking for cover, for the most part, and not being particularly supportive of Trump right now. There have been House Republicans on CNN lambasting Trump in a way I haven't seen in two years, and even Fox News has been slowly weaving in some critical coverage of Trump.

And then there's Romney.

The reality of the situation is that Romney's op-ed is a very public bet that Trump and Trumpism (whatever that may be) are both on their way out. This op-ed is clearly about Presidential positioning, but, at it's core- it's also him jumping off of what he sees as a sinking ship. The way this stuff works is it starts off as a slow- but steady- trickle, and then- overnight- turns into a flash flood. That's the direction things are heading in as of this moment.

Wrathbringer
01-01-2019, 10:37 PM
Trump has 18 ongoing criminal investigations and it's only going to increase before 2020. He's done. The MAGA experiment has been a total flop.

You're retarded.


It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out, but Romney's op-ed is definitely noteworthy. The wheels are genuinely starting to come off of the bus. Senate Republicans are ducking for cover, for the most part, and not being particularly supportive of Trump right now. There have been House Republicans on CNN lambasting Trump in a way I haven't seen in two years, and even Fox News has been slowly weaving in some critical coverage of Trump.

And then there's Romney.

The reality of the situation is that Romney's op-ed is a very public bet that Trump and Trumpism (whatever that may be) are both on their way out. This op-ed is clearly about Presidential positioning, but, at it's core- it's also him jumping off of what he sees as a sinking ship. The way this stuff works is it starts off as a slow- but steady- trickle, and then- overnight- turns into a flash flood. That's the direction things are heading in as of this moment.

You're retarded.

Wrathbringer
01-01-2019, 10:40 PM
Romney is a moron. I can't believe Utah elected him.

They're mormon, which is only one letter away from moron. Coincidence?

time4fun
01-01-2019, 10:41 PM
So how many Republican challengers are going after Trump in 2020? ROmney, Corker, Flake.. Rubio?

If there's any silver lining to the erosion of our democratic norms that this maniac and his adherents have ushered in- it's that the messenger is as deeply flawed as it gets. Hopefully when Trump goes down in flames he pulls the most cancerous parts of the Republican party and its rising embrace of authoritarianism/rejection of democracy down with him.

The current incarnation of the Republican party has become dangerous, but maybe- just maybe- Trump will inadvertently create a much-needed reset. If the Romneys, Corkers, and Flakes inherit the GOP- our democracy will live through all of this. Had someone else played Trump- someone who wasn't as deeply incompetent and obviously corrupt as he is- we might not be able to stop the country from becoming the next Hungary or Poland.

Wrathbringer
01-01-2019, 10:47 PM
If there's any silver lining to the erosion of our democratic norms that this maniac and his adherents have ushered in- it's that the messenger is as deeply flawed as it gets. Hopefully when Trump goes down in flames he pulls the most cancerous parts of the Republican party and its rising embrace of authoritarianism/rejection of democracy down with him.

The current incarnation of the Republican party has become dangerous, but maybe- just maybe- Trump will inadvertently create a much-needed reset. If the Romneys, Corkers, and Flakes inherit the GOP- our democracy will live through all of this. Had someone else played Trump- someone who wasn't as deeply incompetent and obviously corrupt as he is- we might not be able to stop the country from becoming the next Hungary or Poland.

ROFL oh honey you're retarded.

Androidpk
01-01-2019, 11:12 PM
It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out, but Romney's op-ed is definitely noteworthy. The wheels are genuinely starting to come off of the bus. Senate Republicans are ducking for cover, for the most part, and not being particularly supportive of Trump right now. There have been House Republicans on CNN lambasting Trump in a way I haven't seen in two years, and even Fox News has been slowly weaving in some critical coverage of Trump.

And then there's Romney.

The reality of the situation is that Romney's op-ed is a very public bet that Trump and Trumpism (whatever that may be) are both on their way out. This op-ed is clearly about Presidential positioning, but, at it's core- it's also him jumping off of what he sees as a sinking ship. The way this stuff works is it starts off as a slow- but steady- trickle, and then- overnight- turns into a flash flood. That's the direction things are heading in as of this moment.

Trump has no political capital left, he's toast.

time4fun
01-01-2019, 11:25 PM
Trump has no political capital left, he's toast.

I don't know if I'd go that far. Fear of primary season is still alive and well. If Trump were truly out of political capital, he'd be on his way out the door- and not voluntarily.

I suspect we'll know he's out of political capital when the Koars, PBs, and Tgos of the board start loudly, and regularly "reminding" us all that they were never really Trump fans- they just liked a few things he said.

But when someone like Romney- who has clear Presidential aspirations- is willing to bet the farm against Trump in such a public way...it does feel less of a question of "if" and more a question of "when".

Tgo01
01-01-2019, 11:34 PM
I suspect we'll know he's out of political capital when the Koars, PBs, and Tgos of the board start loudly, and regularly "reminding" us all that they were never really Trump fans- they just liked a few things he said.

Why do you lie so much when only Androidpk believes your lies anymore? I was very vocal on LNet and on the PC that I wasn't much of a Trump fan during the election and even stated that had ANYONE else been the Democrat nominee (even Sanders) that I would have supported them. So the fact that I would "remind" you that I was never a Trump fan is just about the dumbest thing you could claim considering I wasn't a fan of his at all during the election.

He has done a surprisingly large number of things I like and I like the fact that he has stuck to his campaign promises, unlike past presidents.

I will say this; if he hasn't yet started building the wall or at least secured funding to start building the wall by the time the 2020 election rolls around I probably won't vote for him. He's done a lot of good but I feel the main thing people wanted with their vote for him was tougher border security. So he better find a way to make it happen because I think a lot of people will not support him if he doesn't.

Fortybox
01-01-2019, 11:39 PM
Why do you lie so much when only Androidpk believes your lies anymore? I was very vocal on LNet and on the PC that I wasn't much of a Trump fan during the election and even stated that had ANYONE else been the Democrat nominee (even Sanders) that I would have supported them. So the fact that I would "remind" you that I was never a Trump fan is just about the dumbest thing you could claim considering I wasn't a fan of his at all during the election.

He has done a surprisingly large number of things I like and I like the fact that he has stuck to his campaign promises, unlike past presidents.

I will say this; if he hasn't yet started building the wall or at least secured funding to start building the wall by the time the 2020 election rolls around I probably won't vote for him. He's done a lot of good but I feel the main thing people wanted with their vote for him was tougher border security. So he better find a way to make it happen because I think a lot of people will not support him if he doesn't.

Most of us on here didn't support him in the primaries. I was a Cruz guy myself.

But between a Trump vs. Hillary? C'mon. Warren? LOL. You're insane if you even thought about Sanders but I forgive you.

Time4fun would have voted for anyone with a 'D' next to their name. If PB was the Democratic nominee she would have voted for him. If Trump was the Democratic nominee she would be all in support of him. She is party first - liberal rhetoric first.

Tgo01
01-02-2019, 12:17 AM
Most of us on here didn't support him in the primaries. I was a Cruz guy myself.

But between a Trump vs. Hillary? C'mon. Warren? LOL. You're insane if you even thought about Sanders but I forgive you.

Time4fun would have voted for anyone with a 'D' next to their name. If PB was the Democratic nominee she would have voted for him. If Trump was the Democratic nominee she would be all in support of him. She is party first - liberal rhetoric first.

Not that I'm a huge Sanders fan, but I thought Trump was going to be like most presidents and once he got into office was going to backtrack on most of his campaign promises. If I knew then what I know now I would have easily supported Trump over Sanders, if by some miracle Sanders is the Democrat nominee in 2020 I would for sure vote for Trump. At this point in time I'm not sure there are any Democrats I would vote for over Trump. The most I would do is just leave the presidential ticket blank and fill in other elections if Trump doesn't get me my wall.

Gelston
01-02-2019, 02:31 AM
Two retards responded here.

Wrathbringer
01-02-2019, 05:38 AM
Not that I'm a huge Sanders fan, but I thought Trump was going to be like most presidents and once he got into office was going to backtrack on most of his campaign promises. If I knew then what I know now I would have easily supported Trump over Sanders, if by some miracle Sanders is the Democrat nominee in 2020 I would for sure vote for Trump. At this point in time I'm not sure there are any Democrats I would vote for over Trump. The most I would do is just leave the presidential ticket blank and fill in other elections if Trump doesn't get me my wall.

That's all well and good, but I thought you didn't vote?

Tgo01
01-02-2019, 05:42 AM
That's all well and good, but I thought you didn't vote?

This past election was the first election I have actually voted in in many years. I didn't vote for Trump but at the rate this is going he'll easily have my vote over any of these laughable Democrats they have shoved inside of that clown car.

Wrathbringer
01-02-2019, 06:06 AM
This past election was the first election I have actually voted in in many years. I didn't vote for Trump but at the rate this is going he'll easily have my vote over any of these laughable Democrats they have shoved inside of that clown car.

I also didn't vote for trump in 2016. Much higher chance I do in 2020 though. Democraps have gone off the deep end with open borders, asylum for criminals, sanctuary cities for murderous gang members, amnesty for illegal aliens and wanting to raise taxes for all their retarded free things ideas. The liberal tears are going to be just as sweet in 2020.

kutter
01-02-2019, 08:06 AM
I also didn't vote for trump in 2016. Much higher chance I do in 2020 though. Democraps have gone off the deep end with open borders, asylum for criminals, sanctuary cities for murderous gang members, amnesty for illegal aliens and wanting to raise taxes for all their retarded free things ideas. The liberal tears are going to be just as sweet in 2020.

I voted for Gary Johnson, I know, he is an idiot, but well, I did like a lot of his ideas. It was, some would say, a wasted vote and I get that, but like so many, this time around I will be switching to Trump, as Tgo said, if he gets something done on the wall. Just like 2016 I think there are a lot of people that are not talking about supporting Trump but when they get into the ballot box, they will pull that lever.

I do find it interesting that the left says the Republicans have gone of the rails, when if you only look back 50 years to one of the Democrats best Presidents, JFK, and compare him to now, he would never even get the nomination. In fact, he would probably not even be a Democrat by today's standards.

ClydeR
01-02-2019, 08:21 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dv6FY85UYAEPKWS.jpg


This is such a good tweet. It hits all the elements you see in classic Trump tweets.

Parkbandit
01-02-2019, 08:23 AM
It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out, but Romney's op-ed is definitely noteworthy. The wheels are genuinely starting to come off of the bus. Senate Republicans are ducking for cover, for the most part, and not being particularly supportive of Trump right now. There have been House Republicans on CNN lambasting Trump in a way I haven't seen in two years, and even Fox News has been slowly weaving in some critical coverage of Trump.

And then there's Romney.

The reality of the situation is that Romney's op-ed is a very public bet that Trump and Trumpism (whatever that may be) are both on their way out. This op-ed is clearly about Presidential positioning, but, at it's core- it's also him jumping off of what he sees as a sinking ship. The way this stuff works is it starts off as a slow- but steady- trickle, and then- overnight- turns into a flash flood. That's the direction things are heading in as of this moment.

Didn't you say the same thing when Romney put out his previous op-ed?

You're political prognostications are as accurate as Androidpk's.

Just stop trying to be wrong in every post. The title is firmly in your hands now. Cwolff has gone back under his rock, Backlash tried and failed, Androidpk is just too lazy and Shaft doesn't even try.

Unless another challenger rears up their ugly mug.. I don't see this belt swaping wastes anytime soon. And yea.. it's spelled "wastes" on purpose.

Parkbandit
01-02-2019, 08:28 AM
I happily voted for Trump and will again.

The entertainment from this message board alone made that the greatest single vote in my lifetime.

Thank you for your collective meltdown.

Astray
01-02-2019, 08:28 AM
I voted for Gary Johnson, I know, he is an idiot, but well, I did like a lot of his ideas.

Same.

Wrathbringer
01-02-2019, 09:45 AM
I voted for Gary Johnson, I know, he is an idiot, but well, I did like a lot of his ideas. It was, some would say, a wasted vote and I get that, but like so many, this time around I will be switching to Trump, as Tgo said, if he gets something done on the wall. Just like 2016 I think there are a lot of people that are not talking about supporting Trump but when they get into the ballot box, they will pull that lever.

I do find it interesting that the left says the Republicans have gone of the rails, when if you only look back 50 years to one of the Democrats best Presidents, JFK, and compare him to now, he would never even get the nomination. In fact, he would probably not even be a Democrat by today's standards.

I also voted for Johnson. For the second time. It's not a wasted vote. I may still vote libertarian again, but in 2018 I voted straight party republican because democraps are increasingly retarded and I want the wall. I'm afraid trump has waited too long to dig in his heels on border security. With the house now controlled by the democraps, I think the chances of a wall during this term are nil.

kutter
01-02-2019, 09:47 AM
I also voted for Johnson. For the second time. It's not a wasted vote. I may still vote libertarian again, but in 2018 I voted straight party republican because democraps are increasingly retarded and I want the wall. I'm afraid trump has waited too long to dig in his heels on border security. With the Senate now controlled by the democraps, I think the chances of a wall during this term are nil.

I think you meant the House.

Wrathbringer
01-02-2019, 09:49 AM
I think you meant the House.

Yeah I'm tired.

kutter
01-02-2019, 09:54 AM
Honestly, I think the Democrats are going to recognize that they have to give something on the wall/fence/barrier, whatever you want to call it, because politically it is such a loser for them. It is all fine to talk about undocumented aliens, but that only flies on the coast and a little in some border states. They run a very high risk of keeping the heartland firmly in the grasp of the Republicans by doing so.

Methais
01-02-2019, 10:04 AM
You're actually dumb enough to think no one is going to try and primary the country's worst POTUS ever.

It's impossible to primary Obama at this point, couchcunt.

Methais
01-02-2019, 10:15 AM
If there's any silver lining to the erosion of our democratic norms that this maniac and his adherents have ushered in- it's that the messenger is as deeply flawed as it gets. Hopefully when Trump goes down in flames he pulls the most cancerous parts of the Republican party and its rising embrace of authoritarianism/rejection of democracy down with him.

The current incarnation of the Republican party has become dangerous, but maybe- just maybe- Trump will inadvertently create a much-needed reset. If the Romneys, Corkers, and Flakes inherit the GOP- our democracy will live through all of this. Had someone else played Trump- someone who wasn't as deeply incompetent and obviously corrupt as he is- we might not be able to stop the country from becoming the next Hungary or Poland.

Remember when Romney was this horrible racist that hated poor people and wanted grandma to die only 6 years ago? Now suddenly he's the hopeful future of GOP purity?

You're stupid. As fuck. And a huge drama queen.

https://media.giphy.com/media/5WXqTFTgO9a7e/200.gif

Methais
01-02-2019, 10:25 AM
I suspect we'll know he's out of political capital when the Koars, PBs, and Tgos of the board start loudly, and regularly "reminding" us all that they were never really Trump fans- they just liked a few things he said.

This is a fantastic example of how full of shit you are.

Example: PB has said from the start that Trump wasn't his first, second, or even third choice, but since he won the primary, and Hillary was the other option, he voted for him, if for no other reason than for the entertainment of watching retards like you have meltdowns daily.

According to you though, PB has a Trump shrine in his living room.

What a pathetic loser you are. :lol:

Wrathbringer
01-02-2019, 10:30 AM
This is a fantastic example of how full of shit you are.

Example: PB has said from the start that Trump wasn't his first, second, or even third choice, but since he won the primary, and Hillary was the other option, he voted for him, if for no other reason than for the entertainment of watching retards like you have meltdowns daily.

According to you though, PB has a Trump shrine in his living room.

What a pathetic loser you are. :lol:

PB has said numerous times that he only voted for trump for the supreme court picks. Time4dung is retarded.

time4fun
01-02-2019, 10:35 AM
Honestly, I think the Democrats are going to recognize that they have to give something on the wall/fence/barrier, whatever you want to call it, because politically it is such a loser for them. It is all fine to talk about undocumented aliens, but that only flies on the coast and a little in some border states. They run a very high risk of keeping the heartland firmly in the grasp of the Republicans by doing so.

It's really not a losing issue for Dems. Only about 1/3 of the country actually wants a wall built.

Trump actually made the issue toxic. It's been steadily losing support over the past two years, and shutting the government down over it isn't helping.

Astray
01-02-2019, 10:54 AM
Only about 1/3 of the country actually wants a wall built.

You mind sharing the data on that?

Methais
01-02-2019, 11:16 AM
You mind sharing the data on that?

Just figure out which search term would return that on the first Google result and you'll have your answer.

Back
01-02-2019, 11:16 AM
I also voted for Johnson. For the second time. It's not a wasted vote. I may still vote libertarian again, but in 2018 I voted straight party republican because democraps are increasingly retarded and I want the wall. I'm afraid trump has waited too long to dig in his heels on border security. With the house now controlled by the democraps, I think the chances of a wall during this term are nil.

LOL. You voted for "the wall". Man were you duped! You probably actually believed Mexico would pay for it too. Way to go, dimwit. You sold your vote to a con artist.

What are you so afraid of? If you're so concerned I heard that installing a moat around your house is particularly effective at security.

time4fun
01-02-2019, 11:30 AM
You mind sharing the data on that?


Latest data is from an Ipsos poll (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-47-americans-blame-trump-government-shutdown-n952466)taken a week ago or so. Currently only 35% of people support funding for the wall, and only 25% support shutting the government over it.

Two years ago somewhere around 45% of people supported funding for the wall.

For Democrats this is very much a winning issue. It galvanizes liberals- who have this nutty idea that racial scapegoating is immoral and would rather pay for things like food and healthcare for poor children and turns off independent voters who tend to be less concerned with racist narratives but are more sensitive to political dysfunction.

time4fun
01-02-2019, 11:41 AM
I do find it interesting that the left says the Republicans have gone of the rails, when if you only look back 50 years to one of the Democrats best Presidents, JFK, and compare him to now, he would never even get the nomination. In fact, he would probably not even be a Democrat by today's standards.

Well, on the flip side we were able to get the Civil Rights Act passed in 1968, and there's absolutely no way something that "radical" could get passed right now.

But when I say that the Republican party has become toxic, I'm actually referring to a very specific set of political manipulations intended to erode democracy.

They ushered in Citizens United- which has been incredibly damaging and destabilizing. They've taken gerrymandering to a level of severity that this country has never seen (but others have- see below), they've systematically closed polling locations in democratic-leaning areas in states they control, have severely curtailed early voting and eliminated same-day registration where possible. They've passed Voter ID laws that, among other things, have actually restricted the number of acceptable IDs for voting. They've also been stacking the Courts with deeply conservative Judges in a way that, again, we just haven't seen. Judges who aren't simply deeply partisan ideologues but who- in many cases- are deeply unqualified as Judges. They were put in place because they could be counted on to make certain decisions. On top of that, they've increasingly attacked the notion of a free press- in blatant terms.

The thing is, none of this is actually new. This is a very specific playbook that has been used in countries like Hungary and Poland to hijack the governments and force them into one party rule. In Hungary the White Nationalist party now controls the entire government, and Poland has fallen into an authoritarian regime. These kinds of manipulations are the way fascism and totalitarianism have been able to take control of European countries at various points over the last 100 years.

The fact that Republican voters are happy to scoff at these things isn't evidence that they aren't deeply concerning- it's just those voters playing their part in this grand shift. None of this is to say that we are inevitably headed into fascism, but it is to say that we have a party that is hellbent on creating the conditions necessary for it. If we- as a country- can't come together and acknowledge what's going on, it simply becomes a question of when.

Methais
01-02-2019, 11:49 AM
For Democrats this is very much a winning issue. It galvanizes liberals- who have this nutty idea that racial scapegoating is immoral

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


I'm starting to think you are the grandmaster of all trolls. No one can have this little self awareness.

Methais
01-02-2019, 11:56 AM
Well, on the flip side we were able to get the Civil Rights Act passed in 1968, and there's absolutely no way something that "radical" could get passed right now.

But when I say that the Republican party has become toxic, I'm actually referring to a very specific set of political manipulations intended to erode democracy.

They ushered in Citizens United- which has been incredibly damaging and destabilizing. They've taken gerrymandering to a level of severity that this country has never seen (but others have- see below), they've systematically closed polling locations in democratic-leaning areas in states they control, have severely curtailed early voting and eliminated same-day registration where possible. They've passed Voter ID laws that, among other things, have actually restricted the number of acceptable IDs for voting. They've also been stacking the Courts with deeply conservative Judges in a way that, again, we just haven't seen. Judges who aren't simply deeply partisan ideologues but who- in many cases- are deeply unqualified as Judges. They were put in place because they could be counted on to make certain decisions. On top of that, they've increasingly attacked the notion of a free press- in blatant terms.

The thing is, none of this is actually new. This is a very specific playbook that has been used in countries like Hungary and Poland to hijack the governments and force them into one party rule. In Hungary the White Nationalist party now controls the entire government, and Poland has fallen into an authoritarian regime. These kinds of manipulations are the way fascism and totalitarianism have been able to take control of European countries at various points over the last 100 years.

The fact that Republican voters are happy to scoff at these things isn't evidence that they aren't deeply concerning- it's just those voters playing their part in this grand shift. None of this is to say that we are inevitably headed into fascism, but it is to say that we have a party that is hellbent on creating the conditions necessary for it. If we- as a country- can't come together and acknowledge what's going on, it simply becomes a question of when.

https://i.imgur.com/HKU5y3D.gif

Astray
01-02-2019, 11:58 AM
Oh man, looks like someones alt didn't last too long.

Methais
01-02-2019, 12:03 PM
Trump was sent by Democrats from the future to destroy the Republican party. Tardbringer, Methhead, Fagston, Klutter, Parkbench, and Shittybox are low IQ fucktards suckered in by a New York hustler. Just remember to quote all these fucktards so when the eventual Trump implosion occurs you can have an endless reservoir of tardness to point back to.

On a scale of 1 to couch, how angry are you today?

Wrathbringer
01-02-2019, 12:47 PM
LOL. You voted for "the wall". Man were you duped! You probably actually believed Mexico would pay for it too. Way to go, dimwit. You sold your vote to a con artist.

What are you so afraid of? If you're so concerned I heard that installing a moat around your house is particularly effective at security.

TR;DR

Back
01-02-2019, 01:00 PM
TR;DR


https://media1.tenor.com/images/a278b5a03e1c6ac0eaa4f0ff2f6f0e90/tenor.gif?itemid=5459122

Gelston
01-02-2019, 01:02 PM
https://media1.tenor.com/images/a278b5a03e1c6ac0eaa4f0ff2f6f0e90/tenor.gif?itemid=5459122

Dont you have someone's order to put in? I imagine they are getting angry waiting for their food will you tard around on pc.

Methais
01-02-2019, 01:24 PM
https://media1.tenor.com/images/a278b5a03e1c6ac0eaa4f0ff2f6f0e90/tenor.gif?itemid=5459122

https://i.imgur.com/HKU5y3D.gif

Parkbandit
01-02-2019, 01:47 PM
This is a fantastic example of how full of shit you are.

Example: PB has said from the start that Trump wasn't his first, second, or even third choice, but since he won the primary, and Hillary was the other option, he voted for him, if for no other reason than for the entertainment of watching retards like you have meltdowns daily.

According to you though, PB has a Trump shrine in his living room.

What a pathetic loser you are. :lol:

When has facts stopped time4fun though? She will just make up a new PhD on facts or something.


PB has said numerous times that he only voted for trump for the supreme court picks. Time4dung is retarded.

Not the only reason. My other reason was to see the dumbest people in our society having a complete meltdown over Trump becoming President.

SHAFT
01-02-2019, 01:49 PM
LOL. You voted for "the wall". Man were you duped! You probably actually believed Mexico would pay for it too. Way to go, dimwit. You sold your vote to a con artist.

What are you so afraid of? If you're so concerned I heard that installing a moat around your house is particularly effective at security.

The guy who calls everyone retarded just openly admitted to voting for trump's wall. Haha! He's gotta be trolling

Parkbandit
01-02-2019, 01:52 PM
Well, on the flip side we were able to get the Civil Rights Act passed in 1968, and there's absolutely no way something that "radical" could get passed right now.


I didn't bother reading the rest of your stupidity because, let's be honest.. it's just really stupid.

But what's this "we" stuff? You know which party was standing in the way for the Civil Rights Act in 1968? That's right.. Democrats.

Gelston
01-02-2019, 01:57 PM
The guy who calls everyone retarded just openly admitted to voting for trump's wall. Haha! He's gotta be trolling

I voted for Trump because he wasn't Hillary Clinton.

Parkbandit
01-02-2019, 02:42 PM
I voted for Trump because he wasn't Hillary Clinton.

http://worldartsme.com/images/winner-animated-clipart-1.jpg

Androidpk
01-02-2019, 05:51 PM
Mitt Romney’s scorching critique of President Trump in a New Year’s Day op-ed has sparked a call from within the Republican National Committee to change party rules to protect Trump from any long-shot primary challenge in 2020.

The RNC committeeman representing the Virgin Islands late Tuesday emailed fellow elected members of the national party urging them to change the rules when they convene in New Mexico for their annual winter meeting later this month. Republicans are confident that Trump would hold off any primary challenger, but worry the campaign would derail his re-election.

“Look, the political history is clear. No Republican president opposed for re-nomination has ever won re-election,” RNC committeeman Jevon O.A. Williams said in a email obtained by the Washington Examiner. “Unfortunately, loopholes in the rules governing the 2020 re-nomination campaign are enabling these so-called Republicans to flirt with the possibility of contested primaries and caucuses.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/romneys-attack-prompts-call-to-protect-trump-from-2020-primary-challenger

Tgo01
01-02-2019, 06:18 PM
Trump was sent by Democrats from the future to destroy the Republican party. Tardbringer, Methhead, Fagston, Klutter, Parkbench, and Shittybox are low IQ fucktards suckered in by a New York hustler. Just remember to quote all these fucktards so when the eventual Trump implosion occurs you can have an endless reservoir of tardness to point back to.

Is this sellstuff1's other account?

Gelston
01-02-2019, 06:19 PM
Is this sellstuff1's other account?

no it is your other account

Tgo01
01-02-2019, 06:20 PM
no it is your other account

Shit!

Astray
01-02-2019, 06:20 PM
Is this sellstuff1's other account?

Looking that way.

Tgo01
01-02-2019, 06:22 PM
The guy who calls everyone retarded just openly admitted to voting for trump's wall. Haha! He's gotta be trolling

Says the guy who willingly got in bed with the far left of which at least two are confirmed sociopaths right here on the PC.

Ashlander
01-02-2019, 09:57 PM
Shit!

Well at least you aren't agreeing with yourself with it.

Parkbandit
01-02-2019, 10:23 PM
Well at least you aren't agreeing with yourself with it.

https://i.imgur.com/a9TpuJR.gif

Fortybox
01-03-2019, 07:50 AM
Romney's tactics are garbage. I really dislike the guy...even to the point that I'd vote against him.

Astray
01-03-2019, 08:03 AM
Latest data is from an Ipsos poll (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-47-americans-blame-trump-government-shutdown-n952466)taken a week ago or so. Currently only 35% of people support funding for the wall, and only 25% support shutting the government over it.


It gathered responses from 2,440 adults, including 946 Democrats and 846 Republicans.

Okay.

Parkbandit
01-03-2019, 08:52 AM
Romney's tactics are garbage. I really dislike the guy...even to the point that I'd vote against him.

Ditto.

Parkbandit
01-03-2019, 08:54 AM
Okay.

It's amazing how much faith time4fun puts into polling.. especially after the 2016 election.

They are easily manipulated to create news from their standpoint.

audioserf
01-03-2019, 09:52 AM
Romney is smarmy and two-faced, even by politician standards. Dude was straight fiending for the Secretary of State job in the Trump administration. If he'd gotten that, I somehow don't think we'd see him popping off in op-ed pieces.

Astray
01-03-2019, 10:00 AM
Romney... wasn't he the guy saying he doesn't care about 47% because they are all 'government dependents'? In a room full of wealthy people, too?

Stumplicker
01-03-2019, 10:03 AM
This is ancient history at this point, but wasn't the Affordable Care Act also Romney's own plan from Massachussetts and he disowned and started bashing it as soon as it was being pushed by the other party?

audioserf
01-03-2019, 10:11 AM
Romney... wasn't he the guy saying he doesn't care about 47% because they are all 'government dependents'? In a room full of wealthy people, too?

That's our Mittens!

Methais
01-03-2019, 10:15 AM
Is this sellstuff1's other account?

Probably macguyver.

Close enough though. They both came from the same cesspool of extreme failure and mental illness.

audioserf
01-03-2019, 10:19 AM
This is ancient history at this point, but wasn't the Affordable Care Act also Romney's own plan from Massachussetts and he disowned and started bashing it as soon as it was being pushed by the other party?

Yep. ACA and RomneyCare were very similar programs - RomneyCare was actually very popular in Massachussets and it was his baby. Flipped on it instantly when Obama was pushing the idea, though.