PDA

View Full Version : Sorry, But It’s Entirely the Right’s Fault



Pages : 1 [2]

cwolff
07-10-2017, 05:08 PM
Weird how unemployment is highest among blacks in your most Liberal areas.


Yeah...congrats right wingers of PC.

THIS is the guy you count among your own.


Pretty sure he's ignored by everyone but you. But you also take Macgyver seriously, so....

This goes straight to Flimbo's argument about Toxic culture.

RichardCranium
07-10-2017, 05:12 PM
This goes straight to Flimbo's argument about Toxic culture.

It just requires thick skin and a sense of humor.

Neveragain
07-10-2017, 05:13 PM
This goes straight to Flimbo's argument about Toxic culture.

So quoting statistical data that can be found in any college level text book on the subject is now considered "toxic". :clap:

Cry more please.

Savageheart
07-10-2017, 05:15 PM
What textbooks? Does Stormfront sell them?

Neveragain
07-10-2017, 05:22 PM
What textbooks? Does Stormfront sell them?

Facts are facts. Sorry they don't align with your feelings. Maybe that's why black communities that have lived under Democrat leadership are giant shit holes?

Savageheart
07-10-2017, 05:28 PM
Facts require citation not blurry images with no context or reviewed information.

Unless you are declaring yourself the subject matter expert and these are your findings after intense sociological study and statistical analysis?

Actually why bother, you get to be number two on my ignore list, enjoy!

Neveragain
07-10-2017, 05:28 PM
What textbooks? Does Stormfront sell them?

Dude there's plenty of data. Here's a hint, go to google, you do know what google is? Type in Race IQ bell curve and like magic millions of results come up.

Sorry you hate science.

Neveragain
07-10-2017, 05:33 PM
It's really strange to see people flip on commonly known statistics, doesn't bother me in the least that Asian countries have a higher average IQ. It is what it is, evolution in the works, you guys do believe in the evolution model, right?

cwolff
07-10-2017, 05:35 PM
It's really strange to see people flip on commonly known statistics, doesn't bother me in the least that Asian countries have a higher average IQ. It is what it is, evolution in the works, you guys do believe in the evolution model, right?

Like a college kid who just found a old dog eared copy of Atlas Shrugged and can't stop telling everyone how great it is, you seem to have just found The Bell Curve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve#Criticism_of_alleged_assumptions).

Neveragain
07-10-2017, 05:55 PM
Like a college kid who just found a old dog eared copy of Atlas Shrugged and can't stop telling everyone how great it is, you seem to have just found The Bell Curve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve#Criticism_of_alleged_assumptions).

"an old dog eared"

Actually I just posted a graph, it's you that seems to have just discovered the data. I didn't make any assumptions.

Neveragain
07-10-2017, 07:08 PM
Facts require citation not blurry images with no context or reviewed information.

Unless you are declaring yourself the subject matter expert and these are your findings after intense sociological study and statistical analysis?

Actually why bother, you get to be number two on my ignore list, enjoy!

I made the list, YES!

See, because of fucks like Savageheart, Time4lies, Cwolf....................................snowflake s in general, we get stupid fucking shit like this. Where we can't even enforce laws because identifying the perps may not be PC.


BART Withholding Surveillance Videos Of Crime To Avoid ‘Stereotypes’

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/07/09/bart-withholding-surveillance-videos-of-crime-to-avoid-stereotypes/#.WWPqsaFiSSk.facebook

To hell with the facts and the victims as long as we feel good about ourselves.

But hey, I made the ignore list of some sexually confused rando on the PC. Winning!

Gelston
07-10-2017, 07:21 PM
This goes straight to Flimbo's argument about Toxic culture.

No, it goes to Flimbo saying that we were responsible for someone committing suicide (we weren't) and the him getting upset when we responded back to his bullshit.

Parkbandit
07-10-2017, 07:42 PM
Facts require citation not blurry images with no context or reviewed information.

Unless you are declaring yourself the subject matter expert and these are your findings after intense sociological study and statistical analysis?

Actually why bother, you get to be number two on my ignore list, enjoy!

http://www.cscmediagroupus.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/fingers-in-ears.jpg

Parkbandit
07-10-2017, 07:43 PM
No, it goes to Flimbo saying that we were responsible for someone committing suicide (we weren't) and the him getting upset when we responded back to his bullshit.

Liberal logic: It's only toxic if you disagree with it.

cwolff
07-10-2017, 08:10 PM
No, it goes to Flimbo saying that we were responsible for someone committing suicide (we weren't) and the him getting upset when we responded back to his bullshit.

Thought you were the context guy? Out of all the words Flimbo wrote all you see warclaidh? He did have other points that he made which are worthwhile.

Gelston
07-10-2017, 08:13 PM
Thought you were the context guy? Out of all the words Flimbo wrote all you see warclaidh? He did have other points that he made which are worthwhile.

What? He has said this MULTIPLE times on Lich. It is completely in context. Flimbo is a fucking moron.

drauz
07-10-2017, 08:20 PM
Thought you were the context guy? Out of all the words Flimbo wrote all you see warclaidh? He did have other points that he made which are worthwhile.

It is something that Flimbo does 2-3 times a year. If people agree with him so much then his internet forums would be a live and well. They don't seem to. People would rather have an open forum with a few assholes than a censored forum where moderators get to decide what you can say/discuss.

Welcome to the internet where anonymity leads to hurt feelings.

cwolff
07-10-2017, 08:20 PM
What? He has said this MULTIPLE times on Lich. It is completely in context. Flimbo is a fucking moron.

Ok, that makes more sense now. I get where you're coming from. That history is beyond me. Ive been out of the game for a few years. Also, I am biased because I like the guy and he's been really helpful with my monks.

Pin
07-12-2017, 11:53 PM
Why no thread on Don Jr? Just curious..

Edit: Never mind, I found it.

cwolff
07-13-2017, 09:11 AM
In a survey that was conducted from Aug. 23 to Sept. 2, 2016 — a month after Trump accepted his party’s nomination — Republicans’ positive assessment of colleges and universities fell to 43 percent, while negative assessments rose to 45 percent. By June of this year, 58 percent of Republicans had a negative view of higher education and 36 percent a positive view.

This is some scary shit. They just want to get dumber and dumber and dumber. No need to learn shit when Breitbart and Fox has you convinced that you know everything already.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/13/opinion/republicans-elites-trump.html

Back
07-13-2017, 10:08 AM
This is some scary shit. They just want to get dumber and dumber and dumber. No need to learn shit when Breitbart and Fox has you convinced that you know everything already.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/13/opinion/republicans-elites-trump.html

There is a pattern to it. When a group casts doubts on all of our established pillars of good and knowledge then supplies their own "facts" they maintain control of the people. The GOP is doing this right now. They want people not to trust scientists, professors, academics, intellectuals, journalists, institutions of higher learning, doctors, humanitarians, charities, human rights activists and organizations, and so on. Who does the GOP want you to trust? Them of course, and Wall Street.

cwolff
07-13-2017, 10:11 AM
There is a pattern to it. When a group casts doubts on all of our established pillars of good and knowledge then supplies their own "facts" they maintain control of the people. The GOP is doing this right now. They want people not to trust scientists, professors, academics, intellectuals, journalists, institutions of higher learning, doctors, humanitarians, charities, human rights activists and organizations, and so on. Who does the GOP want you to trust? Them of course, and Wall Street.

Ya definitely. We've seen this before from dictatorships, cults and drug dealers.

Wrathbringer
07-13-2017, 12:02 PM
There is a pattern to it. When a group casts doubts on all of our established pillars of good and knowledge then supplies their own "facts" they maintain control of the people. The GOP is doing this right now. They want people not to trust scientists, professors, academics, intellectuals, journalists, institutions of higher learning, doctors, humanitarians, charities, human rights activists and organizations, and so on. Who does the GOP want you to trust? Them of course, and Wall Street.

LOL back

Methais
07-13-2017, 12:18 PM
ugh, I know. I'm sick of it. It needs to go away.

time4fun needs to go on vacation again. Except this time let us know beforehand so that we'll actually notice she's gone and then be able to fully enjoy her absence.

Even her avatar looks like a cunt, which I'm sure is no coincidence.

Parkbandit
07-13-2017, 03:25 PM
Ya definitely. We've seen this before from dictatorships, cults and drug dealers.

Derp derp.. don't forget racists too!

Latrinsorm
07-15-2017, 01:33 PM
It is something that Flimbo does 2-3 times a year. If people agree with him so much then his internet forums would be a live and well. They don't seem to. People would rather have an open forum with a few assholes than a censored forum where moderators get to decide what you can say/discuss.Eh, force of habit and critical mass are things, though.

Back
07-18-2017, 01:50 PM
If he wants to say that the Democrats are the party of slavery, secession, and Jim Crowe, that is fine with me.

I should have added to my statement "in the recent past". The republicans have gone way extreme of what they used to be and the democrats have stayed the same, in the recent past.

I know everyone does not read every single one of my posts so someone might suspect I did not know about the history of both parties. But I do.

Fortybox
07-18-2017, 01:58 PM
time4fun needs to go on vacation again. Except this time let us know beforehand so that we'll actually notice she's gone and then be able to fully enjoy her absence.

Even her avatar looks like a cunt, which I'm sure is no coincidence.

It's probably how "she" wants to look like after she is done with her transformation.

cwolff
07-23-2017, 11:19 AM
Asymmetric polarization: The entire GOP has moved to the right, where Dems have just become slightly less moderate

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFYFxAcXcAA-3ha.jpg:large

Latrinsorm
07-23-2017, 02:39 PM
The interesting thing about that graph to me is that the replacement of Southern Democrats over time didn't move the Democrats as a whole way further left. It reminds me of the XKCD that pointed out that Loving v Virginia happened when the overwhelming majority of Americans opposed interracial marriage, whereas Obergefell v Hodges happened at a 50/50 moment. Different branch but same sort of idea - the federal government used to lead change, now it merely codifies it.

Obviously more data is required, as always.

Tgo01
07-23-2017, 04:35 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFYFxAcXcAA-3ha.jpg:large

Wait, I thought Republicans were the progressives of yesterday and Democrats were the racist redneck inbred conservatives?

Oh right! It was an instant switch in 1964. Do Democrats ever tire of their own bullshit?

Latrinsorm
07-23-2017, 04:51 PM
Wait, I thought Republicans were the progressives of yesterday and Democrats were the racist redneck inbred conservatives? Oh right! It was an instant switch in 1964. Do Democrats ever tire of their own bullshit?The whole point of the term "Southern Democrats" is to distinguish between various types of Democrat. Similarly, the Democrats of the late 1800s were not entirely Bourbon Democrats - that's precisely why the term was invented.

Tgo01
07-23-2017, 06:56 PM
The whole point of the term "Southern Democrats" is to distinguish between various types of Democrat. Similarly, the Democrats of the late 1800s were not entirely Bourbon Democrats - that's precisely why the term was invented.

Word salad.

Latrinsorm
07-23-2017, 07:53 PM
You forgot "virtue signaling".

Methais
07-23-2017, 09:27 PM
You forgot "virtue signaling".

You forgot to compliment someone on their shoes.