Who was giving me 10:1 odds...

[macgyver]

Yo, who's the fella that was going to give me 10:1 odds on Clinton winning the election, damn I knew I should've bet.

[Androidpk]

Yo, who's the fella that was going to give me 10:1 odds on Clinton winning the election, damn I knew I should've bet.

:lol:

[time4fun]

Yo, who's the fella that was going to give me 10:1 odds on Clinton winning the election, damn I knew I should've bet.

You think she's going to lose 5-7 points in the space of a week and a half because the FBI found some emails that weren't hers?

Seriously?

[Warriorbird]

Without more counterpunch I'd say she goes from 6 points to 2. This works excellent for Trump swinging Johnson voters to him though.

[Tgo01]

because the FBI found some emails that weren't hers?

:rofl:

I was waiting for the time4fun spin on this to come around! And you did not disappoint.

Found some emails that weren't hers. LOL

Come on time4fun, we all know you didn't come up with this talking point on your own. Which "news" site did you get it from? HuffPost? Politifact? SNOPES?!

[Androidpk]

You think she's going to lose 5-7 points in the space of a week and a half because the FBI found some emails that weren't hers?

Seriously?

You don't know what the FBI has found.

[Tgo01]

Come on time4fun, we all know you didn't come up with this talking point on your own. Which "news" site did you get it from? HuffPost? Politifact? SNOPES?!

Holy shit, I really do think it was from Snopes.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/10/28/fbi-reopening-clinton-e-mail-investigation/


But the Los Angeles Times reported the messages in question apparently didn't involve Clinton herself:


The Associated Press also reported that the e-mails in question "did not come from [Clinton's] private server":

[Warriorbird]

Holy shit, I really do think it was from Snopes.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/10/28/fbi-reopening-clinton-e-mail-investigation/

Mainly seemed like tweets from other sources. When will you tell us the true details of the "Snopes conspiracy?"

[Tgo01]

Mainly seemed like tweets from other sources. When will you tell us the true details of the "Snopes conspiracy?"

There is no "Snopes conspiracy", other than the people they have writing these political articles are biased as fuck and it's so obvious it's almost painful.

It's not like the original couple who started Snopes are the ones doing these stories, I'm not sure they even do any stories on their site at all anymore. So they hired some other people and it's all turned to shit now. And even if it were the original couple writing these stories I still wouldn't get my political "news" from a site that originally dedicated itself to debunking Bigfoot stories, just like I might raise an eyebrow about an article on how to fix your engine found on Webmd.

[Warriorbird]

There is no "Snopes conspiracy", other than the people they have writing these political articles are biased as fuck and it's so obvious it's almost painful.

It's not like the original couple who started Snopes are the ones doing these stories, I'm not sure they even do any stories on their site at all anymore. So they hired some other people and it's all turned to shit now. And even if it were the original couple writing these stories I still wouldn't get my political "news" from a site that originally dedicated itself to debunking Bigfoot stories, just like I might raise an eyebrow about an article on how to fix your engine found on Webmd.

Did they not support a conservative conspiracy theory once in the past? Noo!

[Tgo01]

Did they not support a conservative conspiracy theory once in the past? Noo!

I don't know. Did they? What?

[Warriorbird]

I don't know. Did they? What?

I'm suggesting that you're perhaps more partisan than the media you rail against.

[Tgo01]

I'm suggesting that you're perhaps more partisan than the media you rail against.

You're so adorable.

[Warriorbird]

You're so adorable.

I know. You too man. Your conviction that you're Diogenes of Sinope is almost Latrinian in scope.

[Androidpk]

I'm suggesting that you're perhaps more partisan than the media you rail against.

I see you got your daily CNN talking points.

[Warriorbird]

I see you got your daily CNN talking points.

What exactly did me talking to Tgo01 about him feeling he's more reliable than Snopes have to do with CNN?

[Fallen]

What exactly did me talking to Tgo01 about him feeling he's more reliable than Snopes have to do with CNN?

Wait, you didn't see that fucking hit piece CNN ran on TG01 last night?

[Warriorbird]

Wait, you didn't see that fucking hit piece CNN ran on TG01 last night?

If that ever actually happened he would think it was the greatest day of his life.

[Latrinsorm]

Wait, you didn't see that fucking hit piece CNN ran on TG01 last night?I laughed.

[Parkbandit]

You think she's going to lose 5-7 points in the space of a week and a half because the FBI found some emails that weren't hers?

Seriously?

Actually, she lost those points prior to the FBI announcement. The race already was tightening when the Weiner sprung up.

[drauz]

You think she's going to lose 5-7 points in the space of a week and a half because the FBI found some emails that weren't hers?

Seriously?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/02/tracking-poll-finds-race-tied-as-trump-opens-up-an-8-point-edge-on-honesty/

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-trump-tied-democratic-enthusiasm-dips/story?id=43199459

Trump leads in a recent Washington Post/ABC poll showing 46/45.

[Parkbandit]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/02/tracking-poll-finds-race-tied-as-trump-opens-up-an-8-point-edge-on-honesty/

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-trump-tied-democratic-enthusiasm-dips/story?id=43199459

Trump leads in a recent Washington Post/ABC poll showing 46/45.

Yea, but Huffington Post has Clinton up by 6! 48 to 42. 7 if you round 48 to 49!

And it has the word "ton" in it, so you know this poll carries more weight.

[drauz]

Yea, but Huffington Post has Clinton up by 6! 48 to 42. 7 if you round 48 to 49!

And it has the word "ton" in it, so you know this poll carries more weight.

The first link is a poll that shows voters think Trump is more trustworthy than Clinton.

[Dendum]

I would put a million silvers on clinton to win with a 4 mil payout if trump wins

[Gelston]

I would put a million silvers on clinton to win with a 4 mil payout if trump wins

He said 10 to 1, not 4 to 1.

[Methais]

You think she's going to lose 5-7 points in the space of a week and a half because the FBI found some emails that weren't hers?

Seriously?

It's like you've become a parody of yourself or something.

[Tgo01]

Heck, even left leaning 538 has raised Trump's odds of winning from 12% to 30%.

[Parkbandit]

I would put a million silvers on clinton to win with a 4 mil payout if trump wins

Math... how does it work?

[Dendum]

He said 10 to 1, not 4 to 1.

Obviously

[Tgo01]

Heck, even left leaning 538 has raised Trump's odds of winning from 12% to 30%.

They have Trump up to 34% now.

I wonder if they will eventually give both candidates a 50% chance of winning and proving how utterly useless they are.

[time4fun]

Heck, even left leaning 538 has raised Trump's odds of winning from 12% to 30%.

Nate Silver isn't left leaning- in 2008 and 2012 he was the most accurate prediction site.

Just because you all lost doesn't mean someone pointing it out was left leaning.

[Tgo01]

Nate Silver isn't left leaning

Thank you, I needed a good laugh today.


Just because you all lost doesn't mean someone pointing it out was left leaning.

A twofer! :rofl:

[time4fun]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/02/tracking-poll-finds-race-tied-as-trump-opens-up-an-8-point-edge-on-honesty/

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-trump-tied-democratic-enthusiasm-dips/story?id=43199459

Trump leads in a recent Washington Post/ABC poll showing 46/45.

Yeah...ouch.

Having said that- there's evidence here that it's not actually about the FBI thing- it's really that we're now correcting for the previous swing in Clinton's favor as we get closer to the election- that the 6-10 point leads she had were really the anomaly (and not the "new normal"- as a lot of us on the left convinced ourselves it was), and that now we're back to where we were before- Clinton with a not-quite-comfortable 3-4 point lead on average nationally.

In particular- the thing about the polls is that Clinton isn't so much losing votes as Trump is gaining them.

[time4fun]

Thank you, I needed a good laugh today.



A twofer! :rofl:

It doesn't even dawn on you to provide evidence for your arguments, does it?

[Gelston]

It doesn't even dawn on you to provide evidence for your arguments, does it?

He has said that he mostly votes for democrats... So yeah.

[time4fun]

He has said that he mostly votes for democrats... So yeah.

How does that impact his statistical prediction models again?

And how does whatever lame argument you'll try to make fit into the reality that he's been the most accurate source of political predictions in the last two Presidential elections?

[Tgo01]

It doesn't even dawn on you to provide evidence for your arguments, does it?

You mean besides the shit I already provided? Yeah, I suppose not.

[Tgo01]

How does that impact his statistical prediction models again?

You said Nate Silver isn't left leaning, now you're saying his political affiliation doesn't impact his predictions (even though the whole Trump thing proves otherwise.)

Stop moving the goalposts.

[Gelston]

How does that impact his statistical prediction models again?

And how does whatever lame argument you'll try to make fit into the reality that he's been the most accurate source of political predictions in the last two Presidential elections?

I didn't say it did. I am responding to you saying


Nate Silver isn't left leaning

Yes, he is.

[time4fun]

You said Nate Silver isn't left leaning, now you're saying his political affiliation doesn't impact his predictions (even though the whole Trump thing proves otherwise.)

Stop moving the goalposts.

We're talking about his political prediction models.

YOU were specifically talking about his political prediction models.

So again, what does his personal political preference have to do with your argument that his political prediction models are left leaning?

[Gelston]

We're talking about his political prediction models.

YOU were specifically talking about his political prediction models.

So again, what does his personal political preference have to do with your argument that his political prediction models are left leaning?

YOU said he isn't left leaning. He is. Regardless of what ever else, he IS left leaning. Admit he is left leaning. Admit you are incorrect.

[Parkbandit]

Nate Silver isn't left leaning- in 2008 and 2012 he was the most accurate prediction site.

Just because you all lost doesn't mean someone pointing it out was left leaning.

Time4Fun! STOP! YOU WON THE BELT!

There's no need to defend it.

You are undisputed.

You are the One.

Congrats.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah...ouch.

Having said that- there's evidence here that it's not actually about the FBI thing- it's really that we're now correcting for the previous swing in Clinton's favor as we get closer to the election- that the 6-10 point leads she had were really the anomaly (and not the "new normal"- as a lot of us on the left convinced ourselves it was), and that now we're back to where we were before- Clinton with a not-quite-comfortable 3-4 point lead on average nationally.

In particular- the thing about the polls is that Clinton isn't so much losing votes as Trump is gaining them.

So, what you're saying is that the media is creating "news" again by cherry picking polling data to show Hillary with a 6-10 point lead in hopes to disenfranchise people either into voting for her (everyone wants to be the winner) and / or hammering home that Republicans are wasting their time by voting for Trump.

I agree. I don't believe the current polls actually reflect the FBI news that they are re-opening up the email scandal now that the Weiner has arose or that the FBI has a long investigation into the "charity" known as the Clinton Foundation where indictments could be soon coming.

[Kembal]

So, what you're saying is that the media is creating "news" again by cherry picking polling data to show Hillary with a 6-10 point lead in hopes to disenfranchise people either into voting for her (everyone wants to be the winner) and / or hammering home that Republicans are wasting their time by voting for Trump.

I agree. I don't believe the current polls actually reflect the FBI news that they are re-opening up the email scandal now that the Weiner has arose or that the FBI has a long investigation into the "charity" known as the Clinton Foundation where indictments could be soon coming.

Quoting for posterity, since you think there's a possibility that there will be indictments in any of this. :forehead:

[Tgo01]

Trump up 14 in Texas now. "Texas is a swing state now!"

Democrats were so delusional just a short few days ago.

[Gelston]

I'm not going to trust any poll numbers until they are exit polls numbers.

[Methais]

I'm not going to trust any poll numbers until they are exit polls numbers.

If they show Hillary with a huge lead then they're trustworthy.

If they show anything else then they're wrong.

time4fun will back me up on this.

[Gelston]

If they show Hillary with a huge lead then they're trustworthy.

If they show anything else then they're wrong.

time4fun will back me up on this.

Yeah. Even at Trump's inauguration she'll still be all like "No, this is just biased reporting. Hillary won."

[macgyver]

Yeah. Even at Trump's inauguration she'll still be all like "No, this is just biased reporting. Hillary won."

Trump being down by a couple points in the "polls" could actually be a boon more than anything. It'll fire up the undecideds and the lazys to get up and vote because "their vote may be the deciding factor."

[Androidpk]

Yeah. Even at Trump's inauguration she'll still be all like "No, this is just biased reporting. Hillary won."

russians stole the election for Trump

[drauz]

Yeah...ouch.

Having said that- there's evidence here that it's not actually about the FBI thing- it's really that we're now correcting for the previous swing in Clinton's favor as we get closer to the election- that the 6-10 point leads she had were really the anomaly (and not the "new normal"- as a lot of us on the left convinced ourselves it was), and that now we're back to where we were before- Clinton with a not-quite-comfortable 3-4 point lead on average nationally.

In particular- the thing about the polls is that Clinton isn't so much losing votes as Trump is gaining them.

I think the part about honestly speaks more about FBI investigation which in turn would effect her poll numbers.

[Parkbandit]

Quoting for posterity, since you think there's a possibility that there will be indictments in any of this. :forehead:

There is always a possibility.. but no, I don't believe the Clintons will ever be charged.

[Tgo01]

538 has Trump up to almost 36% chance of winning now.

[Parkbandit]

538 has Trump up to almost 36% chance of winning now.

Watch.. that number will continue to climb up until it has the winner at like 51% and the loser at like 49% and he will be the "closest" and still the darling of the left because he called it the best and they will ignore how god awfully bad he's been for the past year.

[Tgo01]

Watch.. that number will continue to climb up until it has the winner at like 51% and the loser at like 49% and he will be the "closest" and still the darling of the left because he called it the best and they will ignore how god awfully bad he's been for the past year.

Yup, looks like Nate Silver is trying to save face after his disastrous prediction of the Republican primary. Now he's trying to edge the numbers really close to 50/50 so he's golden.

[macgyver]

Trump takes Pennsylvania; if he takes Florida his odds go from 30 to 61% to win the White House. Think about that, I don't believe he's even a underdog any more. Then there's the silent majority who'll come out in full force.

[Androidpk]

CNN dropped Hillary below 270.

[Tgo01]

How glorious would it be if Trump does win and there is a loud cry from the left about the election being rigged after spending weeks saying the elections aren't rigged because Hillary was polling higher at the time?

God I don't believe in, please grant me this. It's all I have ever asked you for. Fuck world peace, fuck solving world hunger, this is the only thing I'll ever ask you for.

Thank you.

[Aluvius]

How glorious would it be if Trump does win and there is a loud cry from the left about the election being rigged after spending weeks saying the elections aren't rigged because Hillary was polling higher at the time?

God I don't believe in, please grant me this. It's all I have ever asked you for. Fuck world peace, fuck solving world hunger, this is the only thing I'll ever ask you for.

Thank you.

This brings up an interesting conundrum:

Either the election IS rigged, therefore Trump wins it through cheating.

Or the election IS NOT rigged, therefore Trump and his supporters were lying about the election being rigged.

Wonder which it is?

[Androidpk]

Or maybe the counter rigging overcame the rigging and the original riggers lost to the other team

[kookiegod]

Or maybe the counter rigging overcame the rigging and the original riggers lost to the other team


The sad thing is, a dead red snapper could have ran on the Republican ticket and won, but Trump got the nod.

Any Republican could have won this easily other than Trump.

Hillary is going to win and win huge I think. Its a disaster and hopefully someone brings back "America Held Hostage Day 1" on her Presidency.

The sad thing even further is the gridlock and partisanship, investigations and games will prevent the business of the American people to get things done they were elected to do.

If Paul Ryan has any balls, he works with Clinton on entitlement reforms and tax code reform because the Liberty party and Tea Party already hates him and he gets it done, gets his legacy done early and runs against Hillary in 2020.

~Paul

[Velfi]

The sad thing is, a dead red snapper could have ran on the Republican ticket and won, but Trump got the nod.

Any Republican could have won this easily other than Trump.

They ran plenty of limp fish and all of them went into the woodchipper, Fargo-style.


If Paul Ryan has any balls, he works with Clinton on entitlement reforms and tax code reform because the Liberty party and Tea Party already hates him and he gets it done, gets his legacy done early and runs against Hillary in 2020.

~Paul

http://i.imgur.com/wBpzry3.gif

[Archigeek]

I suspect that if Clinton wins, she won't run again in 2020. She'll be what, 74? That's little late to start the marathon that the US election has become.

[Pneumothorax]

One thing that I haven't seen much reporting on is the "monster vote", the people who get a call from a pollster and if they haven't voted in either of the last 2 elections they are not counted because they are not considered a likely voter. I think Trump has drawn out a lot of those type of people, some for and some against, but I'm betting it's a lot more for, because his enthusiasm numbers are through the roof, and at least 10-15 points higher than Hilary. But that's why we have the election, if it were up to the media and pollsters she would have been crowned in 2015.

[Parkbandit]

This brings up an interesting conundrum:

Either the election IS rigged, therefore Trump wins it through cheating.

Or the election IS NOT rigged, therefore Trump and his supporters were lying about the election being rigged.

Wonder which it is?

Because there is only 2 possible choices...................

[Parkbandit]

The sad thing is, a dead red snapper could have ran on the Republican ticket and won, but Trump got the nod.

Any Republican could have won this easily other than Trump.

The field was far too diluted with 17 people running and once Trump started winning, some stayed in way too long because they thought they were entitled to the nomination and it solidified Trump winning.


Hillary is going to win and win huge I think. Its a disaster and hopefully someone brings back "America Held Hostage Day 1" on her Presidency.

What polls are you looking at that would give you that type of hope?


The sad thing even further is the gridlock and partisanship, investigations and games will prevent the business of the American people to get things done they were elected to do.

If Paul Ryan has any balls, he works with Clinton on entitlement reforms and tax code reform because the Liberty party and Tea Party already hates him and he gets it done, gets his legacy done early and runs against Hillary in 2020.

~Paul

You believe that Hillary wants entitlement and tax code reforms? Elections have consequences.. and neither of those issues will be addressed.

[macgyver]

The field was far too diluted with 17 people running and once Trump started winning, some stayed in way too long because they thought they were entitled to the nomination and it solidified Trump winning.



What polls are you looking at that would give you that type of hope?



You believe that Hillary wants entitlement and tax code reforms? Elections have consequences.. and neither of those issues will be addressed.

Hillary isn't going to win. People have this obssession over polls but don't realize how inaccurate they are. In fact studies have shown upwards of 20% of voters actually make a final decision in the polling booth!

[Warriorbird]

Hillary isn't going to win. People have this obssession over polls but don't realize how inaccurate they are. In fact studies have shown upwards of 20% of voters actually make a final decision in the polling booth!

Polls matter... but people forget both margins of error and the comparatively high odds that Trump actually has right now.

[time4fun]

Hillary isn't going to win. People have this obssession over polls but don't realize how inaccurate they are. In fact studies have shown upwards of 20% of voters actually make a final decision in the polling booth!

Republicans said the same thing in 2012.

That went well.

[Parkbandit]

Republicans said the same thing in 2012.

That went well.

Make the bet? I mean, it's a sure thing right?

[Archigeek]

What to bet, what to bet...

A bottle of Lagavulin 16? A bottle of Surly's Darkness 2016? 5 million Gemstone silver coins? Hmm.

[Dendum]

Make the bet? I mean, it's a sure thing right?

What odds?

[Androidpk]

I'll take a bottle of Lagavulin 16 please.

[kookiegod]

The field was far too diluted with 17 people running and once Trump started winning, some stayed in way too long because they thought they were entitled to the nomination and it solidified Trump winning.



What polls are you looking at that would give you that type of hope?



You believe that Hillary wants entitlement and tax code reforms? Elections have consequences.. and neither of those issues will be addressed.

Your first point I will agree with.

Second, polls change by the day. Wasn't that long ago Hillary was up 10-12 in some places. Its just a hunch based on talking to people at this point.

The last one, Ryan wants entitlement reform, and basically Congress does, they just don't want to take the blame for it. Both parties want the tax code reformed, and the money from overseas repatriated. No one wants to take the blame for it.

Ryan could do both and forge an unholy alliance and come out looking like a hero. Or a goat. Guess we see.

~Paul

[Archigeek]

I'll take a bottle of Lagavulin 16 please.

This doesn't sound like a bet suggestion to me. Perhaps you should stick to buying your own. I did suggest some nice stakes I think, if you like bold flavors and rare text game currency.

[Androidpk]

Fine, a bottle of Lagavulin and some medium rare stakes.

[Taernath]

Fine, a bottle of Lagavulin and some medium rare stakes.

Trump steaks.

[Parkbandit]

What odds?

You seriously have issues reading and comprehending the thread title.. don't you?

You are posting in a thread titled "WHO WAS GIVING ME 10-1 ODDS" The numbers before the word "odds" means what odds he is looking for.

[time4fun]

You seriously have issues reading and comprehending the thread title.. don't you?

You are posting in a thread titled "WHO WAS GIVING ME 10-1 ODDS" The numbers before the word "odds" means what odds he is looking for.

You're human cancer.

[Parkbandit]

Your first point I will agree with.

Second, polls change by the day. Wasn't that long ago Hillary was up 10-12 in some places. Its just a hunch based on talking to people at this point.

There are still some places that Hillary is up 10-12 points.. but most of the battleground states show a very close race with the momentum swinging in Trump's direction.


The last one, Ryan wants entitlement reform, and basically Congress does, they just don't want to take the blame for it. Both parties want the tax code reformed, and the money from overseas repatriated. No one wants to take the blame for it.

Ryan could do both and forge an unholy alliance and come out looking like a hero. Or a goat. Guess we see.

~Paul

Hillary is running on entitlement and tax reform?

I've only read that her tax platform is to make rich people pay their "fair" share and the only thing on entitlements is she wants to increase it to include paid family and medical leave, expand Obamacare (and hopefully rename it Hillarycare because it's not fair the black man stole it from her!), free college tuition and expand Social Security.

[Parkbandit]

You're human cancer.

You're a liberal dumb cunt.

[macgyver]

I think all the people voting due to "concerns about Trump" have already done so, immigrants in fear of being deported, women who don't like his candid attitude, or just libs who really think he's the end of the world. The ones going to the polls the day after tomorrow really haven't made up their minds(undecideds hillary haters of both parties) or the "silent majority" who think of November 8 as some kind of D-day when they finally "take over".

"It ain't over till it's over."
-Yogi Berra

[Dendum]

You seriously have issues reading and comprehending the thread title.. don't you?

You are posting in a thread titled "WHO WAS GIVING ME 10-1 ODDS" The numbers before the word "odds" means what odds he is looking for.

So your faith in Trump is such that the only way it is reasonable for you or someone else to make a bet is id you get a 10 to 1 payout for a Trump win? If that ia the case then you and mac have fuck all faith in trump actually winning and are just full of hot air.

[macgyver]

My faith is shaken only because of Florida. Trump loses Florida chance of winning goes down to 2~5%. If he wins Florida, chance of winning goes to 60~65%

[Warriorbird]

My faith is shaken only because of Florida. Trump loses Florida chance of winning goes down to 2~5%. If he wins Florida, chance of winning goes to 60~65%

I thought you didn't believe in polls.

[Parkbandit]

So your faith in Trump is such that the only way it is reasonable for you or someone else to make a bet is id you get a 10 to 1 payout for a Trump win? If that ia the case then you and mac have fuck all faith in trump actually winning and are just full of hot air.

Honestly, are you this fucking dumb? You do realize that the original poster was the one that wanted to make a 10 to 1 bet for Trump, right?

I've never stated I wanted to make any sort of bet on this election.

[macgyver]

I thought you didn't believe in polls.

I am a realist though; also looking more down ballot as well. Hillary may become President but with a poison pill congress might as well just step down.

[Parkbandit]

My faith is shaken only because of Florida. Trump loses Florida chance of winning goes down to 2~5%. If he wins Florida, chance of winning goes to 60~65%

I think he will win Florida, but I doubt he will end up winning the election. It doesn't go up to 60-65% if he wins Florida, since he's going to have to run the table for NC, OH, IA, NH, GA and AZ.. and even then he needs to take NV or MI or PA

[Gelston]

You're human cancer.

You're a racist. I'm not saying this jokingly or sarcastic.

[macgyver]

I think he will win Florida, but I doubt he will end up winning the election. It doesn't go up to 60-65% if he wins Florida, since he's going to have to run the table for NC, OH, IA, NH, GA and AZ.. and even then he needs to take NV or MI or PA

http://img.pandawhale.com/post-40935-Wilfred-Mott-crying-gif-Imgur-1HXe.gif

[Methais]

You're a racist. I'm not saying this jokingly or sarcastic.

She was trying to imply that someone on Lnet yesterday was racist because they referred to their RL husband as "a black".

(Paraphrased)
"I'm married to a black and we're both voting Trump."

"Uhh...what do you mean "a black"?"

Yes clearly everyone else is the cancer.

[Warriorbird]

I am a realist though; also looking more down ballot as well. Hillary may become President but with a poison pill congress might as well just step down.

To a canny Democrat it stops the disaster of a Trump Presidency and enables midterm wins rather than losses. For those of us who think the Republican Congress are dangerous nutjobs but don't want all sorts of pie in the sky Democratic plans either this is an ideal outcome... and she can hopefully sneak many appointments in.

[Androidpk]

To a canny Democrat

:lol2:

[Warriorbird]

:lol2:

The sad bit is you'd have a point if Trump weren't way more dangerous. I'd vote for Richard Nixon over George Wallace any day.

[Androidpk]

The sad bit is you'd have a point if Trump weren't way more dangerous.

Whatever allows you to sleep at night I suppose.

[Kembal]

http://img.pandawhale.com/post-40935-Wilfred-Mott-crying-gif-Imgur-1HXe.gif

points for the Doctor Who gif?

[Parkbandit]

Nate Silver isn't left leaning- in 2008 and 2012 he was the most accurate prediction site.

Just because you all lost doesn't mean someone pointing it out was left leaning.

:lol: x 1000

I HOPE this puts Nate Silver out to pasture for good as the end all be all authority of political polling for the retarded left. He was literally the worst from the very beginning.

[Parkbandit]

The sad thing is, a dead red snapper could have ran on the Republican ticket and won, but Trump got the nod.

Any Republican could have won this easily other than Trump.

Hillary is going to win and win huge I think. Its a disaster and hopefully someone brings back "America Held Hostage Day 1" on her Presidency.

The sad thing even further is the gridlock and partisanship, investigations and games will prevent the business of the American people to get things done they were elected to do.

If Paul Ryan has any balls, he works with Clinton on entitlement reforms and tax code reform because the Liberty party and Tea Party already hates him and he gets it done, gets his legacy done early and runs against Hillary in 2020.

~Paul

Amazing.. if you replace Trump with Hillary and Republican with Democrat, you would have been 100% correct.

Hopefully, the minority party will get out of the way and not obstruct.. since we have been hearing that it's bad when they do that... that they should get on with the business of the American people.

It will be a delicious 4 years.

[Tgo01]

How glorious would it be if Trump does win and there is a loud cry from the left about the election being rigged after spending weeks saying the elections aren't rigged because Hillary was polling higher at the time?

God I don't believe in, please grant me this. It's all I have ever asked you for. Fuck world peace, fuck solving world hunger, this is the only thing I'll ever ask you for.

Thank you.

Praying to God DOES work! So...God is real?

[Parkbandit]

Praying to God DOES work! So...God is real?

Yes. And now you need to go to church and give 10% tithe every single year.. or God will give you cancer.

Also, plastic statues of St. Joseph buried head down, facing the house you are selling, works if you need to unload some real estate.

It's real.

[macgyver]

I knew I should've taken those odds!