View Full Version : Favorite DNC Wikileaks
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 01:09 PM
"Thanks for facilitating Luis coming on today, and bearing with us through a meelee of GOP nonsense and cancellations and all that. Any particular points he’ll want to make? We’re gonna stay Dem focused…" -CNN producer to DNC
But seriously.. the media doesn't have a bias. Really.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 01:10 PM
https://i.sli.mg/vR9aXN.jpg
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 01:18 PM
http://www.berniesandersvideo.com/uploads/8/9/4/8/8948721/_7692785_orig.jpg
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 01:20 PM
Where are all the fair weather liberals?
Gelston
07-24-2016, 01:22 PM
They are triggered in their safe space.
Taernath
07-24-2016, 01:31 PM
Where are all the fair weather liberals?
Wouldn't a fair weather liberal be one who stands by their party only when they're doing well?
~Rocktar~
07-24-2016, 01:32 PM
Wouldn't a fair weather liberal be one who stands by their party only when they're doing well?
That's the point and who is being called out.
Taernath
07-24-2016, 01:35 PM
That's the point and who is being called out.
I think everyone realizes what the DNC did was shitty. You're not going to see many people of any party defending it.
Jarvan
07-24-2016, 01:36 PM
I don't know why this is news.... hell... Unless you are watching FOX, this ISN'T news.
Hell.. this week... Hillary can be caught on Camera sacrificing Black babies to Satan, and eating their hearts... and CBS, CNN, and NBC wouldn't cover it.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 01:36 PM
I think everyone realizes what the DNC did was shitty. You're not going to see many people of any party defending it.
Did you see Robby Mook earlier? Blamed it all on the Russians.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 01:45 PM
More leaks on the way, including private server/Clinton Foundation stuff.
Wrathbringer
07-24-2016, 01:50 PM
I don't know why this is news.... hell... Unless you are watching FOX, this ISN'T news.
Hell.. this week... Hillary can be caught on Camera sacrificing Black babies to Satan, and eating their hearts... and CBS, CNN, and NBC wouldn't cover it.
I can't believe Trump/the media hasn't hammered hrc on her husband's 5 romps aboard a pedophile orgy airplane in which he dismissed his security detail. Maybe he's waiting for a debate to play that card.
Jarvan
07-24-2016, 01:55 PM
More leaks on the way, including private server/Clinton Foundation stuff.
Pk.. give it a rest.
Hillary could pull out a colt 45, and shoot Trump in the head at a debate and say to the camera.. "that's my rebuttal".
And she wouldn't even get handcuffed.
GS4Pirate
07-24-2016, 02:47 PM
I don't know why this is news.... hell... Unless you are watching FOX, this ISN'T news.
Hell.. this week... Hillary can be caught on Camera sacrificing Black babies to Satan, and eating their hearts... and CBS, CNN, and NBC wouldn't cover it.
Wait, I thought sacrificing Black babies was standard operating procedure for the Democrats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Av6D6Cs8SY
Jarvan
07-24-2016, 02:53 PM
Wait, I thought sacrificing Black babies was standard operating procedure for the Democrats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Av6D6Cs8SY
true... but they don't eat their hearts....
They sell them.
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 03:41 PM
Did you see Robby Mook earlier? Blamed it all on the Russians.
“What’s disturbing about this entire situation is that experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, took all these e-mails, and now are leaking them out through these websites.”
“Obviously they have to determine what’s accurate, what’s been doctored, what hasn’t been doctored. And it’s troubling that some experts are telling us this was done by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump,”
That's hilarious... on the same level with Weiner saying his Twitter was hacked.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 03:43 PM
All RedState reenactment aside... Americans really do love the idea they're resisting Russian totalitarianism. In a world where the Republicans get to pretend they're anti Wall Street and pro regulation (lulz) to try to pander to Bernie Sanders voters the Democrats are going to be anti Russia.
Where are all the fair weather liberals?
I think you mean progressives. Most Democrats are not, in fact, liberals. *I* am a liberal.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 03:46 PM
All RedState reenactment aside... Americans really do love the idea they're resisting Russian totalitarianism. In a world where the Republicans get to pretend they're anti Wall Street and pro regulation (lulz) to try to pander to Bernie Sanders voters the Democrats are going to be anti Russia.
It's the democrats that are anti wall st right?
Archigeek
07-24-2016, 03:46 PM
I think everyone realizes what the DNC did was shitty. You're not going to see many people of any party defending it.
I'm a member of the Democratic Party, and I'll be the first to say that DWS needs to go, as would a number of people who were on "the committee". Listen to what RT Rybak had to say about it for example. He was pretty vocal in his anger about the debate timing business for example. It was clear that there was a Hillary bias, and it's apparent that some people can't see the damage that bias causes to the party base.
Gelston
07-24-2016, 03:47 PM
It's the democrats that are anti wall st right?
Of course they are, Democrats don't like walls.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 03:48 PM
It's the democrats that are anti wall st right?
No no. Nobody is anti Wall Street.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 04:06 PM
No no. Nobody is anti Wall Street.
In a world where the Republicans get to pretend they're anti Wall Street
So you think it's hilarious when republicans do it but when Hillary and company pretend to be anti wall st it's not as funny?
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 04:07 PM
Of course they are, Democrats don't like walls.
Well judging from all their security leaks they certainly don't seem to like firewalls.
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 04:15 PM
No no. Nobody is anti Wall Street.
I think Sanders is nuts.. but I think he honestly believes he is anti-Wall Street.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 04:17 PM
I think Sanders is nuts.. but I think he honestly believes he is anti-Wall Street.
What about Pocahontas?
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 04:18 PM
What about Pocahontas?
There is nothing about her that is "honest" at all.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 04:18 PM
DWS announced she is stepping down from her DNC position when the convention ends. Gotta get ready for her Clinton administration cabinet position. DWS for Secretary of State?
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 04:20 PM
“Going forward, the best way for me to accomplish those goals is to step down as Party Chair at the end of this convention.
As Party Chair, this week I will open and close the Convention and I will address our delegates about the stakes involved in this election not only for Democrats, but for all Americans.”
We have planned a great and unified Convention this week and I hope and expect that the DNC team that has worked so hard to get us to this point will have the strong support of all Democrats in making sure this is the best convention we have ever had.”
Statement by Debbie Wasserman Schultz
I'm going to go out on a limb and say they will put a person that represents a voting block they are trying to solidify into that position. Maybe a gay latino. Or a black lesbian.
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 04:24 PM
DWS announced she is stepping down from her DNC position when the convention ends. Gotta get ready for her Clinton administration cabinet position. DWS for Secretary of State?
She will be put up in a nice cozy board somewhere, making millions for her help.
She won't be put in the Administration though.. she's too damaged.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 04:32 PM
She will be put up in a nice cozy board somewhere, making millions for her help.
She won't be put in the Administration though.. she's too damaged.
Hillary is far more damaged and she might be the next prez.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 04:33 PM
“Going forward, the best way for me to accomplish those goals is to step down as Party Chair at the end of this convention.
As Party Chair, this week I will open and close the Convention and I will address our delegates about the stakes involved in this election not only for Democrats, but for all Americans.”
We have planned a great and unified Convention this week and I hope and expect that the DNC team that has worked so hard to get us to this point will have the strong support of all Democrats in making sure this is the best convention we have ever had.”
Statement by Debbie Wasserman Schultz
I'm going to go out on a limb and say they will put a person that represents a voting block they are trying to solidify into that position. Maybe a gay latino. Or a black lesbian.
Marcia Fudge
GS4Pirate
07-24-2016, 05:03 PM
Pk.. give it a rest.
Hillary could pull out a colt 45, and shoot Trump in the head at a debate and say to the camera.. "that's my rebuttal".
And she wouldn't even get handcuffed.
I have totally given up on Hillary hacks. I spent 3 hours last week trying to explain to some stupid cunt that Bill Clinton was impeached, this stupid bitch insisted that he had not and that I was just a lying shitlord.
This is bad.
Jarvan
07-24-2016, 05:27 PM
She will be put up in a nice cozy board somewhere, making millions for her help.
She won't be put in the Administration though.. she's too damaged.
She will get a position in the Clinton Foundation. Wait... isn't that the DNC?
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 07:34 PM
Pk.. give it a rest.
Only when I'm no longer breathing.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 07:43 PM
So you think it's hilarious when republicans do it but when Hillary and company pretend to be anti wall st it's not as funny?
Sanders didn't win and he was absolutely cheated against. Notably Trump won and he was cheated against.
Sanders's window just closed and this will be spun as Putin interfering with the election.
Notably I don't think I'd consider Gary Johnson much in terms of regulating anything. He's a Libertarian.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 07:49 PM
what does that have to do with you mocking republicans and their wall st stance?
Ardwen
07-24-2016, 07:51 PM
The real issue is as flawed as Clinton is, Trump is a multi-phobic lunatic
Wesley
07-24-2016, 07:52 PM
http://pre02.deviantart.net/dab0/th/pre/i/2012/270/4/0/john_f__kennedy_alien_hunter_by_sharpwriter-d4pkjm8.jpg
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 07:53 PM
what does that have to do with you mocking republicans and their wall st stance?
Sanders was legitimately against Wall Street. Anybody else claiming it shouldn't. The "we're bringing back Glass-Steagall!" to pander to former Sanders supporters is sad.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 07:56 PM
Sanders was legitimately against Wall Street. Anybody else claiming it shouldn't. The "we're bringing black Glass-Steagall!" to pander to former Sanders supporters is sad.
Again, what does that have to do with your comment on republicans and wall street?
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 08:01 PM
Again, what does that have to do with your comment on republicans and wall street?
I was explaining why I thought it was hilarious that they would claim they were against Wall Street since you don't seem to get it.
Androidpk
07-24-2016, 08:09 PM
Right..
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 08:41 PM
"we're bringing black Glass-Steagall!"
Always playing the race card...
WRoss
07-24-2016, 08:41 PM
Schultz just got named Honorary Chair of the 50-State program on the Clinton campaign
http://fortune.com/2016/07/24/wasserman-schultz-clinton-campaign/
No corruption to see here peasants. We have to keep you ignorant.
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 08:43 PM
Schultz just got named Honorary Chair of the 50-State program on the Clinton campaign
http://fortune.com/2016/07/24/wasserman-schultz-clinton-campaign/
No corruption to see here peasants. We have to keep you ignorant.
Hillary obviously doesn't care about the optics.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 08:48 PM
Always playing the race card...
One of my best typos in years.
WRoss
07-24-2016, 08:49 PM
Hillary obviously doesn't care about the optics.
I am just flabbergasted at this whole campaign. Like, if there is possibly a worse move she could have made, I don't think she could have. The only appeal to this that I can think of is that she wants to openly show people that if you are corrupt for her, she will reward you.
Parkbandit
07-24-2016, 08:56 PM
I am just flabbergasted at this whole campaign. Like, if there is possibly a worse move she could have made, I don't think she could have. The only appeal to this that I can think of is that she wants to openly show people that if you are corrupt for her, she will reward you.
But will she lose any votes because of it? Probably not. Her followers don't care... they believe it's all the Right Wing conspiracy stuff.
I wish I was surprised that she doesn't care what other people think.. rules are made for the peasants, not the ruling class.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 09:00 PM
I am just flabbergasted at this whole campaign. Like, if there is possibly a worse move she could have made, I don't think she could have. The only appeal to this that I can think of is that she wants to openly show people that if you are corrupt for her, she will reward you.
That was an insanely baffling move. I thought Hillary'd be smart enough to throw her under the bus.
It's even freakier that she's put in charge of a "50 State Strategy" when the VP pick is one of the original people who made it and she fucked it over.
I'll blame her and the rest of us for not calling her out harder for 2014 if Trump wins.
GS4Pirate
07-24-2016, 09:48 PM
That was an insanely baffling move. I thought Hillary'd be smart enough to throw her under the bus.
It's even freakier that she's put in charge of a "50 State Strategy" when the VP pick is one of the original people who made it and she fucked it over.
I'll blame her and the rest of us for not calling her out harder for 2014 if Trump wins.
Democrats and bad judgement walk hand in hand and you want these fucktards picking our next SCJ's? That's poster boy shit right there.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 09:58 PM
Democrats and bad judgement walk hand in hand and you want these fucktards picking our next SCJ's? That's poster boy shit right there.
You and I have different values. Demoratic picked justices are more likely to express mine than Republican justices are.
Luftstreitkräfte
07-24-2016, 09:59 PM
The mere sight of Hillary Clinton makes my stomach turn, fucking seriously. I'd take Trump over her any day. At least his sleaze is palatable.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 10:01 PM
The mere sight of Hillary Clinton makes my stomach turn, fucking seriously. I'd take Trump over her any day. At least his sleaze is palatable.
Are you gonna register when he makes you?
Luftstreitkräfte
07-24-2016, 10:18 PM
Are you gonna register when he makes you?
I didn't realize everyone thats banged your mom has to register, I guess if he's my President he calls the shots so I'll be on the safe side and do it.
Serious note: After spending 10 years with all kinds of Muslims, overhearing their intimate conversations when "no one else was listening" i'd say registering is the least we could do. I'm seriously 100% in support of his policy towards Muslims.
Warriorbird
07-24-2016, 10:24 PM
Serious note: After spending 10 years with all kinds of Muslims, overhearing their intimate conversations when "no one else was listening" i'd say registering is the least we could do. I'm seriously 100% in support of his policy towards Muslims.
I was curious. I know a number of my students aren't so comfortable with it.
Taernath
07-24-2016, 10:38 PM
I am just flabbergasted at this whole campaign. Like, if there is possibly a worse move she could have made, I don't think she could have. The only appeal to this that I can think of is that she wants to openly show people that if you are corrupt for her, she will reward you.
It's so bizarre watching DWS go from the not-so-secret back pocket of Clinton to her front pocket with absolutely no shame.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 12:44 AM
I was curious. I know a number of my students aren't so comfortable with it.
Maybe when your students grow up and have experienced 35+ years of Islamic extremism, had children and raised a family, they will have a better grasp on reality. That is, as long as one of these rag head fucks doesn't manage to set off a dirty bomb in one of our cities before that time comes.
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 12:46 AM
Maybe when your students grow up and have experienced 35+ years of Islamic extremism, had children and raised a family, they will have a better grasp on reality. That is, as long as one of these rag head fucks doesn't manage to set off a dirty bomb in one of our cities before that time comes.
Most of the Muslim ones I'm referring to are the children of people who helped America's armed forces... primarily through translation work.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 01:15 AM
Most of the Muslim ones I'm referring to are the children of people who helped America's armed forces... primarily through translation work.
Well, the Muslims I'm referring to have had a long term goal of destroying western civilization and their doing a pretty fine job of reminding us that's their goal. We have to do something, letting more of these people in from that region is like playing Russian roulette. We have this sock drawer filled with black and white socks, mostly the drawer has black socks which are totally awesome socks. The problem is we are blindly taking socks from the drawer, we are going to get stuck with some shitty white socks if we don't open our fucking eyes. There's also a good chance one of those white socks will come out smelling like a nuclear winter.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 01:20 AM
You and I have different values. Demoratic picked justices are more likely to express mine than Republican justices are.
You still trusting HRC to do the right thing? You poor sap.
~Rocktar~
07-25-2016, 02:00 AM
“Going forward, the best way for me to accomplish those goals is to step down as Party Chair at the end of this convention.
As Party Chair, this week I will open and close the Convention and I will address our delegates about the stakes involved in this election not only for Democrats, but for all Americans.”
We have planned a great and unified Convention this week and I hope and expect that the DNC team that has worked so hard to get us to this point will have the strong support of all Democrats in making sure this is the best convention we have ever had.”
Statement by Debbie Wasserman Schultz
I'm going to go out on a limb and say they will put a person that represents a voting block they are trying to solidify into that position. Maybe a gay latino. Or a black lesbian.
Close, they elevated vice char Donna Brazile as interim chair until after the election. A few mintues after the announcement, e-mails surface of her anti Sanders sentiment.
http://dennismichaellynch.com/new-democratic-chairperson-also-exposed-in-wikileaks-emails/
Jarvan
07-25-2016, 04:19 AM
Close, they elevated vice char Donna Brazile as interim chair until after the election. A few mintues after the announcement, e-mails surface of her anti Sanders sentiment.
http://dennismichaellynch.com/new-democratic-chairperson-also-exposed-in-wikileaks-emails/
But she APOLOGIZED.
So it's all good.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 06:20 AM
I have no idea how this convention is going to be but there's no way it's gonna run as smooth as the RNC last week.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 08:17 AM
Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-dnc-documents-show-plans-to-reward-big-donors-with-federal-appointments/
18 U.S. Code § 600 - Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity:
Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 08:26 AM
Bold claim from Assange, saying next batch of leaks has enough dirt to ensure Hillary's arrest.
Gelston
07-25-2016, 08:35 AM
Bold claim from Assange, saying next batch of leaks has enough dirt to ensure Hillary's arrest.
I imagine if Jesus Christ himself delivered the documents and confirmed they were factual and it was straight up high treason with video, audio, and she herself confirmed it was all true, she'd still weasel out of it.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 08:36 AM
I imagine if Jesus Christ himself delivered the documents and confirmed they were factual and it was straight up high treason with video, audio, and she herself confirmed it was all true, she'd still weasel out of it.
she's good but she isn't untouchable
Gelston
07-25-2016, 08:40 AM
she's good but she isn't untouchable
Right now, the history books are saying something different. I think if she loses this election, she might see some charges from something, but I don't think anyone can touch her now.
Parkbandit
07-25-2016, 08:42 AM
she's good but she isn't untouchable
http://wcinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/tef_master_rgb_280-300x300.jpg
elcidcannon
07-25-2016, 08:46 AM
Well judging from all their security leaks they certainly don't seem to like firewalls.
ZING!
Shaps
07-25-2016, 08:54 AM
What's hilarious is how the Democrats championed Wikileaks when it was supposedly going against the Republicans.
Now that it's going against them.. LOL.
I'll give it to Assange.. at least he's airing all of it, regardless of what party it works against.
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 09:00 AM
What's hilarious is how the Democrats championed Wikileaks when it was supposedly going against the Republicans.
Now that it's going against them.. LOL.
I'll give it to Assange.. at least he's airing all of it, regardless of what party it works against.
He personally hates Hillary so doesn't mind the Trump success/Putin assistance.
If the DNC were dumb enough to let this happen it should come out. The only thing that baffles me is Hillary hiring DWS. I'd think her campaign/her were smarter.
You still trusting HRC to do the right thing? You poor sap.
I trust her court picks more than Trump's. I don't like conservative justices.
Gelston
07-25-2016, 09:01 AM
What's hilarious is how the Democrats championed Wikileaks when it was supposedly going against the Republicans.
Now that it's going against them.. LOL.
I'll give it to Assange.. at least he's airing all of it, regardless of what party it works against.
It is the other way around too, you know there are Republicans cheering for Wikileaks right now. I am, although I still also hate them and think they should all go to prison... Is this a love/hate relationship?
Parkbandit
07-25-2016, 09:22 AM
It is the other way around too, you know there are Republicans cheering for Wikileaks right now. I am, although I still also hate them and think they should all go to prison... Is this a love/hate relationship?
Ditto.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:57 AM
You still trusting HRC to do the right thing? You poor sap.
Maybe WB is counting on scorched earth policy, if this is the case I do tip my hat to him. I do know this is the rout the "Cruz" faction of the Republicans are counting on.
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 10:05 AM
Maybe WB is counting on scorched earth policy, if this is the case I do tip my hat to him. I do know this is the rout the "Cruz" faction of the Republicans are counting on.
I certainly would have actively preferred and campaigned for Sanders. If Clinton loses this winnable race from her nonsense we have to count on how badly the Republicans messed up the last time they had the Presidency and Congress. None of this makes me like Trump or the Republican Party... just be unsatisfied with the Democratic candidate/structure she was allowed to put into place.
Gelston
07-25-2016, 10:09 AM
If Clinton loses this winnable race from her nonsense
It is becomming less and less winnable for her. If she loses, she needs to take it as a sign that she was never meant to be President.
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 10:13 AM
It is becomming less and less winnable for her. If she loses, she needs to take it as a sign that she was never meant to be President.
Absolutely. She should be thankful it isn't Rubio or Kasich against her. I'm sure they'd be up nearing double digits.
Jarvan
07-25-2016, 10:18 AM
Hillary Clinton in an interview asked about the leaked emails...
"I don't know anything about these emails.. I haven't read them"
Seems to me... she never knows anything about any email.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 10:19 AM
It is becomming less and less winnable for her. If she loses, she needs to take it as a sign that she was never meant to be President.
I don't see her winning. Her unfavorable numbers are at 70%. She's done for and so is this democratic party.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 10:56 AM
lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnNMllexHyk&feature=youtu.be&t=2m24s
Shaps
07-25-2016, 12:24 PM
It is the other way around too, you know there are Republicans cheering for Wikileaks right now. I am, although I still also hate them and think they should all go to prison... Is this a love/hate relationship?
Fully agree with you.
I'm glad politicians in general, regardless of party affiliation, are getting the screws put to them. How the general public are such idiots is truly astounding. This just highlights what the DNC really thinks of it's voters, and maybe now so many won't just be sheep.
It is hilarious watching the news channels trying to downplay/spin this whole controversy though. Sure they have to cover it, but the terms/language they use is muted. If this was a Republican scandal, it would be to the electric chair with the RNC.
Shaps
07-25-2016, 12:26 PM
If I were a Democrat (I consider myself Independent), I would be pissed the hell off that Hillary hired this bat shit crazy person to her campaign after this came out.
If that is not a slap in the face, I don't know what is.
Fallen
07-25-2016, 12:41 PM
Not everything coming out of the wikileaks situation is good: http://gizmodo.com/wikileaks-just-published-tons-of-personal-data-like-a-b-1784140603?utm_source=recirculation&utm_medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=fridayPM
Gelston
07-25-2016, 12:46 PM
Not everything coming out of the wikileaks situation is good: http://gizmodo.com/wikileaks-just-published-tons-of-personal-data-like-a-b-1784140603?utm_source=recirculation&utm_medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=fridayPM
Sweet, time to go try out a bunch of new MMOs.
Parkbandit
07-25-2016, 01:36 PM
If I were a Democrat (I consider myself Independent), I would be pissed the hell off that Hillary hired this bat shit crazy person to her campaign after this came out.
If that is not a slap in the face, I don't know what is.
Why do you hate women so much????
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 05:34 PM
But the Florida congresswoman did not go quietly or without a fight. It took pressure from the White House – including a phone call with President Obama – to get her to finally see the writing on the wall. Two reliable sources say Wasserman Schultz was trying to make top aides take the fall, rather than take personal responsibility. Until the end, she struggled to understand what a lightning rod she’s become.
What? All I've been hearing is how wonderful DWS is for stepping forward and doing the right thing for the sake of the party.
Parkbandit
07-25-2016, 05:40 PM
What? All I've been hearing is how wonderful DWS is for stepping forward and doing the right thing for the sake of the party.
Mass media spin for Hillary.
Latrinsorm
07-25-2016, 07:48 PM
Well, the Muslims I'm referring to have had a long term goal of destroying western civilization and their doing a pretty fine job of reminding us that's their goal. We have to do something, letting more of these people in from that region is like playing Russian roulette. We have this sock drawer filled with black and white socks, mostly the drawer has black socks which are totally awesome socks. The problem is we are blindly taking socks from the drawer, we are going to get stuck with some shitty white socks if we don't open our fucking eyes. There's also a good chance one of those white socks will come out smelling like a nuclear winter.People make this exact same argument every time immigration causes a massive demographic change. Before the Muslims and Hispanics it was the eastern Europeans, and they even assassinated a President. Before them it was the Irish and German Catholics, and people like you came up with the Know Nothings.
I am a descendant of those Irish, Germans, and eastern Europeans, and so I know: you've always been wrong. You will always be wrong. And America will always survive you.
I don't see her winning. Her unfavorable numbers are at 70%. She's done for and so is this democratic party.Her unfavorable numbers are in the 50-60 range, but what matters is that so are Trump's. This is (part of) why Nate Silver still has Clinton at 60-40 odds to win.
Tgo01
07-25-2016, 07:50 PM
This is (part of) why Nate Silver still has Clinton at 60-40 odds to win.
Nate Silver has already shown he is a Democrat political hack this election cycle, why is anyone taking him seriously anymore? Especially a Democrat pretending to be a Republican?
Latrinsorm
07-25-2016, 07:55 PM
Nate Silver has already shown he is a Democrat political hack this election cycle, why is anyone taking him seriously anymore? Especially a Democrat pretending to be a Republican?Need oven mitts for a take that hot. Yowza.
I take Nate Silver seriously because I don't believe he suddenly became a political hack, because he has an excellent track record, and because he cops to and thinks about the times when that track record have failed.
Tgo01
07-25-2016, 07:58 PM
I take Nate Silver seriously because I don't believe he suddenly became a political hack
You're right, he's always been a political hack, he just made it crystal clear this time around.
Didn't Trump have like a 2% chance of securing the nomination according to Silver? Even after candidates were dropping out left and right and poll after poll showed Trump with a wide lead there was Silver saying "Gais gais, don't worry gais! Trump will never receive more than 25% support and he'll never be the nominee!"
Wesley
07-25-2016, 08:02 PM
You're right, he's always been a political hack, he just made it crystal clear this time around.
Didn't Trump have like a 2% chance of securing the nomination according to Silver? Even after candidates were dropping out left and right and poll after poll showed Trump with a wide lead there was Silver saying "Gais gais, don't worry gais! Trump will never receive more than 25% support and he'll never be the nominee!"
To be fair, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone affiliated with any political party early in the primaries that though Trump had any legitimate chance at a nomination.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 08:02 PM
Nate Silver.. lol. Nothing but a paid shill for team Hillary.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 08:07 PM
People make this exact same argument every time immigration causes a massive demographic change. Before the Muslims and Hispanics it was the eastern Europeans, and they even assassinated a President. Before them it was the Irish and German Catholics, and people like you came up with the Know Nothings.
I am a descendant of those Irish, Germans, and eastern Europeans, and so I know: you've always been wrong. You will always be wrong. And America will always survive you.Her unfavorable numbers are in the 50-60 range, but what matters is that so are Trump's. This is (part of) why Nate Silver still has Clinton at 60-40 odds to win.
How lovely of you to try and compare races to a religion that has ALWAYS been hell bent on creating a world caliphate. People like you Latrin is why these people see our weakness, we continue on this limp wristed path and I assure you we will be nuked by these fucks.
Simply put Latrin you're either to scared to stand up to these people or completely ignorant of the truth of Islam's history. Your "just comfort them" tripe has NEVER, EVER, EVER, NEVER, EVER in human history defeated an enemy.
How many more attacks will it take Latrin, we are at 1-2 major attacks a week now on Western society, will it take 1 a day for your ilk to stop being complacent to these animals?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MZx38i6iYs
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 08:11 PM
Hillary's made some ludicrous mistakes. Simultaneously there's a lot of political trickery time left before the election.
Wesley
07-25-2016, 08:16 PM
How lovely of you to try and compare races to a religion that has ALWAYS been hell bent on creating a world caliphate. People like you Latrin is why these people see our weakness, we continue on this limp wristed path and I assure you we will be nuked by these fucks.
Simply put Latrin you're either to scared to stand up to these people or completely ignorant of the truth of Islam's history. Your "just comfort them" tripe has NEVER, EVER, EVER, NEVER, EVER in human history defeated an enemy.
How many more attacks will it take Latrin, we are at 1-2 major attacks a week now on Western society, will it take 1 a day for your ilk to stop being complacent to these animals?
I'd be interested to know how you would fix the issue as you see it. Genocide of a billion and a half people? No, that'd be too extreme, wouldn't it? Perhaps we could just round them up so we can keep tabs on them? Keep them segregated from the rest of the population? And what of the ones living in predominantly Non-Muslim countries, like the US.
What exactly is your "Final Solution" to "The Muslim Question"?
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 08:27 PM
I'd be interested to know how you would fix the issue as you see it. Genocide of a billion and a half people? No, that'd be too extreme, wouldn't it? Perhaps we could just round them up so we can keep tabs on them? Keep them segregated from the rest of the population? And what of the ones living in predominantly Non-Muslim countries, like the US.
What exactly is your "Final Solution" to "The Muslim Question"?
I have already stated my "Final Solution" (how very clever, it would be interesting to hear your take on abortion) We drop a fucking nuke right in the middle of ISIS controlled land, after that we warn them, more attacks=more nukes. You make them fear us more than their god. This is how wars are won, I'm sorry your bleeding heart can't handle the truth.
Wesley
07-25-2016, 08:32 PM
This is how wars are won, I'm sorry your bleeding heart can't handle the truth.
It's a little bit disturbing that every time I advocate against genocide here I'm called a liberal in response.
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 08:33 PM
I have already stated my "Final Solution" (how very clever, it would be interesting to hear your take on abortion) We drop a fucking nuke right in the middle of ISIS controlled land, after that we warn them, more attacks=more nukes. You make them fear us more than their god. This is how wars are won, I'm sorry your bleeding heart can't handle the truth.
And folks wonder why I don't support Trump.
It's a little bit disturbing that every time I advocate against genocide here I'm called a liberal in response.
Fairly common these days. Part of why I still have some faint hope for this election.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 08:44 PM
It's a little bit disturbing that every time I advocate against genocide here I'm called a liberal in response.
I didn't call you a liberal, I called you a bleeding heart. You're the one that made the association.
P.S. Don't come crying about being labeled a bleeding heart when you throw out "The final solution" bullshit.
because :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M8szlSa-8o
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 08:44 PM
I have already stated my "Final Solution" (how very clever, it would be interesting to hear your take on abortion) We drop a fucking nuke right in the middle of ISIS controlled land, after that we warn them, more attacks=more nukes. You make them fear us more than their god. This is how wars are won, I'm sorry your bleeding heart can't handle the truth.
Jesus.. get the fuck out of here, moron. Have you signed up with any militias to fight daesh yet or are you still home in your moms basement smoking weed and complaining about being sick?
Jarvan
07-25-2016, 08:46 PM
I'd be interested to know how you would fix the issue as you see it. Genocide of a billion and a half people? No, that'd be too extreme, wouldn't it? Perhaps we could just round them up so we can keep tabs on them? Keep them segregated from the rest of the population? And what of the ones living in predominantly Non-Muslim countries, like the US.
What exactly is your "Final Solution" to "The Muslim Question"?
make the "Moderates" deal with the problem of radicals.
How do you make them? Give them a choice... fight the radicals, or fight us. Course instead of fight.. you could say you would cut them off. no more funds, no more trade. Embargo their ass, force NATO to stop trading with them as well. Cut them off from the rest of the world. You don't have to drop bombs.
Shitty choice.. and people wouldn't like it... but you asked how to defeat a radical ideology. Only that SAME BASE IDEOLOGY can do it. It's just that they don't want to. Most of them want to take it's place.
If I could somehow transport the entire middle east to an alternate dimension and let them deal with their own crap and leave us out of it, I would. We can't which means we have to deal with it.
It's funny tho.. but I bet we can all guess who will use the nukes first... them or us. Not to mention... you talk about Genocide... yet that is what they want, and if they could achieve it, they would.
Taernath
07-25-2016, 08:48 PM
Yes, unilaterally nuking a geographic region and killing hundreds of millions of people would have no ramifications whatsoever.
Wesley
07-25-2016, 08:48 PM
I didn't call you a liberal, I called you a bleeding heart. You're the one that made the association.
P.S. Don't come crying about being labeled a bleeding heart when you throw out "The final solution" bullshit.
My sincerest apologies. I wasn't aware you were calling me a heart shaped plant.
bleed·ing heart
noun
1.
informalderogatory
a person considered to be dangerously softhearted, typically someone considered too liberal in political beliefs.
"a tirade against bleeding-heart environmentalists"
2.
any of a number of plants that have heart-shaped flowers, typically pink or red, in particular.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 08:52 PM
make the "Moderates" deal with the problem of radicals.
How do you make them? Give them a choice... fight the radicals, or fight us. Course instead of fight.. you could say you would cut them off. no more funds, no more trade. Embargo their ass, force NATO to stop trading with them as well. Cut them off from the rest of the world. You don't have to drop bombs.
Is this like Hillary going to Wall St. and telling them to cut it out? You really think Saudi Arabia gives a fuck? Bahrain? Qatar?
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 08:56 PM
Jesus.. get the fuck out of here, moron. Have you signed up with any militias to fight daesh yet or are you still home in your moms basement smoking weed and complaining about being sick?
What the fuck are you talking about?
Now anybody that is against ISIS, MUST go to the battlefield? Using that logic, anyone that is not on the battlefield MUST be an ISIS supporter?
This is why the nuke option is good, it gets launched from a sub in the middle of the sea. No ally losses.
Do you seriously keep wanting to make it personal, you're the one with the past of theft and leaching off women, not I sir. I have always paid my way.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 08:58 PM
Yes, unilaterally nuking a geographic region and killing hundreds of millions of people would have no ramifications whatsoever.
You do know nukes come in many different sizes, yes? From little tiny nukes that can be fired from artillery to big ol fuck bombs that are mounted on ballistic missiles.
Wesley
07-25-2016, 08:59 PM
What the fuck are you talking about?
Now anybody that is against ISIS, MUST go to the battlefield? Using that logic, anyone that is not on the battlefield MUST be an ISIS supporter?
This is why the nuke option is good, it gets launched from a sub in the middle of the sea. No ally losses.
Do you seriously keep wanting to make it personal, you're the one with the past of theft and leaching off women, not I sir. I have always paid my way.
Yeah! Everybody knows that when a large, coordinated attack is taken out against a population center, the rest of the affected populace falls in line and knows their place!
Like how after 9/11, the rest of America felt super complacent and peaceful!
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 09:00 PM
What the fuck are you talking about?
Now anybody that is against ISIS, MUST go to the battlefield? Using that logic, anyone that is not on the battlefield MUST be an ISIS supporter?
This is why the nuke option is good, it gets launched from a sub in the middle of the sea. No ally losses.
Do you seriously keep wanting to make it personal, you're the one with the past of theft and leaching off women, not I sir. I have always paid my way.
I'm just asking because you seem to have a habit about bitching that nothing is being done to fight terrorism. WTF have you done exactly?
No ally losses? Did you see Taernath's comment? If you don't think there would be major, major consequences for the US blindly dropping nukes in SW Asia then you're an even bigger moron then I thought. And yes, I'll make it personal all I want. I've got nothing to hide but apparently you do.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:01 PM
make the "Moderates" deal with the problem of radicals.
How do you make them? Give them a choice... fight the radicals, or fight us. Course instead of fight.. you could say you would cut them off. no more funds, no more trade. Embargo their ass, force NATO to stop trading with them as well. Cut them off from the rest of the world. You don't have to drop bombs.
Shitty choice.. and people wouldn't like it... but you asked how to defeat a radical ideology. Only that SAME BASE IDEOLOGY can do it. It's just that they don't want to. Most of them want to take it's place.
If I could somehow transport the entire middle east to an alternate dimension and let them deal with their own crap and leave us out of it, I would. We can't which means we have to deal with it.
It's funny tho.. but I bet we can all guess who will use the nukes first... them or us. Not to mention... you talk about Genocide... yet that is what they want, and if they could achieve it, they would.
That's what it's going to take for these people, we will have to be nuked first.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:02 PM
I'm just asking because you seem to have a habit about bitching that nothing is being done to fight terrorism. WTF have you done exactly?
No ally losses? Did you see Taernath's comment? If you don't think there would be major, major consequences for the US blindly dropping nukes in SW Asia then you're an even bigger moron then I thought. And yes, I'll make it personal all I want. I've got nothing to hide but apparently you do.
Who? Who is going to do anything?
I have something to hide? Please let me know what this is, because I'm at a loss.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:05 PM
Yeah! Everybody knows that when a large, coordinated attack is taken out against a population center, the rest of the affected populace falls in line and knows their place!
Like how after 9/11, the rest of America felt super complacent and peaceful!
The Japanese fell in line within days and now are one of our best friends.
Wesley
07-25-2016, 09:06 PM
The Japanese fell in line within days and now are one of our best friends.
Are you legitimately mentally challenged?
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 09:08 PM
The Japanese fell in line within days and now are one of our best friends.
Nation state vs non-state actors... seriously, just STFU with this idiocy.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:09 PM
Are you legitimately mentally challenged?
Have the Japanese ever been a problem since we nuked them? NO. It worked, it saved lives and ended the war.
Parkbandit
07-25-2016, 09:10 PM
And folks wonder why I don't support Trump.
Who actually wonders that? I certainly don't since Trump doesn't have a "D" next to his name.
No one with an IQ above 3 believed you wouldn't support whoever the Democrat was this election cycle.. no matter how crooked she is.
Taernath
07-25-2016, 09:11 PM
You do know nukes come in many different sizes, yes? From little tiny nukes that can be fired from artillery to big ol fuck bombs that are mounted on ballistic missiles.
You do know you said "We drop a fucking nuke right in the middle of ISIS controlled land", yes? You weren't talking about tactical nukes, you were talking about creating a lebensparkplatz stretching over several middle east countries. Even if we did use lower-yield bombs, what would be the point? We can accomplish the same thing with conventional arms.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:13 PM
Nation state vs non-state actors... seriously, just STFU with this idiocy.
What would be the difference? Do you not understand that their belief in their god is what gives them the courage to blow themselves up? Are you seriously this naive, putting fear into the enemy is what wins wars.
Now please tell me what my big secret is, I'm really curious about this.
Wesley
07-25-2016, 09:14 PM
Have the Japanese ever been a problem since we nuked them? NO. It worked, it saved lives and ended the war.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were an accelerated end to the war that ensured that Japan ultimately surrendered to the United States rather than Russia, who had turned after VE-Day to the East. This was after a multi year offensive Army and Navy campaign waged by Japan in China and the Pacific, the result of which was a complete destruction of their ability to wage war and do anything but defend the last outpost they had left (the mainland). All in all, it cost millions of lives on both sides over a period of years. If the technology had existed at the beginning of the war to drop two nuclear weapons on the Japanese mainland, and the US had done that, it would have severely pissed off a well armed Japanese Army and Navy who likely would have been much more willing to deal peace with China and turn its entire attention to the real enemy: The one who just dropped bombs on them.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:16 PM
You do know you said "We drop a fucking nuke right in the middle of ISIS controlled land", yes? You weren't talking about tactical nukes, you were talking about creating a lebensparkplatz stretching over several middle east countries. Even if we did use lower-yield bombs, what would be the point? We can accomplish the same thing with conventional arms.
Cool, drop a couple daisy cutters, whatever. You're still going to have civilians killed. There is no way around this, to defeat a savage, you have to be savage.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:19 PM
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were an accelerated end to the war that ensured that Japan ultimately surrendered to the United States rather than Russia, who had turned after VE-Day to the East. This was after a multi year offensive Army and Navy campaign waged by Japan in China and the Pacific, the result of which was a complete destruction of their ability to wage war and do anything but defend the last outpost they had left (the mainland). All in all, it cost millions of lives on both sides over a period of years. If the technology had existed at the beginning of the war to drop two nuclear weapons on the Japanese mainland, and the US had done that, it would have severely pissed off a well armed Japanese Army and Navy who likely would have been much more willing to deal peace with China and turn its entire attention to the real enemy: The one who just dropped bombs on them.
Have the Japanese ever been a problem since we nuked them? NO. It worked, it saved lives and ended the war.
The fact is, your long spew of "what if" means shit in reality. The nukes ended the war, saved lives and we have had peace with Japan ever since.
Jarvan
07-25-2016, 09:20 PM
Nation state vs non-state actors... seriously, just STFU with this idiocy.
ISIL... Islamic STATE...
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 09:21 PM
Who actually wonders that? I certainly don't since Trump doesn't have a "D" next to his name.
No one with an IQ above 3 believed you wouldn't support whoever the Democrat was this election cycle.. no matter how crooked she is.
How many non Republican Presidential candidates have you voted for?
Wesley
07-25-2016, 09:21 PM
Have the Japanese ever been a problem since we nuked them? NO. It worked, it saved lives and ended the war.
The fact is, your long spew of "what if" means shit in reality. The nukes ended the war, saved lives and we have had peace with Japan ever since.
I can see the answer to my previous question was "Yes".
Jarvan
07-25-2016, 09:21 PM
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were an accelerated end to the war that ensured that Japan ultimately surrendered to the United States rather than Russia, who had turned after VE-Day to the East. This was after a multi year offensive Army and Navy campaign waged by Japan in China and the Pacific, the result of which was a complete destruction of their ability to wage war and do anything but defend the last outpost they had left (the mainland). All in all, it cost millions of lives on both sides over a period of years. If the technology had existed at the beginning of the war to drop two nuclear weapons on the Japanese mainland, and the US had done that, it would have severely pissed off a well armed Japanese Army and Navy who likely would have been much more willing to deal peace with China and turn its entire attention to the real enemy: The one who just dropped bombs on them.
Well.. .we don't exactly want IRAN to control Syria and Iraq, now do we?
Taernath
07-25-2016, 09:22 PM
Cool, drop a couple daisy cutters, whatever. You're still going to have civilians killed. There is no way around this, to defeat a savage, you have to be savage.
I'm sure the people you'd consign to death in a nuclear bombing campaign would agree with you.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 09:24 PM
Who actually wonders that? I certainly don't since Trump doesn't have a "D" next to his name.
No one with an IQ above 3 believed you wouldn't support whoever the Democrat was this election cycle.. no matter how crooked she is.
What are you talking about, WB is totally against Hillary!
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:26 PM
I can see the answer to my previous question was "Yes".
Wesley, when you resort to calling people crazy, when you know you don't have a legit retort, you have lost the debate
Let's see how this went for you.
"Final solution" comment, cries like a bitch when called a bleeding heart, then goes back to name calling. This is playground level politics Wesley.
Wesley
07-25-2016, 09:27 PM
Wesley, when you resort to calling people crazy, when you know you don't have a legit retort, you have lost the debate
Let's see how this went for you.
"Final solution" comment, cries like a bitch when called a bleeding heart, then goes back to name calling. This is playground level politics Wesley.
If you aren't able to read, I'm not able to help you.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 09:27 PM
ISIL... Islamic STATE...
Calling yourself a state doesn't make you a state..
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:30 PM
I'm sure the people you'd consign to death in a nuclear bombing campaign would agree with you.
What are you not understanding, these people will nuke us if they get their hands on the weaponry. They already stated they want to destroy us, why are we waiting? I mean fuck Iran just got the go ahead, yea go ahead build your nukes, we trust you.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:31 PM
If you aren't able to read, I'm not able to help you.
Still on the playground I see.
drauz
07-25-2016, 09:40 PM
Still on the playground I see.
He tried replying with a thought out response, but you replied with a nuh-uh and just repeated what you had said before. Playground politics indeed.
Gelston
07-25-2016, 09:43 PM
What the fuck happened to this thread? Oh, GS4Pirate started posting in it, completely derailed it, and is talking about dumb shit again.
What the fuck happened to this thread? Oh, GS4Pirate started posting in it, completely derailed it, and is talking about dumb shit again.
It's almost Tuesday!
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 09:51 PM
It's almost Tuesday!
Sup, Back. What are your thoughts on the beloved Democratic party right now?
Sup, Back. What are your thoughts on the beloved Democratic party right now?
Not surprised. Political maneuvering happens. I preferred Bernie but we get Clair Under... I mean, Hillary. Still waaaaaay the fuck better than Trump.
We are lucky we only have two parties in this country. Look at other governments around the world and they can be stifled with multiple parties who then have to make backroom deals to get anything done. We do too but to a lesser degree.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 09:58 PM
What the fuck happened to this thread? Oh, GS4Pirate started posting in it, completely derailed it, and is talking about dumb shit again.
Nope I was asked what I would do, then everyone started crying.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 10:00 PM
He tried replying with a thought out response, but you replied with a nuh-uh and just repeated what you had said before. Playground politics indeed.
I repeated my question because it was not answered, it was a reply of made up scenarios of what might have happened. so I simply restated the question that Wesley keeps dodging. Kind of like your shit.
Androidpk
07-25-2016, 10:04 PM
Nope I was asked what I would do, then everyone started crying.
Crying? No, laughing at your complete and utter stupidity.
drauz
07-25-2016, 10:11 PM
I repeated my question because it was not answered, it was a reply of made up scenarios of what might have happened. so I simply restated the question that Wesley keeps dodging.
No, he was trying to tell you why we dropped the nuke. It wasn't a made up scenario, it was the rationale behind dropping the bomb...
Kind of like your shit.
I don't dodge your questions. I've always answered them, even when I find them ridiculous and know you are trying to play the "gotcha" game. You barely seem to read what people post and just skim it and form an incomplete opinion of what you think it says. You then base your entire argument on what you think someone is saying rather than what they are saying, you add words that aren't written. Is there something you are still looking for an answer to, from me?
Playground politics indeed.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 10:20 PM
No, he was trying to tell you why we dropped the nuke. It wasn't a made up scenario, it was the rationale behind dropping the bomb...
I know why we dropped the nukes, it was the latter part of the reply that went on about what if's.......basically tripe.
Dude you're always side stepping questions.
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 10:21 PM
Crying? No, laughing at your complete and utter stupidity.
No it was crying.
"Why do I always get called a liberal?" :violin:
drauz
07-25-2016, 10:29 PM
Dude you're always side stepping questions.
I say I don't, you say I do it all the time. What are we to do about this quandary?
drauz
07-25-2016, 10:30 PM
No it was crying.
"Why do I always get called a liberal?" :violin:
Typical, you leave out the most important part of the sentence. Do you work for CNN or something?
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 11:03 PM
I say I don't, you say I do it all the time. What are we to do about this quandary?
Maybe we should watch another documentary where people take michael moore seriously. You know the one, where at the end the dumbfucks from California tell people to trust the Government.............I wonder how many of those people were Bernie supporters?
GS4Pirate
07-25-2016, 11:15 PM
Typical, you leave out the most important part of the sentence. Do you work for CNN or something?
What was the important part, where he uses "Final solution" or where I return the stupid shit with bleeding heart?
To me the important part was using "final solution" when I'm guessing Wesley is most likely on the pro-death side of the abortion issue. I could post some pretty ugly stats that will make him swallow his "final solution" comment....that could be fun.
Warriorbird
07-25-2016, 11:25 PM
I say I don't, you say I do it all the time. What are we to do about this quandary?
http://media2.fdncms.com/arktimes/imager/the-moment-of-angst-tommy-wiseau-as-joh/u/big/957920/0625a_elead_1.gif
drauz
07-26-2016, 12:24 AM
Maybe we should watch another documentary where people take michael moore seriously. You know the one, where at the end the dumbfucks from California tell people to trust the Government.............I wonder how many of those people were Bernie supporters?
Playground politics, good job buddy.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 12:37 AM
Playground politics, good job buddy.
Did I call you stupid or any other derogatory names? Or are you just hurt that I found the documentary a little communist?
Corporations bad!, even though millions of Americans that invest their retirement in stocks, do far better over the long term than Social Security and that money is reinvested in the economy creating more business's and jobs.
Government good! Even though the government created the laws that allow for the cheating and well.................I think the Democrats are showing just how great the Government is over this past couple of days. Totally for the common man.
P.S. This is me right now, well a pastier white, but I think you get it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P03KmaxxK3c
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 12:51 AM
Did I call you stupid or any other derogatory names? Or are you just hurt that I found the documentary a little communist?
Corporations bad!, even though millions of Americans that invest their retirement in stocks, do far better over the long term than Social Security and that money is reinvested in the economy creating more business's and jobs.
Government good! Even though the government created the laws that allow for the cheating and well.................I think the Democrats are showing just how great the Government is over this past couple of days. Totally for the common man.
P.S. This is me right now, well a pastier white, but I think you get it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P03KmaxxK3c
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4ySAzVEDGYI/TtYpMHpncrI/AAAAAAAAO7A/AaAEUu_VeGU/s640/dorothea+lange+depression+era+photographs+13.jpg
tyrant-201
07-26-2016, 12:52 AM
Did I call you stupid or any other derogatory names? Or are you just hurt that I found the documentary a little communist?
Corporations bad!, even though millions of Americans that invest their retirement in stocks, do far better over the long term than Social Security and that money is reinvested in the economy creating more business's and jobs.
Government good! Even though the government created the laws that allow for the cheating and well.................I think the Democrats are showing just how great the Government is over this past couple of days. Totally for the common man.
P.S. This is me right now, well a pastier white, but I think you get it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P03KmaxxK3c
You have it all figured out.
Good job. :)
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 12:52 AM
8045
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 12:57 AM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4ySAzVEDGYI/TtYpMHpncrI/AAAAAAAAO7A/AaAEUu_VeGU/s640/dorothea+lange+depression+era+photographs+13.jpg
They look kind of pissed that Snoop took all their weed.
drauz
07-26-2016, 01:00 AM
What was the important part, where he uses "Final solution" or where I return the stupid shit with bleeding heart?
To me the important part was using "final solution" when I'm guessing Wesley is most likely on the pro-death side of the abortion issue. I could post some pretty ugly stats that will make him swallow his "final solution" comment....that could be fun.
Let me fix your quote for you:
No it was crying.
"every time I advocate against genocide here I'm called a liberal" :violin:
This is what I'm talking about. You saw the words "called a liberal" together in a sentence and your zero'd in on them without caring about the rest.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 01:02 AM
They look kind of pissed that Snoop took all their weed.
http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/bioshock/images/2/20/3-00-A-14.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140213165541
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 01:04 AM
Let me fix your quote for you:
This is what I'm talking about. You saw the words "called a liberal" together in a sentence and your zero'd in on them without caring about the rest.
That's because I don't zero in on bullshit, nobody here is advocating genocide except the Muslims. Fucking Duh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3tQT35CKnE
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 01:07 AM
Let me fix your quote for you:
This is what I'm talking about. You saw the words "called a liberal" together in a sentence and your zero'd in on them without caring about the rest.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/f0/c4/a2/f0c4a2dc9fc40fe1c6c06043ecdf0254.jpg
drauz
07-26-2016, 01:08 AM
Did I call you stupid or any other derogatory names? Or are you just hurt that I found the documentary a little communist?
Corporations bad!, even though millions of Americans that invest their retirement in stocks, do far better over the long term than Social Security and that money is reinvested in the economy creating more business's and jobs.
Government good! Even though the government created the laws that allow for the cheating and well.................I think the Democrats are showing just how great the Government is over this past couple of days. Totally for the common man.
I think that what corporations started out to be and what they have become is indeed bad. You got me.
Heres the thing, I can agree with an assertion of a documentary and then not agree with another assertion of it. I know its crazy right? I do think government has its place, but I can also see where I think it steps over the line. You seem to view everything in black and white. You can't see the grey area.
drauz
07-26-2016, 01:09 AM
That's because I don't zero in on bullshit, nobody here is advocating genocide except the Muslims. Fucking Duh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3tQT35CKnE
Didn't you just advocate shooting a nuke into ISIS controlled territory? Holy shit... I thought you didn't post here when you smoked...
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 01:19 AM
Didn't you just advocate shooting a nuke into ISIS controlled territory? Holy shit... I thought you didn't post here when you smoked...
Sure did, that sure the hell has nothing to do with genocide. You know, the extermination of a group of people? Not at all what's being advocated by nuking your enemy.
Are you simply ignoring what these people want? I'll say it once again, war is fucking ugly and evil, if you're not willing to destroy your enemy you have already lost the war. Just hand it over to them if you don't have the stomach to see it through to the end.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQawcWJKY70
drauz
07-26-2016, 01:30 AM
Sure did, that sure the hell has nothing to do with genocide. You know, the extermination of a group of people? Not at all what's being advocated by nuking your enemy.
Are you simply ignoring what these people want? I'll say it once again, war is fucking ugly and evil, if you're not willing to destroy your enemy you have already lost the war. Just hand it over to them if you don't have the stomach to see it through to the end.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQawcWJKY70
So where do you draw the line for muslims? What part of the faith is ok to live in your eyes?
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 01:46 AM
So where do you draw the line for muslims? What part of the faith is ok to live in your eyes?
The part that doesn't want to eradicate other groups of people for not believing in their god. If they can't handle their own problem, too fucking bad.
How many more innocent American civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends?
Whether you like it or not, it's us or them. Living in your fantasy world where if we all just hug each other is delusional. You're more than welcome to live your delusion but not at the cost of other American lives.
drauz
07-26-2016, 01:48 AM
The part that doesn't want to eradicate other groups of people for not believing in their god. If they can't handle their own problem, too fucking bad.
How many more innocent American civilians are willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends?
Whether you like it or not, it's us or them. Living in your fantasy world where if we all just hug each other is delusional. You're more than welcome to live your delusion but not at the cost of other American lives.
So them saying 'I don't want to eradicate other groups of people for not believing in my god." is enough for you?
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 01:48 AM
The part that doesn't want to eradicate other groups of people for not believing in their god. If they can't handle their own problem, too fucking bad.
How many more innocent American civilians are willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends?
Whether you like it or not, it's us or them. Living in your fantasy world where if we all just hug each other is delusional. You're more than welcome to live your delusion but not at the cost of other American lives.
So you want to kill all of them because they can't handle the fact that some of them are mass murderers.
Are you gonna nuke America next?
drauz
07-26-2016, 02:00 AM
So you want to kill all of them because they can't handle the fact that some of them are mass murderers.
Are you gonna nuke America next?
But he doesn't want to genocide anyone..
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 03:23 AM
So you want to kill all of them because they can't handle the fact that some of them are mass murderers.
Are you gonna nuke America next?
No, if they can't take care of their own problem to fucking bad their in the way.
And no, nuking America is what they want to do. What about "Death to America" is so hard for you to translate?
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 03:25 AM
So them saying 'I don't want to eradicate other groups of people for not believing in my god." is enough for you?
Actions speak louder than words, kind of like your habit of not answering questions, so I will ask again.
How many more innocent American civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends?
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 03:28 AM
But he doesn't want to genocide anyone..
Again, nobody here is calling for genocide but the Muslims you are coddling.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 03:39 AM
More importantly, I can hardly contain myself waiting to hear this great big secret Androidpunk seems to know about me, but doesn't have the spine to expose this great secret.
It must be uuuuuuuuuuuge. So huge, that I may need to travel 1300 miles back home to live in my mothers basement (the basement that doesn't exist).
I'm salivating at the thought of this being exposed to the world.
drauz
07-26-2016, 03:57 AM
Actions speak louder than words, kind of like your habit of not answering questions, so I will ask again.
How many more innocent American civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends?
Here you go again with your loaded questions. I would say the number 42 sounds good though, it is the answer to everything after all.
Do you're parents know you're gay? Its a yes or no question by the way.
drauz
07-26-2016, 03:59 AM
Actions speak louder than words, kind of like your habit of not answering questions, so I will ask again.
How many more innocent American civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends?
By the way, you didn't answer the question. So answer it.
drauz
07-26-2016, 04:03 AM
I'm salivating at the thought of this being exposed to the world.
You're a card carrying communist.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 04:04 AM
Here you go again with your loaded questions. I would say the number 42 sounds good though, it is the answer to everything after all.
Do you're parents know you're gay?
It's not a loaded question, it's just a question that you don't want to answer. So how many more? obviously the losses we have already experienced is not enough.
I'm gay now? I had no idea you're 12 year old.
Honestly if I was gay, it wouldn't be something I would hide.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 04:10 AM
You're a card carrying communist.
Dude, you can keep guessing and I would have no idea if you were right or wrong. Because Android is either full of shit or has had his head filled with shit. Though I do find it cute that some of the community shows so much interest in me that they will still whisper to each other months after I wasn't even playing.
To my knowledge this is the best I have heard so far: I'm black mailing someone (no idea who) and I'm threatening to tell their husband we cybered. Now for the life of me, I don't know what I am getting for this black mailing. Though I will admit that is some far out fucking shit.
drauz
07-26-2016, 04:11 AM
It's not a loaded question, it's just a question that you don't want to answer. So how many more? obviously the losses we have already experienced is not enough.
I'm gay now? I had no idea you're 12 year old.
Honestly if I was gay, it wouldn't be something I would hide.
Can you not read? The answer to your question is in the quote.
Funny how you won't answer my loaded question or even my actual question though... Actions do speak louder than words.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 04:21 AM
Can you not read? The answer to your question is in the quote.
Funny how you won't answer my loaded question or even my actual question though... Actions do speak louder than words.
Obviously it's a question that can't be answered if I'm not gay. Your question is very different, obviously, than asking you how many more civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends.
Your answer of 42 is not an answer, it's you avoiding a difficult question because of the passive position you wish to take.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 04:25 AM
Do you're parents know you're gay?
It's also a bit difficult to answer a question that reads:
Do you are parents know you are gay?
drauz
07-26-2016, 04:28 AM
Obviously it's a question that can't be answered if I'm not gay. Your question is very different, obviously, than asking you how many more civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort your Muslim friends.
Your answer of 42 is not an answer, it's you avoiding a difficult question because of the passive position you wish to take.
Obviously I can't answer the question if I don't have any muslim friends, now can I?
Its not a difficult question, its a "gotcha" question. The reason its a stupid question is because you are making retarded assumptions again, like I think we should be doing nothing, and that your solution is the only way forward.
So are you ever going to actually answer my question?
So them saying 'I don't want to eradicate other groups of people for not believing in my god." is enough for you?
Your "actions speak louder than words" is a non answer. This is a yes or no question. If your answer is no, then what is good enough for you?
drauz
07-26-2016, 04:30 AM
It's also a bit difficult to answer a question that reads:
Do you are parents know you are gay?
http://www.reshareit.com/wp-content/uploads/cant-win-an-argument-correct-grammar.png
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 04:34 AM
Obviously I can't answer the question if I don't have any muslim friends, now can I?
Its not a difficult question, its a "gotcha" question. The reason its a stupid question is because you are making retarded assumptions again, like I think we should be doing nothing, and that your solution is the only way forward.
So are you ever going to actually answer my question?
So them saying 'I don't want to eradicate other groups of people for not believing in my god." is enough for you?
Your "actions speak louder than words" is a non answer. This is a yes or no question. If your answer is no, then what is good enough for you?
You sure act like their your friends.
And no, just saying it is not enough, they have to prove they can actually live side by side with different people without killing them, hence, actions speak louder than words.
So I will restate the question without snark.
How many more American civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort Muslim extremists?
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 04:36 AM
http://www.reshareit.com/wp-content/uploads/cant-win-an-argument-correct-grammar.png
If you're losing the argument you ask if a person can read and then post a meme about your spelling being called out after you question someones literacy.
Jarvan
07-26-2016, 04:43 AM
Calling yourself a state doesn't make you a state..
Lets see... they control land. We call them a state..
I am kinda missing how they are not a state.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 04:48 AM
Lets see... they control land. We call them a state..
I am kinda missing how they are not a state.
Well honestly they don't wear uniforms and everyone knows you're not officially a state until you have matching uniforms. #ISISTAILORLIVESMATTER
drauz
07-26-2016, 04:52 AM
You sure act like their your friends.
And no, just saying it is not enough, they have to prove they can actually live side by side with different people without killing them, hence, actions speak louder than words.
So I will restate the question without snark.
How many more American civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort Muslim extremists?
they're
Shaps
07-26-2016, 05:01 AM
they're
Their, their. Let's not be hostile to one another.
drauz
07-26-2016, 05:08 AM
How many more American civilians are you willing to sacrifice to comfort Muslim extremists?
The answer is none. I just have different views on how it should be handled, we literally just argued about this a week or so ago, it just doesn't involve a nuke.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 07:19 AM
Lets see... they control land. We call them a state..
I am kinda missing how they are not a state.
Okay? I control land, does that make me a state? Did Iraq and Syria stop being states because of daesh? Don't be stupid.
Jarvan
07-26-2016, 07:42 AM
Okay? I control land, does that make me a state? Did Iraq and Syria stop being states because of daesh? Don't be stupid.
You enforce laws on the land you own by right of force?
I did not know that you overthrew land in the us.
Also.. I seriously doubt you OWN the land. last I heard.. you didn't even pay the rent on the land you stayed in.
Did Israel take land from other countries when they were invaded in 67? Yes, Did they retain that land? So far. is it basically Israel's at this point? Yes.
ISIL (love how you now use Daesh because ISIL has state in it) took land from Syria and Iraq. They currently hold that land. It's theirs. They are losing some, yes, but they still hold the land by force. They enforce the laws, and even collect taxes.
What exactly do you need for it to be called a "state". Permission from the UN?
What a moron.
RichardCranium
07-26-2016, 07:49 AM
We are lucky we only have two parties in this country. Look at other governments around the world and they can be stifled with multiple parties who then have to make backroom deals to get anything done. We do too but to a lesser degree.
At this point I can't tell if you're trolling or serious.
Parkbandit
07-26-2016, 07:51 AM
How many non Republican Presidential candidates have you voted for?
BUT REPUBLICANS!!!
You're so predictable.
So.. I think we can both agree: no one was wondering who you were voting for.
As far as your deflective question: Many.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 09:01 AM
BUT REPUBLICANS!!!
You're so predictable.
So.. I think we can both agree: no one was wondering who you were voting for.
As far as your deflective question: Many.
Cute attempt to claim to be better with so many specific details.
This isn't about Republicans but you. You have no moral high ground. It's also been quite evident how terrible you all look when you use your meme.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 09:24 AM
You enforce laws on the land you own by right of force?
I did not know that you overthrew land in the us.
Also.. I seriously doubt you OWN the land. last I heard.. you didn't even pay the rent on the land you stayed in.
Did Israel take land from other countries when they were invaded in 67? Yes, Did they retain that land? So far. is it basically Israel's at this point? Yes.
ISIL (love how you now use Daesh because ISIL has state in it) took land from Syria and Iraq. They currently hold that land. It's theirs. They are losing some, yes, but they still hold the land by force. They enforce the laws, and even collect taxes.
What exactly do you need for it to be called a "state". Permission from the UN?
What a moron.
I don't pay rent? lol
Yes, I called them daesh. I've BEEN calling them that for some time now you twat. And no, they are not a state. They are a terrorist organization.
The United States is a country.
Iraq is a country.
Syria is a country.
daesh is not a fucking country.
yes, you are indeed a moron.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 09:26 AM
You have no moral high ground.
says the person bending over backwards to vote for hillary clinton
Gelston
07-26-2016, 09:29 AM
I don't pay rent? lol
Yes, I called them daesh. I've BEEN calling them that for some time now you twat. And no, they are not a state. They are a terrorist organization.
The United States is a country.
Iraq is a country.
Syria is a country.
daesh is not a fucking country.
yes, you are indeed a moron.
ISIS is a country. As Jarvan says, it controls land, collects taxes, enforces laws, has elected leaders, public works, judges, all that stuff. You may not like the fact, but it fits the definition. It may not be recognized, but sorry, it is. It isn't a big deal.
I mean, you can keep towing the Obama/Kerry line on them if you want, but you are just downplaying it all.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 09:29 AM
says the person bending over backwards to vote for hillary clinton
I didn't claim it. I'm solely in this for the Supreme Court picks. We're headed for a rough Presidency either way.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 09:30 AM
ISIS is a country. As Jarvan says, it controls land, collects taxes, enforces laws, has elected leaders, public works, judges, all that stuff. You may not like the fact, but it fits the definition. It may not be recognized, but sorry, it is. It isn't a big deal.
You can say that all you want, doesn't make it true. No country on Earth recognizes daesh as a country. They are not a country now and will never be one.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 09:31 AM
I didn't claim it. I'm solely in this for the Supreme Court picks. We're headed for a rough Presidency either way.
Your excuse is as weak as you are.
Gelston
07-26-2016, 09:31 AM
You can say that all you want, doesn't make it true. No country on Earth recognizes daesh as a country. They are not a country now and will never be one.
It doesn't NEED to be recognized to fit the definition of a country. RECOGNIZATION is diplomacy, it is a DE FACTO country, not a de jure one.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 09:33 AM
I don't pay rent? lol
Yes, I called them daesh. I've BEEN calling them that for some time now you twat. And no, they are not a state. They are a terrorist organization.
The United States is a country.
Iraq is a country.
Syria is a country.
daesh is not a fucking country.
yes, you are indeed a moron.
Are they not a country because it's not found in a Rand McNally atlas?
Was the US not a country because King George didn't recognize us as a country?
Can you explain why when we nuked Japan they have ever since been an ally and that somehow not having state status magically would make the outcome any different? Are Borders now a magical spell?
Even more importantly, are you going to reveal to all of us this great secret I'm hiding? I think we all want to know what it is, including myself.
Wrathbringer
07-26-2016, 09:34 AM
I farted.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 09:40 AM
It doesn't NEED to be recognized to fit the definition of a country. RECOGNIZATION is diplomacy, it is a DE FACTO country, not a de jure one.
Right. And I personally identify as a glass of orange juice.
Gelston
07-26-2016, 09:42 AM
Right. And I personally identify as a glass of orange juice.
Well, you are a fucking weirdo.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 09:53 AM
I think we need an intermission with James Lahey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORli-oLFlwE
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 10:03 AM
Intermission over.
Another attack in France, this time these lovely people stormed in on a Church service and decapitated the priest.
We need more of these people here in the US, that will fix everything.
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 10:11 AM
Hehe, someones been triggered.
Jarvan
07-26-2016, 10:28 AM
I don't pay rent? lol
Yes, I called them daesh. I've BEEN calling them that for some time now you twat. And no, they are not a state. They are a terrorist organization.
The United States is a country.
Iraq is a country.
Syria is a country.
daesh is not a fucking country.
yes, you are indeed a moron.
How did just about every country in the world become a country?
They seized land, and ruled it. EVERY FUCKING time Obama and Kerry call them ISIL... they admit that they are a state. I mean.. seriously.. what the fuck don't you get you idiot piece of shit?
We have failed to recognize numerous countries that seized power in a coup... that doesn't NOT make them states. Yes... ISIL is a terrorist organization. Guess what... so is FUCKING IRAN. Dipshit.
Jarvan
07-26-2016, 10:36 AM
Right. And I personally identify as a glass of orange juice.
Close to the same IQ level at least. Tho I think OJ (Both the Liquid and the Killer) edges you out.
Wrathbringer
07-26-2016, 10:36 AM
you idiot piece of shit?
lol
Shaps
07-26-2016, 10:43 AM
Intermission over.
Another attack in France, this time these lovely people stormed in on a Church service and decapitated the priest.
We need more of these people here in the US, that will fix everything.
Xenophobe. If you just tried to understand them more and their perspective, none of the killings would occur. You'll eventually realize their way of life is superior and submit.
Gelston
07-26-2016, 10:44 AM
Xenophobe. If you just tried to understand them more and their perspective, none of the killings would occur. You'll eventually realize their way of life is superior and submit.
Okay IW.
Shaps
07-26-2016, 11:05 AM
Okay IW.
L2Sarcasm
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 11:14 AM
Your excuse is as weak as you are.
So I'm supposed to choose people who don't have my values because my party is running somebody shady? I don't think so.
Gelston
07-26-2016, 11:16 AM
L2Sarcasm
YOU LEARN TO SARCASM
Parkbandit
07-26-2016, 11:16 AM
Cute attempt to claim to be better with so many specific details.
This isn't about Republicans but you. You have no moral high ground. It's also been quite evident how terrible you all look when you use your meme.
You made a retarded statement that said "And folks wonder why I don't support Trump."
I pointed out that no one here is wondering that. We knew in 2011 you would be voting for Hillary Clinton because she's a Democrat.
You're comeback was your standard copy/paste bullshit "B-b-b-b-u-t Republicans!" Honestly, the only part of your canned bullshit response was that you OMG ARE A TEACHER!
Then you asked me how many Democrats I voted for.
I told you many.
Who the fuck is asking to take a moral high ground? Do you even read posts? Do they make sense in your head.. but then when someone helps you type out your response, do you just forget what you were reading?
Dude, stop. You are looking more foolish than normal.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 11:21 AM
How did just about every country in the world become a country?
They seized land, and ruled it. EVERY FUCKING time Obama and Kerry call them ISIL... they admit that they are a state. I mean.. seriously.. what the fuck don't you get you idiot piece of shit?
We have failed to recognize numerous countries that seized power in a coup... that doesn't NOT make them states. Yes... ISIL is a terrorist organization. Guess what... so is FUCKING IRAN. Dipshit.
Buy a fucking clue. Buy as many as you can. No one recognizes daesh as a state/country. Keep on being offended though that you're wrong, it's hilarious.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 11:21 AM
You made a retarded statement that said "And folks wonder why I don't support Trump."
I pointed out that no one here is wondering that. We knew in 2011 you would be voting for Hillary Clinton because she's a Democrat.
You're comeback was your standard copy/paste bullshit "B-b-b-b-u-t Republicans!" Honestly, the only part of your canned bullshit response was that you OMG ARE A TEACHER!
Then you asked me how many Democrats I voted for.
I told you many.
Who the fuck is asking to take a moral high ground? Do you even read posts? Do they make sense in your head.. but then when someone helps you type out your response, do you just forget what you were reading?
Dude, stop. You are looking more foolish than normal.
That's the problem. You immediately assume people are "retarded." The rest of your nonsense comes from the idea that nobody could possibly hold beliefs different than yours and be intelligent.
Intelligent people can believe differently than you. It makes you mostly pointless to talk to.
"Many." is still hilarious.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 11:24 AM
http://www.state.gov/misc/list/
Oh look, State Department doesn't have daesh/ISIL/ISIS listed as a country. Better contact them and let them know they're missing one, Jarvan!
Luftstreitkräfte
07-26-2016, 11:27 AM
Okay IW.
I actually wouldn't agree with that statement fully. In fact, Islamic supremacy is the main factor that caused me to opt out of further involvement in their community as a devotee. Exclusivity is not my thing. They think they're better than everyone else, but they hide it when they're a minority, which is exactly what Muhammad did during the early Islamic period.
Typical Muslim statements:
"When are your parents going to convert?"
"Why doesn't your wife wear hijab?"
"Everyone will convert to Islam in sha Allah"
"Things were better when we controlled the world - we will again."
Barf.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 11:28 AM
So I'm supposed to choose people who don't have my values because my party is running somebody shady? I don't think so.
You share the same values with Hillary? That explains everything.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 11:29 AM
You share the same values with Hillary? That explains everything.
In Supreme court justices I prefer liberal corporate sellouts to conservative corporate sellouts.
That's what she'd pick versus what Trump would pick.
In a strange mirror world in which Johnson won he'd pick people who want to destroy the government entirely if he could but probably get forced to cooperate with the Republicans who he's closer to.
I don't favor mass deportations.
Both Trump and Hillary will go to war whenever possible.
They'll both have shitty education policies.
Hillary will veto a lot of the crazy shit the Republican legislature will do. Trump wouldn't.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 11:32 AM
In Supreme court justices I prefer liberal corporate sellouts to conservative corporate sellouts.
That's what she'd pick versus what Trump would pick.
In a strange mirror world in which Johnson won he'd pick people who want to destroy the government entirely if he could but probably get forced to cooperate with the Republicans who he's closer to.
I don't favor mass deportations.
Both Trump and Hillary will go to war whenever possible.
They'll both have shitty education policies.
And you know who she would pick? has she told you? the fact that you have any faith in Hillary to do the right thing for this country is downright scary. Pull your head out of your ass for once in your life.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 11:36 AM
And you know who she would pick? has she told you? the fact that you have any faith in Hillary to do the right thing for this country is downright scary. Pull your head out of your ass for once in your life.
They've both actually given lists. I'm sure most Democrats and Republicans would reject my sellout label but barring a couple outliers its basically what's been offered.
I don't want a bunch of Rehnquists or a Scalia.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 11:37 AM
https://www.sayanythingblog.com/files/2014/02/head-in-the-sand.jpg
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 11:39 AM
https://www.sayanythingblog.com/files/2014/02/head-in-the-sand.jpg
A Republican president is going to put up conservative justices, no matter how crappy he is.
A Democratic president is going to put up liberals, no matter how crappy she is.
I don't get why you think I want conservative justices and the Republican Congress having free reign to do dumb shit unvetoed.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 11:43 AM
I don't get why you think I want conservative justices and the Republican Congress having free reign to do dumb shit unvetoed.
I don't get why you think it's okay for Hillary and the DNC to cheat America out of an election, but go on and keep doing your part to help elect Trump.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 11:46 AM
I don't get why you think it's okay for Hillary and the DNC to cheat America out of an election, but go on and keep doing your part to help elect Trump.
At what point did I say I thought it was okay? I don't believe that Bernie is going to get a legitimate shot though. I don't believe Trump did, either, but he managed to win. Bernie didn't. I think DWS was one of the worst DNC chairs the party's had. Ironically one of the best is running as VP.
If I thought I could do something to make Bernie be the nominee I would. I don't believe I can.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 11:47 AM
That's cause you're a weak ass liberal with no convictions.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 11:58 AM
That's cause you're a weak ass liberal with no convictions.
So what's your theory as to how I make Bernie nominee after the primaries are over?
Shout a lot?
Support conservatives?
Jarvan
07-26-2016, 12:06 PM
How many non Republican Presidential candidates have you voted for?
How many non Democrat Presidential candidates have you voted for?
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 12:07 PM
So what's your theory as to how I make Bernie nominee after the primaries are over?
Shout a lot?
Support conservatives?
It isn't even about Bernie Sanders at this point. This election has been a complete fraud and you want to reward the DNC and Hillary by giving her a promotion. Doesn't matter that they're destroying the entire party, you're with her!
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 12:10 PM
How many non Democrat Presidential candidates have you voted for?
Two. I've seen been alive for less elections than some folks. How many Democratic Presidential candidates have you voted for? How recently have you voted for one?
It isn't even about Bernie Sanders at this point. This election has been a complete fraud and you want to reward the DNC and Hillary by giving her a promotion. Doesn't matter that they're destroying the entire party, you're with her!
So to not destroy the party I should make the other party win?
Parkbandit
07-26-2016, 12:11 PM
That's the problem. You immediately assume people are "retarded."
Actually, wrong. I allow them to prove themselves to be retarded.. as you have artfully done.
The rest of your nonsense comes from the idea that nobody could possibly hold beliefs different than yours and be intelligent.
We weren't talking about beliefs.. we were talking about how you thought people "wonder why you won't vote for Trump". That was the entire depth of our conversation...
Intelligent people can believe differently than you.
OMG REALLY!? Thank you Captain Obvious. Tell us the sky is blue again, can you?
It makes you mostly pointless to talk to.
Because I call you out on your retarded bullshit. "Most people wonder" why I continue to bother talking to a mental midget like yourself. I tell them it's entertaining.
"Many." is still hilarious.
Do you not understand the term? Is that part of your confusion?
I have held my nose and voted for many Democratic nominees over my lifetime. Whether you believe that or not doesn't bother me in the least. You probably still believe in the Tooth Fairy... so yea.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 12:14 PM
So to not destroy the party I should make the other party win?
You shouldn't vote for Hillary is what you should do. If that means a Trump presidency then so be it. Vote 3rd party if that makes you feel better. Democratic party is already toast and the worst of the leaks haven't even been put out yet.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 12:14 PM
Actually, wrong. I allow them to prove themselves to be retarded.. as you have artfully done.
We weren't talking about beliefs.. we were talking about how you thought people "wonder why you won't vote for Trump". That was the entire depth of our conversation...
OMG REALLY!? Thank you Captain Obvious. Tell us the sky is blue again, can you?
Because I call you out on your retarded bullshit. "Most people wonder" why I continue to bother talking to a mental midget like yourself. I tell them it's entertaining.
Do you not understand the term? Is that part of your confusion?
I have held my nose and voted for many Democratic nominees over my lifetime. Whether you believe that or not doesn't bother me in the least. You probably still believe in the Tooth Fairy... so yea.
And proving yourself in your eyes is solely agreeing with you.
"Many Democratic nominees." that you won't identify yet you want to hold yourself up as some non partisan saint? Really? You?
GS4Pirate
07-26-2016, 12:17 PM
That's cause you're a weak ass liberal with no convictions.
Wow, I need to check my glasses.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 12:20 PM
You shouldn't vote for Hillary is what you should do. If that means a Trump presidency then so be it. Vote 3rd party if that makes you feel better. Democratic party is already toast and the worst of the leaks haven't even been put out yet.
I don't exactly see how not working to elect Trump makes me a "weak ass liberal." I can respect your third party vote. If I agreed with Gary Johnson on more I'd absolutely vote for him.
If Hillary gets dumped I'll absolutely vote for Bernie. Will you?
Parkbandit
07-26-2016, 12:21 PM
And proving yourself in your eyes is solely agreeing with you.
"Many Democratic nominees." that you won't identify yet you want to hold yourself up as some non partisan saint? Really? You?
I have never, ever held myself up as a non partisan. Ever.
That's only in your tiny malfunctioning brain.
Don't worry though.. the next time you lose a tooth, you'll get $1.00 from a fairy!
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 12:21 PM
You ARE working to elect Trump. You're fully behind a HRC presidency that is NOT going to happen. You may as well be casting a vote directly for Trump at this point.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 12:22 PM
You ARE working to elect Trump. You're fully behind a HRC presidency that is NOT going to happen. You may as well be casting a vote directly for Trump at this point.
I'm not as convinced by that as you are. I can understand why you are though.
Parkbandit
07-26-2016, 12:23 PM
You shouldn't vote for Hillary is what you should do. If that means a Trump presidency then so be it. Vote 3rd party if that makes you feel better. Democratic party is already toast and the worst of the leaks haven't even been put out yet.
You're still sounding like you are crying over spilled milk. You knew he would be voting for Clinton regardless of anything he claims.. why is this a surprise to you?
You should totally write in Bernie Sanders.. and show everyone!
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 12:23 PM
I hear PB voted for Woodrow Wilson and then FDR.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 12:25 PM
You're still sounding like you are crying over spilled milk. You knew he would be voting for Clinton regardless of anything he claims.. why is this a surprise to you?
You should totally write in Bernie Sanders.. and show everyone!
Milk is a precious commodity. And no, I won't be writing in Sanders name. If he's not the nominee then so be it.
Warriorbird
07-26-2016, 12:25 PM
I hear PB voted for Woodrow Wilson and then FDR.
Strom Thurmond '48.
Parkbandit
07-26-2016, 12:25 PM
I hear PB voted for Woodrow Wilson and then FDR.
OMG I'M SO OLD!
BTW: I wouldn't have voted for either of those jokers. I would have voted for Kennedy though.. but he was more of a Republican than a Democrat of today's Party.
Parkbandit
07-26-2016, 12:28 PM
Milk is a precious commodity. And no, I won't be writing in Sanders name. If he's not the nominee then so be it.
There is no scenario where he will be the nominee. If Hillary is arrested/assassinated/strokes out/etc... they will bring forth Biden as the savior of the Party. Or Warren. Or Chelsea.
Sanders won't be nominated as a Democratic candidate. They made sure of that when he announced he was running.
Androidpk
07-26-2016, 12:32 PM
Chelsea..:lol2:
Taernath
07-26-2016, 12:33 PM
I have held my nose and voted for many Democratic nominees over my lifetime.
Who? I'm genuinely curious.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.