Oh Hillary. #tonedownforwhat

[GS4Pirate]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KwqBFQnBdw

[drauz]

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/01/how-hillary-clinton-bought-the-loyalty-of-33-state-democratic-parties/

http://observer.com/2016/02/how-the-dnc-helps-clinton-buy-off-superdelegates/

[GS4Pirate]

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/01/how-hillary-clinton-bought-the-loyalty-of-33-state-democratic-parties/

http://observer.com/2016/02/how-the-dnc-helps-clinton-buy-off-superdelegates/

If this is all true, which I'm sure would be no shocking revelation to anyone, it only makes sense to bring back legal vote buying, this could be a good thing. Voter participation would sky rocket, who wouldn't stand in line for the highest bidder at your voting sight? Each election day it would be like a temporary stock market, the more one thinks about this the better it sounds, especially with today's voter participation numbers.

[Warriorbird]

Citizens United was so dumb. Ugh.

[Jarvan]

Citizens United was so dumb. Ugh.

There was never any need of citizens united.

The system was already broken beyond belief prior to it.


Just think of the "dinners" where people "paid" way more then the max donation limit to eat with the person. I mean... even in LA it doesn't cost 10k for a piece of meat.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/hillary-clinton-george-clooney-fundraiser-221207

Don't forget the unlimited amount unions could give as well.

[Warriorbird]

There was never any need of citizens united.

The system was already broken beyond belief prior to it.


Just think of the "dinners" where people "paid" way more then the max donation limit to eat with the person. I mean... even in LA it doesn't cost 10k for a piece of meat.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/hillary-clinton-george-clooney-fundraiser-221207

Don't forget the unlimited amount unions could give as well.

I'd throw the defense of that in the problems with the ruling.

[Archigeek]

Disgusting

[Parkbandit]

Citizens United was so dumb. Ugh.

It basically evened the playing field for both sides.

[Warriorbird]

It basically evened the playing field for both sides.

I think we'd be better off if it was evened into not existing.

[Jeril]

I think we'd be better off if it was evened into not existing.

Things like this aren't the problem though, they are merely a symptom of it.

[Jarvan]

I'd throw the defense of that in the problems with the ruling.

These types of things with the dinners have been going on LONG before the ruling.

Same with unions.

So.. no.

[Parkbandit]

I think we'd be better off if it was evened into not existing.

I just laugh at all the liberals who are so upset over the Citizens United ruling.. they never cared before when the game was completely rigged in their favor.