Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 119

Thread: Court Blocks Mary Trump Book

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Talking Court Blocks Mary Trump Book

    A New York state judge has temporarily blocked the publication of President Trump's niece Mary's new tell-all book, pending the outcome of a hearing set to take place next month.

    More...

    That's a crazy court ruling. In this country, we don't stop people from speaking or writing. If somebody says something they had no legal right to say, then you sue them for money after they say it. You don't have a court block them from saying it in advance.

    The only time a court should block speech in advance is when it endangers national security and the person doing the speaking had an obligation to keep the information secret. That may have been the case with John Bolton's book, which Trump also tried to get the courts to block. Trump was unsuccessful in the Bolton case because the information in the book was already known the public.

    Trump has fallen victim to the Streisand Effect.
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    31,138
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    She signed an NDA.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    She signed an NDA.
    Then they can sue her if she violated it. But they can't use the government to stop her from publishing a book that they believe is in violation of the NDA.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    31,138
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    Then they can sue her if she violated it. But they can't use the government to stop her from publishing a book that they believe is in violation of the NDA.
    They sorta did and can.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    They sorta did and can.

    That's a fair point.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    They sorta did and can.
    That didn't age well.
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    31,138
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    That didn't age well.
    I mean, it aged fine. One judge stopped it, another allowed it to continue. Another judge can still stop it.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    Then they can sue her if she violated it. But they can't use the government to stop her from publishing a book that they believe is in violation of the NDA.
    So this is the first time in US history that stopped the release of something due to a NDA.

    Good to know.
    RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    There will be no war when guns are more regulated.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashliana View Post
    "I originally created an additional account back in the day to mess with the reputation system" Rep system came in 3 months later...
    Quote Originally Posted by Tsa`ah View Post
    Well tell that to the Naval hospital that issued a birth certificate labeled Ft Lejeune ... and then typed it in.
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    She signed an NDA.
    According to the book, the NDA she signed was based on an agreement about the settlement of Fred Trumps estate. The estate was manipulated by cheeto & crew to devalue it to under 50 mil in order to dodge taxes, increase their gains, and screw the other inheritors out of 95% of the estate. The original value of which, according to the book was close to 1 billion. So, if the agreement she signed was based on an outright fraud, as she contests, the NDA itself would be invalidated which is what her argument is for not being restrained by it. Court case pending.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    No U! I'm a complete retard and don't understand the meaning of the words I use. I heart the only president ever impeached for inciting an insurrection so hard. Please debate me.
    Quote Originally Posted by ParkBandit View Post
    Get more triggered. You're pathetic / retard champion. I love nazi shit and working gloryholes.
    Quote Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage View Post
    I hate fags & soyboys but I love Confederacy! Yeehaw
    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    You a retarded dumbass.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo View Post
    According to the book, the NDA she signed was based on an agreement about the settlement of Fred Trumps estate. The estate was manipulated by cheeto & crew to devalue it to under 50 mil in order to dodge taxes, increase their gains, and screw the other inheritors out of 95% of the estate. The original value of which, according to the book was close to 1 billion. So, if the agreement she signed was based on an outright fraud, as she contests, the NDA itself would be invalidated which is what her argument is for not being restrained by it. Court case pending.
    She signed it to get her money. Now that her money is gone, she came up with a new way to make more.

    She shouldn't have signed it.
    RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    There will be no war when guns are more regulated.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashliana View Post
    "I originally created an additional account back in the day to mess with the reputation system" Rep system came in 3 months later...
    Quote Originally Posted by Tsa`ah View Post
    Well tell that to the Naval hospital that issued a birth certificate labeled Ft Lejeune ... and then typed it in.
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •