Page 9 of 17 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 161

Thread: [Transgender] Ben Shapiro is awesome

  1. #81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    My art teacher in elementary school had 11 fingers. Her right hand had a little toe looking mini thumb branching off from her normal thumb. It was functional and all that shit.

    Due to this anomaly, I am declaring that anyone who says humans only have 10 fingers is a bigot.
    She was clearly an alien. The real question, though, is was she some form of space reptile?

  2. #82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Did she play piano?
    Not to my knowledge, but she should have. I bet she could roll the fuck out of some joints.

    Quote Originally Posted by subzero View Post
    She was clearly an alien. The real question, though, is was she some form of space reptile?
    She was Egyptian and could read heiroglyphics, which I thought was the coolest thing ever because I was all into Indiana Jones at the time, so it's probably safe to say she was an alien of some sort.
    Last edited by Methais; 08-13-2017 at 12:27 AM.
    Discord: 3PiecesOfToast
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  3. #83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    She was Egyptian and could read heiroglyphics, which I thought was the coolest thing ever because I was all into Indiana Jones at the time, so it's probably safe to say she was an alien of some sort.
    Double whammy. She was definitely an alien.

    Also, on another note, I noticed Latrin didn't really weigh in on the men-who-think-they're-women that participate in sports against real women. Do you approve of guys like Fallon Fox beating the shit out of girls or smoking them in other sports? I kind of wish the LFL paid well. I might suddenly discover my identity as a woman so I can go play pro foosball.

    From one of her opponents:

    During Fox's fight against Tamikka Brents, Brents suffered a concussion, an orbital bone fracture, and seven staples to the head in the 1st round. After her loss, Brents took to social media to convey her thoughts on the experience of fighting Fox: “I've fought a lot of women and have never felt the strength that I felt in a fight as I did that night. I can’t answer whether it’s because she was born a man or not because I’m not a doctor. I can only say, I’ve never felt so overpowered ever in my life and I am an abnormally strong female in my own right,” she stated. “Her grip was different, I could usually move around in the clinch against other females but couldn’t move at all in Fox’s clinch
    Here's the only woman to beat her:


  4. #84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by subzero View Post
    When we define the characteristics of humans, are we not defined as having five digits on each hand or foot?
    No, we're not, because many humans don't. That's what the word "define" means. Either you encompass all instances or you don't.
    Is a concept truly 'empirical science'? Aren't they, by definition, contradictory?
    There are many empirical concepts: the concept of mass and the concept of electrical charge to name two.
    This concept regarding gender is relatively new and certainly not wholly accepted even in the 'civilized world'. Outside of countries like ours, I believe you'll find a great many whose people do not accept this idea.
    I can find a great many people who don't accept relativistic physics too. Doesn't make it any less empirical, or them any less wrong. What is it that you think empirical means, anyway?
    The very first sentence contradicts your statement
    The very first sentence says "the concept of gender, a word primarily applied to human beings, has additional connotations". You found a source, it agreed with me, and you still think you're right. Ha! Ha! Good times, subzero.
    So, we can agree then that gender and sex may be used interchangeably as has been done for, oh, I dunno... ever?
    Only if you think there were blue ninjas running around Arendelle.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  5. #85

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    No, we're not, because many humans don't. That's what the word "define" means. Either you encompass all instances or you don't.There are many empirical concepts: the concept of mass and the concept of electrical charge to name two.I can find a great many people who don't accept relativistic physics too. Doesn't make it any less empirical, or them any less wrong. What is it that you think empirical means, anyway?The very first sentence says "the concept of gender, a word primarily applied to human beings, has additional connotations". You found a source, it agreed with me, and you still think you're right. Ha! Ha! Good times, subzero.Only if you think there were blue ninjas running around Arendelle.
    A normal person is born with 10 fingers and someone who is born with more or less is an anomaly are they not?
    Discord: 3PiecesOfToast
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  6. #86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    A normal person is born with 10 fingers and someone who is born with more or less is an anomaly are they not?
    Nope, they are now a new species of human. Homo-too-many-fingers.

  7. #87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    A normal person is born with 10 fingers and someone who is born with more or less is an anomaly are they not?
    Most humans are born with ten fingers, in the same way that most cars have solid roofs.
    It would be incorrect to say a car is defined as having a solid roof, because ragtop convertibles exist.
    It would be incorrect to say a human is defined as having ten fingers, because humans with more or less exist.
    And it would be incorrect to say a male is defined as capable of impregnating someone, because many males cannot.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    Most humans are born with ten fingers, in the same way that most cars have solid roofs.
    It would be incorrect to say a car is defined as having a solid roof, because ragtop convertibles exist.
    It would be incorrect to say a human is defined as having ten fingers, because humans with more or less exist.
    And it would be incorrect to say a male is defined as capable of impregnating someone, because many males cannot.
    You're nitpicking a relatively small number of males born sterile. The problem with your argument, is that their genes backfired. Genetically they are a male, an anomaly occurred. Genetically, a man that says, hey I think I should be a female will always be a man. Vice versa in a female. Now true, some species are able to swap genders NATURALLY to better propagate the species. There is 0% anything natural about taking hormones or having surgery to swap genders. You want to be gay, lesbian, whatever that's fine. Honestly, I think the problem is with people telling me how I should think. You are born with a dick? You're a guy sorry. Born with a pussy? You're a woman. No amount of hormones or surgery will change the DNA.

  9. #89

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crash187 View Post
    You're nitpicking a relatively small number of males born sterile.
    Let me stop you here. My argument has never been people who are born sterile. There are many other ways for a human to not be able to produce children.
    A six year old boy physiologically cannot produce children, but is male. Women post-menopause cannot bear children, yet they remain female.
    Honestly, I think the problem is with people telling me how I should think.
    Nobody's telling you how you should think. We're just telling you what is factually the case. If you want to be factually incorrect, have fun with that.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    Let me stop you here. My argument has never been people who are born sterile. There are many other ways for a human to not be able to produce children.
    A six year old boy physiologically cannot produce children, but is male. Women post-menopause cannot bear children, yet they remain female.Nobody's telling you how you should think. We're just telling you what is factually the case. If you want to be factually incorrect, have fun with that.
    And you're picking out whatever you want to try to prove your case. Physiologically, no JUVENILE (6 year old person or like) of any species is able to produce children. Physiologically, female homo sapiens generally have a certain period where they are able to reproduce. This is not true in other species and true in others. You and everyone else trumpeting the transgender community is telling me I should refer to them as their gender of choice. Gender isn't a choice. Short of those fish or amphibians I mentioned, there is no other species that can at will change gender. I'm sorry but if you're your born with a dick and dick only, you're a male no matter what you want to say you are. Same goes for those born with a vagina and only a vagina.

Similar Threads

  1. Trump Wins Against Transgender Soldiers
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-22-2019, 10:50 AM
  2. Replies: 68
    Last Post: 05-02-2017, 02:24 PM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-27-2017, 08:04 PM
  4. Transgender Debate - Jordan Peterson
    By drauz in forum Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-22-2016, 03:15 AM
  5. Six year old transgender child?
    By Candor in forum Politics
    Replies: 207
    Last Post: 03-28-2013, 07:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •