Another one for you Hypocrites

[Solkern]

Psst. The statement is accurate. Yet again you try to divert, make no real argument and then claim some form of pyrrhic victory while engaging in an orgy of self aggrandizement and back slapping. I know why you don't seek help, the help quit and changed careers.

Ashliana has been making non-stop real arguments and points with fact and evidence to back up those arguments. You and others, only reply with insults, deflections and more insults, instead of giving us any sort of real facts, evidence or solid points, to refute the points Ashliana has made.

[Tgo01]

Ashliana has been making non-stop real arguments and points with fact and evidence to back up those arguments.

Is this the new political laugh thread?

[Solkern]

Is this the new political laugh thread?

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

[Tgo01]

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

I lost the patience to read most of his posts long ago. I will sometimes read one in the same way you can’t help but look at a gruesome car accident. He’s much like you; he will argue incessantly over nitpicky things for pages then claim he made some great points when the other person stops replying to his nonsense.

[Solkern]

I lost the patience to read most of his posts long ago. I will sometimes read one in the same way you can’t help but look at a gruesome car accident. He’s much like you; he will argue incessantly over nitpicky things for pages then claim he made some great points when the other person stops replying to his nonsense.

My point exactly, you can’t find anything, because none of you refute anything he says with substance, just insults and attacks, so once again you did a classic deflect with some insults.

[Realk]

Oh not by a long shot. Hopefully we'll get leaked footage, insider sources, or unnamed sources who report on the vile misogynists' activities. I see where his son got his "proclivities".

https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/wa...ts-book-claims

Pretty soon he's going to get Bill Clinton'd! Oh wait.. I'm sure it will all come out in the Impeachment hearings. Da Da Daaaaaa **dramatic theme music plays**

I'm probably ignorant, but if he wants to swim nekkid shouldn't he have just told them(both sexes) to turn their backs to the pool until he says other wise(i think that's where the danger would be anyways?) maybe except one dude to make sure he doesn't and drown or some shit.

might be another unpopular thought... if that's all it took to make the agents uncomfortable, are they in the right profession and do I want to trust them with my life?

[~Rocktar~]

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

Show me a time when it made a real argument with facts that aren't from a Leftwing shill site or made up assertions from it's fevered head.

[Parkbandit]

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

You would probably have to go back pre-Kierphe days for that. Circa October 2010.

After it was found out that It was using dual accounts to agree with Itself, It pretty much lost the tiny remaining respect anyone had for It.

[Ashliana]

Psst. The statement is accurate. Yet again you try to divert, make no real argument and then claim some form of pyrrhic victory while engaging in an orgy of self aggrandizement and back slapping. I know why you don't seek help, the help quit and changed careers.

There's nothing to "divert" from, as this thread isn't a substantive discussion, but you did manage to pay us a visit to do just the same thing you're claiming I do. Somebody didn't read the thread and jumped in too eagerly, did they?

I lost the patience to read most of his posts long ago. I will sometimes read one in the same way you can’t help but look at a gruesome car accident. He’s much like you; he will argue incessantly over nitpicky things for pages then claim he made some great points when the other person stops replying to his nonsense.

Sure you did. And what you call "arguing over nitpicky things" are, in reality, other people making demonstrably incorrect points and being unable to move on or adapt their position.

Show me a time when it made a real argument with facts that aren't from a Leftwing shill site or made up assertions from it's fevered head.

I cite from government sites whenever possible (including government sources backed by, at the time, Trump appointees), and deliberately cite right-wing sources like Fox as well, specifically to undercut the retarded "(Saw Centrist Source, Get to Ignore Article, Even if Article is Documenting Something Not In Question) strategy you people rely on. You post InfoWars links unironically. Does someone need to explain the difference to you?

You would probably have to go back pre-Kierphe days for that. Circa October 2010.

After it was found out that It was using dual accounts to agree with Itself, It pretty much lost the tiny remaining respect anyone had for It.

Nope, happens all the time. (Thanks, Solkern). You became completely divorced from reality when you couldn't cope with the Obama administration winning twice, and rather than actually lay out and defend coherent arguments, you come to your last resort in every thread. Speaking of which..

[~Rocktar~]

There's nothing to "divert" from, as this thread isn't a substantive discussion, but you did manage to pay us a visit to do just the same thing you're claiming I do. Somebody didn't read the thread and jumped in too eagerly, did they?



Sure you did. And what you call "arguing over nitpicky things" are, in reality, other people making demonstrably incorrect points and being unable to move on or adapt their position.



I cite from government sites whenever possible (including government sources backed by, at the time, Trump appointees), and deliberately cite right-wing sources like Fox as well, specifically to undercut the retarded "(Saw Centrist Source, Get to Ignore Article, Even if Article is Documenting Something Not In Question) strategy you people rely on. You post InfoWars links unironically. Does someone need to explain the difference to you?



Nope, happens all the time. (Thanks, Solkern). You became completely divorced from reality when you couldn't cope with the Obama administration winning twice, and rather than actually lay out and defend coherent arguments, you come to your last resort in every thread. Speaking of which..

The bullshit is deep here. You don't cite much of anything, 99% of your recent posts are just you discounting what is said and proclaiming yourself victor. GEFO.