My goodbye forever rant

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

You were asking if it was official. I was saying it was. It ends with play.net. The forums that end with play.net are also their official forums.

And can you edit the wiki if you are non-staff with an account?

[Gelston]

And can you edit the wiki if you are non-staff with an account?

Yes, but if you put in BS it'll get reverted pretty quick. There are some very... active... editors.

[Whirlin]

Yes, but if you put in BS it'll get reverted pretty quick. There are some very... active... editors.

Aren't there entire threads about wiki moderation?

[m444w]

Come on, you should know that Low Steel isn't meant to be enchanted, period. In fact, according to the GMs, you DID know that whatever you enchanted wasn't supposed to be enchantable. So again, my question for you is this: Are the GMs incorrect in saying that you knew it was not enchantable, and discussed it prior to enchanting it?

I am predisposed to say that you DID know, and it's probably the main reason you purchased it. Especially players that have as much knowledge about these systems as you do.

I'd say that you should have at least questioned whether or not it should be enchantable, but then I come to the conclusion that "Oh, he probably DID, and enchanted it anyways." That's what the GMs are saying - Do you deny this?

You seem to be having trouble holding the thread of conversation, so I will sum it up for you in one post.

Gelston said the Wiki was the source of truth. I disagree because it is full of inaccuracy, to illustrate this I pointed out how the wiki says that Low Steel/High Steel are not enchantable.

Naos has confirmed they are enchantable under the new 925.

I'm sorry I kicked your dog or whatever, but it doesn't change the point that the Wiki is not a good source of actual game documentation.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I guess it's as official a document as any SIMU produces then. Should ban everyone.

[Taernath]

I'm sorry I kicked your dog or whatever, but it doesn't change the point that the Wiki is not a good source of actual game documentation.

It's pretty good for the most part. What would you recommend we use instead?

[Gelston]

You seem to be having trouble holding the thread of conversation, so I will sum it up for you in one post.

Gelston said the Wiki was the source of truth. I disagree because it is full of inaccuracy, to illustrate this I pointed out how the wiki says that Low Steel/High Steel are not enchantable.

Naos has confirmed they are enchantable under the new 925.

I'm sorry I kicked your dog or whatever, but it doesn't change the point that the Wiki is not a good source of actual game documentation.

That isn't based on the material, but rather the category of the flares.

And why wouldn't you bother confirming that coraesine or zelnorn or anything else was meant to be enchanted, if you did such with low steel?

[Methais]

I guess it's as official a document as any SIMU produces then. Should ban everyone.

"Due to a recent round of bug abuse, we have decided to ban everyone."

One day later...

"Due to player demand, we've introduced UNBAN POTIONS in the Simucoin store."

[Gelston]

Aren't there entire threads about wiki moderation?

Oh god. I don't know if Allereli is still around actually.

[drauz]

Oh god. I don't know if Allereli is still around actually.

I don't think she handles the wiki much anymore, she at least is way less active.