Originally Posted by
Tgo01
I don't think you're seeing the difference here.
Forcing a baker to write something = removing the baker's freedom of speech
Removing free speech Twitter doesn't approve of = removing said user's free speech
In both cases it is an attack on free speech, yet you somehow equate forcing a baker to do something against his will to a supposed "free speech platform" censoring speech the platform doesn't like.
I mean you only have freedom of speech against the gov't, they can't do anything to stop or retaliate against it. Literally everyone else in the world can do whatever they want to in response to what you say, just has to be legal.
Youtube saying "your ideas are dangerous" and stopping your ability to share those ideas on their platform is a pretty close approximation of that baker.
No, I am not Drauz in game.