Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Women in Combat

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    The article does not identify any of the 12 Guard members. Wonder if we've ever heard of any of them?
    1) Peter
    2) Andrew
    3) James
    4) John
    5) Philip
    6) Bartholomew
    7) Thomas
    8) Matthew
    9) James
    10) Thaddaeus
    11) Simon
    12) Judas Iscariot

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    That's not how it works. A person is unqualified unless there is something, or some combination of things, that makes him qualified or unless there is something that disqualifies him. There will be many Senators who believe that he is disqualified by his desire to roll back the rules on women in combat by more than 10 years. Will any of them be Republicans? Will he say he misspoke?
    So, he is qualified for the position.

    And I'm all for not lowering the standards so that {insert protected class here because "ZOMG RIGHTS!"} can finally make it in so we can say "We did it!"

    Many women do not belong at the front lines of any combat situation.

    I also don't believe some soy chugging, limp wristed loser like you should be in the military either... not that you would even try.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    The article does not identify any of the 12 Guard members. Wonder if we've ever heard of any of them?
    Pete Hegseth said one of them was him.. because he has a tattoo of a cross on his chest and it hurt someone's feelings and somehow a cross tattoo makes you automatically a white supremacist.

    I can't wait for him to get in there and just start cleaning house from all the DEI nonsense.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    desire to roll back the rules on women in combat by more than 10 years
    You say roll back, most rational people say reevaluate a desire to make a class of people "equal" to another class that is predominately physically superior. Perhaps don't qualify it with women, but say only people who meet a certain physical fitness threshold may serve on the front lines? Or do you oppose that as well because "fairness"?
    http://www.usdebtclock.org/
    Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.

    "Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
    -Superracist, Joe Biden

    “If you don’t believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you don’t believe in free speech.”
    -My favorite liberal

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Parkbandit View Post
    And I'm all for not lowering the standards so that {insert protected class here because "ZOMG RIGHTS!"} can finally make it in so we can say "We did it!"
    Women serve in combat roles now under the standards in place now. Hegseth is the one talking about changing the standards. He wants to change the rules for the purpose of excluding women.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,090

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    Women serve in combat roles now under the standards in place now. Hegseth is the one talking about changing the standards. He wants to change the rules for the purpose of excluding women.
    A woman’s battlefield is in the kitchen.

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    Women serve in combat roles now under the standards in place now. Hegseth is the one talking about changing the standards. He wants to change the rules for the purpose of excluding women.
    Here's the part you intentionally made. NOW being the key word.

    The standards were lowered so women and flimsy wristed soyboys like you could pass (well not you.. you're way too weak).

    Hegseth wants to bring back the standards PRIOR to them being changed.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  8. Default

    Heaven forbid we reevaluate standards ever.
    http://www.usdebtclock.org/
    Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.

    "Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
    -Superracist, Joe Biden

    “If you don’t believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you don’t believe in free speech.”
    -My favorite liberal

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •