According to Biden he said that Harris handled, "everything from foreign policy to domestic policy" under his administration. Clearly she was given the power to handle things. If she had no power why would she be allowed to handle things?
Now, Biden (to my understanding) never went into specific details and from how he speaks I can't be certain if he was trying to praise Harris for her work or to throw her under the bus. My guess it would be the former, but you never know with Biden because he did come out and say that the Inflation Reduction Act had nothing to do with reducing inflation and he wishes they never named it that.
The hard right denial of a woman's right to body autonomy that Trump and JD Vance have campaigned on took a body blow as Melania Trump came out in support of women's rights, stating there is no room to compromise that right.
Last edited by Solkern; 10-03-2024 at 10:36 PM.
Last edited by Solkern; 10-03-2024 at 10:38 PM.
Intent, of what exactly? Being irritated by the disparity in the application of said "fact-checking"?
You want to discuss intent, I'd look for it with the rush to fact check Vance but not Walz. That's intended. Walz got the pre-scripted check on his Tiananmen Square presence bullshit, which was already openly known and accepted as an outright falsehood. And the only reason the campaign even tried to lie their way out of Walz' China affinity was to hide it.
He's an extreme left socialist and a China sympathizer.