Page 1048 of 1956 FirstFirst ... 485489489981038104610471048104910501058109811481548 ... LastLast
Results 10,471 to 10,480 of 19554

Thread: Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

  1. #10471

    Default

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...374_story.html

    The title just makes me chuckle.

    "Unauthorized". Who "authorizes" them?

    I personally think them going over like that was dumb, because it would cause a ruckus on the ground.. but at same time can understand 2 Vets who served, now serving in Congress, going to see the conditions first hand. I'm sort of 50/50 on it really. Maybe 51/49 okay with it, since two guys that have served in the theater, should know what's in store if shit goes sideways - so it's all on them.

    My big question is though. What charter company took on the job... Who took that call and was like, "sure thing! we'll drop you right off in Kabul!". OGA flight maybe? Little something else going on maybe?

    Don't see how people can get ticked though.. considering we apparently sent over the head of the CIA to meet with the head of the Taliban, without anyone knowing.

    Hmm.. maybe the CIA Chief was on the flight with them? (Okay, okay that might be a little conspiracy theory) - but makes ya wonder.
    Last edited by Shaps; 08-25-2021 at 02:52 AM.

  2. #10472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    So what you're saying is there's bipartisan support that they're full of shit.
    I am 100% for removing the 230 protections from Twitter, Facebook, etc., and ensuring that they receive the same scrutiny and standards that major News outlets are subject to.

  3. #10473
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    8,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaps View Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...374_story.html

    The title just makes me chuckle.

    "Unauthorized". Who "authorizes" them?

    I personally think them going over like that was dumb, because it would cause a ruckus on the ground.. but at same time can understand 2 Vets who served, now serving in Congress, going to see the conditions first hand. I'm sort of 50/50 on it really. Maybe 51/49 okay with it, since two guys that have served in the theater, should know what's in store if shit goes sideways - so it's all on them.

    My big question is though. What charter company took on the job... Who took that call and was like, "sure thing! we'll drop you right off in Kabul!". OGA flight maybe? Little something else going on maybe?

    Don't see how people can get ticked though.. considering we apparently sent over the head of the CIA to meet with the head of the Taliban, without anyone knowing.

    Hmm.. maybe the CIA Chief was on the flight with them? (Okay, okay that might be a little conspiracy theory) - but makes ya wonder.
    Pretty sure the State Department or possibly Homeland Security has a say about going into places that are designated conflict zones. Mostly to get security set up. It is laughable though.


    Quote Originally Posted by Shaps View Post
    I am 100% for removing the 230 protections from Twitter, Facebook, etc., and ensuring that they receive the same scrutiny and standards that major News outlets are subject to.
    ^^ I agree with this.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  4. #10474
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    8,239

    Default

    In before the Leftist retards come in yowling about how that isn't how Section 230 works.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  5. #10475

    Default

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/bill-mahe...210800576.html

    It's those damn Trumper's and Republicans I tell you! Now get off my lawn! Grrrrr...

    /sarcasm

  6. #10476
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    an orbit gone wrong
    Posts
    13,609
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    You had better pay your guild dues before you forget. You are 113 months behind.

  7. #10477

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    Bwahaha.
    Make Shattered a $5 stand-alone subscription

  8. #10478

    Default

    I had never heard of ivermectin so I looked up what this is all about. The CDC says they don't recommend people treat COVID with ivermectin because it hasn't been approved by the FDA to treat COVID.....and yet for the past 6+ months they have been pushing everyone to get vaccinated even though (up until a few days ago) there has been no FDA approved vaccine for COVID.

    That is pretty funny.

    "Don't take that non-FDA approved medication! Take THIS non-FDA approved medication! Trust us! We're scientists!"
    Last edited by Tgo01; 08-25-2021 at 03:31 PM.

  9. #10479

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    I had never heard of ivermectin so I looked up what this is all about. The CDC says they don't recommend people treat COVID with ivermectin because it hasn't been approved by the FDA to treat COVID.....and yet for the past 6+ months they have been pushing everyone to get vaccinated even though (up until a few days ago) there has been no FDA approved vaccine for COVID.

    That is pretty funny.

    "Don't take that non-FDA approved medication! Take THIS non-FDA approved medication! Trust us! We're scientists!"
    As always, you've fallen on your face with a totally unforced error, unprompted, Dreaven. The Moderna, Pfizer and J&J vaccines were indeed FDA approved, under an Emergency Use Authorization, just not regular approval.

    Do you pride yourself on being incorrect? Is that why 99.9999% of the shit that flies out of your mouth is demonstrably false bullshit?
    Last edited by Ashliana; 08-25-2021 at 03:37 PM.

  10. #10480
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    PWC, VA
    Posts
    9,132
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaps View Post
    I am 100% for removing the 230 protections from Twitter, Facebook, etc., and ensuring that they receive the same scrutiny and standards that major News outlets are subject to.
    I wouldn't mind it, just cause this would literally collapse social media and destroy it. I don't think social media has been a net positive for the country.
    No, I am not Drauz in game.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2708
    Last Post: 09-18-2025, 11:44 PM
  2. Replies: 6283
    Last Post: 09-10-2025, 11:10 AM
  3. Replies: 8164
    Last Post: 08-15-2025, 02:30 PM
  4. Things that made you frown today (Political version)
    By Warriorbird in forum Politics
    Replies: 185
    Last Post: 08-01-2024, 01:08 PM
  5. Replies: 1017
    Last Post: 03-12-2024, 09:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •