Democrat Convention 2020

[Alfster]

The gaslighting lefties are at it again!

Tgo01: I don't see many people talking about the DNC.
Solkern: Oh yeah? LOL! Same thing will happen with the RNC!
Tgo01: No, everyone will be talking about the RNC, in the media though it will just mostly be "journalists" saying "Orange Man bad" and calling everyone Nazis.

Fast forward to day after RNC opening day.
Tgo01: Looks like I was right, everyone is talking about the RNC, 6 of the 7 top stories on my news app was trash talking the RNC.
Alfter and Solkern: LOL! You were wrong! Ratings were down!!

You guys gaslight almost as much as FlayedAngel. Almost. Work on that and you two can be best at something.

You simply are incapable of admitting you're incorrect. The metrics you cited are equally down on the RNC side and you're going out of your way to say, but but but I'm right!

[Solkern]

You simply are incapable of admitting you're incorrect. The metrics you cited are equally down on the RNC side and you're going out of your way to say, but but but I'm right!

That's the sad, and funny part about it. He posts so much fucking non-sense, that he literally can't remember any of the shit he's posted. and starts spouting random shit that means nothing to the discussion at hand so he can believe he's won.

At least Rocktar and others know when to just stop, tgo just keeps going and going and going like that energizer bunny.

[~Rocktar~]

At least Rocktar and others know when to just stop, tgo just keeps going and going and going like that energizer bunny.

Thanks but you give yourself far too much credit. Usually I have to either go to work, deal with some family issue, have a root canal without Novocaine, talk to the IRS, get drunk, go pull out or any number of other less painful option than continuing to try and explain rational thought and reasoning to you and others. It's less painful to just let you think you have won than to keep wrestling in the manure with you.

[Tgo01]

or any number of other less painful option than continuing to try and explain rational thought and reasoning to you and others. It's less painful to just let you think you have won than to keep wrestling in the manure with you.

Yup, that's why I had to implement my 3 Solkern posts per day rule. Solkern just can't admit he's wrong and will argue over the dumbest shit for pages and pages if you engage him. He's really not worth the effort with how disingenuous and dishonest he is in 99% of his posts.

[Solkern]

Thanks bu you give yourself far too much credit. Usually I have to either go to work, deal with some family issue, have a root canal without Novocaine, talk to the IRS, get drunk, go pull out or any number of other less painful option than continuing to try and explain rational thought and reasoning to you and others. It's less painful to just let you think you have won than to keep wrestling in the manure with you.

Plenty of time to look at other threads and reply, yet when someone calls you out on your bullshit, all of a sudden you say too busy. Lol. You’re cute Rocktar, you got time now, why don’t you go back and answer my question? Or let me guess, another perfectly timed excuse for you cupcake? Or another deflection to avoid answering? Or maybe you’ll do another anti left rant to make you feel better?

Here rocktar, let me ask you again. And can you actually answer the questions, without going into a hysterical anti left rant about how we want to defund the police, take away your guns and turn America into a socialist lawless shit hole

No, we can't because it gets police and civilians needlessly killed. It also results in dead soldiers but it's the politically necessary thing to do because of lack of will on the population to really wage war.

1. Why is it ok for our troops on foreign soil to die needlessly for politics(as you put it), but it’s not ok for police to die needlessly for politics back home? Are the police lives more important that our troops? just remember, you said this, I’m asking why

2. “Do not fire unless fire upon” you do realize troops do it to SAVE innocent civilian lives?

3. So how is implementing the same ideology of “don’t fire unless fire upon” for our police back home who aren’t in a war torn area not feasible?

[Solkern]

Yup, that's why I had to implement my 3 Solkern posts per day rule. Solkern just can't admit he's wrong and will argue over the dumbest shit for pages and pages if you engage him. He's really not worth the effort with how disingenuous and dishonest he is in 99% of his posts.

It’s ok Karen, go back to spouting about the wall to wall coverage of the RNC that got less broadcaster viewership than the DNC.
I know, you’re butt hurt that you didn’t get more ratings than the Dems. Post some more random shit so you can win.

[~Rocktar~]

Plenty of time to look at other threads and reply, yet when someone calls you out on your bullshit, all of a sudden you say too busy. Lol. You’re cute Rocktar, you got time now, why don’t you go back and answer my question? Or let me guess, another perfectly timed excuse for you cupcake? Or another deflection to avoid answering? Or maybe you’ll do another anti left rant to make you feel better?

Here rocktar, let me ask you again. And can you actually answer the questions, without going into a hysterical anti left rant about how we want to defund the police, take away your guns and turn America into a socialist lawless shit hole

How about you fuck right off? Seriously, you defend Marxist criminals, you whine and complain when I point out that you are putting words in my mouth and then you want to complain that I don't answer your questions when you routinely ignore, deflect or simply lie in response to others questions. So, maybe you can do us all a favor and fuck off. And the only reason it's a "anti left rant about how we want to defund the police, take away your guns and turn America into a socialist lawless shit hole" is because that is in fact what you are advocating for. So, again, fuck off if you don't like it. The shoe fits you so wear it.

1. Why is it ok for our troops on foreign soil to die needlessly for politics(as you put it), but it’s not ok for police to die needlessly for politics back home? Are the police lives more important that our troops? just remember, you said this, I’m asking why

2. “Do not fire unless fire upon” you do realize troops do it to SAVE innocent civilian lives?

3. So how is implementing the same ideology of “don’t fire unless fire upon” for our police back home who aren’t in a war torn area not feasible?

I don't think it's ok for our troops to do it, you implied with your question that I do. That's you putting words in my mouth. Now, piss off, this is the SECOND time I have answered you. So, for a third time, I AM NOT ok with this policy in war nor for police in a life or death situation with an armed or likely armed suspect.

As to saving lives, in a war, I pretty much don't care. If we are in a real war, then we need to act like it and be in it to win. Identify and then kill the enemy, don't wait for them to attack you.

Since many people have pointed out in numerous video examples that you are either too retarded to understand, willfully lying to yourself about or simply being an asswipe about (the likely truth) since you obviously haven't been in any real life or death combat situation, here it is. In the seconds that an attack takes place, the cops need to protect themselves and other by taking out a violent attacker, armed or unarmed, as fast as possible. Failure to neutralize the threat instantly is the necessary opening for a criminal to kill the cop or a civilian.

So, Now I have answered you 3 times, I have addressed your inane questions and your willfully asinine insults.

So, my questions to you is this:

1. Why do you think cop lives are less valuable than criminals? Why should a cop attempt to do anything other than neutralize a violent criminal as fast as possible?

2. How many cops have to die so that you can feel morally superior in your fear that the cops might hurt some criminal? Real numbers only.

3. Why do you continue to support and defend criminals and their actions attacking, looting, burning and murdering civilians and civilian targets and why do you think the police should not use force to enforce the laws and protect the people and their property?

[Solkern]

A massively triggered anti left rant about defunding police, destroying America and making it into a socialist shit hole

Right on cue. Thanks cupcake.

[Solkern]

the only reason it's a "anti left rant about how we want to defund the police, take away your guns and turn America into a socialist lawless shit hole" is because that is in fact what you are advocating for. So, again, fuck off if you don't like it. The shoe fits you so wear it.

I’m advocating for it? Who’s putting words in who’s mouth?
I’m a proud gun owner. Have been for 14 years. And I support the second Amendment fully.
Next I’m NOT for socialism, im for a large part against it, I’ve seen how it works, up close and first hand. You haven’t BUT There are some things of socialism I do agree with.
Who keeps putting words in who’s mouth?

I don't think it's ok for our troops to do it, you implied with your question that I do. That's you putting words in my mouth. Now, piss off, this is the SECOND time I have answered you. So, for a third time, I AM NOT ok with this policy in war nor for police in a life or death situation with an armed or likely armed suspect.

1. I never once applied you do. Try harder cupcake, who’s putting words in who’s mouth?
2. Did I ever say or ask if you were ok or not ok? I didn’t. Who’s putting words in who’s mouth?
3. You said troops die abroad needlessly for politics, but we can’t have that in the states. I asked why is that? I didn’t ask if you agreed or disagreed. I asked WHY can troops die needlessly abroad, but not here. Nice deflection.

As to saving lives, in a war, I pretty much don't care. If we are in a real war, then we need to act like it and be in it to win. Identify and then kill the enemy, don't wait for them to attack you.

And you call yourself pro life? That’s funny.

here it is. In the seconds that an attack takes place, the cops need to protect themselves and other by taking out a violent attacker, armed or unarmed, as fast as possible. Failure to neutralize the threat instantly is the necessary opening for a criminal to kill the cop or a civilian.

That works for our troops and the police, yet both have vastly different ways of approach.
Our troops need to protect themselves as well don’t they? In the seconds an attack takes place by taking out a violent attacker? To neutralize a threat instantly? Failure to neutralize a threat instantly will result in our troops and/or civilians dying. Our troops have to deal with everything you said above . Yet they still have the mandate of DO NOT FIRE UNLESS FIRED UPON.
Let me try to explain the difference since it’s difficult for you.
For our troops. Anyone and everyone can be trying to kill them at any moment, from any direction.
For our police, it’s usually one or two people who the police are focused on.
See the difference cupcake? Yet our troops are REQUIRED to get shot at first, while our police are not.
You’ve given zero reasons or excuses, on why the same “do not fire, unless fired upon”, cannot he used with police, as shown up, they deal with far less shit than our troops.

So, my questions to you is this:

1. Why do you think cop lives are less valuable than criminals? Why should a cop attempt to do anything other than neutralize a violent criminal as fast as possible?

Never said they were. A cop should try to neutralize, without killing. And follow a mandate same as our troops.

2. How many cops have to die so that you can feel morally superior in your fear that the cops might hurt some criminal? Real numbers only.

Dumbest question ever, that’s like me asking how many innocent civilians need to die from police for you to see if that changes must happen. real numbers only please.

3. Why do you continue to support and defend criminals and their actions attacking, looting, burning and murdering civilians and civilian targets and why do you think the police should not use force to enforce the laws and protect the people and their property?

Please show me where I’ve ever stated I supported, or defended any criminal action? Because I never did, putting more words on my
Mouth?

[Tgo01]

This is why you don't engage Solkern too much. He's going to keep this up for pages now. He'll probably reply with a 20 paragraph long rant to this post of mine that just simply says not to engage him.