Look at Antifa over here playing 5d chess.
'Boogaloo' arrests in Nevada portray extremists using protests to incite civil war
https://news.yahoo.com/boogaloo-arrests-in-nevada-portray-extremists-using-protests-to-incite-civil-war-131125733.html
https://twitter.com/Antman52899/stat...233899013?s=20
Group of "peaceful protesters" surrounding cops and literally demanding that they "bend your knee" to the black outrage mob.
One cop refused to cave in to their demands and the crowd goes crazy.
Oh, right, they are "fighting tyranny" by demanding people literally bow before them like they were some sort of Gods.
Who do you empathize with in this situation, Blazar? The crowd of protesters who clearly control the situation who are demanding subservience to their ideology, or the officer just standing there doing his job and being harassed for refusing to cave in to their demands?
Betting pool - I got $20 says that cop kills someone with unreasonable force some day.
I'd also point out that cops tell people to get on the ground, and they don't necessarily have the justification or the right to do so. They abuse their power. When you don't get on the ground when a cop tells you to though, you get shot or beaten. What happened to that officer? Nothing. Which one is tyrannical? They wanted him to bend a knee to show respect, which you obviously have no clue what that means, not because they thought they were kings. Believe me, they know they aren't kings. People in this country have been making it very clear to them for a long time now. That guy was a proud, arrogant moron, and he was just asking for things to turn ugly. Props to those people for not.
One day you'll realize you're on the wrong side of this, like Nazis and the holocaust, America and the Trail if Tears, Slavery, Women's Suffrage, and Segregation (huh, see where I'm going with this?). Until we weren't. Look at where we are now. We're getting closer, but we're not there yet. I can't believe how angry and bitter and resentful someone so damned privileged can be. It's amazing. But, you're welcome to do you man.
Last edited by Blazar; 06-06-2020 at 05:24 PM.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~ Marcus Aurelius“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
― George Orwell, 1984
“The urge to shout filthy words at the top of his voice was as strong as ever.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Wow, that is so wrong it's not even funny. Do you ever fact check anything you're fed? See, when I hear something, I verify it stands up to the slightest bit of scrutiny before I share it around. I know that Trump has lowered the standard, but come on. How does it make any sense that a black man would be the first slave owner? And are you trying to say that because blacks owned slaves, it's okay? There were white slaves too, many, many Irish were enslaved here in America. None of this makes it right, so I don't see the point you're trying to make. It's really amazing how low of a standard of truth some of you will accept.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/facts-about-slavery/
Since you probably won't click the link because it goes against what you believe:
Possibly true. The wording of the statement is important. Anthony Johnson was not the first slave owner in American history, but he was, according to historians, among the first to have his lifetime ownership of a servant legally sanctioned by a court.
A former indentured servant himself, Anthony Johnson was a “free negro” who owned a 250-acre farm in Virginia during the 1650s, with five indentured servants under contract to him. One of them, a black man named John Casor, claimed that his term of service had expired years earlier and Johnson was holding him illegally. In 1654, a civil court found that Johnson in fact owned Casor’s services for life, an outcome historian R Halliburton Jr. calls “one of the first known legal sanctions of slavery — other than as a punishment for crime.”
Last edited by Blazar; 06-06-2020 at 05:44 PM.
The way you twist shit around is laughable.
"He wasn't the first slave owner in America! He was just among the first people to own someone for life!" I don't even know what distinction you are trying to draw here? That he wasn't THE FIRST, just AMONG the first? That it wasn't "true" slavery, he just "owned" the services of another man for life?