Page 166 of 264 FirstFirst ... 66116156164165166167168176216 ... LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,660 of 2636

Thread: Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

  1. #1651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    It's legitimate. I stand by what I see as the major problem and it's not the alleged quid quo pro. It's Giuliani and other private citizens acting on behalf of the government without security clearances.

    Admit it. If Hillary did this you'd be screaming
    Oh my bad, your major concern is something even the Democrats haven't yet shifted to. But you're right, I'm sure in their last desperate breath to make this whole thing seem legitimate that will be what they shift their narrative to.

  2. #1652

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Oh my bad, your major concern is something even the Democrats haven't yet shifted to. But you're right, I'm sure in their last desperate breath to make this whole thing seem legitimate that will be what they shift their narrative to.
    Which I think is a mistake that they're not going that route. Unlike you, I'm willing to watch the testimony and make my own decision. I'm not sure I care about withholding aid, but I sure as shit care about national security. This is the problem that I see with this.
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  3. #1653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Are you even watching this sham? Multiple witnesses have said nothing wrong or illegal even happened. So far it's looking like it's just Vindman whose own supervisor said he had serious concerns with him and his conduct.
    I am watching it. I'm hearing plenty of them say they were concerned with what was said and reported it to their lawyers. Some have refused to answer whether it's illegal because they're not lawyers.
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  4. #1654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    Which I think is a mistake that they're not going that route. Unlike you, I'm willing to watch the testimony and make my own decision. I'm not sure I care about withholding aid, but I sure as shit care about national security. This is the problem that I see with this.
    Like I said I'm sure with the Democrats' ever changing narrative they will eventually come to that one. Until then it's kind of pointless to even discuss because it's not even what this impeachment sham is about.

  5. #1655

    Default

    So you're okay with it. Just say that. National security doesn't matter to you
    Last edited by Alfster; 11-19-2019 at 07:31 PM.
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  6. #1656

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    So you're okay with it. Just say that. National security doesn't matter to you
    We have even less information on what you're talking about than we do on Trump's supposedly illegal activities. Why would I comment on that?

  7. #1657

    Default

    You're kidding, right?
    Anonymous is an Idea - not a group.

  8. #1658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfster View Post
    You're kidding, right?
    I honestly don't know what you want from me. We are talking about what the Democrats are alleging Trump did in order to remove him from office. You're talking about something totally different that neither the Democrats nor even the witnesses are commenting on. Shit you're literally the only person I have seen period say this is what you think the big deal is. I don't even think the hacks over at CNN are commenting on this in regards to removing Trump from office.

  9. #1659

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Are you seriously unaware of the multiple whistleblowers Obama fired or had prosecuted during his time in office? Even CNN admitted he prosecuted twice the number of whistleblowers than all previous presidents combined.
    Yes, I am seriously unaware of anyone being granted whistleblower status being retaliated against and prosecuted

  10. #1660

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran View Post
    Yes, I am seriously unaware of anyone being granted whistleblower status being retaliated against and prosecuted
    What a bunch of weasel words. "Granted whistleblower status." How do you even look at yourself in the mirror with two faces staring back at you?

Similar Threads

  1. Biden Impeachment!
    By Shaps in forum Politics
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 01-24-2021, 09:41 PM
  2. Impeachment Trial
    By Methais in forum Politics
    Replies: 166
    Last Post: 02-11-2020, 01:28 PM
  3. another stats inquiry
    By MadHatter in forum Empath
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-13-2017, 04:11 PM
  4. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08-10-2007, 05:42 PM
  5. Impeachment
    By Back in forum Politics
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 04-21-2006, 06:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •