Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[Astray]

Don't you be dissin' the react channel. It's surprisingly watchable!

React channels are lazy content!

[Stumplicker]

React channels are lazy content!

True. That's why I didn't watch it for a long time. It was like reality TV for youtube. But I watched a few and they're surprisingly funny.

Edit to add: I mean, c'mon. What's not to like about Tommy Lee reacting to kids reacting to Guns and Roses videos? That shit's brilliant!

[time4fun]

Firstly, I'm speaking about what clearly defines sex. I thought that was clear from the onset.

Secondly, I knew you'd get hung up on the physical. So I'll answer accordingly in a format even you can understand.

No.
I'm male because my genetics deem me so.
Breasts are fat. You, as a woman, should understand that simple biological outcome.
No, it doesn't. Neither does their feelings.

Yes. I have tattoos, scars, etc etc. It's not new or unique, correct. What's new and worrisome is that people are willing to deny science to accommodate feelings.

You always come in hot with disrespect and ad hominem. I'm not unreasonable. You know that.

Cut it out with the inflammatory shit. It doesn't make you right. It makes you rude.

Except you weren't defining sex properly. Because the situations I gave you would change neither someone's gender nor their sex. So I'm not sure why you thought that was an effective rebuttal.

Breasts are fat. Yes. And men can nurse babies- did you know that? There's a culture in existence right now that has- as far back as any of them can remember- always had men breastfeeding babies instead of women. So I ask you again- if a man is overweight and has breasts- which are capable of lactating and feeding a baby- are they a woman? If not- what makes a someone a woman?

GENETICS! Except...not really. Not only is it circular reasoning for you to just claim you're a man because of your genes, but it's also patently untrue. Or are you under the impression that men can't have two X chromosomes? Or that having an X and Y chromosome always means you have male reproductive organs? Neither of those statements is true, by the way.

And that doesn't explain the numerous societies across time and space that have had more than two genders (the sex/gender divide is a relatively new western conception, btw, and in many ways sex is actually the product of gender).

And don't play victim- you came out swinging by comparing anyone who recognizes gender as a spectrum with flat-earthers. So you lost the high ground from the start.

Finally I hate to break it to you, but in this situation you're the flat-earther. And it's more than a little concerning that you are so deeply threatened by the realities of gender expression in humans. I'm not sure why you need it to be simpler than it is, but your needs don't dictate reality.

[Taernath]

React channels are lazy content!

This is correct.

Methais, consider yourself on notice for continual posting of shitty facebook grandma content.

[Astray]

And that doesn't explain the numerous societies across time and space

hwot

[Taernath]

There's a culture in existence right now that has- as far back as any of them can remember- always had men breastfeeding babies instead of women.

Is this the Aka? Because if it is, that's a wildly inaccurate description of what's actually happening.

[Stumplicker]

Breasts are fat. Yes. And men can nurse babies- did you know that?

Edit to add: Also, there were at least three lies you told in your blurb/rant there, but you already know that.

[Wrathbringer]

Except you weren't defining sex properly. Because the situations I gave you would change neither someone's gender nor their sex. So I'm not sure why you thought that was an effective rebuttal.

Breasts are fat. Yes. And men can nurse babies- did you know that? There's a culture in existence right now that has- as far back as any of them can remember- always had men breastfeeding babies instead of women. So I ask you again- if a man is overweight and has breasts- which are capable of lactating and feeding a baby- are they a woman? If not- what makes a someone a woman?

GENETICS! Except...not really. Not only is it circular reasoning for you to just claim you're a man because of your genes, but it's also patently untrue. Or are you under the impression that men can't have two X chromosomes? Or that having an X and Y chromosome always means you have male reproductive organs? Neither of those statements is true, by the way.

And that doesn't explain the numerous societies across time and space that have had more than two genders (the sex/gender divide is a relatively new western conception, btw, and in many ways sex is actually the product of gender).

And don't play victim- you came out swinging by comparing anyone who recognizes gender as a spectrum with flat-earthers. So you lost the high ground from the start.

Finally I hate to break it to you, but in this situation you're the flat-earther. And it's more than a little concerning that you are so deeply threatened by the realities of gender expression in humans. I'm not sure why you need it to be simpler than it is, but your needs don't dictate reality.

TR;DR.

[Methais]

Except you weren't defining sex properly. Because the situations I gave you would change neither someone's gender nor their sex. So I'm not sure why you thought that was an effective rebuttal.

Breasts are fat. Yes. And men can nurse babies- did you know that? There's a culture in existence right now that has- as far back as any of them can remember- always had men breastfeeding babies instead of women. So I ask you again- if a man is overweight and has breasts- which are capable of lactating and feeding a baby- are they a woman? If not- what makes a someone a woman?

GENETICS! Except...not really. Not only is it circular reasoning for you to just claim you're a man because of your genes, but it's also patently untrue. Or are you under the impression that men can't have two X chromosomes? Or that having an X and Y chromosome always means you have male reproductive organs? Neither of those statements is true, by the way.

And that doesn't explain the numerous societies across time and space that have had more than two genders (the sex/gender divide is a relatively new western conception, btw, and in many ways sex is actually the product of gender).

And don't play victim- you came out swinging by comparing anyone who recognizes gender as a spectrum with flat-earthers. So you lost the high ground from the start.

Finally I hate to break it to you, but in this situation you're the flat-earther. And it's more than a little concerning that you are so deeply threatened by the realities of gender expression in humans. I'm not sure why you need it to be simpler than it is, but your needs don't dictate reality.

You clearly have an extra chromosome.

[Methais]

And that doesn't explain the numerous societies across time and space that have had more than two genders (the sex/gender divide is a relatively new western conception, btw, and in many ways sex is actually the product of gender).

What does the B in LGBT stand for, and what word does the B abbreviate, and what is the definition of said B word?

You won't answer this.