Russia Investigation Heating Up

[time4fun]

So evangelicals think it's okay to have affairs as long as you're boning a hot super model? Family values right?

The white Evangelical political movement isn't about values, it's about white racial anxiety. That's why they have no problem with his personal and professional lives- he's a means to an end

[peam]

You're really patting yourself on the back for that one? I didn't even mention Russia or collusion, I was very specifically pointing out your Trump Derangement Syndrome. Nice deflection attempt though. On a scale of 1 to Androidpk I give it a solid 9.

"I literally did one of the things you mentioned in the post but not both."

[Tgo01]

So evangelicals think it's okay to have affairs as long as you're boning a hot super model? Family values right?

I'm not an evangelical. Again, pk, stick to what you know: whining like a little bitch and threatening people because your feelings were hurt. Honestly that's your bread and butter right there. No one does that as well as you.

[Androidpk]

The white Evangelical political movement isn't about values, it's about white racial anxiety. That's why they have no problem with his personal and professional lives- he's a means to an end

Precisely, it's why they don't care that he most likely conspired with Russia.

[Androidpk]

No one does that as well as you.

Except of course you, who falsely accused a high school teacher of being a pedophile. Remember that?

[Tgo01]

"I literally did one of the things you mentioned in the post but not both."

You consider me pointing out your Trump Derangement Syndrome as an "ad hominem"? That's not how that logical fallacy works. If you had an IQ of 70, which probably isn't much of a stretch, it's not an "ad hominem" to point out your IQ of 70 if it's relevant to the discussion.

Therefore pointing out your Trump Derangement Syndrome, and providing an actual counter argument to your argument, while at the same time proving your Trump Derangement Syndrome, is not an "ad hominem."

I get it, you think an "ad hominem" is simply calling you a name and therefore I lost the argument. That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.

[peam]

You consider me pointing out your Trump Derangement Syndrome as an "ad hominem"? That's not how that logical fallacy works. If you had an IQ of 70, which probably isn't much of a stretch, it's not an "ad hominem" to point out your IQ of 70 if it's relevant to the discussion.

Therefore pointing out your Trump Derangement Syndrome, and providing an actual counter argument to your argument, while at the same time proving your Trump Derangement Syndrome, is not an "ad hominem."

I get it, you think an "ad hominem" is simply calling you a name and therefore I lost the argument. That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.

[Methais]

Cohen is most certainly connected to the Russian investigation though. He knows all about the multiple Trump Tower Moscow deals, his trip to Prague, the Ukraine peace deal, etc. Cohen flipping and cooperating with federal investigators is the final nail in Trump's coffin.

Quoted for OMG OMG OMG THIS IS REALLY IT THIS TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

[Tgo01]

Except of course you, who falsely accused a high school teacher of being a pedophile. Remember that?

You keep repeating this like I have ever denied it or it somehow shames me. Yes, I called Warriorbird a pedophile to prove a point about accusing someone of saying something they never did. Remember how you admitted to doing some fucked up shit but have ever since denied and deflected? Remember the fucked up shit you have done but have since downplayed it like it's no big deal?

You really think everyone is going to forget about all of that because I called someone a pedophile a year ago? If you want anyone on this forum to give you the attention you so desperately seek just keep bashing Trump, at least the people with worse Trump Derangement Syndrome than you will call you awesome when you do.

[Tgo01]

Exactly. A simple "I have no idea what an ad hominem is" would have sufficed.