Page 122 of 272 FirstFirst ... 2272112120121122123124132172222 ... LastLast
Results 1,211 to 1,220 of 2717

Thread: Things that made you frown today (Political Version)

  1. #1211
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,601
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    The bottom line is this: Use either word. Don't be so sanctimonious about it and good luck looking for the ATF Suppressor Application.
    You'd be retarded if you did, because there isn't a specific application for them. You do a standard ATF Form-4.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  2. #1212
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,601
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    A .22LR with a suppressor is still 112 decibels. According to Purdue, it compares to... Steel mill, auto horn at 1 meter. Turbo-fan aircraft at takeoff power at 200 ft (118 dB). Riveting machine (110 dB); live rock music (108 - 114 dB).

    A suppressed M1911, .45 is 130 decibels, which according to Purdue is the same as Military jet aircraft take-off from aircraft carrier with afterburner at 50 ft (130 dB).
    Last edited by Gelston; 06-10-2018 at 02:53 PM.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  3. #1213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Actually it won't be very obvious. Dorner proved that in 2013. They will also have a negative effect on gunshot detection systems some cities use to alert police to the discharge of firearms. Go ahead and make them easier to get. We'll see the used more commonly in crime. It'll be good business for the gun industry. Not only will they sell more silencers but they will also be able to work on upgrading and selling better detection systems. It's a win win for the NRA and the manufacturers for whom they lobby.

    FYI: a silencer is a suppressor. Maybe more accurate to say that all suppressors are in fact silencers.
    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    BUT WHY WOULD THEY BE CALLED SILENCERS IF THEY DON'T MAKE GUNSHOTS SILENT? - cwolff, probably
    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    Aren't you a veteran? How do you not know that suppressors don't work like movie silencers?
    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Fine, they are also called silencers. Do you have any other point other than their name? Are you scared of the name? Do you still think they actually make weapons silent? What about all these cops that are getting assassinated by suppressed weapons?
    Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.

  4. #1214
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,601
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:









    Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.
    Quite fankly, you didn't address anything. Again, where are all the people assassinating police officers?
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  5. #1215
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A Corporate Republic
    Posts
    12,640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:









    Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.
    lol soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo retarded.

  6. #1216
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,118
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    In response to Gelston's comments that it will be ovious a firearm discharged even with a suppressor:









    Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology. First of all I addressed concerns around the use of silencers early in this discussion, I know what a silencer is, I'm not scared of the name (FFS I was an 0311) and you're all butthurt because I taught you something you didn't know.
    Actually you're just spouting more motherjones bullshit and claiming it as fact, but that's not really surprising.

  7. #1217
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,601
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    Well cwolff? They are legal in 43 states? WHERE IS ALL THE SUPPRESSOR CRIME?
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  8. #1218
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Kekistan
    Posts
    10,648
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Quite fankly you fucks owe me an apology.


    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~ Marcus Aurelius
    “It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

    “The urge to shout filthy words at the top of his voice was as strong as ever.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

  9. #1219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Quite fankly, you didn't address anything. Again, where are all the people assassinating police officers?
    Where did I say that all these people are assassinating police officers? I'll help you out. I never did. We do have Dorner's example. When he shot those cops they were baffled why neighbors never reported gunshots. The reason they didn't? Take a guess...Silencers.

    Make these things ubiquitous will mean they'll be used more and more often in crime. Does anyone not agree with that? If so, please explain.

  10. #1220
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,601
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Where did I say that all these people are assassinating police officers? I'll help you out. I never did. We do have Dorner's example. When he shot those cops they were baffled why neighbors never reported gunshots. The reason they didn't? Take a guess...Silencers.

    Make these things ubiquitous will mean they'll be used more and more often in crime. Does anyone not agree with that? If so, please explain.
    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Once suppressors are out there in large numbers they'll be used to assassinate cops, shoot up people in mass killings and generally be used to advantage anyway that a firearm is used today; even in crime. What will the NRA position be then? To sell some sort of anti suppressor handheld flash detector? They certainly won't retract their love of supporessors so my guess is there will be an add on sale type of product to defend against these two BFF's.
    They are out there in large numbers. Where are they assassinating cops at?
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19554
    Last Post: 09-19-2025, 09:57 AM
  2. Replies: 6283
    Last Post: 09-10-2025, 11:10 AM
  3. Replies: 8164
    Last Post: 08-15-2025, 02:30 PM
  4. Things that made you frown today (Political version)
    By Warriorbird in forum Politics
    Replies: 185
    Last Post: 08-01-2024, 01:08 PM
  5. Replies: 148
    Last Post: 05-19-2017, 05:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •