
Originally Posted by
Tgo01
Wait, does your drowning statistic back up the statement you made in the previous sentence?
Yes.

Originally Posted by
Androidpk
Schizophrenia isn't fatal. Your logic is flawed and flat out stupid.
I'm not offering any logical arguments. I'm saying that a mature regulatory system has to take into account acute and chronic side effects, for example death and schizophrenia. I'm further saying that we as a nation don't take the position that anything that can cause death is more dangerous than anything that can't. I'm finally saying that the specific case of 5,000 per 1,000,000 risk of schizophrenia represents more of a danger than the specific case of 1 per 1,000,000 risk of death, and more of a danger than any currently legal substance (except nicotine, which I am also for banning).
Please note how nowhere in the above paragraph are the words therefore, then, thus, etc. I'm still not offering any logical arguments. Please, please don't say "well by that logic...". I have made three empirical claims. If you would like to dispute them, your only choices are to do so empirically or futilely.
Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.