Are these articles playing the semantic games like in the other thread?

Out of 2,258 articles (with 9,136 authors), how many do you think explicitly rejected human-driven global warming? Go on, guess!

One. Yes, one.
I can't help but notice this isn't phrased "How many say global warming is due to human activity" and then answer with 2,257, instead it says "How many explicitly reject human-driven global warming."