More Obamacare fuckups

[AnticorRifling]

I asked TG to clarify the point he's trying to make so that I'm not working with baseless assumptions about what I think he may or may not be attempting to express. Why that would upset you is beyond comprehension.

Because when you're asked a question you don't want to answer you say "Dude I don't understand just spit it out" right after calling everyone else retarded. It doesn't make me upset it makes me laugh (notice that LOL at the start of my post you quoted).

[Tgo01]

Dude, if you have something to say, just say it. I'm not sure where you're trying to lead this conversation but it's annoying. Just spit it out.

Sorry I don't see the confusion.

Does Obama hate America? This is an opinion question, it is not a factual question. It's not like saying does 2 plus 2 equal 4. The only person who knows if Obama hates America is Obama. You can look at his actions and words and say it's more likely than not that he doesn't hate American but it's still an opinion question. Why are they asking this man an opinion question then mocking his answer and claiming he got his "facts" from right wing radio? As if they are somehow proving this man got his opinion from right wing radio and this man is now claiming it as fact because he heard it on the radio.

Everyone should be mocking that article because if it was quoted without being sourced I bet most people would assume it's from The Onion.

[cwolff]

Because when you're asked a question you don't want to answer you say "Dude I don't understand just spit it out" right after calling everyone else retarded. It doesn't make me upset it makes me laugh (notice that LOL at the start of my post you quoted).

I did say that the article I posted went right over the heads of some of our PC posters, and I called you retarded earlier. Is that where this is coming from? Are your feelings hurt?

It's not that I do not want to answer TG's question it's that I don't understand what point he is attempting to make. A cursory glance of the sentence he wrote would leave me to believe that he has some question about the quotation marks used around the word facts in the headline I copied though I do not believe that this actually has him stumped which is why I asked him for greater detail.

Again, why is this upsetting you? Actually it doesn't even matter and feel free to respond or don't. I won't be paying attention.

[Jarvan]

I agree. It does seem that ACA was oversold and underdelivered.



Source for her gender or that she has to change doctors? As far as the gender goes, you can google her name, as for changing doctors...that's one of the points she's making in her piece.

She could very well be the reason that her insurance provider is using ACA as a chance to dump the policy she's on. They've paid out 1.2 million $ just for her treatment. I wonder how many healthy enrollees a plan needs to cover 1.2 million for just one person.

Psssst. Guess what Genius. Just about every single private plan will be dumped. Almost NO private plans covered kids (HA!) till they were 26, which is now required by the law.

I would say it's MUCH more likely that her plan is dumping her NOW, because the plan itself isn't up to the ACA's idea of "good enough". After all, if they were going to dump her cause she was sick, they would have done it years ago, and SAVED 1.2 million.

[cwolff]

Sorry I don't see the confusion.

Does Obama hate America? This is an opinion question, it is not a factual question. It's not like saying does 2 plus 2 equal 4. The only person who knows if Obama hates America is Obama. You can look at his actions and words and say it's more likely than not that he doesn't hate American but it's still an opinion question. Why are they asking this man an opinion question then mocking his answer and claiming he got his "facts" from right wing radio? As if they are somehow proving this man got his opinion from right wing radio and this man is now claiming it as fact because he heard it on the radio.

Everyone should be mocking that article because if it was quoted without being sourced I bet most people would assume it's from The Onion.

I'm sorry TG, but you're trying to make an argument that is irrelevant here. Journalists constantly report on people's opinions. You may want to argue that they should not do this or that they should not show people in a less than flattering light, but that's a WHOLE 'NOTHER THREAD.

[cwolff]

Psssst. Guess what Genius. Just about every single private plan will be dumped. Almost NO private plans covered kids (HA!) till they were 26, which is now required by the law.

I would say it's MUCH more likely that her plan is dumping her NOW, because the plan itself isn't up to the ACA's idea of "good enough". After all, if they were going to dump her cause she was sick, they would have done it years ago, and SAVED 1.2 million.

Dude, they gave her 1.2 million dollars! This is not one of the "not good enough" plans.

[Tgo01]

Journalists constantly report on people's opinions.

True. What they usually don't do is use words like "facts" in the very same article. They also don't usually ask someone's opinion then later on try to trace the "roots" of the person's opinion when there is zero evidence that the person arrived at this opinion of theirs through facts ("facts") presented to them from right wing radio.

Here's another quote from the article which is what I'm talking about:

Many of the claims Jackson made were almost astonishing in their inaccuracy, but in almost all cases, they can be traced back to some of the biggest names in the right-wing media sphere.

How can anyone sit there and say an opinion of his is "astonishingly inaccurate" and they are going to somehow prove this by tracing his opinion back to some of the "biggest names in right-wing media."

[AnticorRifling]

I did say that the article I posted went right over the heads of some of our PC posters, and I called you retarded earlier. Is that where this is coming from? Are your feelings hurt?

It's not that I do not want to answer TG's question it's that I don't understand what point he is attempting to make. A cursory glance of the sentence he wrote would leave me to believe that he has some question about the quotation marks used around the word facts in the headline I copied though I do not believe that this actually has him stumped which is why I asked him for greater detail.

Again, why is this upsetting you? Actually it doesn't even matter and feel free to respond or don't. I won't be paying attention.

Aww someone got called out correctly and now he's going play ground for responses. You're not good at this.

[Jarvan]

My Opinion is Cwolff is a fucking moron and likely never attended school due to not meeting the IQ threshold. Apparently his mother was to ugly for the principle to want to fuck.

Since this is my opinion, It is now fact.

Now we can all ignore Cwolff.

[Tgo01]

My Opinion is Cwolff is a fucking moron and likely never attended school do to not meeting the IQ threshold. Apparently his mother was to ugly for the principle to want to fuck.

Since this is my opinion, It is now fact.

Now we can all ignore Cwolff.

Wait wait now, let's see if we can trace your opinion back to right-wing radio so we can prove your opinions are 100% inaccurate. After all if someone on right-wing radio says it it has to be untrue.