More Obamacare fuckups

[cwolff]

Propaganda isn't how I'd judge the validity of anything. This isn't to garner support, it's to attempt to tank the system to make more people have trouble. It's as disengenous as that MSNBC article people were fussing at cwolff for posting.

While I appreciate your point, the MSNBC article I posted is not baseless progoganda. They are using an interview done by Jonathan Capehart to tell the story of how the right's mouthpieces spread misinformation. If you'll notice, they used the idiotic remarks from Mr. Jackson as the starting point, then traced those points of view back to Congressmen like Bachmann, Gohmert; and talking heads/entertainers like Mark Levin, Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh, Jones, Nugent and Hank Williams Jr.

If the premise of the article was something like "All Republicans are stupid" and they used this one guy as an example to prove that, then I'd agree with your assessment that it's just baseless propoganda. Obviously that's not what the article is reporting, and is in fact doing the work to show the connections and the genesis for these idiotic theories.

Unfortunately it went right over the heads of some of our PC members.

[AnticorRifling]

Please tell us all how you're better than us cwolff.

[Warriorbird]

We've been over this before, just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it propaganda.

It has an aim. The aim is to destroy the coverage of lots more people than just one. Just like that cwolff piece is really an attempt to push Democratic control of Congress.

[Tgo01]

While I appreciate your point, the MSNBC article I posted is not baseless progoganda. They are using an interview done by Jonathan Capehart to tell the story of how the right's mouthpieces spread misinformation. If you'll notice, they used the idiotic remarks from Mr. Jackson as the starting point, then traced those points of view back to Congressmen like Bachmann, Gohmert; and talking heads/entertainers like Mark Levin, Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh, Jones, Nugent and Hank Williams Jr.

If the premise of the article was something like "All Republicans are stupid" and they used this one guy as an example to prove that, then I'd agree with your assessment that it's just baseless propoganda. Obviously that's not what the article is reporting, and is in fact doing the work to show the connections and the genesis for these idiotic theories.

Unfortunately it went right over the heads of some of our PC members.

"I'm right and you're all just wrong and stupid!"

Do you actually believe this stuff you post?

Right from that "article":

Capehart asked Jackson if he thought Obama loved the country.

“Not at all,” he responded. “Not one bit. Not one breath that comes out of his body.”

She then went on to explain how Jackson arrived at this opinion of his. Really? You're really going to ask someone for their opinion then mock them and claim this guy is just brainwashed by the right's "mouthpieces"?

I was hoping you just posted that article as a joke but now watching you actually defend the article is even more absurd than the article itself.

[Androidpk]

You're basing this on all of that time you spent being a soldier right?

Being an armchair general has to count for something.

[cwolff]

"I'm right and you're all just wrong and stupid!"

Do you actually believe this stuff you post?

Right from that "article":



She then went on to explain how Jackson arrived at this opinion of his. Really? You're really going to ask someone for their opinion then mock them and claim this guy is just brainwashed by the right's "mouthpieces"?

I was hoping you just posted that article as a joke but now watching you actually defend the article is even more absurd than the article itself.

The clue TG, is in the headline: Where anti-Obama fanatics get their ‘facts’. Why does this offend you?

[Tgo01]

The clue TG, is in the headline: Where anti-Obama fanatics get their ‘facts’. Why does this offend you?

Do you think facts is in quotes to actually mean they are talking about opinions?

[cwolff]

Do you think facts is in quotes to actually mean they are talking about opinions?

Dude, if you have something to say, just say it. I'm not sure where you're trying to lead this conversation but it's annoying. Just spit it out.

[AnticorRifling]

LOL that's the second time cwolff has used the "I'm wrong so I'm just digging in my heels and not answering questions but I'll say YOU SAY IT!!!!"

You're adorable.

[cwolff]

LOL that's the second time cwolff has used the "I'm wrong so I'm just digging in my heels and not answering questions but I'll say YOU SAY IT!!!!"

You're adorable.

I asked TG to clarify the point he's trying to make so that I'm not working with baseless assumptions about what I think he may or may not be attempting to express. Why that would upset you is beyond comprehension.