Justice for Hire - SCOTUS

[Methais]

We better add AI to the round table alliance that agrees Seran is a retard.

I ran out of people, so I did what I could.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I just love chatGPT. It has it's flaws of course, but it's amazing how often it's spot on. I use it for checking code, summarizing long documents, hell it just wrote a thank you letter for my wife after an interview and we only had to edit a few minor things.

[Seran]

Mystifying how the far right on this forum have forgotten their social studies lessons and decided our Representative Democracy has to be called something else because we have a Constitution. As of they are mutually exclusive, instead of being mutually inclusive as designed by by the Framers. James Madison and the other social elites were terrified of the idea of the lower class gaining a majority, while at the same time recognized the inherit flaws of the monarchy and aristocracies where so many of our citizens migrated out from under. Hence came the Constitution, which is a statement of unalienable rights, while also being a living document guiding the framework of the United States.

[Methais]

Mystifying how the far right on this forum have forgotten their social studies lessons and decided our Representative Democracy has to be called something else because we have a Constitution. As of they are mutually exclusive, instead of being mutually inclusive as designed by by the Framers. James Madison and the other social elites were terrified of the idea of the lower class gaining a majority, while at the same time recognized the inherit flaws of the monarchy and aristocracies where so many of our citizens migrated out from under. Hence came the Constitution, which is a statement of unalienable rights, while also being a living document guiding the framework of the United States.

You should take it up with Bill Gates and tell him about how much smarter than him you are.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Mystifying how the far right on this forum have forgotten their social studies lessons and decided our Representative Democracy has to be called something else because we have a Constitution. As of they are mutually exclusive, instead of being mutually inclusive as designed by by the Framers. James Madison and the other social elites were terrified of the idea of the lower class gaining a majority, while at the same time recognized the inherit flaws of the monarchy and aristocracies where so many of our citizens migrated out from under. Hence came the Constitution, which is a statement of unalienable rights, while also being a living document guiding the framework of the United States.

There are a few issues with the statement:


1. The statement presents a strawman argument by implying that those on the far right believe that a Representative Democracy cannot coexist with a Constitution, when in fact, many conservatives believe in the importance of both.


2. The statement assumes that the Framers designed the Constitution to include a Representative Democracy, when in fact, the Constitution outlines a variety of government structures and principles beyond just a Representative Democracy. For example, the Constitution includes provisions for a bicameral legislature, an independent judiciary, and a system of checks and balances.


3. The statement suggests that the Framers were primarily concerned with preventing the lower class from gaining a majority, when in fact, they were also concerned with protecting individual rights, limiting the power of the government, and creating a stable and effective system of governance.


4. The statement refers to the Constitution as a "living document," which is a contentious and debated concept. While some believe that the Constitution should be interpreted in light of modern values and societal norms, others believe that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the original intent of the Framers.


Overall, the statement oversimplifies the complex history and principles of the United States Constitution and presents a distorted view of the beliefs and values of those on the far right.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

ChatGPT is so based.

[Suppressed Poet]

ChatGPT is so based.

So based and such versatile use applications. It can simultaneously create:

scripts for the studios while all the writers guild is on strike
speeches for Joe Biden
detailed files of human anatomy to make future T800s more efficient killers
responses to Seran’s post on the PC while highlighting his retardation

[Methais]

There are a few issues with the statement:


1. The statement presents a strawman argument by implying that those on the far right believe that a Representative Democracy cannot coexist with a Constitution, when in fact, many conservatives believe in the importance of both.


2. The statement assumes that the Framers designed the Constitution to include a Representative Democracy, when in fact, the Constitution outlines a variety of government structures and principles beyond just a Representative Democracy. For example, the Constitution includes provisions for a bicameral legislature, an independent judiciary, and a system of checks and balances.


3. The statement suggests that the Framers were primarily concerned with preventing the lower class from gaining a majority, when in fact, they were also concerned with protecting individual rights, limiting the power of the government, and creating a stable and effective system of governance.


4. The statement refers to the Constitution as a "living document," which is a contentious and debated concept. While some believe that the Constitution should be interpreted in light of modern values and societal norms, others believe that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the original intent of the Framers.


Overall, the statement oversimplifies the complex history and principles of the United States Constitution and presents a distorted view of the beliefs and values of those on the far right.

Seran isn't going to understand any of that, but it won't stop him from replying with a word salad of failure and butthurt anyway, just before he pats himself on the back for how much smarter he thinks he is than everyone else including ChatGPT.

[Neveragain]

which is a statement of unalienable rights

The first of which is the right to life.

So much for that right, right Seran?

Clown.

[Seran]

The first of which is the right to life.

So much for that right, right Seran?

Clown.

Only if you're adding amendments which state an embryo has more rights to a womb than the woman whose anatomy is being usurped by an unwanted collection of cells. But I think you're confusing the text of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, a common enough mistake for the uneducated.