I have a black friend that was calling out on FB about what the community was gonna do about this verdict. I asked her "Why would you do anything about a white kid shooting 3 white criminals trying to beat him to death in the middle of a riot?"
Then I saw this:
![]()
I asked for neither your Opinion,
your Acceptance
nor your Permission.
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
"It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie
Almost as bad as the DCCC who had to correct their president (or whoever it was) after they put out a statement which said the rioters were "only" protesting against the police killing of Jacob Blake. Except OOPS! Jacob Blake wasn't killed. Almost as if all the media and Democrats do is lie.
Someone on my FB called Rittenhouse a murderer and the three he shot heroes. The dude really said a child rapist and a wife beater was a hero. The dude that survived beat the shit out of his own grandmother.
People are losing their goddamn minds.
Last edited by Gelston; 11-20-2021 at 08:42 AM.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
Christ almighty. Looks like one of Rittenhouse's lawyers is a raging liberal who is doing damage control for his own image now.
So he goes running to CNN of all places to do an interview less than 48 hours after the trial to bash Fox News.“I did not approve of that,” Richards told CNN’s Chris Cuomo of the film crew. “I threw them out of the room several times. I don’t think a film crew is appropriate for something like this.”
Richards said that part of the efforts by Rittenhouse’s family and a family adviser to raise money to help pay for the 18-year-old’s defense included having Carlson’s team present for filming. The attorney described the film crew’s presence as “a definite distraction.”
“And I didn’t approve of it, but I’m not always the boss,” he told CNN.
So brother of the rapist governor asks him if "we’re making it too easy to kill in self-defense" and the lawyer responds with there are too many guns in our society, which sure as shit could be perceived as him answering: yes, yes I do think we're making it too easy to kill in self-defense.“Are you worried that we’re making it too easy to kill in self-defense?” Cuomo asked.
Richards replied, “To me — and I know people will go nuts when I say this — but there’s too many guns in our society. And that might seem like a hollow statement coming from me. I do own firearms. I don’t conceal carry. I don’t want to carry a firearm. I think too many people run around with guns in our society.”
Oh for fuck's sake. Really? So legally he didn't do anything wrong, morally? Meh, maybe.Cuomo then asked the attorney whether Rittenhouse thought he did anything wrong.
“Legally, no,” Richards said.
Then it ends with:
"Does Kyle REALLY wanna be associated with the likes of Fox News? Or would he rather atone for his evil ways and be associated more with the likes of CNN who keeps a "journalist" employed there who advised his rapist governor brother on how to smear his victims so he can keep his political career."“Kyle’s going to have some hard choices in his life about the direction he goes and what he stands for,” Richards said. “Those will have to be made by Kyle, eventually.”
Last edited by Tgo01; 11-20-2021 at 04:38 PM.
“Kyle’s going to have some hard choices in his life about the direction he goes and what he stands for,” Richards said. “Those will have to be made by Kyle, eventually.”
The hardest decisions he's gonna have to make are which news outlets he sues, who he sues first, and who has the highest tab for pain and suffering.
If he learned anything from Nick Sandmann, he absolutely will be suing some major networks. Biden, I don't see that being more than a giant waste of time. That one will get locked up in courts or blah blah blah. Maybe they can just get Kamala to awkwardly giggle on Biden's behalf.
I just hate the actual questions, I don't deny the Lawyer having his own personal views... so long as he provides an adequate defense for his client.. which apparently he did.
I'm not sure I would want a news crew watching everything, documentary style, while in the middle of murder case either.
Where my real issue lies with him is the question, and his response, to 'Are you worried were making it to easy to kill in self defense?"... He bitched out, and the question is a setup.. wrongly worded.. and misleading in nature.. singularly designed to lead the idiots watching the show to subconsciously insert the idea that if you are being attacked, all options should not be on the table to defend yourself. It's grooming people to think a certain way, so that when they are subjugated (whether physically or mentally) they should submit. It's disgusting and very clever.
People will say I'm seeing something not there, but you have to watch the wording and framing of this issue in "mainstream media" and how it is presented. Small wording/sentence structure/framing of an issue is how.. over time.. you alter peoples thoughts to become more compliant.
So fuck the lawyer for being a bitch about that question, and fuck CNN and mainstream media for pushing their bullshit. Oh yea.. and Fuck Joe Biden for being a shill.
I asked for neither your Opinion,
your Acceptance
nor your Permission.
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
"It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie