I went to refresh myself on the Bush 2007 plan, since I didn't remember the details, but it appears it consisted of the following:
1. Taxing the health benefits of Americans who get insurance through their employer after a certain point
2. Subsidies to states to help cover uninsured
This was expected to help cover about 3 million people more, by the Bush administration's estimates.
However, both points ended up in the ACA. 1 is the Cadillac health plan tax (although that's a much higher point for when taxation starts than Bush's proposal) and 2 ended up being the Medicaid expansion.
I don't think you could've tweaked this in any way and made a better plan without incorporating all the other elements of Obamacare.
But yes, Dems killed it for partisan reasons.
Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.
Here's an article about the pros and cons of Bush's plan. Could it be that it wasn't any good and that is what kept it from going anywhere beyond a W daydream? Even Heritage said he didn't go far enough.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...252-9/fulltextUS President George W Bush has proposed using a tax deduction to make health insurance more affordable. But sceptics say the plan will help only the wealthy and is “dead on arrival” in the Democrat-controlled Congress. Michael McCarthy reviews the pros and cons of the proposal.
This is from a different article comparing health care proposals put forward between 2005 and 2007.
With the exception of federal–state partnerships, all of the proposals would transform the traditional role of employers by eventually scaling back or eliminating the extent to which they contract directly with health plans for coverage. The president's and Senator Wyden's proposals would achieve this in part by eliminating the tax exemption for employer-provided benefits and replacing it with an income tax deduction. The proposals differ in the extent to which employers would continue to finance coverage.
With the exception of President Bush's proposal, the plans would require individuals to have health insurance and require employers and individuals to share in the cost.
All of the proposals except the president's would provide subsidies to people with lower incomes to help defray the costs of premiums.
All of the proposals except the president's would pool health risks into large groups in order to equalize premium costs across families, regardless of health risk, and increase efficiency in insurance administration.
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publ...-Coverage.aspx
Last edited by cwolff; 04-15-2014 at 06:06 PM.
This is what I don't understand about your arguments. One minute you're saying Republicans are a bunch of fashion fascists for wanting to repeal Obamacare instead of working with the Democrats to make it better and you say Republicans have offered no healthcare plans of their own then when you have a Republican healthcare plan dropped in your lap all you can do is bash it and says it's worthless.
That's exactly what Republicans are saying in regards to Obamacare; it's worthless so let's scrape it and start over but when Republicans do that they are just evil warlords wanting to take us back to the gilded age where everyone was a carpetbaggerr.
Last edited by Tgo01; 04-15-2014 at 06:16 PM.