
Originally Posted by
Buckwheet
The insurance company I was with didn't have to give a refund, so they were in the 80/20 bracket already. It is not the "exact" same plan only because the max out of pocket went from $10,000 to ACA max of $12,700. Everything else is identical. So why did they go down that much? The only intelligent reason I can see is because more money is coming it pay for the overall bills, which includes paying for people without insurance.
This argument is really stupid because of the following statements:
I don't think - I don't care what anyone "thinks" I care about facts. Why did my premium go down $1100 a MONTH?
How do hospitals make money? They charge for services. There is a reason a simple blood test at the hospital is like $300 here but yet I can order the same thing online for $75. I don't know what that reason is, do you? Its included in my "annual physical" that the insurance company pays fully for me. Why don't they just mail me the kit and save $225 just in the blood test? You can't actually get the blood draw/test at the satellite office. They give you an order and you drive to the "hospital" where the "lab" is.
So all I want to know is, why is it okay for someone who had no insurance be all upset they have to pay into the system at HALF what I was paying for the past 10 years or so, and I can't be pissed off that for 10 years I put 70 grand into the system?
Even if the plan was employer sponsored its included as "total compensation" on most job descriptions and competitive job offers I have ever gotten. Just because someone else is pissing away their money doesn't mean someone isn't negatively impacted through a competitive job offer. We already know of companies saying "go to the exchange and if you buy bronze we will just re-reimburse you for the expense. anything over bronze you pay out of pocket."